BRAF testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma and novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic options

Neuropsychiatric adverse drug reactions with oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer: an analysis from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Introduction

New oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are approved for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim of this study was to assess the neuropsychiatric adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of these drugs reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods

All reports with regorafenib (REG) and encorafenib (ENC) as the primary suspect, and reported in the FAERS between 2012 and 2022, were collected. A descriptive and disproportionality analyses were conducted.

Results

Out of 4,984 cases, 1,357 (30.2%) reported at least one neuropsychiatric ADR. New potential signals for REG included neuropathy peripheral (n = 265; reporting odds ratio, ROR = 19.48, 95% confidence interval, CI 95% = 17.52-22.47; information component, IC = 2.89, IC025-IC075 = 2.77-3.02), hyperesthesia (n = 18; ROR = 12.56, CI 95% = 7.90-19.96; IC = 2.25, IC025-IC075 = 1.79-2.72), taste disorder (n = 41; ROR = 9.91, CI 95% = 7.29-13.49; IC = 2.18, IC025-IC075 = 1.88-2.49), poor quality sleep (n = 18; ROR = 6.56, CI 95% = 4.13-10.42; IC = 1.74, IC025-IC075 = 1.27-2.20), altered state of consciousness (n = 15; ROR = 5.50, CI 95% = 3.31-9.14; IC = 1.57, IC025-IC075 = 1.06-2.07), depressed mood (n = 13; ROR = 1.85, CI 95% = 1.07-3.19; IC = 0.58, IC025-IC075 = 0.04-1.13) and insomnia (n = 63; ROR = 1.48, CI 95% = 1.15-1.89; IC = 0.38, IC025-IC075 = 0.13-0.63). For ENC comprised depressed mood (n = 4; ROR = 5.75, CI 95% = 2.15-15.39; IC = 1.74, IC025-IC075 = 0.76-2.73) and cognitive disorders (n = 3; ROR = 4.71, CI 95% = 1.51-14.66; IC = 1.54, IC025-IC075 = 0.41-2.68).

Discussion

This study identified new unknown potential neuropsychiatric ADRs. Further investigations are required to better define the neurotoxicity of TKIs in mCRC patients.

Renal Disorders with Oral Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Analysis from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database

BACKGROUND

this study assessed the nephrotoxicity of regorafenib (REG) and encorafenib (ENC) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) through an analysis of reports from the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

descriptive and disproportional analyses were performed for all reports using ENC and REG as the primary suspect.

RESULTS

A total of 379 reports had at least one renal adverse drug reaction (ADR), and these ADRs were mainly related to REG (93.1%). Potential safety signals for REG included chromaturia (n = 44; ROR = 12.00, CI 95% = 8.92-16.16; IC = 2.36, IC025-IC075 = 2.06-2.66), hydronephrosis (10; 8.70, 4.67-16.19; 1.85, 1.23-2.47), nephrotic syndrome (7; 5.73, 2.73-12.03; 1.47, 0.73-2.21), renal impairment (53; 4.16, 3.17-5.45; 1.39, 1.12-1.66), dysuria (19; 3.06, 1.95-4.81; 1.06, 0.61-1.52), renal failure (38; 1.66, 1.20-2.28; 0.49, 0.17-0.81), and acute kidney injury (AKI) (43; 1.46, 1.08-1.97; 0.37, 0.07-0.67). For ENC, consistent disproportionalities were observed for AKI (n = 11; ROR = 3.79, CI 95% = 2.09-6.90; IC = 1.32, IC025-IC075 = 0.72-1.91) and dysuria (4; 6.50, 2.43-17.39; 1.86, 0.88-2.85).

CONCLUSIONS

these findings highlight some not extensively reported renal ADRs that require further investigations to better characterize the safety profiles of REG and ENC in patients with mCRC.

European expert panel consensus on the clinical management of BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a heterogenous disease caused by various genetic alterations. The BRAF^V600E mutation occurs in approximately 8-12% of patients and is characterised by an aggressive clinical course and poor prognosis. Here we review the current knowledge on BRAF^V600E-mutant mCRC and provide a series of consensus statements on its clinical management. The treatment landscape for BRAF^V600E-mutant mCRC has changed greatly due to the emergence of molecular targeted therapies (including BRAF inhibitors) and immune checkpoint inhibitors. A scientific literature search identified available data on molecular testing, treatments, and clinical monitoring of patients with BRAF^V600E-mutant mCRC. Consensus statements were discussed and developed by a European expert panel. This manuscript provides consensus management guidance for different clinical presentations of BRAF^V600E-mutant mCRC and makes recommendations regarding treatment sequencing choices. To guide appropriate clinical management and treatment decisions for mCRC patients, tumour tissue analysis for DNA mismatch repair/microsatellite status and, at a minimum, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutational status is mandatory at the time of diagnosis. Finally, we discuss the rapidly evolving treatment landscape for BRAF^V600E-mutant mCRC and define priorities for the development of novel therapeutic strategies that are needed to improve patient outcomes.

