High intratumoral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mRNA levels in pancreatic cancer associated with a high rate of response to S-1

Intratumoural expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase is an independent prognostic factor in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with adjuvant gemcitabine

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a poor prognosis, and biomarkers to guide treatment decisions in PDAC are generally lacking. Intratumoural expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is a potential prognostic parameter in patients with PDAC undergoing surgical resection and postoperative chemotherapy. In the present study, DPD was analysed by immunohistochemistry of a tissue microarray platform including a real-world cohort of 495 patients with PDAC who had undergone resection with curative intent at any of three tertiary centres, including Northern, Western and Southeastern regions of Sweden, between 1993 and 2019. DPD level (high/low) was analysed and overall survival associations were assessed in treatment subgroups using a multivariate Cox regression model accounting for potential confounders. In patients who had not received adjuvant chemotherapy (n=182), the median overall survival time was 11.6 months (95% CI 9.6-13.5), compared with 28.8 months (25.0-32.6) among those who had (n=313; log-rank P<0.001). The most common type of chemotherapy was gemcitabine single agent (Gem, n=239) followed by gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GemCape, n=39). Tumour-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage and DPD expression were statistically significant prognostic parameters in the Gem group (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.41, P=0.036), with high expression of DPD linked with worse survival. In addition, tumour grade and TNM stage were statistically significant prognostic factors in the group that did not receive any chemotherapy (P≤0.001). No statistically significant parameters were identified in the GemCape group. Taken together, intratumoural expression of DPD may be considered a prognostic marker for patients with PDAC treated with adjuvant gemcitabine following surgical resection, with low expression levels predicting better survival. Further studies in larger cohorts of patients receiving multi-drug or non-gemcitabine based regimens are warranted.

Clinical implications of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression in patients with pancreatic cancer who undergo curative resection with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy

The predictive roles of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in patients who undergo curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1, which is the oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug tegafur combined with oteracil and gimeracil, remain unclear. In the present study, the clinical data from 66 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection and received adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for the treatment of pancreatic cancer at Kanagawa Cancer Center (Yokohama City, Japan) from April 2005 to March 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The association between the DPD status and the survival and clinicopathological features were investigated. Of the 66 patients, 34 patients exhibited positive DPD expression (51.5%). Although a significant increase in DPD expression in male patients was observed, no significant differences were identified for other clinicopathological parameters, including tumor factor or node factor, between the DPD-positive expression group and the DPD-negative expression group. The median follow-up period of the present study was 29.2 months. There was no significant difference in the 3-year overall survival (OS) rates following surgery, which were 12.6 and 14.5% in the DPD-positive and DPD-negative expression groups, respectively (P=0.352). However, in a subgroup analysis, a significant difference in the 3-year OS rates following surgery was noted, which were 58.9 and 14.5% in the DPD-high and DPD-low expression groups, respectively (P=0.019). The intratumoral DPD expression in curatively resected pancreatic cancer patients treated with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was identified to not be useful as a predictive marker, whereas the level of DPD expression is a potential predictive marker. The results of the present study require confirmation in another cohort or in a prospective multicenter study.

Drug metabolism and pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer remains a fatal disease in the majority of patients. The era of personalized medicine is upon us: customizing therapy according to each patient's individual cancer. Potentially, therapy can be targeted at individuals who would most likely have a favorable response, making it more efficacious and cost effective. This is particularly relevant for pancreatic cancer, which currently portends a very poor prognosis. However, there is much to be done in this field, and more studies are needed to bring this concept to reality.

Nab-Paclitaxel Plus S-1 Shows Increased Antitumor Activity in Patient-Derived Pancreatic Cancer Xenograft Mouse Models

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the antitumor activity of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus S-1 in patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenograft mouse models and to explore biomarkers that could predict drug efficacy.

METHODS

Ten patient-derived xenograft models were established. The third-generation tumor-bearing mice were randomized into 4 treatment groups: (1) control; (2) S-1; (3) nab-paclitaxel; (4) S-1 plus nab-paclitaxel. Resected tumors were tested by immunohistochemistry for the expression of thymidylate synthase, orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), secreted protein that is acidic and rich in cysteine, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), collagen-1, and CD31.

