The radiosensitising effect of difluorodeoxyuridine, a metabolite of gemcitabine, in vitro

Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its amino acid ester prodrug following intravenous and oral administrations in mice

Gemcitabine is an intravenously administered anti-cancer nucleoside analogue. Systemic exposure following oral administration of gemcitabine is limited by extensive first-pass metabolism via cytidine deaminase (CDA) and potentially by saturation of nucleoside transporter-mediated intestinal uptake. An amino acid ester prodrug of gemcitabine, 5'-l-valyl-gemcitabine (V-Gem), was previously shown to be a substrate of the intestinally expressed peptide transporter 1 (PEPT1) and stable against CDA-mediated metabolism. However, preliminary studies did not evaluate the in vivo oral performance of V-Gem as compared to parent drug. In the present study, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and in vivo oral absorption of gemcitabine and V-Gem following intravenous and oral administrations in mice. These studies revealed that V-Gem undergoes rapid systemic elimination (half-life < 1 min) and has a low oral bioavailability (<1%). Most importantly, the systemic exposure of gemcitabine was not different following oral administration of equimolar doses of gemcitabine (gemcitabine bioavailability of 18.3%) and V-Gem (gemcitabine bioavailability of 16.7%). Single-pass intestinal perfusions with portal blood sampling in mice revealed that V-Gem undergoes extensive activation in intestinal epithelial cells and that gemcitabine undergoes first-pass metabolism in intestinal epithelial cells. Thus, formulation of gemcitabine as the prodrug V-Gem does not increase systemic gemcitabine exposure following oral dosing, due, in part, to the instability of V-Gem in intestinal epithelial cells.

Gemcitabine and glioblastoma: challenges and current perspectives

Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analog currently used for the treatment of various solid tumors as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs. Its use against highly aggressive brain tumors (glioblastoma) has been evaluated in preclinical and clinical trials leading to controversial results. Gemcitabine can inhibit DNA chain elongation, is a potent radiosensitizer and it can enhance antitumor immune activity, but it also presents some drawbacks (e.g., short half-life, side effects, chemoresistance). The aim of this review is to discuss the challenges related to the use of gemcitabine for glioblastoma and to report recent studies that suggest overcoming these obstacles opening new perspectives for its use in the field (e.g., gemcitabine derivatives and/or nanomedicines).

PEGylated squalenoyl-gemcitabine nanoparticles for the treatment of glioblastoma

New treatments for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are desperately needed, as GBM prognosis remains poor, mainly due to treatment resistance, poor distribution of therapeutics in the tumor tissue, and fast metabolism of chemotherapeutic drugs in the brain extracellular space. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) of nanoparticles (NPs) has been shown to improve the delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs to the tumor bed, providing sustained release, and enhancing survival of animals with intracranial tumors. Here we administered gemcitabine, a nucleoside analog used as a first line treatment for a wide variety of extracranial solid tumors, within squalene-based NPs using CED, to overcome the above-mentioned challenges of GBM treatment. Small percentages of poly(ethylene) glycol (PEG) dramatically enhanced the distribution of squalene-gemcitabine nanoparticles (SQ-Gem NPs) in healthy animals and tumor-bearing animals after administration by CED. When tested in an orthotopic model of GBM, SQ-Gem-PEG NPs demonstrated significantly improved therapeutic efficacy compared to free gemcitabine, both as a chemotherapeutic drug and as a radiosensitizer. Furthermore, MR contrast agents were incorporated into the SQ-Gem-PEG NP formulation, providing a way to non-invasively track the NPs during infusion.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of Gemcitabine as a mainstay in adult and pediatric oncology: an EORTC-PAMM perspective

