Efficacy and safety of irinotecan monotherapy as third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer

A multicenter, prospective, observational study of nivolumab readministration for advanced gastric cancer (NIVO RETURNS)

Combination treatment with an anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), and chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric/esophagogastric cancer (AGC). ICI re-administration has been reported to have a clinical benefit for patients with lung cancer or melanoma. However, data on patients with AGC have not yet been collected. We plan to conduct a prospective, multicenter, observational NIVO RETURNS study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab monotherapy re-administration in patients with AGC refractory to initial anti-PD-1 or anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody treatment. Patients who have achieved clinical benefits (complete response, partial response, or stable disease for ≥ 6 months) from prior treatment, including anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, will be included. The primary endpoint will be the objective response rate to nivolumab re-administration. We anticipate that our findings will contribute to the improvement of survival outcomes as later-line treatment for AGC.Clinical trial registration: UMIN000050515, UMIN000051044.

A prospective phase II single-arm study and predictive factor analysis of irinotecan as third-line treatment in patients with metastatic gastric cancer

Background

Currently, there is no recommended standard third-line chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer.

Objectives

In this study, we aimed to evaluate irinotecan's efficacy and safety in treating metastatic gastric cancer after the failure of first- and second-line chemotherapy.

Design

Prospective single-arm, two-center, phase II trial.

Methods

Patients were aged 18-70 years, with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, progressed during or within 3 months following the last administration of second-line chemotherapy and had no other severe hematologic, cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal functional abnormalities or immunodeficiency diseases. Eligible patients received 28-day cycles of irinotecan (180 mg/m2 intravenously, days 1 and 15) and were assessed according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria every two cycles. Patients who discontinued treatment for any reason were followed up every 2 months until death. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and toxicity.

Results

A total of 98 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. In the intention-to-treat population, the median OS was 7.17 months, the median PFS was 3.47 months, and the ORR and DCR were 4.08% and 47.96%, respectively. In the per-protocol population, the median OS was 7.77 months, the median PFS was 3.47 months, and the ORR and DCR were 4.82% and 50.60%, respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities was 19.4%, and none of the patients died owing to adverse events. Cox regression analysis revealed neutropenia and baseline thrombocyte levels were independently correlated with PFS and OS.

Conclusion

Irinotecan monotherapy is an efficient, well-tolerated, and economical third-line treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer as a third-line treatment.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02662959.

Chemotherapy after nivolumab for advanced gastric cancer (REVIVE): a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab therapy is a standard-of-care treatment for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Previous studies have reported improvement in the objective response rate to chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy for other types of cancer. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy in AGC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study in pretreated patients with nivolumab-refractory or -intolerant AGC. Patients received irinotecan, oxaliplatin-containing regimens, or trifluridine/tipiracil. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 199 patients were included (median age: 69 years; male: 70%; female: 30%). Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 7.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7-9.7 months] and 2.9 months (95% CI: 2.2-3.5 months), respectively. Objective response and disease control rates were 16.8% (95% CI: 11.6% to 23.6%) and 18.9% (95% CI: 38.9% to 54.6%), respectively. A prognostic index using alkaline phosphatase and the Glasgow Prognostic Score was generated to classify patients into three risk groups (good, moderate, and poor). The hazard ratios of the moderate and poor groups to the good group were 1.88 (95% CI: 1.22-2.92) and 3.29 (95% CI: 1.92-5.63), respectively. At the initiation of chemotherapy, 42 patients had experienced immune-related adverse events due to prior nivolumab therapy. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (7.5%), anemia (8.0%), and anorexia (7.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy may give rise to a synergistic antitumor effect in AGC. Further investigation is warranted to confirm these findings.

