1
|
Breast-Conserving Surgery in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2023; 2023:5431563. [PMID: 36704213 PMCID: PMC9873444 DOI: 10.1155/2023/5431563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Objectives The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and analyze the influencing factors and predictors of the efficiency and prognosis of NAC. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted by dividing patients into two groups according to two different therapy methods. With BCS as the exposure factor, 46 cases were assigned to the exposed group and 80 cases to the nonexposed group. We compare the difference in operation-related indicators, postoperative complications, local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, and overall survival (OS) rate between the two groups. The factors affecting the efficiency and prognosis of NAC were analyzed by binary logistic regression, and the optimal cutoff value was determined by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The survival curve was plotted, and the univariate log-rank test was performed to analyze the difference in OS between the two groups. The influencing factors of OS were analyzed by the Cox risk regression model. Results NAC + BCS resulted in significantly less intraoperative blood loss, lower incidence of postoperative complications, and shorter operative time and length of hospital stay than that in NAC (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in local recurrence, distant metastasis, or OS between the two groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the clinical stage I and Ki-67 high expression were independent protective factors of the efficacy of NAC. The high expression of Ki-67 and nondecline expression of Ki-67 were independent risk factors of prognosis. Ki-67 high expression was an independent risk factor of OS (P < 0.05). The ROC curve showed that the AUC of Ki-67 for NAC efficacy, prognosis, and OS were 0.706, 0.820, and 0.687, respectively, with optimal cutoff values of 25.5%, 29.0%, and 32.5%, respectively. Survival analysis showed that the OS of patients with NAC + BCS was 73.9% and NAC + MRM was 70.0% (P > 0.05). In the low expression subgroup of Ki-67, the OS of the two groups were 100.0% and 77.8%, respectively (P=0.060). In the high expression subgroup of Ki-67, the OS of the two groups were 53.8% and 63.6%, respectively (P=0.419). Conclusions NAC + BCS is a good method for treating TNBC, which has an obvious short-term effect and a good long-term prognosis. Clinical stage I and the high expression of Ki-67 are independent protective factors for the efficacy of NAC. The high expression of Ki-67 and nondecline expression of Ki-67 are independent risk factors of prognosis. Ki-67 is a potential predictor for the efficacy, prognosis, and OS of NAC in TNBC patients. The high expression of Ki-67 indicates better NAC efficacy, a poorer prognosis, and a lower OS.
Collapse
|
2
|
Fan M, Wu X, Yu J, Liu Y, Wang K, Xue T, Zeng T, Chen S, Li L. Multiparametric MRI radiomics fusion for predicting the response and shrinkage pattern to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1057841. [PMID: 37207135 PMCID: PMC10189126 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1057841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose During neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), breast tumor morphological and vascular characteristics are usually changed. This study aimed to evaluate the tumor shrinkage pattern and response to NACT by preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), diffuse weighted imaging (DWI) and T2 weighted imaging (T2WI). Method In this retrospective analysis, female patients with unilateral unifocal primary breast cancer were included for predicting tumor pathologic/clinical response to NACT (n=216, development set, n=151 and validation set, n=65) and for discriminating the tumor concentric shrinkage (CS) pattern from the others (n=193; development set, n=135 and validation set, n=58). Radiomic features (n=102) of first-order statistical, morphological and textural features were calculated on tumors from the multiparametric MRI. Single- and multiparametric image-based features were assessed separately and were further combined to feed into a random forest-based predictive model. The predictive model was trained in the testing set and assessed on the testing dataset with an area under the curve (AUC). Molecular subtype information and radiomic features were fused to enhance the predictive performance. Results The DCE-MRI-based model showed higher performance (AUCs of 0.919, 0.830 and 0.825 for tumor pathologic response, clinical response and tumor shrinkage patterns, respectively) than either the T2WI or the ADC image-based model. An increased prediction performance was achieved by a model with multiparametric MRI radiomic feature fusion. Conclusions All these results demonstrated that multiparametric MRI features and their information fusion could be of important clinical value for the preoperative prediction of treatment response and shrinkage pattern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Fan
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xilin Wu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiadong Yu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yueyue Liu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kailang Wang
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tailong Xue
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tieyong Zeng
- Department of Mathematics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Shujun Chen
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- *Correspondence: Shujun Chen, ; Lihua Li,
| | - Lihua Li
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Shujun Chen, ; Lihua Li,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen S, Han Y, Ouyang Q, Lu J, Zhang Q, Yang S, Wang J, Huang H, Liu H, Shao Z, Li H, Chen Z, Sun S, Geng C, Lu J, Sun J, Wang J, Xu B. Randomized and dose-escalation trials of recombinant human serum albumin /granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with breast cancer receiving anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:341. [PMID: 33789616 PMCID: PMC8010964 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08093-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human serum albumin /granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHSA/G-CSF) in breast cancer following receipt of cytotoxic agents. METHODS The phase 1b trial assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of dose-escalation, ranging from rHSA/G-CSF 1800 μg, 2100 μg, and 2400 μg. Randomized controlled phase 2b trial was further conducted to ensure the comparative efficacy and safety of rHSA/G-CSF 2400 μg and rhG-CSF 5 μg/kg. In multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel, phase 2 study, participants treated with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy were assigned in a ratio 1:1:1 to receive double delivery of rHSA/G-CSF 1200 μg, 1500 μg, and continuous rhG-CSF 5 μg/kg. RESULTS Between December 16, 2014, to July 23, 2018, a total of 320 patients were enrolled, including 25 individuals in phase 1b trial, 80 patients in phase 2b trial, and 215 participants in phase 2 study. The mean duration of agranulocytosis during the first chemotherapeutic intermission was observed as 1.14 ± 1.35 days in rHSA/G-CSF 1500 μg, which was comparable with that of 1.07 ± 0.97 days obtained in rhG-CSF control (P = 0.71). Safety profiles were assessed to be acceptable ranging from rHSA/G-CSF 1800 μg to 2400 μg, while the double delivery of HSA/G-CSF 2400 μg failed to meet the noninferiority in comparison with rhG-CSF. CONCLUSION The prospective randomized controlled trials demonstrated that rHSA/G-CSF was efficacious and well-tolerated with an approachable frequency and expense of application for prophylactic management of agranulocytosis. The double delivery of rHSA/G-CSF 1500 μg in comparisons with paralleling G-CSF preparations is warranted in the phase 3 trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02465801 (11/17/2014), NCT03246009 (08/08/2017), NCT03251768 (08/07/2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanshan Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yiqun Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Quchang Ouyang
- Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Jianguo Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Xi'an Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, Shanxi, China
| | - Qingyuan Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Shun'e Yang
- Department of Breast Cancer and Lymphoma, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Jingfen Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Linyi Tumor Hospital, Linyi, Shandong, China
| | - Haixin Huang
- Department of Oncology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
| | - Hong Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhimin Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Province Tumor Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhendong Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Sanyuan Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Central Hospital of Xuzhou, the Cancer Institute of Southeast University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Cuizhi Geng
- First Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Junguo Lu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nantong Tumor Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jianwei Sun
- Department of Tumor, Yunnan First People's Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Jiayu Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Binghe Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|