Gemcitabine is an antimetabolite ranking among the most prescribed anticancer drugs worldwide. This nucleoside analog exerts its antiproliferative action after tumoral conversion into active triphosphorylated nucleotides interfering with DNA synthesis and targeting ribonucleotide reductase. Gemcitabine is a mainstay for treating pancreatic and lung cancers, alone or in combination with several cytotoxic drugs (nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin and oxaliplatin), and is an option in a variety of other solid or hematological cancers. Several determinants of response have been identified with gemcitabine, i.e., membrane transporters, activating and inactivating enzymes at the tumor level, or Hedgehog signaling pathway. More recent studies have investigated how germinal genetic polymorphisms affecting cytidine deaminase, the enzyme responsible for the liver disposition of gemcitabine, could act as well as a marker for clinical outcome (i.e., toxicity, efficacy) at the bedside. Besides, constant efforts have been made to develop alternative chemical derivatives or encapsulated forms of gemcitabine, as an attempt to improve its metabolism and pharmacokinetics profile. Overall, gemcitabine is a drug paradigmatic for constant searches of the scientific community to improve its administration through the development of personalized medicine in oncology.

Gemcitabine-Based Chemoradiation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Systematic Review of Literature and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) improves locoregional control and overall survival of locoregionally advanced (LA) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) when compared to radiotherapy alone, but this approach is hampered by significant toxicity. Therefore, alternative ways to enhance the radiation effects are worth investigating. Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine), in addition to its activity against a variety of solid tumors, including SCCHN, is one of the most potent radiosensitizers, and it has an overall favorable safety profile. In this paper, the clinical experience with gemcitabine-based chemoradiation in the treatment of patients with LA-SCCHN is reviewed.

METHODS

We conducted a review of the literature on the clinical experience with radiotherapy combined with either single-agent gemcitabine or gemcitabine/cisplatin-based polychemotherapy for the treatment of patients with LA-SCCHN. We also searched abstracts in databases of major international oncology meetings from the last 20 years. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for complete response rate and grade 3-4 acute mucositis rate.

RESULTS

A total of 13 papers were eligible for the literature review. For schedules using a gemcitabine dose intensity (DI) below 50 mg/m(2) per week, the complete response rate was 86% (95% CI, 74%-93%) with grade 3-4 acute mucositis rate of 38% (95% CI, 27%-50%) and acceptable late toxicity. In one of the studies employing such low DIs, survival data were provided showing a 3-year overall survival of 50%. Compared with DI ≥50 mg/m(2) per week, there was no difference in the complete response rate (71%; 95% CI, 55%-83%; p = .087) but a significantly higher (p < .001) grade 3-4 acute mucositis rate of 74% (95% CI, 62%-83%), often leading to treatment interruptions (survival data provided in 8 studies; 3-year overall survival, 27%-63%). Late toxicity comprising mainly dysphagia was generally underreported, whereas information about xerostomia and skin fibrosis was scarce.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the radiosensitizing potential of gemcitabine and suggests that even very low dosages (less than 50 mg/m(2) per week) provide a sufficient therapeutic ratio and therefore should be further investigated. Refinements in radiation schemes, including intensity-modulated radiation therapy, in combination with low-dose gemcitabine and targeted agents, such as cetuximab, are currently being investigated.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) has become the standard treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC). This approach is hampered by significant toxicity. This paper reviews the studies using gemcitabine as an alternative radio-sensitizer for CCRT in patients with LAHNC. In this capacity, despite its mild intrinsic toxicity, gemcitabine comes with high rates of severe mucositis when used in dosages exceeding 50 mg/m(2) per week. CCRT with low-dose gemcitabine provides a sufficient therapeutic ratio, combining clinical activity, similar to the higher-dose regimens, with lower toxicity. Further investigation is warranted.

Deoxycytidine kinase expression underpins response to gemcitabine in bladder cancer

PURPOSE

In a recent phase II clinical trial, low-dose (100 mg/m(2)) gemcitabine showed promise as a radiosensitizer in bladder cancer, but underlying mechanisms lack elucidation. Here, we investigated the mechanism of radiosensitization by low-dose gemcitabine in bladder cancer cell lines.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Four bladder cancer cell lines were screened for radiosensitization by low-dose gemcitabine using clonogenic assay, and gemcitabine-resistant RT112gem and CALgem cells created by exposure to increasing gemcitabine doses. Four key gemcitabine-regulatory genes were knocked down by transient siRNA. Nude mice carrying CALgem subcutaneous xenografts were exposed to 100 mg/kg gemcitabine ± ionizing radiation (IR) and response assessed by tumor growth delay.

