[Lean management in the pathology laboratory]

Digitization of Pathology Labs: A Review of Lessons Learned

Pathology laboratories are increasingly using digital workflows. This has the potential of increasing laboratory efficiency, but the digitization process also involves major challenges. Several reports have been published describing the individual experiences of specific laboratories with the digitization process. However, a comprehensive overview of the lessons learned is still lacking. We provide an overview of the lessons learned for different aspects of the digitization process, including digital case management, digital slide reading, and computer-aided slide reading. We also cover metrics used for monitoring performance and pitfalls and corresponding values observed in practice. The overview is intended to help pathologists, information technology decision makers, and administrators to benefit from the experiences of others and to implement the digitization process in an optimal way to make their own laboratory future-proof.

Real-life data from standardized preanalytical coding (SPREC) in tissue biobanking and its dual use for sample characterization and process optimization

The standardized preanalytical code (SPREC) aggregates warm ischemia (WIT), cold ischemia (CIT), and fixation times (FIT) in a precise format. Despite its growing importance underpinned by the European in vitro diagnostics regulation or broad preanalytical programs by the National Institutes of Health, little is known about its empirical occurrence in biobanked surgical specimen. In several steps, the Tissue Bank Bern achieved a fully informative SPREC code with insights from 10,555 CIT, 4,740 WIT, and 3,121 FIT values. During process optimization according to LEAN six sigma principles, we identified a dual role of the SPREC code as a sample characteristic and a traceable process parameter. With this preanalytical study, we outlined real-life data in a variety of organs with specific differences in WIT, CIT, and FIT values. Furthermore, our FIT data indicate the potential to adapt the SPREC fixation toward concrete paraffin-embedding time points and to extend its categories beyond 72 h due to weekend delays. Additionally, we identified dependencies of preanalytical variables from workload, daytime, and clinics that were actionable with LEAN process management. Thus, streamlined biobanking workflows during the day were significantly resilient to workload peaks, diminishing the turnaround times of native tissue processing (i.e. CIT) from 74.6 to 46.1 min under heavily stressed conditions. In conclusion, there are surgery-specific preanalytics that are surgico-pathologically limited even under process optimization, which might affect biomarker transfer from one entity to another. Beyond sample characteristics, SPREC coding is highly beneficial for tissue banks and Institutes of Pathology to track WIT, CIT, and FIT for process optimization and monitoring measurements.

Digital pathology – Rising to the challenge

Digital pathology has gone through considerable technical advances during the past few years and certain aspects of digital diagnostics have been widely and swiftly adopted in many centers, catalyzed by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, analysis of requirements, careful planning, and structured implementation should to be considered in order to reap the full benefits of a digital workflow. The aim of this review is to provide a practical, concise and hands-on summary of issues relevant to implementing and developing digital diagnostics in the pathology laboratory. These include important initial considerations, possible approaches to overcome common challenges, potential diagnostic pitfalls, validation and regulatory issues and an introduction to the emerging field of image analysis in routine.

[Histopathological research laboratories in translational research : Conception and integration into the infrastructure of pathological institutes]

A systematic review of histopathology from experimental animal systems is an essential part of up-to-date biomedical research. Pathologists at university hospitals are especially and increasingly challenged by these specialized and time-consuming duties. This article presents and analyzes a new laboratory structure of comparative experimental pathology-jointly lead by veterinary and human pathologists-which might solve this problem. The focus is on the establishment and full integration of this laboratory structure into a local, regional, and nationwide biomedical research cluster. A detailed comparison with an established structure of routine histopathology laboratories discusses merits and benefits as well as disadvantages.

Implementation of modern tools in autopsy practice-the way towards contemporary postmortal diagnostics

Medical, legal, and socioeconomic issues have contributed to the decline of autopsy rates. Pathology-related factors, however, with changing clinical duties on the one hand and decreasing interest and lack of substantial technical developments in this field on the other, may have contributed to this condition as well. We present our experience of a restructuring project that culminated in the introduction of a modernized postmortal diagnostic (PMD) unit: Workflows of PMD procedures and space organization were restructured according to LEAN management principles method. Classical autopsy suites were transformed into postmortal operating rooms. A PMD pathologist staff was designated to perform postmortal operative diagnostics (i.e., using laparotomy and thoracotomy approaches) with the intention of gradually replacing classical autopsy procedures. Postmortal minimal invasive diagnostics (PMID) using laparoscopy and thoracoscopy were successfully implemented with the expertise of clinical colleagues. Reorganization of workflow reduced turn-around times for PMD reports from a median of 33 days to 15 days. Short-term analysis revealed that this combined effort leads to a slight increase in the number of adult postmortal examinations 1 year after the introduction of this project. A change of culture in postmortal diagnostics may contribute to a better reputation of postmortal examinations from the perspective of clinicians, the general public, and affected relatives of the deceased. It may also serve to demonstrate that the pathology community is keen not only to preserve but also to further develop this valuable tool for medical quality control and education.