A phase I study of resminostat in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

Novel pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]benzodiazepine-3,11-dione (PBD) derivatives as selective HDAC6 inhibitors to suppress tumor metastasis and invasion in vitro and in vivo

Selective inhibition of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) has been emerged as a promising approach to cancer treatment. As a pivotal strategy for drug discovery,molecular hybridization was introduced in this study and a series of pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4] benzodiazepine-3,11-diones (PBDs) based hydroxamic acids was rationally designed and synthesizedas novel selective HDAC6 inhibitors. Preliminary in vitro enzyme inhibition assay and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion confirmed our design strategy and met the expectation. Several of the compounds showed high potent against HDAC6 enzyme in vitro, and compound A7 with a long aliphatic linker was revealed to have the similar activity as the positive control tubastatin A. Further in vitro characterization of A7 demonstrates the metastasis inhibitory potency in MDA-MB-231 cell line and western blotting showed that A7 could induce the upregulation of Ac-α-tubulin, but not induce the excessive acetylation of histone H3, which indicated that the compound had HDAC6 targeting effect in MDA-MB-231 cells. In vivo study revealed that compound A7 has satisfactory inhibitory effects onliver and lung metastasis of breast cancer in mice. Molecular docking released that A7 could fit well with the receptor and interact with some key residues, which lays a foundation for further structural modifications to elucidate the interaction mode between compounds and target protein. This pharmacological investigation workflow provided a reasonable and reference methodto examine the pharmacological effects of inhibiting HDAC6 with a single molecule, either in vitro or in vivo. All of these results suggested that A7 is a promising lead compound that could lead to the further development of novel selective HDAC6 inhibitors for the treatment of tumor metastasis.

Selective Targeting of Epigenetic Readers and Histone Deacetylases in Autoimmune and Inflammatory Diseases: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) and bromodomain-containing proteins (BCPs) play a key role in chromatin remodeling. Based on their ability to regulate inducible gene expression in the context of inflammation and cancer, HDACs and BCPs have been the focus of drug discovery efforts, and numerous small-molecule inhibitors have been developed. However, dose-limiting toxicities of the first generation of inhibitors, which typically target multiple HDACs or BCPs, have limited translation to the clinic. Over the last decade, an increasing effort has been dedicated to designing class-, isoform-, or domain-specific HDAC or BCP inhibitors, as well as developing strategies for cell-specific targeted drug delivery. Selective inhibition of the epigenetic modulators is helping to elucidate the functions of individual epigenetic proteins and has the potential to yield better and safer therapeutic strategies. In accordance with this idea, several in vitro and in vivo studies have reported the ability of more selective HDAC/BCP inhibitors to recapitulate the beneficial effects of pan-inhibitors with less unwanted adverse events. In this review, we summarize the most recent advances with these strategies, discussing advantages and limitations of these approaches as well as some therapeutic perspectives, focusing on autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.

A randomized, double-blind, phase II study of oral histone deacetylase inhibitor resminostat plus S-1 versus placebo plus S-1 in biliary tract cancers previously treated with gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Effective second-line chemotherapy options are limited in treating advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Resminostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor. Such inhibitors increase sensitivity to fluorouracil, the active form of S-1. In the phase I study, addition of resminostat to S-1 was suggested to have promising efficacy for pre-treated BTCs. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of resminostat plus S-1 in second-line therapy for BTCs.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive resminostat or placebo (200 mg orally per day; days 1-5 and 8-12) and S-1 group (80-120 mg orally per day by body surface area; days 1-14) over a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints comprised overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

