1
|
Yadav N, Narang J, Chhillar AK, Rana JS. CRISPR: A new paradigm of theranostics. NANOMEDICINE : NANOTECHNOLOGY, BIOLOGY, AND MEDICINE 2021; 33:102350. [PMID: 33359413 PMCID: PMC7831819 DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2020.102350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Infectious and hereditary diseases are the primary cause of human mortality globally. Applications of conventional techniques require significant improvement in sensitivity and specificity in therapeutics. However, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) is an innovative genome editing technology which has provided a significant therapeutic tool exhibiting high sensitivity, fast and precise investigation of distinct pathogens in an epidemic. CRISPR technology has also facilitated the understanding of the biology and therapeutic mechanism of cancer and several other hereditary diseases. Researchers have used the CRISPR technology as a theranostic approach for a wide range of diseases causing pathogens including distinct bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites and genetic mutations as well. In this review article, besides various therapeutic applications of infectious and hereditary diseases we have also explained the structure and mechanism of CRISPR tools and role of CRISPR integrated biosensing technology in provoking diagnostic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neelam Yadav
- Department of Biotechnology, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology, Murthal, Sonepat; Centre for Biotechnology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana.
| | - Jagriti Narang
- Department of Biotechnology, School of Chemical and Life Sciences, Jamia Hamdard, Hamdard Nagar, New Delhi, India.
| | | | - Jogender Singh Rana
- Department of Biotechnology, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology, Murthal, Sonepat.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barman A, Deb B, Chakraborty S. A glance at genome editing with CRISPR–Cas9 technology. Curr Genet 2019; 66:447-462. [DOI: 10.1007/s00294-019-01040-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
3
|
Vaschetto LM, Beccacece HM. The emerging importance of noncoding RNAs in the insecticide tolerance, with special emphasis on Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-RNA 2019; 10:e1539. [PMID: 31045325 DOI: 10.1002/wrna.1539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Revised: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Recently generated high-throughput sequencing data sets have shed light on the important regulatory roles of noncoding RNA (ncRNA) molecules in the development of higher organisms. Nowadays it is well-known that regulatory ncRNAs can bind complementary RNA or DNA sequences and recruit chromatin remodelers to selectively modulate gene expression. Consequently, genome sequencing and transcriptomics technologies are now being used to reveal hidden associations among ncRNAs and distinct biological mechanisms. This is the case for the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella, a worldwide pest known to infest cruciferous crops and to display resistance to most insecticides, including Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) based biopesticides. In P. xylostella, it is thought that ncRNAs could play important roles in both development and insecticide resistance. This review will highlight recent insights into the roles of ncRNAs in P. xylostella and related lepidopterans, and will outline genetic engineering technologies which might be used to design efficient ncRNA-based pest control strategies. This article is categorized under: Regulatory RNAs/RNAi/Riboswitches > Regulatory RNAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis María Vaschetto
- Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IDEA, CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina.,Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (FCEFyN, UNC), Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Hernán Mario Beccacece
- Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (FCEFyN, UNC), Córdoba, Argentina.,Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas y Tecnológicas Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IIByT, CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adames NR, Gallegos JE, Peccoud J. Yeast genetic interaction screens in the age of CRISPR/Cas. Curr Genet 2019; 65:307-327. [PMID: 30255296 PMCID: PMC6420903 DOI: 10.1007/s00294-018-0887-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The ease of performing both forward and reverse genetics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, along with its stable haploid state and short generation times, has made this budding yeast the consummate model eukaryote for genetics. The major advantage of using budding yeast for reverse genetics is this organism's highly efficient homology-directed repair, allowing for precise genome editing simply by introducing DNA with homology to the chromosomal target. Although plasmid- and PCR-based genome editing tools are quite efficient, they depend on rare spontaneous DNA breaks near the target sequence. Consequently, they can generate only one genomic edit at a time, and the edit must be associated with a selectable marker. However, CRISPR/Cas technology is efficient enough to permit markerless and multiplexed edits in a single step. These features have made CRISPR/Cas popular for yeast strain engineering in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering applications, but it has not been widely employed for genetic screens. In this review, we critically examine different methods to generate multi-mutant strains in systematic genetic interaction screens and discuss the potential of CRISPR/Cas to supplement or improve on these methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil R Adames
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA
| | - Jenna E Gallegos
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA
| | - Jean Peccoud
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bird KA, VanBuren R, Puzey JR, Edger PP. The causes and consequences of subgenome dominance in hybrids and recent polyploids. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2018; 220:87-93. [PMID: 29882360 DOI: 10.1111/nph.15256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Contents Summary 87 I. Introduction 87 II. Evolution in action: subgenome dominance within newly formed hybrids and polyploids 88 III. Summary and future directions 90 Acknowledgements 92 References 92 SUMMARY: The merger of divergent genomes, via hybridization or allopolyploidization, frequently results in a 'genomic shock' that induces a series of rapid genetic and epigenetic modifications as a result of conflicts between parental genomes. This conflict among the subgenomes routinely leads one subgenome to become dominant over the other subgenome(s), resulting in subgenome biases in gene content and expression. Recent advances in methods to analyze hybrid and polyploid genomes with comparisons to extant parental progenitors have allowed for major strides in understanding the mechanistic basis for subgenome dominance. In particular, our understanding of the role that homoeologous exchange might play in subgenome dominance and genome evolution is quickly growing. Here we describe recent discoveries uncovering the underlying mechanisms and provide a framework to predict subgenome dominance in hybrids and allopolyploids with far-reaching implications for agricultural, ecological, and evolutionary research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin A Bird
- Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
- Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| | - Robert VanBuren
- Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
- Plant Resilience Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| | - Joshua R Puzey
- Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, 23185, USA
| | - Patrick P Edger
- Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
- Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Border collies of the genome: domestication of an autonomous retrovirus-like transposon. Curr Genet 2018; 65:71-78. [PMID: 29931377 DOI: 10.1007/s00294-018-0857-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Retrotransposons often spread rapidly through eukaryotic genomes until they are neutralized by host-mediated silencing mechanisms, reduced by recombination and mutation, and lost or transformed into benevolent entities. But the Ty1 retrotransposon appears to have been domesticated to guard the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Collapse
|
7
|
Elison GL, Acar M. Scarless genome editing: progress towards understanding genotype-phenotype relationships. Curr Genet 2018; 64:1229-1238. [PMID: 29872908 DOI: 10.1007/s00294-018-0850-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Revised: 05/26/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The ability to predict phenotype from genotype has been an elusive goal for the biological sciences for several decades. Progress decoding genotype-phenotype relationships has been hampered by the challenge of introducing precise genetic changes to specific genomic locations. Here we provide a comparative review of the major techniques that have been historically used to make genetic changes in cells as well as the development of the CRISPR technology which enabled the ability to make marker-free disruptions in endogenous genomic locations. We also discuss how the achievement of truly scarless genome editing has required further adjustments of the original CRISPR method. We conclude by examining recently developed genome editing methods which are not reliant on the induction of a DNA double strand break and discuss the future of both genome engineering and the study of genotype-phenotype relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory L Elison
- Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, 219 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.,Systems Biology Institute, Yale University, 850 West Campus Drive, West Haven, CT, 06516, USA
| | - Murat Acar
- Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, 219 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA. .,Systems Biology Institute, Yale University, 850 West Campus Drive, West Haven, CT, 06516, USA. .,Interdepartmental Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, 300 George Street, Suite 501, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA. .,Department of Physics, Yale University, Prospect Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
| |
Collapse
|