The paradox of proteasome granules

Yeast 26S proteasome nuclear import is coupled to nucleus-specific degradation of the karyopherin adaptor protein Sts1

In eukaryotes, the ubiquitin-proteasome system is an essential pathway for protein degradation and cellular homeostasis. 26S proteasomes concentrate in the nucleus of budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae due to the essential import adaptor protein Sts1 and the karyopherin-α protein Srp1. Here, we show that Sts1 facilitates proteasome nuclear import by recruiting proteasomes to the karyopherin-α/β heterodimer. Following nuclear transport, the karyopherin proteins are likely separated from Sts1 through interaction with RanGTP in the nucleus. RanGTP-induced release of Sts1 from the karyopherin proteins initiates Sts1 proteasomal degradation in vitro. Sts1 undergoes karyopherin-mediated nuclear import in the absence of proteasome interaction, but Sts1 degradation in vivo is only observed when proteasomes successfully localize to the nucleus. Sts1 appears to function as a proteasome import factor during exponential growth only, as it is not found in proteasome storage granules (PSGs) during prolonged glucose starvation, nor does it appear to contribute to the rapid nuclear reimport of proteasomes following glucose refeeding and PSG dissipation. We propose that Sts1 acts as a single-turnover proteasome nuclear import factor by recruiting karyopherins for transport and undergoing subsequent RanGTP-initiated ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradation in the nucleus.

To Kill or to Be Killed: How Does the Battle between the UPS and Autophagy Maintain the Intracellular Homeostasis in Eukaryotes?

The ubiquitin-26S proteasome system and autophagy are two major protein degradation machineries encoded in all eukaryotic organisms. While the UPS is responsible for the turnover of short-lived and/or soluble misfolded proteins under normal growth conditions, the autophagy-lysosomal/vacuolar protein degradation machinery is activated under stress conditions to remove long-lived proteins in the forms of aggregates, either soluble or insoluble, in the cytoplasm and damaged organelles. Recent discoveries suggested an integrative function of these two seemly independent systems for maintaining the proteome homeostasis. One such integration is represented by their reciprocal degradation, in which the small 76-amino acid peptide, ubiquitin, plays an important role as the central signaling hub. In this review, we summarized the current knowledge about the activity control of proteasome and autophagosome at their structural organization, biophysical states, and turnover levels from yeast and mammals to plants. Through comprehensive literature studies, we presented puzzling questions that are awaiting to be solved and proposed exciting new research directions that may shed light on the molecular mechanisms underlying the biological function of protein degradation.

Proteasome granule formation is regulated through mitochondrial respiration and kinase signaling

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, proteasomes are enriched in cell nuclei, in which they execute important cellular functions. Nutrient stress can change this localization, indicating that proteasomes respond to the metabolic state of the cell. However, the signals that connect these processes remain poorly understood. Carbon starvation triggers a reversible translocation of proteasomes to cytosolic condensates known as proteasome storage granules. Surprisingly, we observed strongly reduced levels of proteasome granules when cells had active cellular respiration prior to starvation. This suggests that the mitochondrial activity of cells is a determining factor in the response of proteasomes to carbon starvation. Consistent with this, upon inhibition of mitochondrial function, we observed that proteasomes relocalize to granules. These links between proteasomes and metabolism involve specific signaling pathways, as we identified a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade that is critical to the formation of proteasome granules after respiratory growth but not following glycolytic growth. Furthermore, the yeast homolog of AMP kinase, Snf1, is important for proteasome granule formation induced by mitochondrial inhibitors, but it is dispensable for granule formation following carbon starvation. We propose a model in which mitochondrial activity promotes nuclear localization of the proteasome. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Phase-Separated Subcellular Compartmentation and Related Human Diseases

In live cells, proteins and nucleic acids can associate together through multivalent interactions, and form relatively isolated phases that undertake designated biological functions and activities. In the past decade, liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) has gradually been recognized as a general mechanism for the intracellular organization of biomolecules. LLPS regulates the assembly and composition of dozens of membraneless organelles and condensates in cells. Due to the altered physiological conditions or genetic mutations, phase-separated condensates may undergo aberrant formation, maturation or gelation that contributes to the onset and progression of various diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders and cancers. In this review, we summarize the properties of different membraneless organelles and condensates, and discuss multiple phase separation-regulated biological processes. Based on the dysregulation and mutations of several key regulatory proteins and signaling pathways, we also exemplify how aberrantly regulated LLPS may contribute to human diseases.

