Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: the rate of manipulation following distension arthrogram

Assessing injectate spread in ultrasound-guided capsular hydro dilatation for adhesive capsulitis: A comparative MRI study of anterior rotator interval vs. posterior glenohumeral joint approaches

Adhesive capsulitis is a self-limiting condition of the shoulder, characterized by pain and limited range of motion (ROM). Intra-articular steroid injection and hydrodistension of the joint capsule are effective strategies for pain relief and improvement of ROM. Several randomized studies indicate that anterior rotator cuff interval (RCI) injections yield better outcomes than posterior glenohumeral (GH) joint injections. No study has examined the differences in injectate spread patterns between anterior RCI and posterior GH joint approaches. This study involved three patients with adhesive capsulitis who received ultrasound-guided shoulder joint injections with capsular hydrodilatation, utilizing 10 cc, via either the anterior RCI approach or the posterior GH joint approach. The injectate comprised 1 mL (80 mg) methylprednisolone acetate, 4 mL of 2 % lidocaine, and 5 mL of saline mixed with gadolinium contrast. Immediately following the injection, an MRI of the shoulder was performed to evaluate the distribution of the injectate. Injections via the anterior RCI approach exhibited significant intra-capsular spread and vital pathological intra-capsular and pericapsular structures. In contrast, posterior GH joint injections revealed restricted spread, mainly enlarging the joint recess without involvement of the pericapsular ligaments. This study highlights the distribution of injectate following an ultrasound-guided anterior shoulder joint injection, demonstrating that the anterior RCI approach effectively disperses a 10 mL injectate to the intra-capsular synovial lining and key pericapsular structures. The findings suggest that technique selection significantly impacts injectate distribution in adhesive capsulitis, with a 10 mL volume achieving optimal capsular distension without rupture.

Recurrence of the frozen shoulder after hydrodilatation, what is the true incidence?

Purpose of the study

To assess the outcome and recurrence rates of frozen shoulder treated by hydrodilatation in an independent hospital setting.

Method

Patients presenting to a shoulder clinic from August 2019 to July 2021 with a diagnosis of frozen shoulder were offered hydrodilatation. Data included primary or secondary frozen shoulder, length of symptoms, and diabetic status. An Oxford Shoulder Score was completed prior to hydrodilatation. Using ultrasound guidance, 40 mg Triamcinolone and local anaesthetic (10-25 mL depending on patient tolerance) were injected into the rotator interval. At a mean of 9 months, patients recorded their tolerance of the procedure, subsequent progress, the need for further treatment, and their current Oxford Shoulder Score.

Results

From 55 shoulders, six patients had a failure to improve and 10 patients had a transient improvement followed by recurrence (29%). 2/21 (9.5%) patients had 25 mL injected compared to 14/34 (41%) who had < = 20 mL (p = 0.012). 14/43 (33%) of primary frozen shoulder patients had a recurrence, compared with 2/12 (16%) secondary frozen shoulder patients, p = 0.019.

Conclusion

Further treatment was indicated in 14/34 (41%) of patients who underwent hydrodilatation in the frozen stage of frozen shoulder and could not tolerate more than 20 mL of injection, and was more commonly required in primary (33%) versus secondary (16%) frozen shoulder.

Hydrodilatation With Corticosteroid for the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Current evidence suggests that corticosteroid injection alone expedites the recovery of pain-free range of motion (ROM) in patients with adhesive capsulitis compared to physiotherapy or placebo. However, it remains unclear whether the addition of hydrodilatation with corticosteroid provides improvement in pain-free ROM as well as pain relief.

OBJECTIVE

A review of the literature was conducted to determine whether the combined intervention of hydrodilatation and corticosteroid injection expedites restoration of pain-free ROM compared to a control treatment of corticosteroid injection in patients with adhesive capsulitis.

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched from database inception to January 2017. Relevant studies were determined as randomized controlled trials written in English, comparing the outcomes of hydrodilatation and corticosteroid injection to a control group treated with corticosteroid injection alone in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Two independent reviewers assessed manuscripts for study inclusion and extracted data.

RESULTS

A total of 2276 studies were identified through the search, of which 6 randomized controlled studies (involving 410 shoulders) met criteria for inclusion in this review. Mean age ranged from 51-61 years, with mean symptom duration of 4-9 months. Studies varied significantly regarding the volume of injectate, anatomical injection approach, symptom duration, and the method of glenohumeral capsule distension (capsular rupture versus preservation). Two studies demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvement in the combination group at 3-month follow-up, and one study demonstrated clinically significant improvement only in ROM and/or pain/functional scales, compared to 3 studies demonstrating no benefit when compared to corticosteroid injection alone.

