Feasibility of therapeutic drug monitoring of sunitinib and its implications on response and toxicity in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer

Patient perspectives on treatment-related toxicities and therapeutic drug monitoring with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved treatment-related outcomes of patients with oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). TKIs are usually well tolerated and used for a prolonged time, although experienced toxicity varies between patients. It is unclear whether patients report all (low grade) toxicities and how these impact their daily lives. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to, for example, manage toxicities is increasingly applied, but there is limited insight into the patient perspective regarding TDM. This qualitative study aims to explore patient perspectives on TKI toxicity and TDM.

Methods

Five semi-structured focus group interviews were held, each with three to four patients with NSCLC using a TKI and their (care) partners. Two researchers independently performed a directive content analysis.

Results

In total, 16 patients and 12 (care) partners participated. Experienced treatment-related toxicities were encountered limitedly and patients felt no boundaries discussing these with their treatment team. However, symptoms were sometimes not reported as they were doubted as treatment related. The concept of TDM-guided dosing to, for example, reduce TKI exposure to account for dosing outside the therapeutic window resulted in feelings of uncertainty regarding treatment efficacy. Patients emphasized the need for thorough research and frequent check-ups to ensure treatment efficacy.

Conclusion

Perceived TKI-related toxicities seem limited, although the treatment team should pay attention to symptoms not directly described by patients as treatment related. In general, patients are open to implement TDM-guided dosing, but only if thorough scientific evidence demonstrates retained or enhanced safety and efficacy.

Reasons for non-feasibility of therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted therapies in oncology - an analysis of the closed cohorts of a multicentre prospective study

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) - performing dose adjustments based on measured drug levels and established pharmacokinetic (PK) targets - could optimise treatment with drugs that show large interpatient variability in exposure. We evaluated the feasibility of TDM for multiple oral targeted therapies. Here we report on drugs for which routine TDM is not feasible.

METHODS

We evaluated drug cohorts from the Dutch Pharmacology Oncology Group - TDM study. Based on PK levels taken at pre-specified time points, PK-guided interventions were performed. Feasibility of TDM was evaluated, and based on the success and practicability of TDM, cohorts could be closed.

RESULTS

For 10 out of 24 cohorts TDM was not feasible and inclusion was closed. A high incidence of adverse events resulted in closing the cabozantinib, dabrafenib/trametinib, everolimus, regorafenib and vismodegib cohort. The enzalutamide and erlotinib cohorts were closed because almost all PK levels were above target. Other, non-pharmacological reasons led to closing the palbociclib, olaparib and tamoxifen cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Although TDM could help personalising treatment for many drugs, the above-mentioned reasons can influence its feasibility, usefulness and clinical applicability. Therefore, routine TDM is not advised for cabozantinib, dabrafenib/trametinib, enzalutamide, erlotinib, everolimus, regorafenib and vismodegib. Nonetheless, TDM remains valuable for individual clinical decisions.

Sunitinib malate induces cell death in adult human cardiac progenitor cells

Sunitinib malate is known to cause cardiotoxicity in a sub-population of patients, with heart failure seen in more severe cases. Cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) have been identified in adult human myocardium and contribute to overall tissue maintenance, with previous work identifying negative impacts of sunitinib on these cells. This study aimed to characterise the toxic effects of sunitinib in human CPCs, applying sunitinib concentrations equivalent to clinical plasma levels to these cells in vitro. Cell viability was reduced by 26.5 ± 6.6 % by 2 μM sunitinib for 24 h (p < 0.01); this concentration also induced fold-change increases in gene expression of: calpain (3.1 ± 0.73, p < 0.05), FAS (2.3 ± 0.8, p < 0.05) and BAX (1.9 ± 0.2, p < 0.05), and a decrease in BCL-2 (3.5 ± 0.0, p < 0.001), vs. control (1.0 ± 0.0). This was affirmed by sunitinib inducing fold changes in protein expression of: calpain-1 (2.5 ± 0.5, p < 0.05); FAS receptor (2.1 ± 0.2, p < 0.05) and BAX (2.1 ± 0.2, p < 0.05) vs. control (1.0 ± 0.0). These results indicated that sunitinib induced apoptosis in CPCs, but negative annexin V staining and lack of protection by caspase inhibitors indicated this was not the cell death pathway activated. Further investigation found sunitinib was concentrated in the lysosomes and autophagosomes within CPCs, but did not induce accumulation of acidic organelles. In conclusion, these data confirm that cell death is caused by sunitinib in CPCs at concentrations equivalent to clinical plasma levels, inducing cell death pathway signals that lead to non-apoptotic cell death.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Inter-individual variability in drug response pose significant challenges to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). TKIs meet traditional criteria for using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), but research is still limited. Understanding the role of TDM in individualizing treatment strategies could help optimize treatment. Here we review the state of knowledge of TDM for TKIs in mRCC treatment. A comprehensive literature review of original research studies focusing on TDM of TKIs in mRCC treatment, clinical in vivo studies reporting on pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics, therapeutic ranges, drug concentrations, dose adjustments, clinical outcomes, or other relevant aspects related to TDM. We reviewed studies involving human subjects published in peer-reviewed journals. A narrative synthesis approach was employed to summarize the findings. Key themes and trends related to TDM of TKIs in mRCC treatment were identified and synthesized to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge. Our search yielded 25 articles. Most were observational. The most consistently reported association between plasma concentration and effect was pazopanib Ctrough >20 µg/mL, but this concentration was not significant across all studies. We found inconsistent evidence for sunitinib and cabozantinib. For axitinib, we found a clear exposure-response relationship, but research was too diverse to conclude on a therapeutic window to use for TDM. We found much heterogeneity between recommended time of measurement (minimum plasma concentration [Cmin], maximal plasma concentration [Cmax], area under the curve [AUC]) and large variation in plasma concentration associated with clinical outcomes, which makes it difficult to recommend specific concentration intervals based on 1 or more of these measurements. Results were more consistent with TKIs continuously administered. Further research is needed to elucidate the long-term impact of TDM to possibly establish standardized therapeutic intervals. Prospective studies are suggested. The application of TDM in TKI-combination therapy is warranted in future research.