Understanding circadian regulation of mammalian cell function, protein homeostasis, and metabolism

Circadian rhythms are ∼24 h cycles of organismal and cellular activity ubiquitous to mammalian physiology. A prevailing paradigm suggests that timing information flows linearly from rhythmic transcription via protein abundance changes to drive circadian regulation of cellular function. Challenging this view, recent evidence indicates daily variation in many cellular functions arises through rhythmic post-translational regulation of protein activity. We suggest cellular circadian timing primarily functions to maintain proteome homeostasis rather than perturb it. Indeed, although relevant to timekeeping mechanism, daily rhythms of clock protein abundance may be the exception, not the rule. Informed by insights from yeast and mammalian models, we propose that optimal bioenergetic efficiency results from coupled rhythms in mammalian target of rapamycin complex activity, protein synthesis/turnover, ion transport and protein sequestration, which drive facilitatory rhythms in metabolic flux and substrate utilisation. Such daily consolidation of proteome renewal would account for many aspects of circadian cell biology whilst maintaining osmotic homeostasis.

Structural Insights into Substrate Recognition and Processing by the 20S Proteasome

Four decades of proteasome research have yielded extensive information on ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. The archetype of proteasomes is a 20S barrel-shaped complex that does not rely on ubiquitin as a degradation signal but can degrade substrates with a considerable unstructured stretch. Since roughly half of all proteasomes in most eukaryotic cells are free 20S complexes, ubiquitin-independent protein degradation may coexist with ubiquitin-dependent degradation by the highly regulated 26S proteasome. This article reviews recent advances in our understanding of the biochemical and structural features that underlie the proteolytic mechanism of 20S proteasomes. The two outer α-rings of 20S proteasomes provide a number of potential docking sites for loosely folded polypeptides. The binding of a substrate can induce asymmetric conformational changes, trigger gate opening, and initiate its own degradation through a protease-driven translocation mechanism. Consequently, the substrate translocates through two additional narrow apertures augmented by the β-catalytic active sites. The overall pulling force through the two annuli results in a protease-like unfolding of the substrate and subsequent proteolysis in the catalytic chamber. Although both proteasomes contain identical β-catalytic active sites, the differential translocation mechanisms yield distinct peptide products. Nonoverlapping substrate repertoires and product outcomes rationalize cohabitation of both proteasome complexes in cells.

Tagging the proteasome active site β5 causes tag specific phenotypes in yeast

The efficient and timely degradation of proteins is crucial for many cellular processes and to maintain general proteostasis. The proteasome, a complex multisubunit protease, plays a critical role in protein degradation. Therefore, it is important to understand the assembly, regulation, and localization of proteasome complexes in the cell under different conditions. Fluorescent tags are often utilized to study proteasomes. A GFP-tag on the β5 subunit, one of the core particle (CP) subunits with catalytic activity, has been shown to be incorporated into proteasomes and commonly used by the field. We report here that a tag on this subunit results in aberrant phenotypes that are not observed when several other CP subunits are tagged. These phenotypes appear in combination with other proteasome mutations and include poor growth, and, more significantly, altered 26S proteasome localization. In strains defective for autophagy, β5-GFP tagged proteasomes, unlike other CP tags, localize to granules upon nitrogen starvation. These granules are reflective of previously described proteasome storage granules but display unique properties. This suggests proteasomes with a β5-GFP tag are specifically recognized and sequestered depending on physiological conditions. In all, our data indicate the intricacy of tagging proteasomes, and possibly, large complexes in general.

Asymmetric cell division and replicative aging: a new perspective from the spindle poles

Although cell division is usually portrayed as an equitable process by which a progenitor cell originates two identical daughter cells, there are multiple examples of asymmetric divisions that generate two cells that differ in their content, morphology and/or proliferative potential. The capacity of the cells to generate asymmetry during their division is of paramount biological relevance, playing essential roles during embryonic development, cellular regeneration and tissue morphogenesis. Problems with the proper establishment of asymmetry and polarity during cell division can give rise to cancer and neurodevelopmental disorders, as well as to also accelerate cellular aging. Interestingly, the microtubule organizing centers that orchestrate the formation of the mitotic spindle have been described among the cellular structures that can be differentially allocated during asymmetric cell divisions. This mini-review focuses on recent research from our group and others uncovering a role for the non-random distribution of the spindle-associated microtubule organizing centers in the differential distribution of aging factors during asymmetric mitoses and therefore in the maintenance of the replicative lifespan of the cells.

