Unknown internal carotid artery atherosclerotic stenoses detected with biphasic multidetector computed tomography for head and neck cancer

Carotid endarterectomy for the management of carotid stenosis occurring concurrently with head and neck cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Currently, most patients with concurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) and carotid stenosis (CS) are treated disjointedly for their oncologic and vascular lesions. The purpose of this review is to evaluate literature exploring a novel approach to these cases that poses several advantages, in which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is performed simultaneously with surgical resection of HNC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Carotid stenosis is a common comorbidity of patients presenting with head and neck cancer as these pathologies have overlapping risk factors. Adjuvant oncologic therapy such as radiation therapy to the site of the lesion is known to increase development or progression of carotid stenosis. Performing simultaneous surgical management of CS and HNC decreases total procedures for the patient, provides a less challenging surgical field, and eliminates prioritization of treatment initiation for one pathology over the other. There has been limited reporting of simultaneous CEA with oncologic resection of HNC in the literature. However, of the 21 cases reviewed here, no perioperative strokes were reported with only one perioperative death from myocardial infarction.

SUMMARY

Available literature supports that simultaneous CEA with oncologic resection of HNC is safe and may offer several advantages, although larger studies are required.

Carotid artery wall thickness measured using CT: inter- and intraobserver agreement analysis

SUMMARY

The purpose of this work was to compare inter- and intraobserver agreement in the analysis of CAWT by using MDCTA. The CAWT in 35 patients was quantified by 4 observers. Bland-Altman statistics were used to measure the agreement between observers. The results of our study demonstrated that the CAWT measured by using MDCTA shows a good reproducibility between observers by considering inter- and intraobserver agreement.

Management of head and neck cancer in elderly patients

Head and neck cancer (HNC) represents a heterogeneous group of tumours requiring multimodality approaches. It is debatable whether HNC treatment in geriatric patients should be different to that delivered for younger patients. Furthermore, the risk of death seems to be higher in HNC patients with higher co-morbidity status. Despite the fact that there is no significant difference in outcome in younger versus older patients, older HNC patients are more likely to receive nonstandard, less aggressive therapies than younger patients. Age alone should not be the basis for selecting treatment options in older HNC patients. A thorough pretreatment evaluation of co-morbidities should always be performed, and radical surgical options should not be excluded in older HNC patients treated with curative intent, as postoperative complications occur no more frequently in older patients than in younger patients. Locoregional control and disease-free survival in older patients treated with radiation therapy (either with curative intent or in the palliative setting) are comparable to the results seen in younger HNC patients, with the same acute toxicity profile. In patients receiving systemic therapies, special attention must be given to modification of chemotherapy dosages according to renal and hepatic function. Molecular-targeted therapies appear to be very useful in such patients because of their favourable tolerability. In conclusion, once all physiological and biological risk factors have been addressed, a large proportion of geriatric patients can and should be offered the same HNC treatment as is offered to younger patients.

Radiation-associated carotid artery atherosclerosis: case report and review of contemporaneous literature

Radiation therapy (RT) is a component of the treatment of patients with head and neck malignancies. This therapy may damage the nearby carotid arteries, thereby initiating or accelerating the atherosclerotic process (atheroma formation). Dentists treating patients who have been irradiated should examine the patient's panoramic radiograph for evidence of atheroma-like calcifications, which appear 1.5 to 2.5 cm posterior and inferior to the angle of the mandible. Patients with evidence of such lesions should be referred to their primary care physician with the suggestion that an ultrasound examination of the carotid arteries is indicated.

Color Doppler, power Doppler and B-flow ultrasound in the assessment of ICA stenosis: Comparison with 64-MD-CT angiography

The purpose of this study is to investigate the diagnostic potential of color-coded Doppler sonography (CCDS), power-Doppler (PD) and B-flow ultrasound in assessing the degree of extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis in comparison to CT-angiography (MD-CTA). Thirty-two consecutive patients referred for CTA with 41 ICA-stenoses were included in this prospective study. MD-CTA was performed using a 64 row scanner with a CTDIvol of 13.1 mGy/cm. In CTA, CCDS, PD and B-flow, the degree of stenosis was evaluated by the minimal intrastenotic diameter in comparison to the poststenotic diameter. Two radiologists performed a quantitative evaluation of the stenoses in consensus blinded to the results of ultrasound. These were correlated to CTA, CCDS, PD and B-flow, intraoperative findings and clinical follow-up. Grading of the stenoses in B-flow ultrasound outperformed the other techniques in terms of accuracy with a correlation coefficient to CTA of 0.88, while PD and CCDS measurements yield coefficients of 0.74 and 0.70. Bland-Altman analysis additionally shows a very little bias of the three US methods between 0.5 and 3.2 %. There is excellent correlation (coefficient 0.88, CI 0.77-0.93) with 64-MD-CTA and B-flow ultrasound in terms of accuracy for intrastenotic and poststenotic diameter. Duplex sonography is useful for screening purposes.