Phase II study of S-1 monotherapy in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Neoadjuvant apatinib plus S-1 in locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

About one-third of the lung tumors are staged as locally advanced at the time of initial diagnosis; however, the optimal induction treatment before curative resection has not been elucidated. To date, the evidence regarding the preoperative apatinib plus S-1 for locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma is scarce.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 29-year-old female was admitted because of persistent cough, sputum, and chest distress for 2 months.

DIAGNOSES

Primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma (cT3N2M0, IIIB) with unknown driver gene mutation status.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient had received 4 months of neoadjuvant therapy using oral apatinib (425 mg daily) plus S-1 (60 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks with a 2-week drug-free interval), followed by anatomical lobectomy with curative intent. Adjuvant apatinib (425 mg daily for a month, and 250 mg daily for another month) plus S-1 at the same dosage were administered for 2 months. Thereafter, maintenance of low-dose S-1 monotherapy (40 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks with a 2-week drug-free interval) was continued for 6 months.

OUTCOMES

The adverse events were tolerable and well-controlled. A postoperative recurrence-free survival for 2 years and a half up to now was indicated.

LESSONS

Preoperative apatinib plus S-1 showed efficacy in locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma. However, high-quality trials are warranted before the recommendation of this therapeutic regimen.

Switch maintenance therapy with S-1 after induction therapy with carboplatin and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma

Background Optimal maintenance therapy for lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of switch maintenance therapy with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, after induction therapy with carboplatin and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced SCC. Methods Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced SCC received induction therapy with four cycles of carboplatin (at an area under the curve of 6, day 1 of a 28-day cycle) and nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/kg, days 1, 8, and 15). Patients who achieved disease control after induction therapy received maintenance therapy with S-1 (80 mg/m², days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of maintenance therapy. Results Seventy-two patients with SCC were enrolled to the study. After four cycles of induction therapy, 35 (48.6%) patients achieved disease control, and 31 (43.1%) of these patients received maintenance therapy. Median PFS from the start of maintenance therapy was 3.0 months (95% confidence interval: 2.1-3.8 months). The most common toxicities of grade 3 or higher during maintenance therapy were nausea (13.3%), neutropenia (10.0%), and diarrhea (6.7%). Conclusions Switch maintenance therapy with S-1 after induction therapy with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel was associated with moderate efficacy and acceptable safety and may represent a feasible treatment option for patients with advanced SCC.

A retrospective study of concurrent radiotherapy plus S-1 for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We investigated the efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy plus S-1 (CRS) for treating unresectable stage III advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ANSCLC).Seventy five ANSCLC patients were included in this retrospective study. Of those, 40 patients were assigned to an intervention group, and received S-1 (orally at 40 mg/m) twice daily for 14 consecutive days. Then, concurrent radiotherapy was administered in 2 Gy fractions, 5 times weekly for a total dose of 60 Gy. The other 35 patients were assigned to a control group, and underwent concurrent radiotherapy (the same as the intervention group) and cisplatin (60 mg/m on day 1 (CRC). The outcome measurements included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity.The 3-year ORR was 60.7% and 43.9% for intervention group and control group, respectively (P = .031). The median OS was 34.1 months and 25.3 months in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P = .041). The median PFS was 31.5 months for intervention group, while it was 22.4 months for control group (P = .048). No significant difference in toxicity was found between the 2 groups.The results demonstrated that the efficacy of CRS was superior to the CRC in ANSCLC patients with similar toxicity.

Combination TS-1 plus EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer after progression on first-line or further EGFR-TKIs: A phase II, single-arm trial

Background

EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with TS‐1 might overcome EGFR‐TKI resistance, which has been indicated by several preclinical studies. We investigated the synergistic efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of EGFR‐TKIs and TS‐1 in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with acquired resistance to previous EGFR‐TKI therapy.

Methods

This was a phase II, single‐arm and single‐center prospective study. Stage IIIB–IV NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to prior EGFR‐TKI treatment were enrolled. All patients were administered combination therapy of TS‐1 and continuing EGFR‐TKIs in this study. The primary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS), while overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were secondary endpoints.

Results

A total of 42 patients with acquired resistance to EGFR‐TKIs were eligible for this study. The median PFS for all patients was five months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6–5.4). The OS and DCR were 31.9 (95% CI 17.8–46.0) months and 69.0% (29/42), respectively. No grade 4 toxicity or grade 3 hematologic toxicity was observed in this study. One patient (2%) experienced grade 3 elevated total serum bilirubin.

