Ultrasound-guided retro-calcaneal bursa corticosteroid injection for refractory Achilles tendinitis in patients with seronegative spondyloarthropathy: efficacy and follow-up study

Posterior Heel Pain in Cavovarus Foot: How to Approach It

When a patient presents with posterior heel pain on the background of a cavovarus foot, there are many different aspects to take into account. The morphology of the foot and the specific cause of the patient's pain lead the practitioner to alter the treatment appropriately. Some patients should only receive physiotherapy, but the majority should receive more invasive treatments, including calcaneal osteotomies or tendon debridement, depending on their particular presentation and pathology. This review examines the various different facets of posterior heel pain that must be dealt with and the most up-to-date treatments for the same.

Platelet-rich plasma in chronic Achilles tendinopathy

INTRODUCTION

Achilles tendinopathy [AT] is a functional problem characterised by swelling and pain above the Achilles tendon insertion region. In individuals with AT, PRP or platelet-rich plasma can be used as an alternative modality of treatment with an aim to lessen the discomfort and enhance functional recovery. We assessed the available data supporting the effectiveness of PRP in treating chronic AT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We did a literature search for randomised controlled trials [RCTs] that contrasted the effectiveness of PRP with that of eccentric exercise and placebo injections as treatment for AT in databases such as the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE. The Visual analogue scale [VAS] score, Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles [VISA-A] score, and Achilles tendon thickness were used to measure the results. We used the RevMan 5.3.5 software for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We included five RCTs in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the VISA-A between the PRP and placebo groups at 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 1 year after treatment. However, at 6 weeks after treatment, PRP exhibited better efficacy than the placebo treatment. Two studies in our meta-analysis included VAS scores and tendon thickness. There was no significant difference in VAS scores at 6 weeks and 24 weeks after treatment. However, VAS scores at 12 weeks and tendon thickness were significantly different.

CONCLUSION

PRP injection is an effective treatment for chronic AT. It has a unique potential for increasing function and reducing discomfort in AT patients.

Different clinical presentations of Achilles tendinopathy: a cross-sectional study

Achilles tendinopathy (AT) is a common debilitating tendon disorder in the lower extremity. Clinical presentation of AT might differ from place to place, depending on different variables including cultural factors. This study was conducted to determine the clinical picture of AT in a group of clients referring to an outpatient orthopedics clinic in Shiraz, southern Iran. In this cross-sectional study, a convenient sample of 61 (46 female and 15 male) patients attending to a referral outpatient clinic affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences with a definite diagnosis of AT was studied. Patients with partial- or full-thickness tear of Achilles tendon, history of radicular pain or lower extremity injury, previous history of surgery on their lower extremity, and pregnant women were excluded from the study. We used Maffulli et al. (Foot Ankle Surg 26:240-9, 2020) criteria for the diagnosis of AT in our patients. The patients had a mean age of 47.7 (SD 11.1) years and mean BMI of 28.7 (4.2) kg/m2. There was no significant correlation between the age and body mass index of the participants (Pearson's r = -0.028, p = 0.832). The prevalence of insertional AT among 58 patients with only one site affected, was 84% (95% CI 72-92%), significantly (p < 0.001) higher than that of midportional AT (16%). Women were more frequently affected than men (p < 0.001). The clinical presentation of AT in southern Iran is somewhat different from those reported in other parts of the world. Further studies on larger groups of patients should be done to determine the causes of the observed differences.

Enthesitis in Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis-To Inject or Not To Inject?: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE

Enthesitis is a key manifestation of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) and is considered to be the tissue where the disease initiates. Enthesitis leads to pain and substantial limitations in patients with PsA. Treatment is key in achieving remission or minimal disease activity. Whether it is safe to apply injections to entheseal tissue is unknown. This narrative review aimed to summarize the literature on the efficacy and tolerability of entheseal corticosteroid (CS) injections.

METHODS

The published literature was searched through PubMed as well as identifying relevant articles from their citations,  for articles on the anatomic location of the injection, tissue characteristics (eg, whether there is a tendon sheath), blind versus imaging-guided and entheseal versus perientheseal injections, and related studies in animals. Given that articles on SpA are limited, those on mechanical enthesopathies were also included.