Randomised phase II trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus ramucirumab (RAM) versus trifluridine/tipiracil for previously treated patients with advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (RETRIEVE study, WJOG15822G)

BACKGROUND

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) prolongs survival in the third- or later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC), esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma, and colorectal cancer. While single-arm phase II trials showed promising outcomes of FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab (RAM) as third- or later-line treatments for advanced GC or EGJ cancer, there have been no clinical trials to directly compare FTD/TPI plus RAM with FTD/TPI monotherapy. Therefore, we have started a randomised phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI plus RAM compared with FTD/TPI monotherapy as third- or later-line treatments in patients with advanced GC and EGJ adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

This RETREVE trial (WJOG15822G) is a prospective, open-label, randomised, multicentre phase II trial comparing FTD/TPI plus RAM versus FTD/TPI monotherapy in a third- or later-line setting. Eligibility criteria include age of > 20 years; performance status of 0 or 1; unresectable or recurrent gastric or EGJ adenocarcinoma; confirmed HER2 status; refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, taxane or irinotecan; refractory to RAM (not intolerant); and at least a measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1. FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily, evening of day 1 to morning of day 6 and evening of day 8 to morning of day 13) was administered orally every 4 weeks, and RAM (8 mg/kg) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety. The expected hazard ratio of PFS is set as 0.7, assuming 4-month PFS rate of 27% in FTD/TPI monotherapy and 40% in FTD/TPI plus RAM. The number of subjects was 110, with a one-sided alpha error of 0.10 and power of 0.70.

DISCUSSION

This study will clarify the additional effect of RAM continuation beyond disease progression on FTD/TPI in the third- or later-line setting for patients with advanced GC or EGJ cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCTs041220120.

The Role of Angiogenesis Targeted Therapies in Metastatic Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Review

Since bevacizumab was first approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as an anti-angiogenic therapy in 2004, angiogenesis-targeted therapy has been developed for various types of solid tumors. To date, ramucirumab and apatinib are clinically available as treatments for metastatic advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Ramucirumab demonstrated prolonged survival as second-line therapy of metastatic AGC in the RAINBOW and REGARD trials. However, neither ramucirumab extended survival in treatment-naïve patients with AGC in the RAINFALL or RAINSTORM trials nor bevacizumab in the AVAGAST and AVATAR trials. Apatinib demonstrated superior efficacy over the best supportive care in a Chinese phase III trial but not in an international phase III (ANGEL) trial. Currently, combination therapy of ramucirumab with irinotecan or FTD/TPI is being evaluated in the third-line setting, assessing the efficacy of continuous angiogenesis inhibition from second- to third-line therapy. Recently, the role of angiogenesis inhibition via immunomodulators is attractive to clinicians. Emerging results of several early-phase clinical trials indicated the promising antitumor activity of angiogenesis inhibition in combination with immune therapy. This review offers an overview of the history of clinical trials focused on anti-angiogenic for patients with AGC and presents future perspectives in this area.

Nivolumab versus irinotecan as third- or later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: a multi-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nivolumab (NIVO) and irinotecan (IRI) and to identify clinical factors that facilitate treatment selection.

METHODS

Patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who underwent NIVO or IRI treatment between November 2016 and June 2018 at three institutions were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma pretreated with fluoropyrimidines and taxanes, no previous NIVO or IRI treatment, and adequate organ function. Main outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Interaction between treatment groups and clinical factors regarding OS were tested using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for relevant variables.

RESULTS

Both NIVO (n = 71) and IRI (n = 61) groups had similar baseline characteristics, except for sex distribution. NIVO and IRI groups had ORR of 20% and 6%, median PFS of 1.6 and 1.8 months, and median OS of 6.4 and 6.4 months, respectively. Interaction analysis did not reveal any significant interaction between NIVO and IRI related to OS for various factors. NIVO group tended to have fewer ≥ grade 3 adverse events than IRI group, especially neutropenia (3% vs. 28%) and febrile neutropenia (1% vs. 8%). In the NIVO group, one patient developed pneumonitis, and four patients developed skin reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no remarkable differences in efficacy were found between IRI and NIVO for AGC, NIVO had a better safety profile compared to IRI. We found no clinical markers that can assist treatment decisions.

Irinotecan and its metabolite SN38 inhibits procollagen I production of dermal fibroblasts from Systemic Sclerosis patients

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune connective tissue disease characterized by a microangiopathy and fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. No treatment has been proved to be efficient in case of early or advanced SSc to prevent or reduce fibrosis. There are strong arguments for a key role of topo-I in the pathogenesis of diffuse SSc. Irinotecan, a semisynthetic derivative of Camptothecin, specifically target topo-I. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of noncytotoxic doses of irinotecan or its active metabolite SN38 on collagen production in SSc fibroblasts. Dermal fibroblasts from 4 patients with SSc and 2 healthy donors were cultured in the presence or absence of irinotecan or SN38. Procollagen I release was determined by ELISA and expression of a panel of genes involved in fibrosis was evaluated by qRT-PCR. Subcytotoxic doses of irinotecan and SN38 caused a significant and dose-dependent decrease of the procollagen I production in dermal fibroblasts from SSc patients, respectively − 48 ± 3%, p < 0.0001 and − 37 ± 6.2%, p = 0.0097. Both irinotecan and SN38 led to a global downregulation of genes involved in fibrosis such as COL1A1, COL1A2, MMP1 and ACTA2 in dermal fibroblasts from SSc patients (respectively − 27; − 20.5; − 30.2 and − 30% for irinotecan and − 61; − 55; − 50 and − 54% for SN38). SN38 increased significantly CCL2 mRNA level (+ 163%). The inhibitory effect of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN38 on collagen production by SSc fibroblasts, which occurs through regulating the levels of expression of genes mRNA, suggests that topoisomerase I inhibitors may be effective in limiting fibrosis in such patients.

Self-targeted polymersomal co-formulation of doxorubicin, camptothecin and FOXM1 aptamer for efficient treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

In spite of huge developments in cancer treatment, versatile combinational formulations of different chemotherapeutic agents to enhance anticancer activity while reducing systemic toxicity still remains a challenge. In this regard, in the current study, an amphiphilic hyaluronic acid-b-polycaprolactone diblock copolymer was synthesized using "click chemistry". The synthesized copolymer was self-assembled to form polymersomal structures for co-encapsulation of hydrophilic doxorubicin (DOX) and hydrophobic camptothecin (CPT) in their interior aqueous compartment and their bilayer, respectively with 1:10 and 1:1 ratios. The prepared polymersomal combinational formulation surrounded by hyaluronic acid brush as hydrophilic segment, could provide active targeting of the system against CD44 marker expressed on the surface of cancerous cells. The hyaluronic acid shell could also provide flexible chemistry for the conjugation of therapeutic FOXM1-specific DNA aptamer (Forkhead Box M1; against transcription factor FOXM1) on the surface of polymersomes in order to further suppress cancerous cell proliferation. The obtained results demonstrated that the prepared co-formulation provided sustained, controlled release of the entrapped drugs during 200 h. In vitro cytotoxicity experiments on non-small cell lung cancer, A549 and SK-MES-1 cell lines, demonstrated that the co-formulation of DOX and CPT provided synergistic effect and significantly higher cytotoxicity in comparison with free drugs. The cytotoxicity experiment also indicated that the aptamer conjugation on the co-formulations surface could significantly increase the cytotoxicity and induce apoptosis in combination therapy on both A549 and SK-MES-1 cell lines while aptamer-conjugated blank NPs did not show any cytotoxicity which emphasizes on the sensitization capability of the FOXM1 DNA aptamer against non-small cell lung cancer. Furthermore, it was shown that the co-formulation with or without aptamer renders the formulation specific tumor accumulation in vivo 24 h post-administration, assisting the combination synergy observed in vitro to be translated to in vivo antitumor efficacy. This combinatorial delivery platform strongly offers a novel approach for the synergistic controlled transportation of several chemotherapeutics for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

REVIVE study: a prospective observational study in chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy for advanced gastric cancer

Nivolumab is an increasingly used standard care treatment for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer, with increasing clinical use in Japan. Data from retrospective studies on various tumors have shown the objective response rate to cytotoxic chemotherapy potentially improves after an exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Based on these data, we conducted the multicenter observational REVIVE study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cytotoxic chemotherapy in nivolumab-refractory or nivolumab-intolerant patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients who are refractory or intolerant to nivolumab and scheduled to receive irinotecan monotherapy, oxaliplatin combination treatment or oral trifluridine/tipiracil hydrochloride therapy will be included. The primary end point is overall survival of nivolumab-pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer after the cytotoxic chemotherapy. Clinical trial registration: UMIN000032182 (umin.ac.jp).

Efficacy of Irinotecan as Third-line Chemotherapy for Unresectable or Recurrent Gastric Cancer

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of third-line chemotherapy (CTx) for patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer (GC) refractory to S-1 with or without platinum and taxanes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological and survival data of 26 patients who underwent third-line CTx.