RESULTS

Tumor growth inhibition of the S-1 group, nab-paclitaxel group, and combination group was 69.52%, 86.63%, 103.56%, respectively (P < 0.05). The efficacy of S-1 is better in thymidylate synthase-negative, OPRT-positive, and DPD-negative tumors. The efficacy of nab-paclitaxel is better in HER2-positive tumors. Collagen-1 was decreased and CD31 was increased in tumors treated with nab-paclitaxel and S-1 plus nab-paclitaxel compared with control or S-1.

CONCLUSIONS

This preclinical study showed that S-1 plus nab-paclitaxel exerted significantly better antitumor activity than S-1 or nab-paclitaxel alone. Thymidylate synthase, OPRT, and DPD were possibly biomarkers of S-1 and HER2 of nab-paclitaxel.

Impact of intratumoral expression levels of fluoropyrimidine-metabolizing enzymes on treatment outcomes of adjuvant S-1 therapy in gastric cancer

We analyzed the expression levels of fluoropyrimidine-metabolizing enzymes (thymidylate synthase [TS], dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase [DPD], thymidine phosphorylase [TP] and orotate phosphoribosyltransferase [OPRT]) to identify potential biomarkers related to treatment outcomes in gastric cancer (GC) patients receiving adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy. In this study, 184 patients who received curative gastrectomy (D2 lymph node dissection) and adjuvant S-1 were included. Immunohistochemistry and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were performed to measure the protein and mRNA levels of TS, DPD, TP, and OPRT in tumor tissue. In univariate analysis, low intratumoral DPD protein expression was related to poorer 5-year disease-free survival (DFS; 78% vs. 88%; P = 0.068). Low intratumoral DPD mRNA expression (1st [lowest] quartile) was also related to poorer DFS (69% vs. 90%; P < 0.001) compared to high intratumoral DPD expression (2nd to 4th quartiles). In multivariate analyses, low intratumoral DPD protein or mRNA expression was related to worse DFS (P < 0.05), irrespective of other clinical variables. TS, TP, and OPRT expression levels were not related to treatment outcomes. Severe non-hematologic toxicities (grade ≥ 3) had a trend towards more frequent development in patients with low intratumoral DPD mRNA expression (29% vs. 16%; P = 0.068). In conclusion, GC patients with high intratumoral DPD expression did not have inferior outcome following adjuvant S-1 therapy compared with those with low DPD expression. Instead, low intratumoral DPD expression was related to poor DFS.

Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreas cancer: Past lessons and future therapies

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains a most deadly malignancy, with an overall 5-year survival of 5%. A subset of patients will be diagnosed with potentially resectable disease, and while complete surgical resection provides the only chance at cure, data from trials of postoperative chemoradiation and/or chemotherapy demonstrate a modest survival advantage over those patients who undergo resection alone. As such, most practitioners believe that completion of multimodality therapy is the optimal treatment. However, the sequence of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy is frequently debated, as patients may benefit from a neoadjuvant approach by initiating chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation prior to resection. Here we review the rationale for neoadjuvant therapy, which includes a higher rate of completion of multimodality therapy, minimizing the risk of unnecessary surgical resection for patients who develop early metastatic disease, improved surgical outcomes and the potential for longer overall survival. However, there are no prospective, randomized studies of the neoadjuvant approach compared to a surgery-first strategy; the established and ongoing investigations of neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer are discussed in detail. Lastly, as the future of therapeutic regimens is likely to entail patient-specific genetic and molecular analyses, and the treatment that is best applied based on those data, a review of clinically relevant biomarkers in pancreatic cancer is also presented.

Systemic therapies for pancreatic cancer--the role of pharmacogenetics

Effective systemic treatment of pancreatic cancer remains a major challenge, with progress hampered by drug resistance and treatment related toxicities. Currently available cytotoxic agents as monotherapy or in combination have provided only a modest survival benefit for patients with advanced disease. Disappointing phase III results with gemcitabine-based combinations in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer might be related to poor efficacy of systemic therapies in unselected patients. Future research strategies should prioritize identification of predictive markers through pharmacogenetic investigations. The individualization of patient treatment through pharmacogenetics may help to improve outcome by maximizing efficacy whilst lowering toxicity. This review provides an update on the pharmacogenetics of pancreatic cancer treatment and its influence on treatment benefits and toxicity.