FINDINGS

The literature on the efficacy and tolerability of entheseal CS injection in SpA and PsA are limited. In most articles on entheseal injection, the entheseal tissue has not actually been targeted. The decision of entheseal injection should be made on an individual basis, with consideration of the use of CS injection as the last treatment option following more conservative measures such as NSAIDs, physiotherapy, rest, and lifestyle modifications. Entheseal injection should be avoided in high-risk patients, such as those who have rupture at the enthesis. Diagnostic ultrasound is advised to ensure the presence of inflammation that can potentially benefit from corticosteroid injection, as well as the absence of rupture. In the authors' perspective, perientheseal injections should be tried before intraentheseal injections. Finally, ultrasound guidance for needle placement is strongly encouraged.

IMPLICATIONS

The literature on the efficacy and tolerability of entheseal CS injection in SpA and PsA is limited. With the lack of quality data, recommendations on entheseal corticosteroid injection remain expert opinion.

Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of Achilles tendon disease

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in the treatment of patients with Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) and Achilles tendinopathy (AT) has been controversial.

AIM

To assess PRP injections’ effectiveness in treating ATR and AT.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of relevant literature was conducted utilizing multiple databases such as Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Science and Technology Journal, EMBASE, and China Biomedical CD-ROM. The present investigation integrated randomized controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma injections in managing individuals with Achilles tendon rupture and tendinopathy. The eligibility criteria for the trials encompassed publications that were published within the timeframe of January 1, 1966 to December 2022. The statistical analysis was performed utilizing the Review Manager 5.4.1, the visual analogue scale (VAS), Victorian Institute Ankle Function Scale (VISA-A), and Achilles Tendon Thickness were used to assess outcomes.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 13 randomized controlled trials, 8 of which were randomized controlled trials of PRP for AT and 5 of which were randomized controlled trials of PRP for ATR. PRP for AT at 6 wk [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 1.92, 95%CI: -0.54 to 4.38, I² = 34%], at 3 mo [WMD = 0.20, 95%CI: -2.65 to 3.05, I² = 60%], and 6 mo [WMD = 2.75, 95%CI: -2.76 to 8.26, I² = 87%) after which there was no significant difference in VISA-A scores between the PRP and control groups. There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the PRP group and the control group after 6 wk [WMD = 6.75, 95%CI: -6.12 to 19.62, I² = 69%] and 6 mo [WMD = 10.46, 95%CI: -2.44 to 23.37, I² = 69%] of treatment, and at mid-treatment at 3 mo [WMD = 11.30, 95%CI: 7.33 to 15.27, I² = 0%] after mid-treatment, the PRP group demonstrated better outcomes than the control group. Post-treatment patient satisfaction [WMD = 1.07, 95%CI: 0.84 to 1.35, I² = 0%], Achilles tendon thickness [WMD = 0.34, 95%CI: -0.04 to 0.71, I² = 61%] and return to sport [WMD = 1.11, 95%CI: 0.87 to 1.42, I² = 0%] were not significantly different between the PRP and control groups. The study did not find any statistically significant distinction between the groups that received PRP treatment and those that did not, regarding the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles scores at 3 mo [WMD = -1.49, 95%CI: -5.24 to 2.25, I² = 0%], 6 mo [WMD = -0.24, 95%CI: -3.80 to 3.32, I² = 0%], and 12 mo [WMD = -2.02, 95%CI: -5.34 to 1.29, I² = 87%] for ATR patients. Additionally, no significant difference was observed between the PRP and the control groups in improving Heel lift height respectively at 6 mo [WMD = -3.96, 95%CI: -8.61 to 0.69, I² = 0%] and 12 mo [WMD = -1.66, 95%CI: -11.15 to 7.83, I² = 0%] for ATR patients. There was no significant difference in calf circumference between the PRP group and the control group after 6 mo [WMD = 1.01, 95%CI: -0.78 to 2.80, I² = 54%] and 12 mo [WMD = -0.55, 95%CI: -2.2 to 1.09, I² = 0%] of treatment. There was no significant difference in ankle mobility between the PRP and control groups at 6 mo of treatment [WMD = -0.38, 95%CI: -2.34 to 1.58, I² = 82%] and after 12 mo of treatment [WMD = -0.98, 95%CI: -1.41 to -0.56, I² = 10%] there was a significant improvement in ankle mobility between the PRP and control groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of return to exercise after treatment [WMD = 1.20, 95%CI: 0.77 to 1.87, I² = 0%] and the rate of adverse events [WMD = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.50 to 1.45, I² = 0%] between the PRP group and the control group.