RESULTS

Irinotecan therapy (odds ratio=0.12, 95% confidence interval=0.02-0.38; p<0.01) and ≥2 cycles of third-line CTx (odds ratio=0.01, 95% confidence intervaI=0.01-0.11; p<0.01) were independent predictors of longer progression-free survival in multivariate Cox regression analysis. In 18 patients (69%) receiving irinotecan, the overall response rate was 11%, and the disease control rate was 44%. Median progression-free and overall survival were 3.5 and 11.3 months, respectively. Ten patients (56%) had grade 3-4 toxicities, which were managed.

CONCLUSION

Irinotecan therapy may become optimal and tolerated in the third-line setting to prolong progression-free survival by increasing the number of treatment cycles.

Impact of single-heterozygous UGT1A1 on the clinical outcomes of irinotecan monotherapy after fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based combination therapy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether the UGT1A1 status, single heterozygous (SH) or wild type (WT), is associated with the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We investigated the association between clinical outcomes (efficacy and safety) and UGT1A1 status in patients who received irinotecan monotherapy.

METHODS

We evaluated AGC patients who received irinotecan monotherapy between January 2011 and December 2017. Efficacy was assessed according to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Toxicity was graded using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0).

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were evaluated (62 and 38 patients with UGT1A1 WT and SH, respectively). In the WT and SH groups, the irinotecan dose was reduced in 19 (30.6%) and 18 (47.2%) patients (p = 0.135), respectively; treatment was delayed due to adverse events (AEs) in 19 (30.6%) and 13 (34.2%) patients (p = 0.826), respectively; the median PFS was 3.15 and 3.25 months (HR, 0.734; 95% CI 0.465-1.158; p = 0.184), respectively; and the median OS was 10.4 and 7.26 months (HR, 1.137; 95% CI 0.752-1.721; p = 0.543), respectively. Severe hematological AEs (Grade ≥ 3) were significantly more frequent in the SH group than in the WT group (63% vs. 36%; p = 0.008), while severe non-hematological AEs was not significantly different (16.0% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.173).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the efficacy of irinotecan monotherapy between UGT1A1 WT and UGT1A1 SH, but UGT1A1 SH was associated with a high frequency of severe hematological toxicity.

Clinical and molecular factors for selection of nivolumab or irinotecan as third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The use of nivolumab or irinotecan as the third-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains controversial.

METHODS

This study analyzed patients with AGC treated with nivolumab or irinotecan (nivolumab group or irinotecan group, respectively) from May 2016 to April 2019 following two or more previous lines of chemotherapy. Univariate survival analysis was conducted to identify the clinical and molecular factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients (74 treated with nivolumab and 82 treated with irinotecan) were analyzed. The median PFS was 1.9 months in both treatment groups. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.2 and 6.2 months in the nivolumab and irinotecan groups, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or more, liver metastasis, a large tumor size at baseline, and HER2-positive status were associated with a worse PFS in the nivolumab group compared with the irinotecan group. The nivolumab group showed a significantly longer PFS (median 3.1 versus 2.0 months) and OS (median 12.9 versus 7.8 months) than the irinotecan group in patients with 0 or 1 of these factors, whereas the irinotecan group showed a significantly longer PFS (median 1.0 versus 1.8 months) and a trend of longer OS (median 3.9 versus 6.1 months) in patients with ⩾2 of these factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Some clinical and molecular factors were associated with outcomes following nivolumab or irinotecan as the third- or later-line treatment in patients with AGC. These factors must be considered while selecting an optimal treatment option.

Markedly increased ocular side effect causing severe vision deterioration after chemotherapy using new or investigational epidermal or fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors

Background

We sought to describe corneal epithelial changes after using epidermal (EGFR) or fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors as chemotherapy and to clarify incidence and prognosis.

Materials

Retrospective chart review.