Systemic therapies for pancreatic cancer--the role of pharmacogenetics

Effective systemic treatment of pancreatic cancer remains a major challenge, with progress hampered by drug resistance and treatment related toxicities. Currently available cytotoxic agents as monotherapy or in combination have provided only a modest survival benefit for patients with advanced disease. Disappointing phase III results with gemcitabine-based combinations in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer might be related to poor efficacy of systemic therapies in unselected patients. Future research strategies should prioritize identification of predictive markers through pharmacogenetic investigations. The individualization of patient treatment through pharmacogenetics may help to improve outcome by maximizing efficacy whilst lowering toxicity. This review provides an update on the pharmacogenetics of pancreatic cancer treatment and its influence on treatment benefits and toxicity.

Combined analysis of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 expression predicts survival of pancreatic carcinoma patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection

BACKGROUND

Although postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) improves survival in some patients, the effectiveness varies by individual, and the results remain unsatisfying. The aim of this study was to investigate whether intratumoral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) expression can predict the survival of PDAC patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 (GEM+S-1) chemotherapy.

METHODS

Intratumoral DPD and hENT1 expression were examined by immunohistochemistry in 86 PDAC patients who received adjuvant GEM+S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection (all R0 or R1). Relationships between clinicopathologic factors, including DPD and hENT1 expression, and disease-free or overall survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

DPD and hENT1 expression had no significant relationship with any other clinicopathologic factors. A multivariate disease-free survival analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.90: 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-5.90; P = 0.001), DPD expression (HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.37-4.44; P = 0.003), and hENT1 expression (HR 2.55; 95% CI 1.37-4.64; P = 0.004) as independent factors. Multivariate overall survival analysis also identified pT factor (HR 3.47; 95% CI 1.08-15.8; P = 0.03), lymph node metastasis (HR 2.08; 95% CI 1.01-4.57; P = 0.04), DPD expression (HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.06-3.71; P = 0.03), and hENT1 expression (HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.10-4.19; P = 0.02) as independent factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined analysis of DPD and hENT1 expression predicts the survival of PDAC patients treated with adjuvant GEM+S-1 chemotherapy.

Impact of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and γ-glutamyl hydrolase on the outcomes of patients treated with gemcitabine or S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

Gene expression analyses may play useful roles in determining the prognosis of cancer patients and in selecting antitumor drugs. This retrospective study examined potential prognostic factors in patients with pancreatic cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The study group consisted of 79 patients who had received gemcitabine or S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. Using laser-captured microdissection and real-time RT-PCR assay, we quantitatively evaluated the mRNA levels of 10 genes associated with patient prognosis and sensitivity to chemotherapy using paraffin-embedded specimens of the primary tumors resected before the start of adjuvant chemotherapy. In univariate analyses, a low gene expression level of γ-glutamyl hydrolase (GGH) and a high gene expression level of folylpolyglutamate synthase correlated with a favorable outcome. In a multivariate analysis, a low gene expression level of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and GGH significantly correlated with outcome (hazard ratio of the high DPD group to the low DPD group: 5.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-24.05; P=0.022; the high GGH group to the low GGH group: 3.77; 95% CI 1.04-13.79, P=0.043). For adjuvant chemotherapy of patients with pancreatic cancer, the mRNA level of DPD and GGH may affect the prognosis of these patients.

Critical role of laser microdissection for genetic, epigenetic and proteomic analyses in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease, and molecular studies to unravel novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets are warranted. However, PDAC is characterized by different precursor lesions, as well as by an intense desmoplastic reaction, with islet of neoplastic cells often representing a minor population. Moreover, normal ductal cells, which are considered to be the normal counterpart of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells, comprise approximately 5% of the total population of cells making up this organ. For all these reasons, molecular techniques to identify critical mutations, as well as the pattern of altered mRNA/microRNA/protein expression should be performed on selected pancreatic cell subpopulations. Therefore, the use of the newest laser microdissection techniques is critical for the analysis of PDAC biological characteristics. This article highlights the most recent and clinically relevant aspects of genetic, epigenetic and proteomic analyses of PDAC from the perspective of the application of laser microdissection.