Conclusion

The combination treatment of TS‐1 and EGFR‐TKIs was effective and well tolerated by patients who had experienced prior EGFR‐TKI treatment failure. Our results need to be validated by larger prospective clinical trials.

A randomized phase II trial of erlotinib vs. S-1 as a third- or fourth-line therapy for patients with wild-type EGFR non-small cell lung cancer (HOT1002)

PURPOSE

A high proportion of patients with wild-type EGFR non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receive third-line therapy and beyond, with no prospective randomized trials addressing the issue. This study aimed to select the most suitable regimen as a third- or fourth-line therapy for wild-type EGFR NSCLC.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized phase II study in Japan included patients with recurrent or advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown EGFR, who progressed after two or three previous chemotherapies. The patients were randomly assigned to erlotinib (150 mg/day, days 1-21) or S-1 (80-120 mg/day, days 1-14) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2016, 37 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib (E arm, n = 19) and S-1 (S arm, n = 18). This study was terminated prematurely because of poor patient accrual. DCR/ORR were 42.1%/15.8% in the E arm and 66.7%/16.7% in the S arm. Median PFS/OS were 1.6 months/8.0 months in the E arm and 3.3 months/12.2 months in the S arm. In both groups, the most commonly reported grade 3-4 toxicities were fatigue, anorexia, and nausea. One grade 5 pneumonitis occurred in the S arm. No significant difference was seen in QOL.

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 as a third- or fourth-line therapy for wild-type EGFR NSCLC showed numerically better clinical outcomes than erlotinib.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO

UMIN000005308.

Phase II clinical trial of S-1 plus oral leucovorin in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, has potent antitumor activity against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Meanwhile, leucovorin enhances the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil by inhibiting thymidylate synthase. Therefore, this phase II clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of S-1 plus leucovorin combination therapy for previously treated patients with NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were prospectively enrolled if they received 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens. S-1 (40-60 mg) and leucovorin (25mg) were administered together orally twice per day for 7 consecutive days followed by 7 days of rest. This 2-week cycle was repeated for a maximum of 25 cycles until the onset of disease progression or unacceptable adverse events. Endpoints included objective tumor response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

Among 33 patients, 6 (18.2%), 14 (42.4%), and 11 (33.3%) had partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 3.5 and 11.7 months, respectively. The common grade 3 toxicities included stomatitis (18.2%), anorexia (12.1%), and neutropenia (9.1%). One patient had pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis, and another experienced paralytic ileus. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 plus leucovorin combination therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile in previously treated patients with NSCLC.

Phase II trial of S-1 as third-line or further chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), receiving two or more prior chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

S-1 was administered orally for 14 consecutive days, followed by a 7-day rest period. This treatment course was repeated until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2012, 45 patients were enrolled in this study. Of the 45 patients, 4 patients [8.9 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.6-17.2 %] exhibited a partial response and 24 patients (53.3 %) exhibited stable disease. The disease control rate was 62.2 % (95 % CI 48.1-76.4 %). Median progression-free survival was 71 days, and median survival time was 205 days. Four patients had grade 3 hematological toxicities, but toxicities of grade 4 were not observed in this study.

CONCLUSION

Although S-1 monotherapy as third-line treatment or beyond was well tolerated, the response rate for this regimen did not demonstrate sufficient activity for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase II study of oral S-1 plus cisplatin with bevacizumab for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus cisplatin with bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients received S-1 plus cisplatin with bevacizumab. S-1 (80 mg/m(2)) was administered orally twice daily for 14 days, cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) on day 1, and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1 and every 3 weeks for 4-6 cycles. Patients with an objective response or stable disease received maintenance bevacizumab every 3 weeks until disease progression.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled in this study. The median number of chemotherapy was four (range, 1-6 cycles), and the median number of bevacizumab alone was three (range, 1-31 cycles). The grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropaenia (23%), thrombocytopaenia (10%), febrile neutropaenia (3%), hypertension (17%), pneumonia (7%), and bowel perforation (3%). The objective response rate was 71% (95% CI, 55-88%) for a disease control rate of 100%. The median progression-free and overall survival times were 7.0 months and 20.0 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 plus cisplatin with bevacizumab is an active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with chemotherapy-naïve non-squamous NSCLC.