Results

Among 6871 patients and 17 EGFR or FGFR inhibitors, 1161 patients (16.9%) referred for ophthalmologic examination. In total, 1145 patients had disease-related or unrelated ocular complications. Among 16 patients with treatment-related ocular complications, three patients had treatment-related radiation retinopathy and one patient showed treatment-related corneal ulcer. Finally the authors identified that, in 12 patients, three EGFR inhibitors and two FGFR inhibitors caused corneal epithelial lesions. Vandetanib, Osimertinib, and ABT-414 caused vortex keratopathy in nine patients, while ASP-5878 and FPA-144 caused epithelial changes resembling corneal dysmaturation in three patients. The mean interval until symptoms appeared was 246 days with vandetanib, 196 days with osimertinib, 30 days with ABT-414, 55 days with ASP-5878, and 70 days with FPA-144. The mean of the lowest logarithm of minimal angle of resolution visual acuity results of the right and left eyes after chemotherapy were 0.338 and 0.413. The incidence rates of epithelial changes were 15.79% with vandetanib, 0.5% with osimertinib, 100% with ABT-414, 50.0% with ASP-5878, and 18.2% with FPA-144. After excluding deceased patients and those who were lost to follow-up or still undergoing treatment, we confirmed the reversibility of corneal lesions after the discontinuation of each agent. Seven patients showed full recovery of their vision and corneal epithelium, while three achieved a partial level of recovery. Although patients diagnosed with glioblastoma used prophylactic topical steroids before and during ABT-414 therapy, all developed vortex keratopathy.

Conclusions

EGFR and FGFR inhibitors are chemotherapy agents that could make corneal epithelial changes. Contrary to the low probability of ocular complication with old EGFR drugs, recently introduced EGFR and FGFR agents showed a high incidence of ocular complication with severe vision distortion. Doctors should forewarn patients planning chemotherapy with these agents that decreased visual acuity could develop due to corneal epithelial changes and also reassure them that the condition could be improved after the end of treatment without the use of steroid eye drops.

Trial registration

This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of Samsung Medical Center (IRB no. 2019–04-027) and was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

What is the value of third-line chemotherapy in advanced gastroesophageal cancer? A 5-year retrospective analysis at a single center

AIM

The survival benefit of using a non-cross resistant second-line chemotherapy in the third-line setting in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer is unproven. We evaluated the utility of third-line chemotherapy in patients treated at a single institution.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2014, efficacy and toxicity data of patients who received three or more lines of systemic therapies for metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma at the National Cancer Centre Singapore was retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (6%) patients received three or more lines of chemotherapy. The median age and ECOG performance status were 59 years (36-82) and 1 (0-2), respectively. Majority of patients (88%) had tumor located in the stomach and 13 patients (41%) had diffuse histology or poorly cohesive or signet ring cells. Four (12%) patients had HER2-positive disease. Prior therapy was platinum (100%), fluoropyrimidine (97%), taxane (63%), irinotecan (28%), anthracycline (13%) and ramucirumab (3%). Third-line therapy consisted of 24 (75%) monotherapy, 6 (19%) doublet, 1 (3%) triplet chemotherapy and 1 (3%) clinical trial. Monotherapy irinotecan (44%) was most common, followed by docetaxel (19%) and paclitaxel (9%). Of 22 patients evaluable for response, there was 1 (5%) partial response, 9 (41%) stable disease. Median overall survival was 18.3 weeks (4.3-65.1). Of 30 patients evaluable for toxicities, 17 (57%) experienced at least one grade 3 or 4 toxicities.

CONCLUSION

The benefit of using non-cross resistant second-line regimens as third-line chemotherapy was small with moderate toxicity. Newer agents such as nivolumab or TAS-102 or clinical trial may be preferred.

Delivery rate of patients with advanced gastric cancer to third-line chemotherapy and those patients' characteristics: an analysis in real-world setting

Background

Nivolumab has recently become available for third-line chemotherapy of advanced gastric cancer in Japan. The drug is expected to provide long-term survival in some patients. However, not all patients receive third-line therapy. In this study, we investigated the frequency of prescribing and the predictive factors for prescribing of third-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 271 patients with unresected advanced gastric cancer who had started chemotherapy between January 2006 and June 2017 at Kurashiki Central Hospital. Patients' median age was 68 years, and 190 patients were male. We compared baseline characteristics of patients who did or did not receive third-line chemotherapy and, through multivariate logistic-regression analysis, identified potential predictive factors for receiving third-line chemotherapy.

Results

Among the 271 patients, 71 (26.2%) received third-line chemotherapy. In the univariate analysis, the rate of receiving this care was significantly related to patients' performance status, cancer histology, and several laboratory variables at baseline. Multivariate analysis revealed that performance status 0 and serum C-reactive protein levels ≤0.6 mg/dL were independent and significant predictive factors for administration of the third-line chemotherapy; adjusted odds ratios of the two factors were 4.17 (95% confidence interval, 2.13-8.15) and 2.46 (1.19-5.08), respectively.