CONCLUSION

The use of PRP for AT improved the patient’s immediate VAS scores but not VISA-A scores, changes in Achilles tendon thickness, patient satisfaction, or return to sport. Treatment of ATR with PRP injections alone improved long-term ankle mobility but had no significant effect on VISA-A scores, single heel lift height, calf circumference or return to sport. Additional research employing more extensive sampling sizes, more strict experimental methods, and standard methodologies may be necessary to yield more dependable and precise findings.

Ultrasonography-guided Intervention in the Achilles Tendon and Plantar Fascia

Tendinopathy is very common in the foot and ankle. Achilles tendinopathy is a painful overuse injury that often occurs in athletes, especially those who participate in running and jumping sports. Plantar fasciitis is the most frequent cause of plantar pain in the adult heel. Initial treatment of these conditions is conservative. However, in some cases symptoms only improve slowly, and many cases are intractable. When conservative management fails, ultrasonography guided injections are indicated. We discuss the main interventions performed in the foot and ankle for Achilles tendinopathy, retrocalcaneal bursitis, and plantar fasciitis. We describe the different agents that can be used and the various ultrasonography-guided procedures that offer technical and practical information to improve daily clinical practice.

Current evidence and practical knowledge for ultrasound-guided procedures in rheumatology: Joint aspiration, injection, and other applications

Ultrasound (US)-guided procedures have increasingly gained their role in the daily practice of rheumatology, owing to the growing evidence supporting their utility. The utilization of US guidance in procedures may enhance their accuracy, efficacy, and safety. This article presents a comprehensive review of the current evidence and practical knowledge pertaining to US-guided procedures in rheumatology, encompassing joint aspirations, injections, and other applications such as tendon sheath injections. We provide a detailed description of the US-guided procedure process and compare the in-plane and out-of-plane view methods, along with practical techniques based on existing evidence or our own expertise. For each joint, we summarize how to perform procedures with figures to facilitate a better understanding. Additionally, we introduce other applications of US-guided procedures for tendons, enthesis, bursae, and nerves as well as emerging therapies such as US-guided fascia hydrorelease. By utilizing these US techniques, rheumatologists can achieve the ability to manage a wider range of musculoskeletal conditions.

The Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Achilles Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Over the past few years, many studies have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in treating musculoskeletal conditions. However, there is controversy about its benefits for patients with Achilles tendinopathy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether platelet-rich plasma injections can improve outcomes in patients with Achilles tendinopathy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biomedical CD-ROM, and Chinese Science and Technology Journal databases to identify randomised controlled clinical trials that compared the efficacy of PRP injection in patients with Achilles tendinopathy (AT) versus placebo, published between 1 January 1966 and 1 December 2022. Review Manager 5.4.1 software was used for the statistical analysis, and the Jadad score was used to assess the included literature. Only 8 of the 288 articles found met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Our work suggests that: The PRP treatment group had a slightly higher VISA-A score than the placebo group at 6 weeks [MD = 1.92, 95% CI (-0.54, 4.38), I² = 34%], at 12 weeks [MD = 0.20, 95% CI (-2.65 3.05), I² = 60%], and 24 weeks [MD = 2.75, 95% CI (-2.76, 8.26), I² = 87%]). However, the difference was not statistically significant. The Achilles tendon thickness was higher at 12 weeks of treatment in the PRP treatment group compared to the control group [MD = 0.34, 95% CI (-0.04, 0.71), p = 0.08], but the difference was not statistically significant. The VAS-improvement results showed no significant difference at 6 and 24 weeks between the two groups, respectively (MD = 6.75, 95% CI = (-6.12, 19.62), I² = 69%, p = 0.30), and (MD = 10.46, 95% CI = (-2.44 to 23.37), I² = 69%, p = 0.11). However, at 12 weeks of treatment, the PRP injection group showed a substantial VAS improvement compared to the control group (MD = 11.30, 95% CI = (7.33 to 15.27), I² = 0%, p < 0.00001). The difference was statistically significant. The return to exercise rate results showed a higher return to exercise rate in the PRP treatment group than the placebo group [RR = 1.11, 95% CI (0.87, 1.42), p = 0.40]; the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

