A comparative study on the diversity of clinical features between the sero-negative and sero-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients

Rheumatoid Factor: Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance and Therapeutic Implications in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid factor (RF) is the first autoantibody identified in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) which targets the fragment crystallizable (Fc) region of immunoglobulin (Ig) G. Although IgM isotype is predominant, other Ig isotypes, including IgG and IgA, also exist. While RF is not specific to RA, it remains a valuable serological test for diagnosing the disease, as evidenced by its inclusion in the 2010 classification criteria for RA based on elevated serum RF levels. RF is also associated with RA severity, including joint damage and extra-articular manifestations, serving as a poor prognostic factor and aiding in the identification of difficult-to-treat RA. Recent studies have demonstrated that high serum RF levels are associated with a reduced response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. In contrast, anti-TNF antibodies lacking the Fc portion have shown stable efficacy in RA patients regardless of baseline RF levels. These findings reaffirm the clinical significance of RF measurement, 80 years after its initial discovery. This review explores the diagnostic and prognostic significance of RF and its impact on treatment selection in RA management.

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Ankle Joint in Relation to Rheumatoid Factor Status and Disease Activity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a form of inflammatory disease whose clinical pattern is largely dependent on the presence of both anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and rheumatoid factor (RF). Although this is still debatable, seronegative RA seems to be a somewhat less serious condition. The present study aimed to evaluate ankle joint ultrasound in relation to RF status and disease activity in RA patients.

Methods

A cross-sectional study involving RA patients from a single center was conducted. Laboratory test evaluations and clinical activity assessments were carried out. The ankle joint was examined using musculoskeletal ultrasound (US).

Results

The study included 100 patients with established RA in total. Eighty-two patients tested positive for RF with a mean age of 42.3, whereas only 18 tested negative with a mean age of 39.6. Patients who tested positive for RF had a longer duration of illness (9.39 ± 5.39 vs. 4.56 ± 3.24). There were no differences in clinical activity scores between the seropositive and seronegative groups. The pathological US findings of any ankle joint showed no differences between the seropositive and seronegative groups. Patients with US findings of tibialis posterior tenosynovitis in the left ankle and synovitis and erosion in the right ankle, particularly in the tibiotalar and talonavicular joints, had significantly high Disease Activity Score 28-Erythrocyte sedimentation rate-scores. The increased disease activity was accompanied by significant erosions on both ankles.

Conclusion

In terms of disease activity, there is no clinically significant difference between seropositive and seronegative RA patients. Sonographic ankle joint abnormalities do not appear to be associated with the patients' RF status. High RA disease activity, on the other hand, is associated with synovitis and erosions, particularly in the talonavicular and tibiotalar joints, as well as tibialis posterior tenosynovitis.

Concomitant atypical knee gout and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis: A case report

BACKGROUND

Gout and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (SNRA) are two distinct inflammatory joint diseases whose co-occurrence is relatively infrequently reported. Limited information is available regarding the clinical management and prognosis of these combined diseases.

CASE SUMMARY

A 57-year-old woman with a 20-year history of joint swelling, tenderness, and morning stiffness who was negative for rheumatoid factor and had a normal uric acid level was diagnosed with SNRA. The initial regimen of methotrexate, leflunomide, and celecoxib alleviated her symptoms, except for those associated with the knee. After symptom recurrence after medication cessation, her regimen was updated to include iguratimod, methotrexate, methylprednisolone, and folic acid, but her knee issues persisted. Minimally invasive needle-knife scope therapy revealed proliferating pannus and needle-shaped crystals in the knee, indicating coexistent SNRA and atypical knee gout. After postarthroscopic surgery to remove the synovium and urate crystals, and following a tailored regimen of methotrexate, leflunomide, celecoxib, benzbromarone, and allopurinol, her knee symptoms were significantly alleviated with no recurrence observed over a period of more than one year, indicating successful management of both conditions.

CONCLUSION

This study reports the case of a patient concurrently afflicted with atypical gout of the knee and SNRA and underscores the significance of minimally invasive joint techniques as effective diagnostic and therapeutic tools in the field of rheumatology and immunology.

Clinical implications of seropositive and seronegative autoantibody status in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A comparative multicentre observational study

Background and Objectives

Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated protein (anti-CCP) have been used to improve the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, their association with RA disease phenotypes, individually and in combination, is not well studied. The aim of the study was to compare patients' and disease characteristics, activity and severity in double seronegative (DNRA), single seropositive RF, single seropositive anti-CCP and double seropositive (DPRA) patients.