RESULTS

Gemcitabine was cytotoxic in the low nanomolar range (10-40 nmol/L) in four bladder cancer cell lines and radiosensitized all four lines. Sensitizer enhancement ratios at 10% survival were: RT112 1.42, CAL29 1.55, T24 1.63, and VMCUB1 1.47. Transient siRNA knockdown of deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) significantly reduced radiosensitization by gemcitabine (P = 0.02). RT112gem and CALgem cells displayed robust decreases of dCK mRNA and protein levels; reexpression of dCK restored gemcitabine sensitivity. However, CALgem xenografts responded better to combination gemcitabine/IR than either treatment alone (P < 0.001) with dCK strongly expressed in the tumor vasculature and stroma.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine resistance in bladder cancer cell lines was associated with decreased dCK expression, but gemcitabine-resistant xenografts were responsive to combination low-dose gemcitabine/IR. We propose that dCK activity in tumor vasculature renders it gemcitabine sensitive, which is sufficient to invoke a tumor response and permit tumor cell kill in gemcitabine-resistant tumors.

The radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine and its main metabolite dFdU under low oxygen conditions is in vitro not dependent on functional HIF-1 protein

Background

Regions within solid tumours often experience oxygen deprivation, which is associated with resistance to chemotherapy and irradiation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine and its main metabolite dFdU under normoxia versus hypoxia and to determine whether hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) is involved in the radiosensitising mechanism.

Methods

Stable expression of dominant negative HIF-1α (dnHIF) in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, that ablated endogenous HIF-1 transcriptional activity, was validated by western blot and functionality was assessed by HIF-1α activity assay. Cells were exposed to varying oxygen environments and treated with gemcitabine or dFdU for 24 h, followed by irradiation. Clonogenicity was then assessed. Using radiosensitising conditions, cells were collected for cell cycle analysis.

Results

HIF-1 activity was significantly inhibited in cells stably expressing dnHIF. A clear radiosensitising effect under normoxia and hypoxia was observed for both gemcitabine and dFdU. No significant difference in radiobiological parameters between HIF-1 proficient and HIF-1 deficient MDA-MB-231 cells was demonstrated.

Conclusions

For the first time, radiosensitisation by dFdU, the main metabolite of gemcitabine, was demonstrated under low oxygen conditions. No major role for functional HIF-1 protein in radiosensitisation by gemcitabine or dFdU could be shown.

SLC28A3 genotype and gemcitabine rate of infusion affect dFdCTP metabolite disposition in patients with solid tumours

Background:

Gemcitabine is used for the treatment of several solid tumours and exhibits high inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. In this study, we explore possible predictive covariates on drug and metabolite disposition.

Methods:

Forty patients were enrolled. Gemcitabine and dFdU concentrations in the plasma and dFdCTP concentrations in peripheral blood mononuclear cell were measured to 72 h post infusion, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. Patient-specific covariates were tested in model development.

Results:

The pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine was best described by a two-compartment model with body surface area, age and NT5C2 genotype as significant covariates. The pharmacokinetics of dFdU and dFdCTP were adequately described by three-compartment models. Creatinine clearance and cytidine deaminase genotype were significant covariates for dFdU pharmacokinetics. Rate of infusion of <25 mg m⁻² min⁻¹ and the presence of homozygous major allele for SLC28A3 (CC genotype) were each associated with an almost two-fold increase in the formation clearance of dFdCTP.

Conclusion:

Prolonged dFdCTP systemic exposures (⩾72 h) were commonly observed. Infusion rate <25 mg m⁻² min⁻¹ and carriers for SLC28A3 variant were each associated with about two-fold higher dFdCTP formation clearance. The impacts of these covariates on treatment-related toxicity in more selected patient populations (that is, first-line treatment, single disease state and so on) are not yet clear.