There is no proof that PRP injections can enhance patient functional and clinical outcomes for Achilles tendinopathy. Augmenting the frequency of PRP injections may boost the outcomes, and additionally, more rigorous designs and standardised clinical randomised controlled trials are needed to produce more reliable and accurate results.

The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound - Part II: Joint Pathologies, Pediatric Applications, and Guided Procedures

The second part of the Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound (MSUS), produced under the auspices of EFSUMB, following the same methodology as for Part 1, provides information and recommendations on the use of this imaging modality for joint pathology, pediatric applications, and musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided procedures. Clinical application, practical points, limitations, and artifacts are described and discussed for every joint or procedure. The document is intended to guide clinical users in their daily practice.

Safety and efficacy of image-guided retrocalcaneal bursa corticosteroid injection for the treatment of retrocalcaneal bursitis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and efficacy of image-guided retrocalcaneal bursa corticosteroid injection for retrocalcaneal bursitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After IRB approval, all fluoroscopically guided and ultrasound-guided retrocalcaneal bursa injections (2013-2019) were retrospectively evaluated. Pre-procedure US and radiographs were scored by 2 blinded radiologists in consensus for Achilles tendinosis and retrocalcaneal bursitis (0-3 scale), Achilles enthesopathy (present/absent), and Haglund deformity (present/absent). Pre- and post-procedure pain scores (0-10 scale) evaluated short-term response at 1-4 weeks: excellent (7-10 point decline), good (4-6 point decline), fair (1-3 point decline), or no response. Paired t-test determined significance of short-term improvement. Kaplan-Meier method analyzed time to progression to surgery or complication at 6-month minimum follow-up. Logistic regression analysis evaluated for association between demographic and imaging variables and negative outcome.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighteen injections (181 female; mean 54.5 years) performed under ultrasonographic (157, 72%) or fluoroscopic (61, 28%) guidance were evaluated for complication and long-term outcomes. Injections with short-term follow-up (n = 62) yielded excellent or good response in 62.9% (p < 0.00001). Thirty patients (14%) had subsequent elective Achilles surgery. Bursal Doppler flow was associated with progression to surgery (p = 0.00042). No differences were identified in outcomes between US and fluoroscopic-guidance cohorts. Four Achilles ruptures (1.8%) were identified 15-59 days post-injection, each with immediately preceding acute injury.

CONCLUSION

Image-guided retrocalcaneal bursa corticosteroid injection yields significant short-term decrease in pain score in majority (63%) of patients. Subsequent Achilles tendon rupture rate was 1.8%. Bursa Doppler flow was significantly correlated with progression to surgery and may represent a negative prognostic indicator.

Glucocorticoids in spondyloarthritis-systematic review and real-world analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify and summarize the efficacy and safety of systemic glucocorticoids (GCs) and local injections of GC in SpA.

METHODS

PubMed (Medline) and EMBASE were searched with pre-defined keywords for relevant articles in English reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized interventional studies and non-randomized observational studies of the efficacy of GC in SpA, with five or more patients, for inclusion in a systematic literature review. Local injections of GC included IA and entheseal injections, but excluded SI joint injections.

RESULTS

Out of 9657 records identified, there were 14 studies on the use of systemic GCs in SpA (364 patients), including two RCTs of oral prednisolone. On pooling data from two placebo-controlled RCTs (≤24 weeks), BASDAI 50 was 4.2 times more likely (95% CI: 1.5, 11.5) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Assessment Group (ASAS) 20 was twice more likely (95% CI: 1.1, 3.64) to occur in patients on high-dose oral prednisolone (± taper). Pulsed GCs led to dramatic improvements that lasted a few weeks to a few months. There were no deaths or major adverse events. There were 10 studies (560 patients) on local GCs in SpA. IA injection was effective in achieving a sustained response in 51.5-90% of joints at 6 months. Entheseal injections led to reduced pain and improved US parameters.