RESULTS

Among 101 patients enrolled, 50 received resminostat+S-1 and 51 received placebo+S-1. Median PFS was 2.9 months for resminostat+S-1 vs. 3.0 months for placebo+S-1 (HR: 1.154, 95% CI: 0.759-1.757, p = 0.502); median OS was 7.8 months vs. 7.5 months, respectively (HR: 1.049, 95% CI: 0.653-1.684, p = 0.834); the RR and DCR were 6.0% vs. 9.8% and 70.0% vs. 78.4%, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TrAEs) of grade ≥ 3 occurring more frequently (≥10% difference) in the resminostat+S-1 than in the placebo+S-1 comprised platelet count decreased (18.0% vs. 2.0%) and decreased appetite (16.0% vs. 2.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Resminostat plus S-1 therapy improved neither PFS nor OS for patients with pre-treated BTCs. Addition of resminostat to S-1 was associated with higher incidence of TrAEs, but these were manageable (JapicCTI-183883).

Maintenance therapy in patients with mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome: A neglected topic

In advanced-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), the current therapeutic options rarely provide long-lasting responses, leaving allogenic stem-cell transplantation the only potentially curative option for highly selected patients. Until today, there are no standardised strategies for maintenance therapy in patients with CTCL who achieved disease control. Moreover, evidence-based treatment options or drugs that are approved for maintenance treatment in advanced stages after remission induction are still lacking. Patients require maintenance options that provide a good safety profile, are convenient to apply and do not negatively affect their health-related quality of life. However, carrying out large-scale, controlled studies is challenging in CTCL. In addition to information on the concept of maintenance therapy, this review provides an update on current and emerging approaches that target maintenance treatment in advanced-stage CTCL. After all, the group of potentially interesting maintenance therapy candidates, especially for patients in advanced stage, includes not only immunomodulating and phototherapeutic modalities that have been used already for many decades but also newer systemic therapies, including epigenetic modifiers.

Resminostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, circumvents tolerance to EGFR inhibitors in EGFR-mutated lung cancer cells with BIM deletion polymorphism

Drug-tolerant cells are mediators of acquired resistance. BIM-intron2 deletion polymorphism (BIM-del) is one of the mechanisms underlying the resistance to epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI)-mediated apoptosis that induces drug tolerance. Here, we investigated whether resminostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, circumvents BIM-del-associated apoptosis resistance. The human EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line PC-9 and its homozygous BIM-del-positive variant (PC-9 BIMi2- / -), established by editing with zinc finger nuclease, were used. In comparison with PC-9 cells, PC-9 BIMi2- / - cells were less sensitive to apoptosis mediated by EGFR-TKIs such as gefitinib and osimertinib. The combined use of resminostat and an EGFR-TKI preferentially induced the expression of the pro-apoptotic BIM transcript containing exon 4 rather than that containing exon 3, increased the level of pro-apoptotic BIM protein (BIMEL), and stimulated apoptosis in vitro. In a subcutaneous tumor model derived from PC-9 BIMi2- / - cells, gefitinib monotherapy decreased tumor size but retained residual lesions, indicative of the presence of tolerant cells in tumors. The combined use of resminostat and gefitinib increased BIMEL protein level and induced apoptosis, subsequently leading to the remarkable shrinkage of tumor. These findings suggest the potential of resminostat to circumvent tolerance to EGFR-TKIs associated with BIM deletion polymorphism. J. Med. Invest. 67 : 343-350, August, 2020.

Inhibition of histone deacetylases, topoisomerases and epidermal growth factor receptor by metal-based anticancer agents: Design & synthetic strategies and their medicinal attributes

Metal-based inhibitors of histone deacetylases (HDAC), DNA topoisomerases (Topos) and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) have demonstrated their cytotoxic potential against various cancer types such as breast, lung, uterus, colon, etc. Additionally, these have proven their role in resolving the resistance issues, enhancing the affinity, lipophilicity, stability, and biocompatibility and therefore, emerged as potential candidates for molecularly targeted therapeutics. This review focusses on nature and role of metals and organic ligands in tuning the anticancer activity in multiple modes of inhibition considering HDACs, Topos or EGFR as one of the primary targets. The conceptual design and synthetic approaches of platinum and non-platinum metal complexes comprising of chiefly ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, copper, iron, nickel, cobalt, zinc metals coordinated with organic scaffolds, along with their biological activity profiles, structure-activity relationships (SARs), docking studies, possible modes of action, and their scope and limitations are discussed in detail.