Microautophagy regulates proteasome homeostasis

Proteasomes are highly abundant protein complexes that are responsible for most regulated protein degradation in cells under favorable growth conditions. When yeast cells are under nutritional stress, most proteasomes exit the nucleus and either accumulate in cytoplasmic condensates called proteasome storage granules (PSGs) or are directed to the vacuole by autophagy. Nitrogen starvation does not cause PSG formation but leads to degradation of proteasomes through the classical macroautophagy pathway. By contrast, carbon starvation or extended incubation in stationary phase results in both PSG formation and macroautophagy of proteasomes. Unexpectedly, we found that glucose limitation also causes proteasomes to be taken up directly into vacuoles by a microautophagy mechanism. Macro- and micro-autophagy occur in parallel in glucose-starved cells, and microautophagy appears biased toward aberrant or inactive proteasomes, leaving functional proteasomes to accumulate in PSGs. PSGs dissolve and proteasomes remobilize to the nucleus within minutes after glucose refeeding. We showed that AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and endosomal-sorting-complex-required-for-transport (ESCRT) factors are required for proteasome microautophagy and also impact PSG dissipation and nuclear reimport of proteasomes after glucose refeeding. The insoluble protein deposit (IPOD) compartment provides an alternative means of proteasome homeostasis, including when microautophagy is impaired. Our findings reveal a surprising diversity of mechanisms for proteasome quality and quantity control during starvation. A mechanistic understanding of the AMPK-regulated ESCRT-mediated microautophagy pathway could provide new avenues for manipulating proteasome homeostasis and treating human disease.

How does protein degradation regulate TOM machinery-dependent mitochondrial import?

Mitochondrial dysregulation is a pivotal hallmark of aging-related disorders. Although there is a considerable understanding of the molecular counteracting responses toward damaged mitochondria, the molecular underpinnings connecting the abnormal aggregation of mitochondrial precursor protein fragments and abrogation of mitochondrial import machinery are far from clear. Recently, proteasomal-dependent degradation was unveiled as a pivotal fine-tuner of TOM machinery-dependent mitochondrial import. Herein, the role of proteasomal-mediated degradation in regulating fidelity of TOM-dependent import is briefly discussed and analyzed. The insights obtained from the characterization of this process may be applied to targeting mitochondrial import dysfunction in some neurodegenerative disorders.

Spatial Organization of Proteasome Aggregates in the Regulation of Proteasome Homeostasis

Misfolded proteins and insoluble aggregates are continuously produced in the cell and can result in severe stress that threatens cellular fitness and viability if not managed effectively. Accordingly, organisms have evolved several protective protein quality control (PQC) machineries to address these threats. In eukaryotes, the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) plays a vital role in the disposal of intracellular misfolded, damaged, or unneeded proteins. Although ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation of many proteins plays a key role in the PQC system, cells must also dispose of the proteasomes themselves when their subunits are assembled improperly, or when they dysfunction under various conditions, e.g., as a result of genomic mutations, diverse stresses, or treatment with proteasome inhibitors. Here, we review recent studies that identified the regulatory pathways that mediate proteasomes sorting under various stress conditions, and the elimination of its dysfunctional subunits. Following inactivation of the 26S proteasome, UPS-mediated degradation of its own misassembled subunits is the favored disposal pathway. However, the cytosolic cell-compartment-specific aggregase, Hsp42 mediates an alternative pathway, the accumulation of these subunits in cytoprotective compartments, where they become extensively modified with ubiquitin, and are directed by ubiquitin receptors for autophagic clearance (proteaphagy). We also discuss the sorting mechanisms that the cell uses under nitrogen stress, and to distinguish between dysfunctional proteasome aggregates and proteasome storage granules (PSGs), reversible assemblies of membrane-free cytoplasmic condensates that form in yeast upon carbon starvation and help protect proteasomes from autophagic degradation. Regulated proteasome subunit homeostasis is thus controlled through cellular probing of the level of proteasome assembly, and the interplay between UPS-mediated degradation or sorting of misfolded proteins into distinct cellular compartments.

Direct visualization of degradation microcompartments at the ER membrane

Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) is an essential process that removes misfolded proteins from the ER, preventing cellular dysfunction and disease. While most of the key components of ERAD are known, their specific localization remains a mystery. This study uses in situ cryo-electron tomography to directly visualize the ERAD machinery within the native cellular environment. Proteasomes and Cdc48, the complexes that extract and degrade ER proteins, cluster together in non–membrane-bound cytosolic microcompartments that contact ribosome-free patches on the ER membrane. This discrete molecular organization may facilitate efficient ERAD. Structural analysis reveals that proteasomes directly engage ER-localized substrates, providing evidence for a noncanonical “direct ERAD” pathway. In addition, live-cell fluorescence microscopy suggests that these ER-associated proteasome clusters form by liquid–liquid phase separation.

To promote the biochemical reactions of life, cells can compartmentalize molecular interaction partners together within separated non–membrane-bound regions. It is unknown whether this strategy is used to facilitate protein degradation at specific locations within the cell. Leveraging in situ cryo-electron tomography to image the native molecular landscape of the unicellular alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, we discovered that the cytosolic protein degradation machinery is concentrated within ∼200-nm foci that contact specialized patches of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane away from the ER–Golgi interface. These non–membrane-bound microcompartments exclude ribosomes and consist of a core of densely clustered 26S proteasomes surrounded by a loose cloud of Cdc48. Active proteasomes in the microcompartments directly engage with putative substrate at the ER membrane, a function canonically assigned to Cdc48. Live-cell fluorescence microscopy revealed that the proteasome clusters are dynamic, with frequent assembly and fusion events. We propose that the microcompartments perform ER-associated degradation, colocalizing the degradation machinery at specific ER hot spots to enable efficient protein quality control.