CONCLUSION

There were limited studies on either systemic or local injections of GCs in SpA. However, there was good evidence of efficacy with the use of high-dose systemic GCs in the short term (≤6 months) in SpA. Both IA and entheseal injections seemed safe and effective.

Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-part VI, foot and ankle

Objectives

Clarity regarding accuracy and effectiveness for interventional procedures around the foot and ankle is lacking. Consequently, a board of 53 members of the Ultrasound and Interventional Subcommittees of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) reviewed the published literature to evaluate the evidence on image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures around this anatomical region.

Methods

We report the results of a Delphi-based consensus of 53 experts from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology who reviewed the published literature for evidence on image-guided interventional procedures offered around foot and ankle in order to derive their clinical indications. Experts drafted a list of statements and graded them according to the Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine levels of evidence. Consensus was considered strong when > 95% of experts agreed with the statement or broad when > 80% but < 95% agreed. The results of the Delphi-based consensus were used to write the paper that was shared with all panel members for final approval.

Results

A list of 16 evidence-based statements on clinical indications for image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures in the foot and ankle were drafted after a literature review. The highest level of evidence was reported for four statements, all receiving 100% agreement.

Conclusion

According to this consensus, image-guided interventions should not be considered a first-level approach for treating Achilles tendinopathy, while ultrasonography guidance is strongly recommended to improve the efficacy of interventional procedures for plantar fasciitis and Morton’s neuroma, particularly using platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroids, respectively.

Key Points

• The expert panel of the ESSR listed 16 evidence-based statements on clinical indications of image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures in the foot and ankle.

• Strong consensus was obtained for all statements.

• The highest level of evidence was reached by four statements concerning the effectiveness of US-guided injections of corticosteroid for Morton’s neuroma and PRP for plantar fasciitis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08125-z.

Non-pharmacological interventions and corticosteroid injections for the management of the Achilles tendon in inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Achilles tendon (AT) pathologies, particularly Achilles enthesitis, are common in inflammatory arthritis (IA). Although there are various non-pharmacological interventions and injection therapies available, it is unknown if these interventions are effective for people with IA, as this population is often excluded from studies investigating the management of AT pathologies. This study aimed to identify and critically appraise the evidence for non-pharmacological interventions and corticosteroid injections in the management of AT pathology in those with IA.

METHODS

All studies which met the inclusion criteria (AT interventions in adults with a working clinical diagnosis of IA, English language) were identified from the following databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library. The search strategies used the search terms 'spondyloarthropathies', 'inflammatory arthritis', 'achilles tendon', 'physical therapy', 'conservative management', 'injections', and related synonyms. Studies included were quantitative longitudinal design, such as randomised controlled trials, pseudo randomised and non-randomised experimental studies, observational studies, cohort studies, and case control studies. All outcome measures were investigated, quality assessment to determine internal and external validity of included studies was undertaken, and qualitative data synthesis was conducted.

RESULTS

Of the 10,911 articles identified in the search strategy, only two studies that investigated the efficacy of corticosteroid injections for the management of the AT in IA met the inclusion criteria, and no studies were identified for non-pharmacological interventions. Both injection studies had low quality rating for internal and external validity, and thus overall validity. The included studies only investigated two outcome domains: pain and ultrasound (US) (B Mode and Doppler) identified abnormalities and vascularity in the AT. There is weak evidence suggesting a short-term improvement (6-12 weeks) in pain and for the reduction in some abnormal US (B-Mode and Doppler) detectable features (entheseal thickness, bursitis, and entheseal vascularity) at the AT and surrounding structures post-corticosteroid injection.

CONCLUSION

Weak evidence is available regarding the efficacy of corticosteroid injections in reducing pain and inconclusive evidence for the improvement of abnormal US detectable features. No studies were identified for non-pharmacological interventions. It is evident from the lack of relevant literature that there is an urgent need for more studies assessing non-pharmacological interventions for the AT in people with IA.