An Optimized LC-MS/MS Method for Quantification of Sunitinib and N -Desethyl Sunitinib in Human Plasma and Its Application for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib (SUN) malate is an oral, multitargeted, tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. SUN has a narrow therapeutic window and high variability in interpatient pharmacokinetic parameters. Clinical detection methods for SUN and N -desethyl SUN limit the application of SUN to therapeutic drug monitoring. All published methods for quantifying SUN in human plasma require strict light protection to avoid light-induced isomerism or the use of additional quantitative software. To avoid these difficult processes in clinical routines, the authors propose a novel method that merges the peaks of the E -isomer and Z -isomer of SUN or N -desethyl SUN into a single peak.

METHODS

The E -isomer and Z -isomer peaks of SUN or N -desethyl SUN were merged into a single peak by optimizing the mobile phases to decrease the resolution of the isomers. A suitable chromatographic column was selected to obtain a good peak shape. Thereafter, the conventional and single-peak methods (SPM) were simultaneously validated and compared according to the guidelines published by the Food and Drug Administration in 2018 and the Chinese Pharmacopoeia in 2020.

RESULTS

The verification results showed that the SPM was superior to the conventional method in the matrix effect and met the requirements for biological sample analysis. SPM was then applied to detect the total steady-state concentration of SUN and N -desethyl SUN in tumor patients who received SUN malate.

CONCLUSIONS

The established SPM makes the detection of SUN and N -desethyl SUN easier and faster without light protection or extra quantitative software, making it more appropriate for routine clinical use. The clinical application results showed that 12 patients took 37.5 mg per day, with a median total trough steady-state concentration of 75.0 ng/mL.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Kinase Inhibitors in Oncology

Although kinase inhibitors (KI) frequently portray large interpatient variability, a 'one size fits all' regimen is still often used. In the meantime, relationships between exposure-response and exposure-toxicity have been established for several KIs, so this regimen could lead to unnecessary toxicity and suboptimal efficacy. Dose adjustments based on measured systemic pharmacokinetic levels-i.e., therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-could therefore improve treatment efficacy and reduce the incidence of toxicities. Therefore, the aim of this comprehensive review is to give an overview of the available evidence for TDM for the 77 FDA/EMA kinase inhibitors currently approved (as of July 1st, 2023) used in hematology and oncology. We elaborate on exposure-response and exposure-toxicity relationships for these kinase inhibitors and provide practical recommendations for TDM and discuss corresponding pharmacokinetic targets when possible.

Sunitinib therapy for imatinib-resistant and/or intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: comparison of safety and efficacy between standard and reduced dosage regimens

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib therapy for patients with imatinib-resistant and/or intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) often causes severe adverse events (AEs) that lead to treatment discontinuation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of imatinib-resistant and/or intolerant GIST patients who underwent sunitinib therapy in our institutions between 2007 and 2020. Forty-one patients were enrolled and divided into two groups on the basis of the starting dosage: the standard dosage group (50 mg/day, 21 patients) and the reduced dosage group (37.5 mg/day, 20 patients). Tolerability, safety and clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Three patients (14%) in the standard dosage group and another three (15%) in the reduced dosage group (P = 1.000) discontinued sunitinib therapy because of AEs. The incidences of grade 3 or more severe treatment-related AEs were 90 and 75%, respectively (P = 0.238). Two possible treatment-related deaths were noted in the standard dosage group. Clinical efficacy was comparable between the two groups: median time to treatment failure and overall survival were 4.5 months [interquartile range (IQR), 3.6-9.0] and 13.7 months (IQR, 7.5-22.9) in the standard dosage group and 4.6 months (IQR, 2.7-17.0) and 13.4 months (IQR, 9.3-36.8) in the reduced dosage group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduced dosage of 37.5 mg sunitinib tended to decrease toxicity and the incidences of severe AEs and treatment-related deaths. This reduced dosage regimen showed equivalent clinical efficacy including patient survival. The reduced dosage of 37.5 mg sunitinib can be adopted as an alternative therapy for patients with imatinib-resistant and/or intolerant GISTs.