Methods

Adults subjects with RA from Egyptian College of Rheumatology (ECR) database who had RF and anti-CCP results available were included. Demographic, clinical features, disease activity score 28 (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and laboratory data were collected and compared among different RA groups.

Results

5268 RA patients with mean age of 44.9±11.6 years, and 4477 (85%) were females. 2900 (55%) had DPRA, 892 (16.9%) had single positive RF, 597 (11.3%) had single positive anti-CCP while 879 (16.7%) had DNRA. Patients with DPRA had significantly high percentage of metabolic syndrome (19.3%, P < 0.001), and functional impairment using HAQ (P = 0.01). Older age (RRR [relative risk ratio]: 1.03, 95%CI: 1.0, 1.0, P = 0.029), greater DAS28 (RRR: 1.51, 95%CI: 1.2, 1.9, P < 0.001), higher steroid use (RRR: 2.4, 95%CI: 1.36, 4.25, P = 0.002) were at higher risk of DPRA while longer disease duration (RRR: 1.08, 95%CI: 1.01, 1.16, P = 0.017) and fibromyalgia syndrome (RRR: 2.54, 95%CI: 1.10, 5.88, P = 0.028) were associated with higher odds of single positive RF status.

Conclusion

Dual antibody-positive status has higher disease activity and severity, and higher chance of development of metabolic syndrome; highlighting the implicated role of inflammation, atherogenesis and cardiovascular disease risk in RA.

Ultrasound tenosynovitis: A differential feature of patients with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To identify differential features between patients with seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHOD

Prospective cohort study, including patients who were admitted for polyarthralgia. At baseline was performed: laboratory studies, X-rays of hands and feet, ultrasound of both hands with power Doppler technique, clinical data and clinimetry. In subsequent visits the definitive diagnosis of RA was established or not. It was considered as seronegative RA when patients were negative for both RF and ACPAs.

RESULTS

746 patients were included, of which 128 (17.1%) ended with a final diagnosis of RA. Of these 128 patients, 87 (67.9%) were seropositive RA, while 41 (32%) were seronegative RA. The only feature that showed significant differences was the presence of tenosynovitis detected by ultrasound with a positive power Doppler signal, 13.7% of the patients with seropositive RA vs 41.6% of the patients with seronegative RA (p=0.0028).

CONCLUSION

The only differential feature of patients with seronegative RA was the higher proportion of tenosynovitis detected by ultrasound.

Patients with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis have a different phenotype than seropositive patients: A clinical and ultrasound study

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory disease whose clinical phenotype largely depends on the presence of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA). Seronegative RA appears to be a less severe disease, but this remains controversial. This study aimed to assess whether seronegative patients show a less severe disease than seropositive patients.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on RA outpatients from a single center. Clinical activity scales, laboratory evaluations, and cardiovascular risk scores were assessed. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) examinations were performed.

Results

One hundred and fourteen patients were enrolled. Eighty-five were seropositive (76% women) and 29 seronegative (93% women). Seropositive patients had a younger age at disease onset (43 ± 14 vs. 54 ± 11; p = 0.001) and used sulfasalazine (47 vs. 17%; p = 0.004) and glucocorticoids (36 vs. 10%; p = 0.007) more frequently. No differences in clinical activity scales and in 10-year cardiovascular risk were observed. Pathological US data were found more frequently in seropositive patients in the 2^nd metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, both in grayscale (71 vs. 38%; p = 0.008) and in power Doppler (PD; 53 vs. 9%; p < 0.001); erosions (36 vs. 9%; p = 0.020) were also more frequent. We found greater severity of PD signals in the 2nd MCP and 3rd MCP joints of the seropositive patients, while synovitis severity was higher only in the 2nd MCP joints. The percentage of total joints with erosions (9 vs. 1%; p < 0.001) and 2nd MCP joints with erosions (25 vs. 7%; p < 0.001) was higher in seropositive patients.

Conclusion

RA patients show a differentiated phenotype according to their ACPA and RF status. In seronegative patients, RA begins later in life and has a lower requirement for antirheumatic therapies. On US evaluation, seropositive patients show more joint damage, especially in MCP joints. Despite this, long-term cardiovascular risk is similar among RA patients, regardless of their RF and ACPA status.

