Phase I study of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Research progress of co-delivery nanoparticle drug delivery systems in non-small cell lung cancer: A review

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as the most commonly diagnosed type of lung cancer, has long been a major focus for cancer drug researchers. Traditional chemotherapy has shown significant efficacy in patients initially diagnosed with NSCLC; however, with the emergence of drug resistance and notable toxic side effects, conventional and single-agent chemotherapy can no longer meet the treatment needs of patients. Nanomedicine systems have gained widespread attention among scholars due to their unique advantages, such as particle size, stable in vivo circulation, and multifunctional carrier materials. However, most single-drug delivery systems fail to meet the treatment expectations for NSCLC patients, prompting the active development of co-delivery nanomedicine systems in preclinical NSCLC research. These systems can utilize surface-modified carriers to co-deliver drugs, genes, photosensitizers, or sonosensitizers with different mechanisms of action. This approach not only achieves the synergistic effects of multiple drugs, multiple pathways, and the combination of chemotherapy with photodynamic/sonodynamic therapy but also, through the encapsulation of inorganic materials, allows for more controllable drug release under external forces such as magnetic fields. This further amplifies the synergistic effects between the drugs, and the results of these studies are significantly superior to those of single-drug treatments. In conclusion, this review summarizes the delivery strategies and the extended use of inorganic materials in the co-delivery of nanoparticles for NSCLC research in recent years, with the hope of providing reference for researchers' drug design strategies.

Application of nano-radiosensitizers in non-small cell lung cancer

Radiotherapy stands as a cornerstone in the treatment of numerous malignant tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer. However, the critical challenge of amplifying the tumoricidal effectiveness of radiotherapy while minimizing collateral damage to healthy tissues remains an area of significant research interest. Radiosensitizers, by methods such as amplifying DNA damage and fostering the creation of free radicals, play a pivotal role in enhancing the destructive impact of radiotherapy on tumors. Over recent decades, nano-dimensional radiosensitizers have emerged as a notable advancement. Their mechanisms include cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase, combating tumor hypoxia, and others, thereby enhancing the efficacy of radiotherapy. This review delves into the evolving landscape of nanomaterials used for radiosensitization in non-small cell lung cancer. It provides insights into the current research progress and critically examines the challenges and future prospects within this burgeoning field.

Image Guidance Volume-Modulated Arc Radiation Therapy Concurrently With Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Cisplatin for Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Single-Arm Dose Escalation Trial

PURPOSE

Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab) paclitaxel has improved uptake by tumor cells in comparison to paclitaxel. The aim of this study was to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin with concurrent image guidance volume modulated arc therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This single-arm phase 1 trial followed the standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design. Patients with histologically proven stage IB2-IVA LACC were eligible. Image guidance volume modulated arc therapy included 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to the pelvis and 59.4 Gy simultaneous boost in 28 fractions to involved pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, and subsequent high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy at a total dose of 30.0 Gy in 5 fractions, twice a week. Concurrent chemotherapy regimen included weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m²) and weekly nab-paclitaxel at escalating doses (10, 20, 33, 50, and 70 mg/m² per week). Duration of the planned treatment was 8 weeks. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity and grade 3 or above nonhematologic toxicity were considered as DLT. MTD was defined as the highest dose with ≤33% DLT.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients were enrolled from September 2019 to August 2021. The most common adverse events were grade 1 to 3 leukopenia, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting. A total of 4 patients (18.0%) experienced DLT: grade 3 hypokalemia at 33 mg/m² (1 of 6 subjects), grade 3 deep vein thrombosis at 50 mg/m² (1 of 6) and 70 mg/m² (1 of 4), and grade 3 perineum edema at 70 mg/m² (1 of 3). The estimated MTD was 50 mg/m². Complete response was observed in 20 patients (90.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing concurrent IG-VAMT with nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin for LACC, MTD of nab-paclitaxel was 50 mg/m². Complete response rate was 90.9%.

Advances of Nanomedicine in Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy (RT) remains one of the current main treatment strategies for many types of cancer. However, how to improve RT efficiency while reducing its side effects is still a large challenge to be overcome. Advancements in nanomedicine have provided many effective approaches for radiosensitization. Metal nanoparticles (NPs) such as platinum-based or hafnium-based NPs are proved to be ideal radiosensitizers because of their unique physicochemical properties and high X-ray absorption efficiency. With nanoparticles, such as liposomes, bovine serum albumin, and polymers, the radiosensitizing drugs can be promoted to reach the tumor sites, thereby enhancing anti-tumor responses. Nowadays, the combination of some NPs and RT have been applied to clinical treatment for many types of cancer, including breast cancer. Here, as well as reviewing recent studies on radiotherapy combined with inorganic, organic, and biomimetic nanomaterials for oncology, we analyzed the underlying mechanisms of NPs radiosensitization, which may contribute to exploring new directions for the clinical translation of nanoparticle-based radiosensitizers.