Conclusions

In this real-world study, only 26.2% of patients received third-line chemotherapy. Poor performance status and high serum C-reactive protein value at the start of first-line chemotherapy were significantly associated with lower frequency of administration of third-line chemotherapy.

Novel Agents in Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Gastric Cancer: More Shadows Than Lights

Metastatic gastric cancer is still a disease with a poor prognosis. Recently, different novel agents (e.g., apatinib, nivolumab, TAS-102) have demonstrated a survival advantage compared with placebo for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer. Although the possible availability of active agents may be a desirable option in a very poor therapeutic scenario, clinical data from the recent studies with these drugs raise yet controversial issues. The purpose of this review is to briefly summarize the results of these novel drugs focusing on the limitations that bring some shadows on their positive therapeutic results.

Association between UGT1A1 gene polymorphism and safety and efficacy of irinotecan monotherapy as the third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

While uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 is a key enzyme in the metabolism of irinotecan, relationship between UGT1A1 genotype and safety and efficacy of irinotecan monotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer is not clarified.

METHODS

Efficacy and safety in advanced gastric cancer patients, who were tested for UGT1A1*6 and *28 genotype and treated with irinotecan monotherapy as third-line treatment from 2009 to 2014, were evaluated according to the UGT1A1*6 and *28 genotypes.

RESULTS

Among 74 patients of the subjects, the genotypes of UGT1A1 were wild-type (WT) in 37 patients (50%), single heterozygosity (SH) in 27 (36.5%) and double heterozygosity or homozygosity (Homo/DH) in 10 (13.5%). The initial dose of irinotecan was reduced in 10 patients (27%) with WT, in 9 (33%) with SH, and in 7 (70%) with Homo/DH. Median overall survival was 6.9 months, 6.3 months, and 2.8 months in the WT, SH and Homo/DH genotypes, associated with median time to treatment failure of 2.4 months, 2.3 months, and 1.3 months, respectively. Among 36 patients with measurable lesion, disease control rates were 47.6%, 41.7% and 33.3% in the WT, SH and Homo/DH genotypes. Grade 3 or higher adverse events of special interest were neutropenia (13%, 22%, and 64% for the WT, SH and Homo/DH genotypes), febrile neutropenia (2%, 7%, and 50%) and diarrhea (6%, 5%, and 21%).

CONCLUSIONS

The UGT1A1 polymorphism may be related to the clinical outcomes of irinotecan monotherapy as the third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer.

Hyperprogressive disease during nivolumab or irinotecan treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Background

Nivolumab showed a survival benefit for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, an acceleration of tumour growth during immunotherapy, (hyperprogressive disease, HPD) has been reported in various cancers. This study reviewed the HPD in patients with AGC treated with nivolumab or irinotecan.

Methods

The subjects of this retrospective study were patients with AGC with measurable lesions, and their tumour growth rates (TGR) during nivolumab or irinotecan were compared with those during prior therapy. HPD was defined as an increase in TGR more than twofold.

Results

34 and 66 patients received nivolumab and irinotecan in third or later line between June 2009 and September 2018 at our hospital; 22 patients receiving nivolumab had prior treatment with irinotecan, and one patient received irinotecan after nivolumab. Nivolumab and irinotecan showed no differences in disease control rates (38.2% and 34.8%) and in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.6, p=0.802). The incidence of HPD was slightly higher after nivolumab (29.4%) than after irinotecan (13.5%) (p=0.0656), showing no differences in background between the patients with and without HPD. Compared between HPD and PD other than HPD after nivolumab, the HRs for PFS and overall survival (OS) were 1.1 (95% CI 0.5 to 2.7; p=0.756), and 2.1 (95% CI 0.7 to 5.8; p=0.168), but such clear difference in OS was not observed after irinotecan.

Conclusions

HPD was observed more frequently after nivolumab compared with irinotecan, which was associated with a poor prognosis after nivolumab but not so clearly after irinotecan.