Localized delivery of chemotherapy to the cervix for radiosensitization

OBJECTIVE

Chemoradiation is the mainstay of therapy for advanced cervical cancer, with the most effective treatment regimens involving combinations of radiosensitizing agents. However, administration of radiosensitizing chemotherapeutics concurrently with pelvic radiation is not without side effects. The aim of this study was to examine the utility of localized drug delivery as a means of improving drug targeting of radiosensitizing chemotherapeutics to the cervix while limiting systemic toxicities.

METHODS

An initial proof-of-concept study was performed in 14 healthy women following local administration of diazepam utilizing a novel cervical delivery device (CerviPrep™). Uterine vein and peripheral blood samples were collected and diazepam was measured using a GC-MS method. In the follow-up study, gemcitabine was applied to the cervix in 17 women undergoing hysterectomy for various gynecological malignancies. Cervical tissue, uterine vein blood samples, and peripheral plasma were collected, and gemcitabine and its deaminated metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) were measured using HPLC-UV and LC/MS methods.

RESULTS

Targeted delivery of diazepam to the cervix was consistent with parent drug detectable in the uterine vein of 13 of 14 women. In the second study, pharmacologically relevant concentrations of gemcitabine (0.01-6.6 nmol/g tissue) were detected in the cervical tissue of 11 of 16 available specimens with dFdU measureable in 15 samples (0.04-8.8 nmol/g tissue). Neither gemcitabine nor its metabolites were detected in the peripheral plasma of any subject.

CONCLUSIONS

Localized drug delivery to the cervix is possible and may be useful in limiting toxicity associated with intravenous administration of chemotherapeutics for radiosensitization.

Phase 1 trial of gemcitabine with bortezomib in elderly patients with advanced solid tumors

INTRODUCTION

Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, has synergistic antitumor activity with gemcitabine, an antimetabolite, in preclinical and clinical studies. The safety of this combination has not yet been established in elderly patients; therefore, this dose-escalation study was designed to assess the maximum-tolerated dose of bortezomib and gemcitabine in patients aged 70 years or older with advanced-stage solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Gemcitabine was administered intravenously (800 to 1000 mg/m) over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8, followed 60 minutes later by bortezomib administered as an intravenous push over 3 to 5 seconds (1.0 to 1.8 mg/m) on a 21-day cycle. This study used a standard phase 1 dose-escalation design with 3 or 6 patients per dose level.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with stage IV solid tumors were treated. Median age was 73 years (range: 70 to 87 y). All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than 2. Median number of earlier chemotherapy regimens was 2 (range: 0 to 6). Dose-limiting toxicities were seen in 2 of 8 patients enrolled at the second dose level of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m) and bortezomib (1.0 mg/m), which consisted of grade ≥3 lower extremity edema, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and dehydration. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (n=9), neutropenia (n=6), and anemia (n=5). Partial response (n=3) or disease stabilization (n=3) was seen in 6 of 14 evaluable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent weekly gemcitabine (800 mg/m) and bortezomib (1 mg/m) is the recommended schedule for future phase 2 trials in elderly patients with stage IV solid tumors.

Deoxyuridine analog nucleotides in deoxycytidine analog treatment: secondary active metabolites?

Deoxycytidine analogs (dCa's) are nucleosides widely used in anticancer and anti (retro) viral therapies. Intracellularly phosphorylated dCa anabolites are considered to be their main active metabolites. This article reviews the literature on the formation and pharmacological activity of deaminated dCa nucleotides. Most dCa's are rapidly deaminated into deoxyuridine analogs (dUa's) which are only slowly phosphorylated and therefore relatively inactive. dUa nucleotides are, however, also formed via deamination of dCa monophosphates by deoxycytidine monophosphate deaminase (dCMPD). dUa-monophosphates can interact with thymidylate synthase (TS), whereas dUa-triphosphates are incorporated into nucleic acids and interfere with polymerases. Administration of dCa's as monophosphate prodrugs or co-administration of the cytidine deaminase inhibitor tetrahydrouridine (THU) does not prevent dUa nucleotide formation which is, on the other hand, influenced by the dose and dCMPD activity. Taken together, these observations show that the formation of dUa nucleotides is a common phenomenon in treatment with dCa's and these compounds may play a role in treatment outcome. We conclude that more attention should be given to these relatively unknown, but potentially important metabolites.