A Phase I/II Study of Biweekly Carboplatin and Nab-paclitaxel With Concurrent Radiotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Unresectable Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cell cancer (LA-NSCLC). We conducted a phase I/II study of biweekly carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) with radiotherapy (RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the phase I part, patients with inoperable stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC were treated with carboplatin (area under the time-concentration curve, 4) and nab-PTX (60-100 mg/m²) on days 1, 15, and 29. Thoracic RT was administered from day 1 to a total dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. In the phase II part, patients were administered carboplatin and nab-PTX on days 1, 15, and 29 at the recommended dose (RD). The primary endpoint of the phase I part was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the RD. In the phase II part, the primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival (OS) rate, and secondary endpoints were the objective response rate, progression-free survival, OS, and safety profile.

RESULTS

In the phase I part, although maximum tolerated dose was not obtained, the RD was carboplatin (area under the time-concentration curve, 4) and nab-PTX (100 mg/m²). Of the evaluable 28 patients, the rate of 2-year OS was 67.8% (95% confidence interval, 49.3%-82.1%). The objective response rate was 96.4%, and the median follow-up time was 33.2 months. The median progression-free survival was 18.2 months (95% confidence interval, 13.1 months to not reached). The most common toxicities of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (60.5%), anemia (14.2%), thrombocytopenia (7.2%), and pneumonitis (3.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study achieved the primary endpoint. Biweekly carboplatin and nab-PTX with concurrent RT was well-tolerated and exerted promising antitumor activity.

Phase I/II Study of Cisplatin plus Nab-Paclitaxel with Concurrent Thoracic Radiotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

LESSONS LEARNED

The combination of cisplatin plus nab-paclitaxel with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer is a promising therapeutic strategy. Further investigation is warranted.

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase I/II trial of cisplatin plus nab-paclitaxel with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the recommended dose (RD) of nab-paclitaxel and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this regimen.

METHODS

In the phase I study, escalating doses of weekly nab-paclitaxel were administered together with cisplatin at 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks and concurrent radiotherapy. In the phase II study, nab-paclitaxel was administered at the RD.

RESULTS

In the phase I study, whereas no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed with nab-paclitaxel at 50 or 60 mg/m² , one of six patients experienced DLT (esophagitis of grade 3) at 70 mg/m² , determined as the RD. Twenty-four patients at RD were evaluable for safety and efficacy in phase II. Common toxicities included esophagitis (87.5%) and leukopenia (79.2%). Pneumonitis and treatment-related deaths were not observed, but 20 patients (83.3%) experienced radiation pneumonitis, with one case of grade 3 and four of grade 2, after completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 73.9% and 56.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.3%-74.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemoradiation with nab-paclitaxel at 70 mg/m² and cisplatin at 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks showed encouraging feasibility and activity for locally advanced NSCLC.

Nanotechnology in Radiation Oncology

Nanotechnology has made remarkable contributions to clinical oncology. Nanotherapeutics and diagnostic tools have distinctive characteristics which allow them superior abilities to deliver therapeutics and imaging agents for radiation oncology. Compared to solid biopsies and imaging, the analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) offers a more rapid, real-time, and less invasive method to monitor the dynamic molecular profiles of tumors. The potential of CTCs to be translated as a novel cancer biomarker has been demonstrated in numerous clinical studies. This review will discuss clinical applications of nanomaterials in radiation oncology and the implication of CTCs in cancer detection and monitoring.

Local Cancer Recurrence: The Realities, Challenges, and Opportunities for New Therapies

Locoregional recurrence negatively impacts both long-term survival and quality of life for several malignancies. For appropriate-risk patients with an isolated, resectable, local recurrence, surgery represents the only potentially curative therapy. However, oncologic outcomes remain inferior for patients with locally recurrent disease even after macroscopically complete resection. Unfortunately, these operations are often extensive, with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. This review highlights selected malignancies (mesothelioma, sarcoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, rectal cancer, and peritoneal surface malignancies) in which surgical resection is a key treatment modality and local recurrence plays a significant role in overall oncologic outcome with regard to survival and quality of life. For each type of cancer, the current, state-of-the-art treatment strategies and their outcomes are assessed. The need for additional therapeutic options is presented given the limitations of the current standard therapies. New and emerging treatment modalities, including polymer films and nanoparticles, are highlighted as potential future solutions for both prevention and treatment of locally recurrent cancers. Finally, the authors identify additional clinical and research opportunities and propose future research strategies based on the various patterns of local recurrence among the different cancers.