Salvage chemotherapy with the combination of oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidines, platinum, taxanes, and irinotecan

BACKGROUND

Although nivolumab showed survival benefit in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) progressing after standard chemotherapy, there is a lack of data regarding oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in this clinical setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin with l-leucovorin and bolus/continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil as salvage treatment in patients with AGC refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidines, cisplatin, taxanes, and irinotecan.

RESULTS

Overall, 50 patients treated between December 2009 and December 2013 were included in this analysis. The overall response rate (ORR) was 21.2% among 33 patients with measurable disease. The median time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were 2.4 and 4.2 months. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with OS included poor performance status [hazard ratio (HR) 3.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.55-6.60], shorter time from the start of first-line therapy (HR 2.20; 95% CI 1.18-4.12), and higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio value (HR 4.87; 95% CI 2.32-10.25). In patients (n = 35) with at most one risk factor, the ORR, median TTF, and OS were 26.1%, 3.6, and 6.7 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (30%), anemia (22%), febrile neutropenia (8%), and peripheral neuropathy (8%). Initial and subsequent dose reduction was performed in 18 (36%) and 23 (46%) patients. There was one treatment-related death caused by septic infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage chemotherapy with the combination of oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil has a potential activity and is tolerable for heavily treated AGC with appropriate dose modification and patient selection.

The role of third-line chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer: A cohort study with propensity score matching analysis

In recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer, second-line chemotherapy is generally recommended in current guidelines. Although third-line therapy is often performed in daily practice in some countries, there are only a few reports about its benefits.A retrospective review was conducted on 682 patients who underwent at least first-line chemotherapy for recurrent (n = 297) or primary metastatic (n = 385) disease. Clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to lines of chemotherapy.One hundred sixty-seven patients (24.5%) underwent third- or further-line therapy. Third- or further-line therapy was frequently performed in patients with young age (<70) (P < .0001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 or 1 (P < .0001), surgical resection before first-line therapy (P = .007), and first-line combination regimen (P = .001). The median OS for all patients after the initiation of first-line therapy was 10 months. The median OS of patients who received third- or further-line therapy was significantly longer than that of patients who received second- or lesser-line therapy (18 vs 8 months, P < .0001). The multivariate analysis revealed that third- or further-line therapy was independently associated with favorable OS (hazard ratio = 0.58, P < .0001). Moreover, patients who received third- or further-line therapy demonstrated better OS both in univariate (P = .002) and multivariate (P < .0001) analysis even after propensity score matching using baseline characteristics. The median OS after the start of third-line chemotherapy was 6 months. In addition, ECOG PS 0 or 1 at the initiation of third-line therapy (P < .0001) and surgical resection (P = .009) were independently associated with longer OS after third-line therapy.The current study suggests that third-line therapy could be recommended for recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer patients with good PS after progression from second-line chemotherapy in clinical practice.

Human non‑small cell lung cancer cells can be sensitized to camptothecin by modulating autophagy

Lung cancer is a prevalent disease and is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Despite the development of various anticancer drugs, the prognosis of lung cancer is relatively poor. Metastasis of lung cancer, as well as chemoresistance, is associated with a high mortality rate for patients with lung cancer. Camptothecin (CPT) is a well-known anticancer drug, which causes cancer cell apoptosis via the induction of DNA damage; however, the cytotoxicity of CPT easily reaches a plateau at a relatively high dose in lung cancer cells, thus limiting its efficacy. The present study demonstrated that CPT may induce autophagy in two human non‑small cell lung cancer cell lines, H1299 and H460. In addition, the results of a viability assay and Annexin V staining revealed that CPT-induced autophagy could protect lung cancer cells from programmed cell death. Conversely, the cytotoxicity of CPT was increased when autophagy was blocked by 3-methyladenine treatment. Furthermore, inhibition of autophagy enhanced the levels of CPT-induced DNA damage in the lung cancer cell lines. Accordingly, these findings suggested that autophagy exerts a protective role in CPT-treated lung cancer cells, and the combination of CPT with a specific inhibitor of autophagy may be considered a promising strategy for the future treatment of lung cancer.

Irinotecan monotherapy as third-line or later treatment in advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) are often treated with irinotecan monotherapy as salvage-line therapy. However, the survival benefit of this therapy remains to be elucidated.

