Optimal table feed in run-off CT angiography in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms

Virtual single source CT using dual source acquisition: Clinical applicability in run-off CT-angiography for intra-individual comparison of different scan protocols

PURPOSE

Virtual single source computed tomography (VSS-CT) acquisition on a dual source CT (DSCT) has been demonstrated to allow for dose-neutral intra-individual comparison of three acquisition protocols at different radiation dose levels (RDL) within one acquisition in a phantom. The purpose of this study was twofold: first to evaluate the applicability of VSS-CT in patients and second to optimize the task-dependent trade-off between radiation dose and image quality of lower extremity CT angiography (run-off CTA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this IRB-approved prospective study 52 patients underwent run-off CTA between 06/2012 and 06/2013. VSS-CT acquisition was conducted using a first generation DSCT applying equal X-ray tube settings (120 kVp), collimation (2 × 32 × 0.6 mm), and slice thickness (1.0 mm) but different effective tube current-time products (tube A: 80 mAs, tube B: 40 mAs). Three different image datasets representing three different radiation dose levels (RDL40, RDL80, RDL120) were reconstructed using a soft kernel from the raw data of tube B, tube A or both tubes combined. Dose length products (DLP) of each raw data set were documented. Quantitative image quality (IQ) was assessed for five anatomical levels using image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). To investigate dose efficiency of each acquisition, the dose-weighted CNR (CNRD) was determined. Qualitative IQ was evaluated by two blinded readers in consensus using a 5-point Likert scale and compared with a Friedman- and posthoc Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

Mean DLP was 200 ± 40, 400 ± 90 and 600 ± 130 mGy·cm for the RDL40, RDL80 and RDL120, respectively. Image noise and CNR were best for RDL120 and decreased significantly for RDL80 and RDL40, independent of the anatomic level (p < 0.001). CNRD showed no significant differences at the abdominal and pelvic level between the investigated radiation dose levels. However, for thigh to foot level a significant increase of CNRD was noted between RDL120, RDL80 and RDL40. Significant differences of qualitative IQ were observed between RDL120 and RDL40 from the abdominal to the foot level, whereas no difference was seen for the other dose levels.

CONCLUSION

Radiation dose splitting with VSS-CT can be applied to run-off CTA facilitating intra-individual comparison of different acquisition protocols without additional radiation exposure. Furthermore, a radiation dose reduction potential for run-off CTA of approximately 1/3 as compared to the acquisition protocol recommended by the manufacturer could be identified in this study.

Diagnostic confidence of run-off CT-angiography as the primary diagnostic imaging modality in patients presenting with acute or chronic peripheral arterial disease

Objectives

To investigate the reliability of CT-angiography of the lower extremities (run-off CTA) to derive a treatment decision in patients with acute and chronic peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Materials and Methods

314 patients referred for run-off CTA were includ-ed in this retrospective study. First, diagnostic confidence of run-off CTA to derive a treat-ment decision was assessed in an interdisciplinary vascular conference using a 2 point scale (sufficient or not sufficient diagnostic confidence) and compared with the image quality eval-uated by two readers in consensus in four different levels (abdominopelvic, thigh, calf, foot arteries). Second, reliability of treatment decision was verified in all patients undergoing re-vascularization therapy.

Results

Diagnostic confidence of run-off CTA to derive a treatment deci-sion was sufficient in all patients with acute and in 97% of patients (215/221) with chronic PAD, whereas the rate of run-off CTA with non-diagnostic image quality was considerably higher in the calf and foot level (acute vs. chronic; calf: 28% vs.17%; foot: 52% vs. 20%). Reliability of treatment decision was superior for patients with chronic (123/133 = 92%) than for patients with acute PAD (64/78 = 82%, P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Run-off CTA is a reliable imaging modality for primary diag-nostic work-up of patients with acute and chronic PAD.

Low contrast volume run-off CT angiography with optimized scan time based on double-level test bolus technique--feasibility study

PURPOSE

To verify the technical feasibility of low contrast volume (40 mL) run-off CT angiography (run-off CTA) with the individual scan time optimization based on double-level test bolus technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study of 92 consecutive patients who underwent run-off CTA performed with 40 mL of contrast medium (injection rate of 6 mL/s) and optimized scan times on a second generation of dual-source CT. Individual optimized scan times were calculated from aortopopliteal transit times obtained on the basis of double-level test bolus technique--the single injection of 10 mL test bolus and dynamic acquisitions in two levels (abdominal aorta and popliteal arteries). Intraluminal attenuation (HU) was measured in 6 levels (aorta, iliac, femoral and popliteal arteries, middle and distal lower-legs) and subjective quality (3-point score) was assessed. Relations of image quality, test bolus parameters and arterial circulation involvement were analyzed.

RESULTS

High mean attenuation (HU) values (468; 437; 442; 440; 342; 274) and quality score in all monitored levels was achieved. In 91 patients (0.99) the sufficient diagnostic quality (score 1-2) in aorta, iliac and femoral arteries was determined. A total of 6 patients (0.07) were not evaluable in distal lower-legs. Only the weak indirect correlation of image quality and test-bolus parameters was proved in iliac, femoral and popliteal levels (r values: -0.263, -0.298 and -0.254). The statistically significant difference of the test-bolus parameters and image quality was proved in patients with occlusive and aneurysmal disease.

CONCLUSION

We proved the technical feasibility and sufficient quality of run-off CTA with low volume of contrast medium and optimized scan time according to aortopopliteal transit time calculated from double-level test bolus.