Safety and Tolerability of Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors in Oncology

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are expressed at increased levels in cells of various malignancies, and the use of HDAC inhibitors has improved outcomes in patients with haematological malignancies (T-cell lymphomas and multiple myeloma). However, they are not as effective in solid tumours. Five agents are currently approved under various jurisdictions, namely belinostat, chidamide, panobinostat, romidepsin and vorinostat. These agents are associated with a range of class-related and agent-specific serious and/or severe adverse effects, notably myelosuppression, diarrhoea and various cardiac effects. Among the cardiac effects are ST-T segment abnormalities and QTc interval prolongation of the electrocardiogram, isolated cases of atrial fibrillation and, in rare instances, ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In order to improve the safety profile of this class of drugs as well as their efficacy in indications already approved and to further widen their indications, a large number of newer HDAC inhibitors with varying degrees of HDAC isoform selectivity have been synthesised and are currently under clinical development. Preliminary evidence from early studies suggests that they may be effective in non-haematological cancers as well when used in combination with other therapeutic modalities, but that they too appear to be associated with the above class-related adverse effects. As the database accumulates, the safety, efficacy and risk/benefit of the newer agents and their indications will become clearer.

Phase I/II study of first-line combination therapy with sorafenib plus resminostat, an oral HDAC inhibitor, versus sorafenib monotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in east Asian patients

PURPOSE

Resminostat is an oral inhibitor of class I, IIB, and IV histone deacetylases. This phase I/II study compared the safety and efficacy of resminostat plus sorafenib versus sorafenib monotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In phase I, resminostat (400 mg or 600 mg/day on days 1 to 5 every 14 days) was administered with sorafenib (800 mg/day for 14 days) to determine the recommended dose for phase II. In phase II, patients were randomized (1:1) to sorafenib monotherapy or resminostat plus sorafenib. The primary endpoint was time-to-progression (TTP).

RESULTS

Nine patients (3: 400 mg, 6: 600 mg) were enrolled in phase I, and the recommended dose of resminostat was determined to be 400 mg/day. Then 170 patients were enrolled in phase II. Median TTP/overall survival (OS) were 2.8/14.1 months with monotherapy versus 2.8/11.8 months with combination therapy (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.984, p = 0.925/HR: 1.046, p = 0.824). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups (98.8% versus 100.0%). However, thrombocytopenia ≥ Grade 3 was significantly more frequent in the combination therapy group (34.5% versus 2.4%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that median TTP/OS was 1.5/6.9 months for monotherapy versus 2.8/13.1 months for combination therapy (HR: 0.795, p = 0.392/HR: 0.567, p = 0.065) among patients with a normal-to-high baseline platelet count (≥ 150 × 10³/mm³).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced HCC, first-line therapy with resminostat at the recommended dose plus sorafenib showed no significant efficacy advantage over sorafenib monotherapy.

Resminostat induces changes in epithelial plasticity of hepatocellular carcinoma cells and sensitizes them to sorafenib-induced apoptosis

Resminostat, a novel class I, IIb, and IV histone deacetylase inhibitor, was studied in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after relapse to sorafenib (SHELTER study). In this phase I/II clinical trial, combination of sorafenib and resminostat was safe and showed early signs of efficacy. However, the molecular mechanisms behind this synergism have not been explored yet. In this work, we aimed to analyze whether resminostat regulates epithelial-mesenchymal and stemness phenotype as a mechanism of sensitization to sorafenib. Three HCC cell lines with differences in their epithelial/mesenchymal characteristics were treated with resminostat and sorafenib alone, or in combination. Resminostat prevented growth and induced cell death in the HCC cells, in a time and dose dependent manner. A collaborative effect between resminostat and sorafenib was detected in the mesenchymal HCC cells, which were insensitive to sorafenib-induced apoptosis. Expression of mesenchymal-related genes was decreased in resminostat-treated HCC cells, concomitant with an increase in epithelial-related gene expression, organized tight junctions and reduced invasive growth. Moreover, resminostat down-regulated CD44 expression, coincident with decreased capacity to form colonies at low cell density.

CONCLUSION

Resminostat shifts mesenchymal cells towards a more epithelial phenotype, lower invasive and stemness properties, which may contribute to the sensitization to sorafenib-induced apoptosis.

Phase I/II study of docetaxel combined with resminostat, an oral hydroxamic acid HDAC inhibitor, for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

Objectives To determine the recommended dose and efficacy/safety of docetaxel combined with resminostat (DR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with previous platinum-based chemotherapy. Materials and Methods A multicenter, open-label, phase I/II study was performed in Japanese patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC and prior platinum-based chemotherapy. The recommended phase II dose was determined using a standard 3 + 3 dose design in phase I part. Resminostat was escalated from 400 to 600 mg/day and docetaxel fixed at 75 mg/m². In phase II part, the patients were randomly assigned to docetaxel alone (75 mg/m²) or DR therapy. Docetaxel was administered on day 1 and resminostat on days 1-5 in the DR group. Treatment was repeated every 21 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results A total of 117 patients (phase I part, 9; phase II part, 108) were enrolled. There was no dose-limiting toxicity in phase I part; the recommended dose for resminostat was 600 mg/day with 75 mg/m² of docetaxel. In phase II part, median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 4.2 (2.8-5.7) months with docetaxel group and 4.1 (1.5-5.4) months with DR group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.354, 95% CI: 0.835-2.195; p = 0.209). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events significantly more common with DR group than docetaxel group were leukopenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anorexia. Conclusion In Japanese NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, DR therapy did not improve PFS compared with docetaxel alone and increased toxicity.

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors-current concepts, advances in biology, and potential future therapies

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is the most common malignant CNS tumor of children below 6 months of age. The majority of AT/RTs demonstrate genomic alterations in SMARCB1 (INI1, SNF5, BAF47) or, to a lesser extent, SMARCA4 (BRG1) of the SWItch/sucrose nonfermentable chromatin remodeling complex. Recent transcription and methylation profiling studies suggest the existence of molecular subgroups. Thus, at the root of these seemingly enigmatic tumors lies a network of factors related to epigenetic regulation, which is not yet completely understood. While conventional-type chemotherapy may have significant survival benefit for certain patients, it remains to be determined which patients will eventually prove resistant to chemotherapy and thus need novel therapeutic strategies. Elucidation of the molecular consequences of a disturbed epigenome has led to the identification of a series of transduction cascades, which may be targeted for therapy. Among these are the pathways of cyclin D1/cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6, Hedgehog/GLI1, Wnt/ß-catenin, enhancer of zeste homolog 2, and aurora kinase A, among others. Compounds specifically targeting these pathways or agents that alter the epigenetic state of the cell are currently being evaluated in preclinical settings and in experimental clinical trials for AT/RT.

Why Hydroxamates May Not Be the Best Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors--What Some May Have Forgotten or Would Rather Forget?

Hydroxamate-based histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) have been approved as therapeutic agents by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in oncology applications. While the potential utility of such HDACIs in other areas of medicinal chemistry is tremendous, there are significant concerns that "pan-HDAC inhibitors" may be too broadly acting and/or toxic for clinical use beyond oncology. In addition to the isozyme selectivity challenge, the potential mutagenicity of hydroxamate-containing HDAC inhibitors represents a major hindrance in their application to other therapeutic areas. Herein we report on the mutagenicity of known hydroxamates, discuss the mechanisms responsible for their genotoxicity, and review some of the current alternatives to hydroxamates. We conclude that the hydroxamate group, while providing high-potency HDACIs, is not necessarily the best zinc-binding group for HDACI drug discovery.