Efficacy of local injection therapy for heel pain in rheumatic inflammatory diseases: A systematic review

Heel pain or achillodynia is one of the most common manifestations in patients with rheumatic inflammatory diseases (RID) and particularly spondyloarthritis (SpA). It can be associated with inflammation at the bone insertion of tendon, ligament, bursa or fascia. However, treatment is still a challenge for rheumatologists. Several findings highlighted the proven benefit of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and recently, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors. However, only limited data about the efficacy of local therapy such as glucocorticoid and anti-TNF injections are available. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of local therapies in heel pain and to make recommendations for further studies. Five studies discussing the effectiveness of local treatments of heel pain in RID were included. All studies recognized that the ultrasonography (US)-guided local corticosteroid or etanercept injections were effective and safe modalities for the treatment of inflammatory heel enthesitis, tendinitis, and retrocalcaneal bursitis (RCB) in patients with RID. Pain relief at the local site was associated with a reversion of the acute inflammatory changes in the heel. Furthermore, US-guided injection in RCB with a lateral approach was beneficial in terms of preventing side effects.

Meta-analysis of Noninsertional Achilles Tendinopathy

BACKGROUND

Achilles tendinopathy is a common clinical problem that can be either insertional or noninsertional. A variety of treatment methods have been described, although little consensus exists on an optimal method or methods. We sought to investigate the current evidence on different treatment methods for noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy, with a focus on functional outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a review of the available literature in PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Data from included studies were categorized according to treatment method and analyzed with respect to functional outcome and complication rate.

RESULTS

In total, 1420 abstracts were reviewed, of which 72 articles containing 3523 patients met inclusion criteria. Within the 72 studies included, 6 operative techniques and 19 nonoperative treatments were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

A wide variety of treatments are available for noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy, although newer treatments and most operative methods lack high-level evidence. Eccentric exercise is the most thoroughly studied and supported nonoperative treatment, while tenotomy and debridement is the operative procedure with the most evidence of efficacy. Platelet-rich plasma injections and extracorporeal shockwave therapy have proven to be viable second-line nonoperative treatments. Gastrocnemius recession and flexor hallucis longus transfer have shown benefit in case series.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, systematic review.

Peripheral spondyloarthritis: a neglected entity-state of the art

Peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) refers to a number of seemingly different spondyloarthritis subsets in which psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is the most common, and symptoms of arthritis, enthesitis or dactylitis predominate the clinical presentation. Although formal classification criteria for pSpA have been introduced in 2011, only a minority of epidemiological and clinical studies addressed this clinical entity as a separate disease. Moreover, research on outcome measures and treatment modalities in pSpA has been mainly focused on PsA. Subsequently, all biological treatments are off-label in patients with non-psoriatic pSpA. Its neglected status has important implications for clinical practice since the emerging group of early-diagnosed non-psoriatic pSpA patients remains poorly characterised and lacks specific treatment recommendations. This review summarises what is currently known regarding pSpA in terms of epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and therapeutic approach.

The Brazilian Society of Rheumatology guidelines for axial spondyloarthritis - 2019

Spondyloarthritis is a group of chronic inflammatory systemic diseases characterized by axial and/or peripheral joints inflammation, as well as extra-articular manifestations. The classification axial spondyloarthritis is adopted when the spine and/or the sacroiliac joints are predominantly involved. This version of recommendations replaces the previous guidelines published in May 2013.A systematic literature review was performed, and two hundred thirty-seven studies were selected and used to formulate 29 recommendations answering 15 clinical questions, which were divided into four sections: diagnosis, non-pharmacological therapy, conventional drug therapy and biological therapy. For each recommendation the level of evidence supporting (highest available), the strength grade according to Oxford, and the degree of expert agreement (inter-rater reliability) is informed.These guidelines bring evidence-based information on clinical management of axial SpA patients, including, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.