A new tool for early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis using combined biomarkers; synovial MAGE-1 mRNA and serum anti-CCP and RF

Introduction

rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common autoimmune disease with unknown etiology and pathogenesis. Biomarkers have the potential to aid in the clinical diagnosis of the disease, or to provide means of detecting early signs of the disease. Evaluating Melanoma associated antigen genes (MAGE-1) mRNA expression rate in synovial fluid cells and serum levels of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP) and rheumatoid factor (RF) for RA early diagnosis.

Methods

a total of 213 subjects were enrolled in the study, 135 RA patients and 78 normal subjects with traumatic knee joints (control group). Serum RF and anti-CCP were estimated quantitatively using ELISA. MAGE-1 mRNA expression rate was analyzed by RT-PCR.

Results

a significant increase in serum levels of RF IgM and anti-CCP in RA patients compared to the controls. A positively significant correlation was found between serum anti-CCP and RF IgM. The expression rate of MAGE-1 mRNA was 100% in RA patients versus the controls (0%). The specificity and the sensitivity of the three biomarkers was 100%.

Conclusion

the high expression rate of MAGE-1 in synovial fluid cells of RA patients is encouraging its utilization as a diagnostic biomarker for RA. The combined use of MAGE-1 transcript in synovial fluid cells, serum RF and anti-CCP is recommended for improving early diagnostic ability of RA.

Rheumatoid Arthritis: Seropositivity versus Seronegativity; A Comparative Cross-sectional Study Arising from Moroccan Context

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is biologically marked by a positive serum rate of rheumatoid factor (RA) and/or anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA). Nevertheless, 20% of RA cases remain seronegative.

OBJECTIVE

The main purpose of this study, is to bring out the clinical, biological, imaging, therapeutic, and evolutionary distinctions between seropositive RA and seronegative one.

METHODS

This is an observational cross-sectional study that involves patients with RA admitted in the rheumatology department, from the period between January 2012 and January 2018. RA seronegativity is described as the absence of both RF and ACPA, while seropositivity is recognized by the presence of at least one of the two antibodies.

RESULTS

294 patients were included, of which 90% were seropositive and 10% seronegative. Therefore, RA in this study is seropositive most often. The bivariate analysis underscored plenty of differences, statistically notable, according to the RA immune status. In fact, patients with seropositive RA had more synovitis (p=0.049), more deformities (p=0.01), and more bone destruction on radiographs (p=0.04). Furthermore, RA in this Moroccan study was quite severe (p=0.006) and got more complicated by systemic manifestations (p=0.02). Whereas, no distinction was brought up between the two groups, concerning the use of biotherapy. As for the multivariate study, seropositive RA in these patients, had greater severity (p=0.009, OR=4.53) and was more deforming (p=0.03 OR=2.45).

CONCLUSION

RA in our Moroccan context is dominated by the seropositive form. This seropositivity is often coupled with clinical severity and joint destruction, resulting in more deformities.

Clinical management of seronegative and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis: A comparative study

Both rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) are associated with poor radiologic outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In general, RA patients positive for RF or ACPA (SPRA) are considered to manifest an aggressive disease course compared with seronegative RA patients (SNRA). However, the relationship between seropositivity and measures of disease severity other than radiologic outcome is disputed. In this study, we sought to compare the clinical presentations and treatment outcomes of SNRA and SPRA patients. A total of 241 patients diagnosed with DMARD-naïve RA under either 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria or 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria were identified (40 with SNRA and 201 with SPRA). We investigated the disease activity measures including ESR, CRP, patient VAS, 28 tender/swollen joint count (28 TJC, 28 SJC) and DAS28 as well as radiologic outcomes at baseline, 1 and 2 years after conventional treatment with DMARD. Age, sex and disease duration were similar between SNRA and SPRA. However, the baseline 28 TJC (4.7±2.9 vs. 3.3±2.7, p = 0.004), 28 SJC (4.3±3.0 vs. 2.9±2.3, p = 0.001) and DAS28 (5.1±1.0 vs. 4.7±1.0, p = 0.043) components were significantly higher in SNRA than in SPRA. Over 2 years of similar treatment with DMARDs, all disease activity measures significantly improved in both groups. Comparison among populations matched for baseline disease activity showed that ΔDAS28 at 1 year was greater in SNRA than in SPRA (-2.84±1.32 vs. -3.70±1.29, p = 0.037) in high disease activity population (DAS28-ESR>5.1). Radiologic outcomes at baseline and at 1- or 2-year follow-up were similar between the 2 groups. In conclusion, SNRA patients manifested more active disease at baseline, but showed a better response to treatment compared with SPRA. SNRA does not appear to be a benign subtype of RA.