MicroRNA-215 suppresses the proliferation, migration and invasion of non-small cell lung carcinoma cells through the downregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-16 expression

The present study investigated the expression of microRNA (miR)-215 in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) at tissue and cellular levels, as well as its biological functions and mechanism of action. A total of 56 patients with NSCLC were included in the present study. NSCLC tissues and tumor-adjacent normal tissues were resected and collected. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to measure the expression of miR-215. Following transfection with miR-215 mimics, A549 cell proliferation, migration and invasion were determined using a Cell Counting Kit-8 and Transwell assay. Western blotting was employed to measure the expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-16 protein. A dual-luciferase reporter assay was conducted to determine the existence of a direct interaction between miR-215 and the MMP-16 gene. Reduced expression of miR-215 in NSCLC was closely associated with lymphatic metastasis and TNM staging. Overexpression of miR-215 inhibited the proliferation of A549 cells in vitro. Upregulated expression of miR-215 inhibited the migration and invasion of A549 cells in vitro. miR-215 exerted its biological functions possibly by regulating the expression of MMP-16. Elevated expression of MMP-16 promoted the proliferation, migration and invasion of A549 cells. miR-215 regulated the proliferation, migration and invasion of A549 cells by binding with the seed 3′-untranslated region of MMP-16 mRNA. The present study demonstrates that reduced expression of miR-215 in NSCLC is negatively associated with lymphatic metastasis and TNM staging. In addition, miR-215 acts as a tumor suppressor gene by inhibiting the proliferation, migration and invasion of NSCLC cells via the downregulation of MMP-16 expression.

A phase I dose escalation trial of nab-paclitaxel and fixed dose radiation in patients with unresectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer typically have poor outcomes, with a median survival of approximately 16 months. Novel methods to improve outcomes are needed. Nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) has shown efficacy in pancreatic cancer and is FDA-approved for metastatic disease in combination with gemcitabine. Nab-paclitaxel is also a promising radiosensitizer based on laboratory studies, but it has never been clinically tested with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

We performed a phase 1 study using a 3 + 3 dose escalation strategy to determine the safety and tolerability of dose-escalated nab-paclitaxel with fractionated radiotherapy for patients with unresectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Following induction chemotherapy with two cycles of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, patients were treated with weekly nab-paclitaxel and daily radiotherapy to a dose of 52.5 Gy in 25 fractions. Final dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) determination was performed at day 65 after the start of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Nine patients received nab-paclitaxel at a dose level of either 100 mg/m² (n = 3) or 125 mg/m² (n = 6). There were no observed grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicities. One DLT (grade 3 neuropathy) was observed in a patient who received 125 mg/m² of nab-paclitaxel. Other grade 3 toxicities included fatigue (11%), anemia (11%) and neutropenia (11%). No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Following chemoradiotherapy, four patients (borderline resectable, n = 2 and unresectable, n = 2) underwent surgical resection, all with negative margins and with significant treatment effect with limited tumor viability.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of fractionated radiation and weekly full dose nab-paclitaxel was safe and well-tolerated.

Nab-paclitaxel as First Line Treatment for NSCLC in Elderly Patients More Than 75 Years Old

Introduction: Lung cancer is still the leading cause of cancer among cancer patients. Although there are novel therapies as second line treatment for NSCLC, there is an issue for elderly patients. Patients and Methods: We collected retrospectively data from 60 patients >75 years of age. Thirty of these patients received nab-paclitaxel and first line treatment and were compared to thirty patients that received only best supportive care. Results: The median life of patients at the date of disease progression, although increased by the administration of the drug (92 days versus 70) was not confirmed statistically significantly (Mann-Whitney test: W = 280, p = 0.138). The administration of drug seems to keep stable the biological condition of patients (McNemar's test: χ² = 0.033, p = 0.99). Patients with chemotherapy the death rate was increased by 50% as compared to those with best supportive care (12 vs 8), the median life until the unfortunate event surpassed statistically significantly the latter (150 days of life as compared to 108, Mann-Whitney test: W = 57.5, p = 0.045). Discussion: Nab-paclitaxel as a monotherapy could be considered as a first line treatment option for patients > 75 years of age without any previous cardiological medical history when compared to best supportive care.