Biomolecular condensates in neurodegeneration and cancer

The intracellular environment is partitioned into functionally distinct compartments containing specific sets of molecules and reactions. Biomolecular condensates, also referred to as membrane-less organelles, are diverse and abundant cellular compartments that lack membranous enclosures. Molecules assemble into condensates by phase separation; multivalent weak interactions drive molecules to separate from their surroundings and concentrate in discrete locations. Biomolecular condensates exist in all eukaryotes and in some prokaryotes, and participate in various essential house-keeping, stress-response and cell type-specific processes. An increasing number of recent studies link abnormal condensate formation, composition and material properties to a number of disease states. In this review, we discuss current knowledge and models describing the regulation of condensates and how they become dysregulated in neurodegeneration and cancer. Further research on the regulation of biomolecular phase separation will help us to better understand their role in cell physiology and disease.

Sky1: at the intersection of prion-like proteins and stress granule regulation

Serine-arginine (SR) protein kinases regulate diverse cellular activities, including various steps in RNA maturation and transport. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae expresses a single SR kinase, Sky1. Sky1 has a bipartite kinase domain, separated by an aggregation-prone prion-like domain (PrLD). The assembly of PrLDs is involved in the formation of various membraneless organelles, including stress granules; stress granules are reversible ribonucleoprotein assemblies that form in response to a variety of stresses. Here, we review a recent study suggesting that Sky1's PrLD promotes Sky1 recruitment to stress granules, and that Sky1 regulates stress granule dissolution by phosphorylating the RNA-shuttling protein Npl3.

Patrolling the nucleus: inner nuclear membrane-associated degradation

Protein quality control and transport are important for the integrity of organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum, but it is largely unknown how protein homeostasis is regulated at the nuclear envelope (NE) despite the connection between NE protein function and human disease. Elucidating mechanisms that regulate the NE proteome is key to understanding nuclear processes such as gene expression, DNA replication and repair as NE components, particularly proteins at the inner nuclear membrane (INM), are involved in the maintenance of nuclear structure, nuclear positioning and chromosome organization. Nuclear pore complexes control the entry and exit of proteins in and out of the nucleus, restricting movement across the nuclear membrane based on protein size, or the size of the extraluminal-facing domain of a transmembrane protein, providing one level of INM proteome regulation. Research in budding yeast has identified a protein quality control system that targets mislocalized and misfolded proteins at the INM. Here, we review what is known about INM-associated degradation, including recent evidence suggesting that it not only targets mislocalized or misfolded proteins, but also contributes to homeostasis of resident INM proteins.

More than just a phase: the search for membraneless organelles in the bacterial cytoplasm

The bacterial cytoplasm, once thought to be a relatively undifferentiated reaction medium, has now been recognized to have extensive microstructure. This microstructure includes bacterial microcompartments, inclusion bodies, granules, and even some membrane-bound vesicles. Several recent papers suggest that bacteria may also organize their cytoplasm using an additional mechanism: phase-separated membraneless organelles, a strategy commonly used by eukaryotes. Phase-separated membraneless organelles such as Cajal bodies, the nucleolus, and stress granules allow proteins to become concentrated in sub-compartments of eukaryotic cells without being surrounded by a barrier to diffusion. In this review, we summarize the known structural organization of the bacterial cytoplasm and discuss the recent evidence that phase-separated membraneless organelles might also play a role in bacterial systems. We specifically focus on bacterial ribonucleoprotein complexes and two different protein components of the bacterial nucleoid that may have the ability to form subcellular partitions within bacteria cells.

The cell biology of quiescent yeast – a diversity of individual scenarios

Most cells, from unicellular to complex organisms, spend part of their life in quiescence, a temporary non-proliferating state. Although central for a variety of essential processes including tissue homeostasis, development and aging, quiescence is poorly understood. In fact, quiescence encompasses various cellular situations depending on the cell type and the environmental niche. Quiescent cell properties also evolve with time, adding another layer of complexity. Studying quiescence is, above all, limited by the fact that a quiescent cell can be recognized as such only after having proved that it is capable of re-proliferating. Recent cellular biology studies in yeast have reported the relocalization of hundreds of proteins and the reorganization of several cellular machineries upon proliferation cessation. These works have revealed that quiescent cells can display various properties, shedding light on a plethora of individual behaviors. The deciphering of the molecular mechanisms beyond these reorganizations, together with the understanding of their cellular functions, have begun to provide insights into the physiology of quiescent cells. In this Review, we discuss recent findings and emerging concepts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae quiescent cell biology.