METHODS

Medical records of AGC patients who were treated with irinotecan monotherapy as salvage-line treatment in six institutions from 2007 to 2014 were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients had prior fluoropyrimidine and taxane therapies, and 75.3% had prior platinum therapy. The median age was 66 (range 27-81) years, and 102 males (69.9%) were included. Performance status (PS) was 0/1/2/3 in 53/70/19/4 patients. Eighty-nine patients (61.0%) had two or more metastatic sites. Irinotecan monotherapy as 3rd-/4th-line therapy was performed in 135/11 (92.5%/7.5%). The median number of administrations was 4 (range 1-62). Forty-six patients (31.5%) required initial dose reduction at the physician's discretion. The overall response rate was 6.8%, and the disease control rate was 43.1%. The median PFS was 3.19 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.30-4.08 months], and the median OS was 6.61 months (95% CI 5.94-7.28 months). Grade 3/4 adverse events were hematological toxicity (46 patients, 31.5%) and non-hematological toxicity (50 patients, 34.2%). Hospitalization due to adverse events was required in 31 patients (21.2%). Patients with relative dose intensity (RDI) less than 80% showed similar survival to those with RDI 80% or higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Irinotecan monotherapy was relatively safely performed as salvage-line treatment for AGC in Japanese clinical practice. Careful patient selection and intensive modification of the dose of irinotecan might possibly be associated with favorable survival.

Outcomes of Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with at Least Three Lines of Systemic Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Second-line therapy has consistently demonstrated survival benefit if compared with best supportive care; however, there is limited evidence whether further lines of treatment may improve the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Starting from a real-world cohort of 868 AGC patients, we retrospectively analyzed baseline parameters, tumor characteristics, and treatment data of those treated with at least three lines. Categorical features were described through cross-tables and chi-square test. We explored the impact of treatment intensity and progression-free survival (PFS) experienced in previous lines on PFS and overall survival in third-line by uni- and multivariate Cox regression models and described by Kaplan-Meier estimator plot with log-rank test.

RESULTS

Overall, 300 patients were included in the analysis. The most common site of primary tumor was gastric body; 45.3% of cancers had an intestinal histotype, 14% were human epidermal growth receptor 2 positive. In third-line, 45.7% of patients received a single-agent chemotherapy, 49.7% a combination regimen. Patients who had experienced a first-line PFS ≥6.9 months had a better prognosis compared with those who had achieved a shorter one. Consistently, a second-line PFS ≥3.5 months positively influenced the prognosis. Patients receiving a third-line combination regimen had better outcomes compared with those treated with a single-agent chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our real-world study confirms that selected AGC patients may receive third-line treatment. Longer PFS in previous lines or a more intense third-line treatment positively influenced prognosis. Further efforts are warranted to define the best therapeutic sequences, and to identify the optimal candidate for treatment beyond second-line.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The benefit of third-line treatment to advanced gastric cancer patients is controversial. This study depicts a real scenario of the clinical practice in Italy, confirming that a non-negligible proportion of patients receive a third-line therapy. Longer progression-free survival in previous treatment lines or higher third-line treatment intensity positively influenced prognosis. Including a large number of real-world patients, this study provides information on third-line treatment from the daily clinical practice; moreover, its results help in defining the best therapeutic sequence and offer some hints to select the optimal candidate for treatment beyond second-line.

Third-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGOUND

Little information regarding to the survival advantage of third-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients is available. The current study is designed to systematically review and perform meta-analysis on the effect of third-line chemotherapy on progressive or recurrent gastric cancer treatment.

METHODS

After thorough searching of online databases, total 20 articles were included into qualitative systematic review and 6 of them were used to conduct qualitative meta-analysis.

RESULTS

It was found that the third-line chemotherapy was superior to placebo or best supportive care in terms of prolonging median oval survival (OS) length and progress free survival (PFS) length (Hedges's g for OS = -0.315 ± 0.077, P < .001; and for PFS = -0.382 ± 0.098, P < .001). In addition, the third-line chemotherapy was favored (Hedges's g = 0.848, P < .001) in terms of overall survival rate (Hazard ratio = 0.679, 95% confidence interval: 0.565-0.816, P < .001) or tumor free survival rate (Hazard ratio = 0.561, 95% confidence interval: 0.444-0.709, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The third-line chemotherapy is superior to the best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer patients who had been pretreated with first-line and second-line chemotherapy.