Combinatorial pharmacologic effects of gemcitabine and its metabolite dFdU

Recent evidence has shown that the gemcitabine metabolite, dFdU, is pharmacologically active. Though less potent, dFdU has a longer half-life and could potentiate or antagonize the activity of gemcitabine. Hence, studies were undertaken to evaluate the combined effects. Following chemical synthesis, an improved purification procedure for dFdU was developed (80 % yield; >99 % purity). Zebrafish phenotype-based embryo screens revealed no acute toxicity after gemcitabine or dFdU treatment. Only gemcitabine affected zebrafish development in a dose-dependent manner. Synergy or antagonism for the combination was not observed. Antitumor effects for dFdU were dose dependent. Antagonism was tumor cell-line dependent and did not depend on formation of the intracellular active metabolite of gemcitabine, suggesting that the drug-metabolite interaction occurs later. These studies highlight a platform for testing the pharmacologic activity for anticancer agent and metabolite combinations. Such analyses are expected to provide insight into the beneficial or harmful effect(s) of metabolites towards parent drug activity.

Gemcitabine Cytotoxicity: Interaction of Efflux and Deamination

Gemcitabine is a cytidine analogue used in the treatment of various solid tumors. Little is known about how gemcitabine and its metabolites are transported out of cells. We set out to study the efflux of gemcitabine and the possible consequences of that process in cancer cells. We observed the efflux of gemcitabine and its deaminated metabolite, 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) using high performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) after gemcitabine treatment. Non-selective ABCC-transport inhibition with probenecid significantly increased intracellular dFdU concentrations, with a similar trend observed with verapamil, a non-selective ABCB1 and ABCG2 transport inhibitor. Neither probenecid nor verapamil altered intracellular gemcitabine levels after the inhibition of deamination with tetrahydrourudine, suggesting that efflux of dFdU, but not gemcitabine, was mediated by ABC transporters. MTS assays showed that probenecid increased sensitivity to gemcitabine. While dFdU displayed little cytotoxicity, intracellular dFdU accumulation inhibited cytidine deaminase, resulting in increased gemcitabine levels and enhanced cytotoxicity. Knockdown of ABCC3, ABCC5 or ABCC10 individually did not significantly increase gemcitabine sensitivity, suggesting the involvement of multiple transporters. In summary, ABCC-mediated efflux may contribute to gemcitabine resistance through increased dFdU efflux that allows for the continuation of gemcitabine deamination. Reversing efflux-mediated gemcitabine resistance may require broad-based efflux inhibition.

Difluorodeoxyuridine plasma concentrations after low-dose gemcitabine during chemoradiation in head and neck cancer patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether relevant plasma levels of dFdU could be detected during concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with low doses of dFdC administered in patients with head and neck cancer and to assess the toxicity related to dose.

METHODS

dFdC was administered at doses of 5 mg/m² twice weekly or 10, 50, or 100 mg/m² weekly. Plasma concentrations of dFdU were determined daily for 7 days after the first administration and before each administration, thereafter. A high-performance liquid chromatographic method was used. During CRT, skin and mucosal toxicity were scored weekly according to the RTOG toxicity scoring system.

RESULTS

Eight patients were sampled at the 10-50 mg/m² dose and nine at the 5-100 mg/m² dose. dFdU levels were in the micromolar range, inducing RS in vitro. There was a strong correlation between the area under the curve of dFdU and the dose of dFdC (r = 0.803, P < 0.001) and a weak correlation between trough concentrations and total dose of dFdC (r = 0.408, P = 0.017). Duration of severe mucositis correlated with dFdC dose.

CONCLUSIONS

During CRT with 10-100 mg/m(2) of dFdC weekly or 5 mg/m(2) twice weekly, dFdU remains detectable at potentially radiosensitizing concentrations.