Prognostic impact of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression on pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients treated with S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic value of intratumoral expression of thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT) in patients treated with S-1-based chemotherapy after surgical resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Intratumoral TS, DPD, and OPRT expression was investigated in 106 patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma by immunohistochemistry. Associations between clinicopathological factors, including intratumoral TS, DPD, and OPRT expression, and survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of 106 patients, 72 had received S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy (S-1(+) group), and 34 had not (S-1(-) group). High TS, DPD, and OPRT expression was observed in 64%, 37%, and 66% of patients, respectively. Among S-1(+) group patients, survival was significantly better for patients with low DPD expression than for patients with high DPD expression (P = 0.022). Intratumoral DPD expression was the only independent prognostic factor for patients treated with S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy by multivariate analysis (P = 0.037). Intratumoral TS and OPRT expression did not appear to influence survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Intratumoral DPD expression may be a relevant predictive marker of survival benefit associated with S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Results of a phase II trial of S-1 as first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (CESAR-study group)

PURPOSE

S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, has previously demonstrated anticancer efficacy in pancreatic cancer (PC), predominantly in Asian populations. This study evaluated the antitumor effect and safety of S-1 in Caucasian patients with metastatic PC.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients received S-1 orally at 30 mg/m(2) twice daily (BID) for 2 weeks, repeated every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS and safety assessment. The trial had a Simon's two-stage design with 22 patients evaluable for efficacy in stage 1 and an additional 18 patients in stage 2, if ≥3/22 patients had a confirmed response at the first stage.

RESULTS

Three out of 27 patients showed PR, however, detection of asymptomatic brain metastases in one of them prevented this study from proceeding to stage 2. The median PFS and OS for all patients was 3.5 and 9.1 months, respectively. The median duration of disease control for patients with SD or PR (n = 17) was 4.3 months. S-1 was well tolerated; fatigue was the most frequent grade 3/4 adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy data of PFS and OS are at least comparable to gemcitabine, the current standard of care. S-1 is active in Caucasian patients with metastatic PC.

Low thymidylate synthase, thymidine phosphorylase, and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mRNA expression correlate with prolonged survival in resected non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Thymidylate synthase (TS), thymidine phosphorylase (TP), and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are key enzymes in the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) pathway. The aim of this study was to investigate the mRNA expression of TS, TP, and DPD in tumor and nontumor lung tissue of patients with NSCLC and to determine the potential of these genes as molecular biomarkers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The TS, TP, and DPD mRNA expression was analyzed in tumor and nontumor tissue of 91 patients with NSCLC by quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with β-actin as the internal control. All tumors were R0 resected. The median follow-up was 85.9 months.

RESULTS

The mRNA expression of TS, TP, and DPD was detectable in both tumor and nontumor tissue. Tumor TP (tTP) seems to correlate with tumor TS (tTS) and tumor DPD (tDPD) mRNA expression, but no correlation in the mRNA expression of tTS and tDPD was found. The TS and TP mRNA expression levels were significantly associated with patient prognosis. The 5-year survival probability was 58.7% (TS), and 59.6% (TP) for patients with a low TS and TP mRNA expression and 33.4% (TS), and 31.8% (TP) for patients with a high mRNA expression (P = .04 [TS]; P = .03 [TP]; log-rank). The probability of survival was significantly different among patients with no and any 1 highly expressed gene compared with patients with any 2 or more of the 3 investigated genes highly expressed (P = .012).

CONCLUSION

High TS, TP, and DPD mRNA expression are biomarkers for a more severe malign NSCLC biology. Quantitation of the mRNA expression of these genes seems to be helpful in differing patients with unequal malign tumor entities and therefore possibly helpful in selecting tailored additional therapies to control the disease.

Relationship between gene expression of 5-fluorouracil metabolic enzymes and 5-fluorouracil sensitivity in primary cancer cells isolated from malignant ascites

This study was designed to investigate the predictive role of 5-FU metabolic enzymes in malignant ascites. Forty-three malignant ascites were collected and primary cancer cells were isolated. Gene expression was detected by quantitative RT-PCR. We found that DPD mRNA was higher in patients with pancreatic cancers than those with gastric cancers, colon cancers, and liver cancers. Significant correlations were found between expression of DPD and TP, and between TS and OPRT. mRNA levels of TS and OPRT correlated significantly with the chemosensitivity of 5-FU. Assessing gene expression would be useful in predicting 5-FU sensitivity for patients with malignant ascites.