BRAF Testing in Melanoma and Colorectal Cancer in Latin America: Challenges and Opportunities

The incidence of colorectal cancer in Argentina and Brazil has reached levels comparable to those in higher-income countries. Similarly, the incidence of melanoma in Latin America has increased during the past decades. BRAFmutation is seen frequently in melanomas and colorectal cancer. Discovering the expression of this specific biomarker in both cancers has unleashed the potential for targeted molecular therapies.In patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma, adopting a combined targeted treatment approach has shown a dramatic increase in overall survival. However, several barriers impede the development of early BRAF testing in Latin America, jeopardizing the potential for personalized therapies and care. To address this, the Americas Health Foundation convened a virtual meeting of Latin American oncologists to address the barriers to BRAF testing in melanoma and colorectal cancer. During a three-day conference, expert oncologists used literature reviews and personal experience to detail the barriers to early BRAF testing in their region. They proposed actionable steps to overcome the barriers identified, which included deficiencies in knowledge, treatment options, equitable distribution, timely results, and local data on BRAF mutations. Oncologists proposed several actions to overcome barriers, including raising public and healthcare awareness about the importance of BRAF testing, expanding treatment options in clinics across the region, developing centers in underserved areas, and increasing affordable treatment options for patients who test positive for BRAF mutations.

Deep Phenotypic Characterisation of CTCs by Combination of Microfluidic Isolation (IsoFlux) and Imaging Flow Cytometry (ImageStream)

Simple Summary

Cells that escape the primary tumour and have the potential ability to colonise distant organs through metastasis are called circulating tumour cells (CTCs). The study of CTCs in colorectal cancer (CRC) has demonstrated their prognostic utility, although current methodologies only allow the evaluation of CTC numbers and a maximum of two markers. Here, we developed a novel protocol for the isolation and characterisation of CTCs by combining two existing technologies. This new methodology allows the simultaneous evaluation of multiple markers and parameters. In particular, we evaluated the expression of a mutant protein (BRAF^V600E) associated with poor response to therapies against EGFR and the expression of PD-L1, a marker for immunotherapy. Based on these markers, we evaluated the CTCs (positive for cytokeratin) of 16 early CRC patients and demonstrated the suitability of our protocol to classify patients into potential responders and non-responders.

Abstract

The isolation of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) mostly relies on the expression of epithelial markers such as EpCAM, and phenotypic characterisation is usually performed under fluorescence microscopy with only one or two additional markers. This limits the ability to detect different CTC subpopulations based on multiple markers. The aim of this work was to develop a novel protocol combining two platforms (IsoFlux^TM and ImageStream^®X) to improve CTC evaluation. Cancer cell lines and peripheral blood from healthy donors were used to evaluate the efficiency of each platform independently and in combination. Peripheral blood was extracted from 16 early CRC patients (before loco-regional surgery) to demonstrate the suitability of the protocol for CTC assessment. Additionally, peripheral blood was extracted from nine patients one month after surgery to validate the utility of our protocol for identifying CTC subpopulation changes over time. Results: Our protocol had a mean recovery efficiency of 69.5% and a limit of detection of at least four cells per millilitre. We developed an analysis method to reduce noise from magnetic beads used for CTC isolation. CTCs were isolated from CRC patients with a median of 37 CTCs (IQ 13.0–85.5) at baseline. CTCs from CRC patients were significantly (p < 0.0001) larger than cytokeratin (CK)-negative cells, and patients were stratified into two groups based on BRAF^V600E and PD-L1 expression on CK-positive cells. The changes observed over time included not only the number of CTCs but also their distribution into four different subpopulations defined according to BRAF^V600E and PD-L1 positivity. We developed a novel protocol for semi-automatic CTC isolation and phenotypic characterisation by combining two platforms. Assessment of CTCs from early CRC patients using our protocol allowed the identification of two clusters of patients with changing phenotypes over time.