Novel 4,4'-diether-2,2'-bipyridine cisplatin analogues are more effective than cisplatin at inducing apoptosis in cancer cell lines

The synthesis and characterization of dichloro(4,4'-bis[methoxy]-2,2'-bipyridine)platinum (1) and dichloro(4,4'-bis[3-methoxy-n-propyl]-2,2'-bipyridine)platinum (2) are described. As analogues to CDDP, these 4,4'-disubstituted 2,2'-bipyridine complexes exhibit decreased EC(50) values of 10-100 times in cancer cell lines of the lung, prostate, and melanoma with several combinations of complex and cell line less than 10 microM. Flow cytometry data indicate 'blocks' of MDA-MD-435 cycle by 1 (G2/M) and 2 (S). Observed cell survival trends in the presence of 1, 2 under ionizing radiation mimic those of CDDP. Preliminary structure activity relationships are discussed for the 4,4'-substitutions made on the bipyridine ring.

The combined effect of fludarabine monophosphate and radiation as well as gemcitabine and radiation on squamous carcinoma tumor cell lines in vitro

PURPOSE

Despite proven antitumor activity of gemcitabine in chemoradiotherapy of advanced head and neck cancer, many authors refer to severe acute and late local and haematological toxicity. Fludarabine does imply nearly the same mechanisms of action as gemcitabine, inhibiting various enzymes involved in DNA replication. This investigation focuses on the combined effect of either fludarabine or gemcitabine and radiation on human squamous carcinoma cell lines in vitro, providing data for future decisions on head and neck chemoradiotherapy regimen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ZMK-1, A549, BW-225, GR-145, OH-65 and CaSki cell lines were incubated with either drug at defined schedules and irradiated at a single fraction dose of 2 Gy every 24 hours up to 8 Gy. Cytotoxic effects were measured by colony-forming assays, quantitative determination of apoptosis and isobologram analysis.

RESULTS

Incubation of fludarabine led to a radiosensitizing effect in the A549, CaSki and ZMK-1 cell lines and an additive effect in the BW-225, GR-145 and OH-65 cell lines. Treatment with gemcitabine only indicated significant radiosensitization in the CaSki cell line in combination with augmented resistance against gemcitabine application alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results reveal a potential radiosensitizing effect of fludarabine and its possible application in chemoradiotherapy of advanced head and neck carcinoma and possibly other tumor entities.

Gemcitabine uptake in glioblastoma multiforme: potential as a radiosensitizer

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most frequent malignant brain tumor, has a poor prognosis, but is relatively sensitive to radiation. Both gemcitabine and its metabolite difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) are potent radiosensitizers. The aim of this phase 0 study was to investigate whether gemcitabine passes the blood-tumor barrier, and is phosphorylated in the tumor by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) to gemcitabine nucleotides in order to enable radiosensitization, and whether it is deaminated by deoxycytidine deaminase (dCDA) to dFdU. Gemcitabine was administered at 500 or 1000 mg/m(2) just before surgery to 10 GBM patients, who were biopsied after 1-4 h. Plasma gemcitabine and dFdU levels varied between 0.9 and 9.2 microM and 24.9 and 72.6 microM, respectively. Tumor gemcitabine and dFdU levels varied from 60 to 3580 pmol/g tissue and from 29 to 72 nmol/g tissue, respectively. The gene expression of dCK (beta-actin ratio) varied between 0.44 and 2.56. The dCK and dCDA activities varied from 1.06 to 2.32 nmol/h/mg protein and from 1.51 to 5.50 nmol/h/mg protein, respectively. These enzyme levels were sufficient to enable gemcitabine phosphorylation, leading to 130-3083 pmol gemcitabine nucleotides/g tissue. These data demonstrate for the first time that gemcitabine passes the blood-tumor barrier in GBM patients. In tumor samples, both gemcitabine and dFdU concentrations are high enough to enable radiosensitization, which warrants clinical studies using gemcitabine in combination with radiation.

Potentiation of high-LET radiation by gemcitabine: targeting HER2 with trastuzumab to treat disseminated peritoneal disease

PURPOSE

Recent studies from this laboratory with (212)Pb-trastuzumab have shown the feasibility of targeted therapy for the treatment of disseminated peritoneal disease using (212)Pb as an in vivo generator of (212)Bi. The objective of the studies presented here was improvement of the efficacy of alpha-particle radioimmunotherapy using a chemotherapeutic agent.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In a series of experiments, a treatment regimen was systematically developed in which athymic mice bearing i.p. LS-174T xenografts were injected i.p. with gemcitabine at 50 mg/kg followed by (212)Pb radioimmunotherapy.

RESULTS

In a pilot study, tumor-bearing mice were treated with gemcitabine and, 24 to 30 h later, with 5 or 10 muCi (212)Pb-trastuzumab. Improvement in median survival was observed at 5 microCi (212)Pb-trastuzumab in the absence (31 days) or presence (51 days) of gemcitabine: 45 and 70 days with 10 microCi versus 16 days for untreated mice (P < 0.001). Multiple doses of gemcitabine combined with a single (212)Pb radioimmunotherapy (10 microCi) administration was then evaluated. Mice received three doses of gemcitabine: one before (212)Pb-trastuzumab and two afterwards. Median survival of mice was 63 versus 54 days for those receiving a single gemcitabine dose before radioimmunotherapy (P < 0.001), specifically attributable to (212)Pb-trastuzumab (P = 0.01). Extending these findings, one versus two treatment cycles was compared. A cycle consisted of sequential treatment with gemcitabine, 10 microCi (212)Pb radioimmunotherapy, then one or two additional gemcitabine doses. In the first cycle, three doses of gemcitabine resulted in a median survival of 90 versus 21 days for the untreated mice. The greatest benefit was noted after cycle 2 in the mice receiving 10 microCi (212)Pb-trastuzumab and two doses of gemcitabine with a median survival of 196.5 days (P = 0.005). Pretreatment of tumor-bearing mice with two doses of gemcitabine before (212)Pb radioimmunotherapy was also assessed with gemcitabine injected 72 and 24 h before (212)Pb-trastuzumab. The median survival was 56 and 76 days with one and two doses of gemcitabine versus 49 days without gemcitabine. The effect may not be wholly specific to trastuzumab because (212)Pb-HuIgG with two doses of gemcitabine resulted in a median survival of 66 days (34 days without gemcitabine).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment regimens combining chemotherapeutics with high-LET targeted therapy may have tremendous potential in the management and care of cancer patients.

Phase II study with the combination of gemcitabine and DTIC in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas

PURPOSE

Based on the promising results of a Phase I study with a combination of gemcitabine and DTIC performed in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS) patients, and due to the limited efficacy of second or third line therapies in those patients, we designed a Phase II study to determine the activity of this new regimen.

METHODS

Patients with ASTS, measurable disease, pretreated with chemotherapy, received gemcitabine 1,800 mg/m2 infused over 180 min followed by DTIC 500 mg/m2 (one cycle), every 2 weeks. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of gemcitabine and 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU), and the accumulation of gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) by peripheral blood mononuclear cells were studied. The influence of the sequence of administration on those parameters was examined to exclude potential drug interactions.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients received a total of 158 cycles (mean four cycles, range 1-18). Grade 3-4 anemia (23% of patients), granulocytopenia (46%) or thrombocytopenia (12%), and grade 3 increase in AST (18%), ALT (21%), or gamma-glutamyl-transferase (9%) were noted. Response rate in 23 patients was 4% (95% CI: 0-24%), and in 8 of 11 patients stable disease lasted > 6 months. Progression-free rate (PFR) at 3 and 6 months was, respectively, 48 and 28%, and median overall survival 37 weeks. Pooled data from the Phase I and Phase II studies showed clinical benefit in patients with leiomyosarcomas (LMS) (57%) and malignant fibrous histiocytomas (MFH) (33%). The sequence of administration did not influence PK of gemcitabine or dFdU. There was a trend (P = 0.11) toward a lower accumulation of dFdCTP when DTIC preceded gemcitabine.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the remission rate was low, PFR figures indicate that this regimen has activity in patients with ASTS. It should be compared with DTIC, or other gemcitabine-containing combinations, in patients with LMS or MFH, to determine whether this combination offers advantages in PFR or in overall activity.