The Effects of Corticosteroid Injection in the Healthy and Damaged Achilles Tendon Model: Histopathological and Biomechanical Experimental Study in Rats

OBJECTIVE

To show the effects of corticosteroids on inflammatory reactions in the injured Achilles tendon in rats.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Thirty-two adult Wistar Albino rats were used in the study. The rats were divided into 4 groups. In the first group (Intact Saline), saline solution was injected to the intact Achilles tendon. In the second group (Intact Corticosteroid), corticosteroid was injected to the intact tendon. In the third group (Injured Saline), saline solution was injected to the injured Achilles tendon. In the fourth group (Injured Corticosteroid), corticosteroid was injected to the injured tendon. All groups were sacrificed on day 30 and Achilles tendons were taken and prepared for histological and biomechanical evaluation.

RESULTS

According to the biomechanical test; mean load-to-failure of the Intact Saline group was significantly lower than the Intact Corticosteroid (p=0.016), Injured Saline (p=0.001) and Injured Corticosteroid) (p=0.012) groups. According to the histopathological evaluation, tenocyte mean of the Intact Saline group was statistically lower than the Injured Saline and Injured Corticosteroid groups. Tenocyte mean of the Intact Corticosteroid group was statistically significantly lower than the Injured Saline and Injured Corticosteroid groups. The ground substance mean of the Intact Saline group was significantly lower than the Injured Saline and Injured Corticosteroid groups. The ground substance mean of the Intact Corticosteroid group was significantly lower than the Injured Saline and Injured Corticosteroid groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of calcification.

CONCLUSION

It has been found that there is biomechanical and histopathological significant benefit of intra-tendon corticosteroid administration in the experimentally generated Achilles tendon injury model.

Peripheral spondyloarthritis: Concept, diagnosis and treatment

Peripheral spondyloarthritis refers to spondyloarthritis with predominant peripheral (arthritis, enthesitis or dactylitis) involvement. Diagnosis can be challenging, particularly in the absence of SpA extra-articular manifestations such as uveitis, psoriasis or inflammatory bowel disease. Evaluation of disease activity should always include assessment of objective signs of inflammation, particularly in the presence of enthesitis as the sole peripheral manifestation, mainly due to the potential misdiagnosis with fibromyalgia tender points. Several recommendations for management/treatment of psoriatic arthritis have been published by EULAR and GRAPPA but none for peripheral SpA in general. NSAIDs and glucocorticoids are recommended as the first step of treatment in all peripheral manifestations, while conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs seem only efficacious in arthritis. Several biologics and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs (TNFi, anti-IL17 and JAK-inhibitors) have been proven to be efficacious in peripheral involvement in PsA (arthritis and enthesitis), but studies on peripheral SpA are lacking.

Platelet-rich plasma injection for the treatment of chronic Achilles tendinopathy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is used as an alternative therapy to reduce pain and improve functional restoration in patients with Achilles tendinopathy (AT). We evaluated the current evidence for the efficacy of PRP as a treatment for chronic AT.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of PRP with that of with placebo injections plus eccentric training as treatment for AT. The articles were uploaded over the establishment of the databases to May 01, 2018. The Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool was used to assess methodological quality. Outcome measurements included the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A), visual analog scale (VAS) and Achilles tendon thickness. Statistical analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3.5 software.

RESULTS

Five RCTs (n = 189) were included in this meta-analysis. Significant differences in the VISA-A were not observed between the PRP and placebo groups after 12 weeks [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.2, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.36 to 0.76, I = 71%], 24 weeks (SMD = 0.77, 95% CI: -0.10-1.65, I = 85%) and 1 year (SMD = 0.83, 95% CI: -0.76-2.42, I = 72%) of treatment. However, PRP exhibited better efficacy than the placebo treatment after 6 weeks (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.15-0.77, I = 34%). Two studies included VAS scores and tendon thickness. VAS scores after 6 weeks (SMD = 1.35, 95% CI: -0.1.04-3.74, I = 93%) and 24 weeks (SMD = 1.48, 95% CI: -0.1.59-4.55, I = 95%) were not significantly different. However, VAS scores at the 12th week (SMD = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.53-1.68, I = 83%) and tendon thickness (SMD = 1.51, 95% CI: 0.39-2.63, I = 53%) were significantly different.

CONCLUSION

PRP injection around the Achilles tendon is an option for the treatment of chronic AT. Limited evidence supports the conclusion that PRP is not superior to placebo treatment. These results still require verification by a large number of well designed, heterogeneous RCT studies.