CONCLUSION

Combining hydrodilatation with corticosteroid injection potentially expedites recovery of pain-free ROM. The greatest benefit is experienced within the first 3 months of intervention. Differences in hydrodilatation techniques, inclusion of capsular preservation, anatomical approach, and length of symptoms may explain the variability in efficacy demonstrated. Further trials using larger sample sizes, better anatomical approaches, image guidance, and hydrodilatation techniques are required to determine the true nature of benefits of hydrodilatation with corticosteroid injection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Effectiveness of Glenohumeral Joint Dilatation for Treatment of Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The objective was to explore the effectiveness of glenohumeral joint distension for the treatment of frozen shoulder. We searched electronic data sources including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase from the earliest records available to February 2017. Eleven randomized controlled trials including at least one pair of comparisons between capsular distension and a reference treatment were included, comprising 747 participants. Patients’ characteristics, details of reference treatments, aspects of capsular distension therapy, and outcome measurement were evaluated at three points in time: baseline, early following intervention, and at the trial’s end. The primary and secondary outcomes were the between-group standardized mean differences of changes in shoulder function and range of motion, respectively. Regarding the long-term primary outcome, the superiority of capsular distension to reference treatments was not identified. One secondary outcome (external rotation limitation) showed a probable early positive response to capsular distension when compared to intra-articular corticosteroid injection. Aspects of approaches, imaging guiding techniques and doses of distension were not found to modify treatment effectiveness. In conclusion, distension of the glenohumeral joint provides a similar long-term efficacy to all reference treatments. A single dose of a corticosteroid-contained regimen introduced through the ultrasound-guided posterior approach is a preferable practice of capsular distension for the management of frozen shoulder.

Capsule preservation improves short-term outcome of hydraulic distension in painful stiff shoulder

The effect of intraarticular hydraulic distension (IHD) for a painful stiff shoulder (or adhesive capsulitis) has been affirmed, but whether rupturing the joint capsule during this process is beneficial remains controversial. By monitoring real-time pressure-volume (PV) profiles during IHD, we could infuse the largest possible volume without rupturing the capsule. Using the novel technique, we compared the short-term effects of IHD when the capsule was preserved versus when it was ruptured. Fifty-four patients with a painful stiff shoulder underwent IHDs intended to preserve or rupture the capsule and then classified into capsule-ruptured (n = 26) and capsule-preserved (n = 20) groups, based on the obtained PV profiles. Their profiles were triphasic or biphasic; eight with flat profiles were excluded from the comparison. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3-day and 1-month follow-ups, in terms of pain and range of motion (ROM). Although both groups showed significant increase in ROM and decrease in pain after IHD, the improvements were greater in the capsule-preserved group than in the ruptured group at both follow-up times, and in triphasic and biphasic cases. In conclusion, the therapeutic effects of IHD in short-term follow-ups were enhanced by preserving the capsule.

Real-time pressure monitoring of intraarticular hydraulic distension for painful stiff shoulders

Intraarticular hydraulic distension (IHD) has been utilized to treat painful stiff shoulders by distending and then rupturing the joint capsules. However, no attempts have been made to optimize the capsule distension, which might give a better clinical outcome. To set up a prerequisite technique for a maximal distension without rupturing the capsule, real-time pressure monitoring of IHD procedures was performed in 16 patients, which revealed triphasic pressure-volume profiles in 10 patients and biphasic in 6 patients. The IHD procedures were terminated without rupturing the capsule by observing the real-time pressure-volume curves (N = 10) or by pain (N = 3). The pressure profiles of the 13 patients who had the infusion stopped without rupture demonstrated stress-relaxation curves of the capsules. The biphasic group showed a steeper slope of the second phase of linearly increasing pressure (p = 0.017) and higher pressure (p = 0.005) with slightly larger volume (p = 0.095) at the termination of fluid infusion than did the triphasic group. The stiffness of the glenohumeral joint capsule had a close correlation with the limitation in range of motion. Real-time pressure monitoring would be helpful to develop a novel IHD technique that could distend the glenohumeral joint as much as possible without rupturing it. The biomechanical parameters derived from the pressure-volume profiles would also be useful to characterize the properties of the joints of painful stiff shoulder patients.

Interventional microadhesiolysis: a new nonsurgical release technique for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder

BACKGROUND

A nonsurgical intervention, interventional microadhesiolysis, was developed to release adhesions in joints and soft tissues. This paper introduces the procedure and evaluates the efficacy of the intervention for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder.

METHODS

Ten patients (five men and five women) with primary adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder were treated at a chronic pain management center in Korea. Three specially made needles are used in interventional microadhesiolysis: the Round, Flexed Round, and Ahn's needles. A Round Needle is inserted on the skin over middle of supraspinatus and advanced under the acromion and acromioclavicular joint (subacromial release). A Flexed Round Needle is inserted two-fingers caudal to the inferior border of the scapular spine and advanced over the capsule sliding on the surface of infraspinatus muscle-tendon fascia. The capsule is released while an assistant simultaneously passively abducts the shoulder to full abduction (posteroinferior capsule release). An Ahn's Needle is inserted on the skin over the lesser tubercle and advanced under the coracoid process sliding on the surface of the subscapularis muscle (subcoracoid release).

RESULTS

After the patients underwent interventional microadhesiolysis, the self-rated pain score or severity declined significantly (p < .01), the shoulder range of motion increased significantly (p < .01), and joint effusion in the affected shoulder decreased or disappeared in nine of ten patients on magnetic resonance imaging compared to their initial status.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that interventional microadhesiolysis is effective for managing adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder.