Influence of heart rate on diagnostic accuracy and image quality of 16-slice CT coronary angiography: comparison of multisegment and halfscan reconstruction approaches

Myocardial CT perfusion imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: multisegment reconstruction does not improve diagnostic performance

BACKGROUND

Multisegment reconstruction (MSR) was introduced to shorten the temporal reconstruction window of computed tomography (CT) and thereby reduce motion artefacts. We investigated whether MSR of myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) can improve diagnostic performance in detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with halfscan reconstruction (HSR).

METHODS

A total of 134 patients (median age 65.7 years) with clinical indication for invasive coronary angiography and without cardiac surgery prospectively underwent static CTP. In 93 patients with multisegment acquisition, we retrospectively performed both MSR and HSR and searched both reconstructions for perfusion defects. Subgroups with known (n = 68) or suspected CAD (n = 25) and high heart rate (n = 30) were analysed. The area under the curve (AUC) was compared applying DeLong approach using ≥ 50% stenosis on invasive coronary angiography as reference standard.

RESULTS

Per-patient analysis revealed the overall AUC of MSR (0.65 [95% confidence interval 0.53, 0.78]) to be inferior to that of HSR (0.79 [0.69, 0.88]; p = 0.011). AUCs of MSR and HSR were similar in all subgroups analysed (known CAD 0.62 [0.45, 0.79] versus 0.72 [0.57, 0.86]; p = 0.157; suspected CAD 0.80 [0.63, 0.97] versus 0.89 [0.77, 1.00]; p = 0.243; high heart rate 0.46 [0.19, 0.73] versus 0.55 [0.33, 0.77]; p = 0.389). Median stress radiation dose was higher for MSR than for HSR (6.67 mSv versus 3.64 mSv, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MSR did not improve diagnostic performance of myocardial CTP imaging while increasing radiation dose compared with HSR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CORE320: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00934037, CARS-320: NCT00967876.

Evaluation of slice sensitivity profiles for helical and axial 4D-CT acquisitions on the Philips Brilliance CT Big Bore

PURPOSE

4D-CT can be performed using two acquisition modes. One employs a cine axial scan and the other acquires the data using a very low pitch helical acquisition. This study evaluates the longitudinal resolutions of each of these methods by creating slice sensitivity profiles (SSP).

METHODS

An SSP phantom was scanned using both axial and helical scanning modes. The phantom was scanned at the center of the field of view (FOV) and at several points offset from the FOV center. For helical scans, the pitch was varied from 0.04 to 0.2. With the axial scans, the phantom position relative to the center of the detector ring was varied. All of these were performed using a 16 × 1.5 mm collimation.

RESULTS

The SSP graphs were generated from these scanned datasets. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the graphs was used as the surrogate for longitudinal resolution. The results of these experiments demonstrated that axial scans have a slightly better resolution at CT isocenter (1.5 vs 1.8 mm). Helical mode scanning maintained this measurement for varying pitch factors and placement with the scan field. However, the resolution for axial scans degrades as the phantom is moved further from the center of the FOV and is positioned nearer to the edge of the detector rings.

CONCLUSIONS

When it is imperative to maintain uniform longitudinal resolution throughout the FOV, it is suggested that helical acquisition be utilized or the axial mode data be reconstructed to account for beam divergence. For axial scans, this will require either limiting the longitudinal extent of each cine axial acquisition and/or using a smaller reconstructed FOV.

An initial randomised study assessing free-breathing CCTA using 320-detector CT

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility of free-breathing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in adults using with a 320-detector multidetector CT (MDCT).

METHODS

In 74 patients who underwent CCTA, 37 CCTA examinations were performed during free-breathing, and the remaining 37 CCTA examinations were produced with the standard breath-holding method. The quality scores for 16 segments of all coronary arteries were analysed and defined as: 1 (excellent), 2 (good), and 3 (poor). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and effective radiation dose of each image were compared between the two methods.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the quality scores between the breath-holding and free-breathing methods (1.10 ± 0.31 vs. 1.12 ± 0.33; P = 0.443). The SNR and CNR were not significantly different between the two methods. The overall mean effective radiation dose revealed no significant difference between the two methods (P = 0.585).

CONCLUSIONS

Free-breathing CCTA using 320-detector MDCT showed no significant difference in image quality compared with standard breath-holding CCTA. For patients with difficulties of breath-holding or non-negligible apnoea-related heart rate variability, free-breathing CCTA can be an alternative solution for coronary artery evaluation.

KEY POINTS

• Cardiac CT is becoming widely used and some patients are inevitably breathless. • Multidetector CT (e.g. 320) offers new opportunities for the breathless patient. • Free breathing images yielded similar image quality to those obtained using breath-holding. • However, a possibility of higher radiation dose precludes its routine application.

Diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed-tomography for detection of significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with various heart rates and heart rhythms compared with conventional coronary-angiography

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice CT for detection of significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with various heart rates (HR) and heart rhythms, including tachycardia and chronic atrial-fibrillation (CAF) compared with conventional-coronary-angiography (CAG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One-hundred-six consecutive patients underwent both 320-slice CT and CAG within 3 months (normal-sinus-rhythm [NSR] 91.5%, CAF 8.5%, mean HR 65 ± 15 beats/min). There were no cardiac events between the 2 procedures. Patients were divided in 2 groups: Group 1 (HR <65 with NSR at CT scan, n=62), and Group 2 (HR >64 with NSR or heart rhythm irregularities at CT scan, n=44). Patients with >50% or >75% luminal stenosis on CT were compared with those with >50% or >75% stenosis on CAG, respectively.

RESULTS

In a segment-by-segment analysis, in all patients, sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of >50% stenosis on CT for predicting >50% stenosis on CAG were 69, 98, 78, and 97%, respectively, and those of >75% stenosis on CT for predicting >75% stenosis on CAG were 78, 98, 64, and 99%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of >50% and 75% stenosis on CT for predicting >50% and >75% stenosis, respectively, on CAG were comparable. Diagnostic accuracy was essentially the same in both groups.

CONCLUSION

320-slice CT had high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis compared with CAG. Even though the numbers were small, patients with high HR or heart rhythm irregularities might have essentially equivalent results to those with low HR with NSR.

Mortality risk in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a prospective 2-center study of 2,583 patients undergoing 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography

OBJECTIVES

We examined mortality risk in relation to extent and composition of nonobstructive plaques by 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA).

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of nonobstructive coronary artery plaques by CCTA is poorly understood.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated consecutive adults from 2 centers undergoing 64-detector row CCTA without prior documented coronary artery disease (CAD) and without obstructive (≥50%) CAD by CCTA. Luminal diameter stenosis severity was classified for each segment as none (0%) or mild (1% to 49%), and plaque composition was classified as noncalcified, calcified, or mixed.

RESULTS

During 3.1 ± 0.5 years, 54 intermediate-term (≥90 days) deaths occurred among 2,583 patients (2.09%), with 4 early (<90 days) deaths. Adjusted for CAD risk factors, the presence of any nonobstructive plaque was associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.98, 95% confidence Interval [CI]: 1.06 to 3.69, p = 0.03), with the highest risk among those exhibiting nonobstructive CAD in 3 epicardial vessels (HR: 4.75, 95% CI: 2.10 to 10.75, p = 0.0002) or ≥5 segments (HR: 5.12, 95% CI: 2.16 to 12.10, p = 0.0002). Higher mortality for nonobstructive CAD was observed even among patients with low 10-year Framingham risk (3.4%, p < 0.0001) as well as those with no traditional, medically treatable CAD risk factors, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia (6.7%, p < 0.0001). No independent relationship between plaque composition and incident mortality was observed. Importantly, patients without evident plaque experienced a low rate of incident death during follow-up (0.34%/year).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence and extent of nonobstructive plaques augment prediction of incident mortality beyond conventional clinical risk assessment.

[Oral versus intravenous beta-blockers for computed tomography coronary angiography? A randomized controlled trial]

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the time employed in the radiological management of outpatients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography varies in function of whether oral or intravenous beta-blockers are administered.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective, analytical, randomized controlled trial. A total of 40 patients with heart rates greater than 65 beats per minute were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Patients in group 1 were administered oral beta-blockers and patients in group 2 were administered intravenous beta-blockers. We measured the overall time from entry to the radiology department to exit from the CT examination room. We also measured heart rate, blood pressure, and the number of conclusive studies.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) overall time was 120 (100-150) minutes in the 19 patients who received oral beta-blockers compared to 35 (27.5-67.5) minutes in the 21 patients who received intravenous beta-blockers (p<0.001). The median time that patients were in the CT examination room was 10 (6-15) minutes in Group 1 and 10 (9-20) minutes in Group 2 (p = 0.57). The decrease in mean arterial pressure was 10 mmHg after the administration of intravenous beta-blockers compared to 3.3 mmHg after the administration of oral beta-blockers (p = 0.01). No significant differences were found in the diagnostic quality of the examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

The time employed in the radiological management of patients undergoing CT coronary angiography is significantly lower when beta-blockers are administered intravenously. There was no difference in the time patients were in the CT examination room or in the diagnostic quality of the examinations.

Coronary computed tomography angiography using prospective electrocardiography-gated axial scans with 64-detector computed tomography: evaluation of stair-step artifacts and padding time

PURPOSE

We compared stair-step artifacts and radiation dose between prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-gated coronary computed tomography angiography (prospective CCTA) and retrospective CCTA using 64-detector CT and determined the optimal padding time (PT) for prospective CCTA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 183 patients [mean heart rate (HR) <65 beats/min, maximum HR instability <5 beats/min] who had undergone CCTA. We scored stair-step artifacts from 1 (severe) to 5 (none) and evaluated the effective dose in 53 patients with retrospective CCTA and 130 with prospective CCTA (PT 200 ms, n = 32; PT 50 ms, n = 98).

RESULTS

Mean artifact scores were 4.3 in both retrospective and prospective CCTAs. However, statistically more arteries scored <3 (nonassessable) on prospective CCTA (P < 0.001). Mean scores for prospective CCTA with 200- and 50-ms PT were 4.1 and 4.3, respectively (no significant difference). The radiation dose of prospective CCTA was reduced by 59.1% to 80.7%.

CONCLUSION

Prospective CCTA reduces the radiation dose and allows diagnostic imaging in most cases but shows more nonevaluable artifacts than retrospective CCTA. Use of 50-ms instead of 200-ms PT appears to maintain image quality in patients with a mean HR < 65 beats/min and HR instability of <5 beats/min.

Patient characteristics as predictors of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT compared with conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery stenoses: CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to investigate patient characteristics associated with image quality and their impact on the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT for the detection of coronary artery stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred ninety-one patients with a coronary artery calcification (CAC) score of <or=600 Agatston units (214 men and 77 women; mean age, 59.3+/-10.0 years [SD]) were analyzed. An overall image quality score was derived using an ordinal scale. The accuracy of quantitative MDCT to detect significant (>or=50%) stenoses was assessed using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) per patient and per vessel using a modified 19-segment model. The effect of CAC, obesity, heart rate, and heart rate variability on image quality and accuracy were evaluated by multiple logistic regression. Image quality and accuracy were further analyzed in subgroups of significant predictor variables. Diagnostic analysis was determined for image quality strata using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Increasing body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR]=0.89, p<0.001), increasing heart rate (OR=0.90, p<0.001), and the presence of breathing artifact (OR=4.97, p<or=0.001) were associated with poorer image quality whereas sex, CAC score, and heart rate variability were not. Compared with examinations of white patients, studies of black patients had significantly poorer image quality (OR=0.58, p=0.04). At a vessel level, CAC score (10 Agatston units) (OR=1.03, p=0.012) and patient age (OR=1.02, p=0.04) were significantly associated with the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative MDCT compared with QCA. A trend was observed in differences in the areas under the ROC curves across image quality strata at the vessel level (p=0.08).

CONCLUSION

Image quality is significantly associated with patient ethnicity, BMI, mean scan heart rate, and the presence of breathing artifact but not with CAC score at a patient level. At a vessel level, CAC score and age were associated with reduced diagnostic accuracy.

Applications of cardiac multidetector CT beyond coronary angiography

Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using multidetector CT (MDCT) represents one of the most promising diagnostic imaging advances in contemporary cardiology. This challenging application has driven a rapid and impressive advancement in CT technology over the past 10 years; leading to increased spatial and temporal resolution, decreased scan times and substantial reductions in radiation dose. Recent technological improvements have not only improved the status of CT coronary angiography but have also enabled new functional myocardial applications that are gaining a foothold in clinical practice as adjuncts or replacements for conventional coronary angiographic studies. Wide-detector CT designs along with prospective ECG-triggered protocols have opened the possibility of performing multiple complementary myocardial measurements during a coronary CT exam with acceptable radiation and contrast exposure. In this Review, we discuss recent technical developments in cardiac MDCT and outline newly enabled noncoronary cardiac applications including viability assessment, myocardial perfusion and molecular imaging.

3D fusion of intravascular ultrasound and coronary computed tomography for in-vivo wall shear stress analysis: a feasibility study

Wall shear stress, the force per area acting on the lumen wall due to the blood flow, is an important biomechanical parameter in the localization and progression of atherosclerosis. To calculate shear stress and relate it to atherosclerosis, a 3D description of the lumen and vessel wall is required. We present a framework to obtain the 3D reconstruction of human coronary arteries by the fusion of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and coronary computed tomography angiography (CT). We imaged 23 patients with IVUS and CT. The images from both modalities were registered for 35 arteries, using bifurcations as landmarks. The IVUS images together with IVUS derived lumen and wall contours were positioned on the 3D centerline, which was derived from CT. The resulting 3D lumen and wall contours were transformed to a surface for calculation of shear stress and plaque thickness. We applied variations in selection of landmarks and investigated whether these variations influenced the relation between shear stress and plaque thickness. Fusion was successfully achieved in 31 of the 35 arteries. The average length of the fused segments was 36.4 ± 15.7 mm. The length in IVUS and CT of the fused parts correlated excellently (R (2) = 0.98). Both for a mildly diseased and a very diseased coronary artery, shear stress was calculated and related to plaque thickness. Variations in the selection of the landmarks for these two arteries did not affect the relationship between shear stress and plaque thickness. This new framework can therefore successfully be applied for shear stress analysis in human coronary arteries.

Comparison between the image quality of multisegment and halfscan reconstructions of non-invasive CT coronary angiography

The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of multisegment and halfscan reconstructions of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography. 126 patients with suspected coronary artery disease and uninfluenced heart rates were examined by 16-slice CT before they underwent invasive coronary angiography. Multisegment and halfscan reconstructions were performed in all patients, and subjective image quality, overall vessel length, vessel length free of motion artefacts and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were compared for both techniques. The diagnostic accuracy of both approaches was compared with the results of invasive coronary angiography. Overall image quality scores of multisegment reconstruction were superior to those of halfscan reconstruction (13.3+/-2.1 vs 11.9+/-2.9; p<0.001). Multisegment reconstruction depicted significantly longer overall coronary vessel lengths (p<0.001) and larger vessel proportions free of motion artefacts in three of the four main coronary arteries. CNRs in the left main, left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary arteries were significantly higher when multisegment reconstruction was used (p<0.001). Overall accuracy was higher for multisegment reconstruction compared with halfscan reconstruction (87% vs 62%). In conclusion, multisegment reconstruction significantly improves image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography compared with standard halfscan reconstruction, resulting in vessel lengths depicted free of motion comparable to those of CT performed in patients given beta-blockers to lower heart rates.

The "post-64" era of coronary CT angiography: understanding new technology from physical principles

Multidetector CT now provides noninvasive coronary imaging, and patients with a low or intermediate probability of coronary artery disease can be imaged with radiation levels comparable to catheterization. Cardiac imaging drives rapid progress in CT hardware. To best apply evolving technology, imagers and referring clinicians need a solid understanding of spatial resolution, temporal resolution, volume coverage, and radiation dose. This article defines and discusses interactions between these parameters for state-of-the-art CT.

The influence of reconstruction algorithm and heart rate on coronary artery image quality and stenosis detection at 64-detector cardiac CT

Objective

We wanted to evaluate the impact of two reconstruction algorithms (halfscan and multisector) on the image quality and the accuracy of measuring the severity of coronary stenoses by using a pulsating cardiac phantom with different heart rates (HRs).

Materials and Methods

Simulated coronary arteries with different stenotic severities (25, 50, 75%) and different luminal diameters (3, 4, 5 mm) were scanned with a fixed pitch of 0.16 and a 0.35 second gantry rotation time on a 64-slice multidetector CT. Both reconstruction algorithms (halfscan and multisector) were applied to HRs of 40-120 beats per minute (bpm) at 10 bpm intervals. Three experienced radiologists visually assessed the image quality and they manually measured the stenotic severity.

Results

Fewer measurement errors occurred with multisector reconstruction (p = 0.05), a slower HR (p < 0.001) and a larger luminal diameter (p = 0.014); measurement errors were not related with the observers or the stenotic severity. There was no significant difference in measurements as for the reconstruction algorithms below an HR of 70 bpm. More nonassessable segments were visualized with halfscan reconstruction (p = 0.004) and higher HRs (p < 0.001). Halfscan reconstruction had better quality scores when the HR was below 60 bpm, while multisector reconstruction had better quality scores when the HR was above 90 bpm. For the HRs between 60 and 90 bpm, both reconstruction modes had similar quality scores. With excluding the nonassessable segments, both reconstruction algorithms achieved a similar mean measured stenotic severity and similar standard deviations.

Conclusion

At a higher HR (above 90 bpm), multisector reconstruction had better temporal resolution, fewer nonassessable segments, better quality scores and better accuracy of measuring the stenotic severity in this phantom study.

Determining optimal acquisition parameters for computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation of a software-assisted, breathhold exam simulation

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Scanning parameters used in multislice computed tomographic (MSCT) coronary angiography should be adapted to patients' heart rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of success of a software-assisted scan simulation to determine optimal gantry rotation time prior to MSCT coronary angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 218 64-slice MSCT coronary angiographic studies were retrospectively analyzed. Prior to the MSCT examination, a scan had been simulated by giving a breath-hold command, after which a software program recorded the patient's heart rate from an electrocardiogram over the expected scanning time and predicted optimal scanning parameters. The success rate in predicting optimal parameters for the subsequent MSCT examination and the resulting acquisition window width were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was a wide range of heart rates among the patients. The mean intraindividual variation during scan simulation and examination was 4.8 beats/min. Optimal scan parameters were selected in 179 of 218 cases (82%). The median acquisition window width achieved in this group was 174 ms (range, 100-200), compared with 192 ms (range, 149-225) in cases in which suboptimal settings were selected (P < .001). Correct prediction occurred significantly more often in patients with low heart rates (<66 beats/min) than in those with higher heart rates (>or=66 beats/min) (93% vs 66%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The software-assisted scan simulation was a fast and simple procedure that allowed the selection of optimal computed tomographic parameters in >80% of patients. The procedure may be a useful adjunct to avoid unwanted synchronicity of gantry rotation and heart cycle and optimize temporal resolution in MSCT coronary angiography.

Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64

Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses is a promising candidate for widespread clinical application because of its non-invasive nature and high sensitivity and negative predictive value as found in several previous studies using 16 to 64 simultaneous detector rows. A multi-centre study of CT coronary angiography using 16 simultaneous detector rows has shown that 16-slice CT is limited by a high number of nondiagnostic cases and a high false-positive rate. A recent meta-analysis indicated a significant interaction between the size of the study sample and the diagnostic odds ratios suggestive of small study bias, highlighting the importance of evaluating MSCT using 64 simultaneous detector rows in a multi-centre approach with a larger sample size. In this manuscript we detail the objectives and methods of the prospective "CORE-64" trial ("Coronary Evaluation Using Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography Angiography using 64 Detectors"). This multi-centre trial was unique in that it assessed the diagnostic performance of 64-slice CT coronary angiography in nine centres worldwide in comparison to conventional coronary angiography. In conclusion, the multi-centre, multi-institutional and multi-continental trial CORE-64 has great potential to ultimately assess the per-patient diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography using 64 simultaneous detector rows.

Evaluation of right ventricular function with multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and analysis of inter- and intraobserver variability

This study was performed to prospectively compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with 16 simultaneous sections and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of global right ventricular function in 50 patients. MDCT using a semiautomatic analysis tool showed good correlation with MRI for end-diastolic volume (EDV, r=0.83, p<0.001), end-systolic volume (ESV, r=0.86, p<0.001) and stroke volume (SV, r=0.74, p<0.001), but only a moderate correlation for the ejection fraction (EF, r=0.67, p<0.001). Bland Altman analysis revealed a slight, but insignificant overestimation of EDV (4.0 ml, p=0.08) and ESV (2.4 ml, p=0.07), and underestimation of EF (0.1%, p=0.92) with MDCT compared with MRI. All limits of agreement between both modalities (EF: +/-15.7%, EDV: +/-31.0 ml, ESV: +/-18.0 ml) were in a moderate but acceptable range. Interobserver variability of MDCT was not significantly different from that of MRI. For MDCT software, the post-processing time was significantly longer (19.6+/-5.8 min) than for MRI (11.8+/-2.6 min, p<0.001). Accurate assessment of right ventricular volumes by 16-detector CT is feasible but still rather time-consuming.

Is there a gender difference in noninvasive coronary imaging? Multislice computed tomography for noninvasive detection of coronary stenoses

BACKGROUND

Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography is the foremost alternative to invasive coronary angiography.

METHODS

We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MSCT in female and male patients with suspected coronary disease. Altogether 50 women and 95 men underwent MSCT with 0.5 mm detector collimation. Coronary artery stenoses of at least 50% on conventional coronary angiography were considered significant.

RESULTS

The coronary vessel diameters of all four main coronary artery branches were significantly larger in men than in women. The diagnostic accuracy of MSCT in identifying patients with coronary artery disease was significantly lower for women (72%) compared with men (89%, p < 0.05). Also sensitivity (70% vs. 95%), positive predictive value (64% vs. 93%), and the rate of nondiagnostic examinations (14% vs. 4%, all: p < 0.05) were significantly worse for women. The effective radiation dose of MSCT coronary angiography was significantly higher in the examination of women (13.7 +/- 1.2 mSv) than of men (11.7 +/- 0.9 mSv, p < 0.001), mainly as a result of the fact that the radiosensitive female breast (contributing 24.5% of the dose in women) is in the x-ray path.

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive coronary angiography with MSCT might be less accurate and sensitive for women than men. Also, women are exposed to a significantly higher effective radiation dose than men.