Differentiation of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging

Imaged periductal infiltration: Diagnostic and prognostic role in intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma

Purpose

This study examines periductal infiltration in intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC), focusing on its importance for differentiating hepatic tumors and its influence on post-surgical survival in IMCC patients.

Methods

Eighty-three consecutive patients with IMCC (n = 43) and liver cancer whose preoperative images showed intrahepatic bile duct dilatation adjacent to the tumor for differential diagnosis from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [n = 21], metastatic liver cancer (MLC) [n = 16] and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) [n = 3] were enrolled. CT and MRI findings of simple bile duct compression, imaged periductal infiltration, and imaged intrabiliary growth adjacent to the main tumor were reviewed. Clinicopathological and imaging features were compared in each group. The sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio were calculated for each imaging finding of IMCC versus the other tumor groups. Overall survival was compared between cases of IMCC with and without imaged periductal infiltration.

Results

Simple bile duct compression and imaged intrabiliary growth were more frequently observed in HCC than in the others (p < 0.0001 and 0.040, respectively). Imaged periductal infiltration was observed more often in histopathologically confirmed large-duct type IMCC than in the small-duct type IMCC (p = 0.034). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that only imaged periductal infiltration (odds ratio, 50.67) was independently correlated with IMCC. Patients with IMCC who had imaged periductal infiltration experienced a poorer prognosis than those without imaged periductal infiltration (p = 0.0034).

Conclusion

Imaged periductal infiltration may serve as a significant marker for differentiating IMCC from other liver cancers. It may also have the potential to predict post-surgical outcomes in patients with IMCC.

Dual-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation of MRI features with other primary hepatocellular carcinoma and differential diagnosis

Objectives

Dual-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma (DPHCC) is a rare subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma characterized by high invasiveness and a poor prognosis. The study aimed to compare clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of DPHCC with that of non-DPHCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), exploring the most valuable features for diagnosing DPHCC.

Methods

A total of 208 cases of primary liver cancer, comprising 27 DPHCC, 113 non-DPHCC, and 68 ICC, who undergone gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, were enrolled in this study. The clinicopathologic and MRI features of all cases were summarized and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the predictors. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate the 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in the cohorts.

Results

In the multivariate analysis, the absence of tumor capsule (P = 0.046; OR = 9.777), persistent enhancement (P = 0.006; OR = 46.941), arterial rim enhancement (P = 0.011; OR = 38.211), and target sign on DWI image (P = 0.021; OR = 30.566) were identified as independently significant factors for distinguishing DPHCC from non-DPHCC. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >20 μg/L (P = 0.036; OR = 67.097) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) positive (P = 0.020; OR = 153.633) were independent significant factors for predicting DPHCC compared to ICC. The 1-year and 2-year DFS rates for patients in the DPHCC group were 65% and 50%, respectively, whereas those for the non-DPHCC group were 80% and 60% and for the ICC group were 50% and 29%, respectively. The 1-year and 2-year OS rates for patients in the DPHCC group were 74% and 60%, respectively, whereas those for the non-DPHCC group were 87% and 70% and for the ICC group were 55% and 37%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significant differences in the 1-year and 2-year OS rates between the DPHCC and non-DPHCC groups (P = 0.030 and 0.027) as well as between the DPHCC and ICC groups (P = 0.029 and 0.016).

Conclusion

In multi-parameter MRI, combining the assessment of the absence of tumor capsule, persistent enhancement, arterial rim enhancement, and target sign on DWI image with clinical data such as AFP >20 μg/L and HBV status may support in the diagnosis of DPHCC and differentiation from non-DPHCC and ICC. Accurate preoperative diagnosis facilitates the selection of personalized treatment options.

Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic ability between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in distinguishing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Original studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and CEUS in differentiating ICC from HCC were identified in PubMed and EMBASE databases. Histopathological examination was used as the reference standard for tumor diagnosis. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2 scale. Data were extracted to calculate the pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) using a bivariate random-effects model, as well as the area under the curve (AUC). Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and investigation of publication bias were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies with 28 data subsets (18 on MRI, 10 on CEUS) were included, consisting of 4169 patients with 1422 ICC lesions and 2747 HCC lesions. Most MRI studies were performed at 3T with hepatobiliary agents, and most CEUS studies used SonoVue as the contrast agent. In MRI, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC in distinguishing ICC from HCC were 0.81 (0.79, 0.84), 0.90 (0.88, 0.91), 41.47 (24.07, 71.44), and 0.93 (0.90, 0.96), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC of CEUS were 0.88 (0.84, 0.90), 0.80 (0.78, 0.83), 42.06 (12.38, 133.23), and 0.93 (0.87, 0.99), respectively. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis demonstrated significant heterogeneity among the studies associated with the type of contrast agent in MRI studies. No publication bias was found.

CONCLUSION

Both MRI and CEUS showed excellent diagnostic performance in differentiating ICC from HCC. CEUS showed higher pooled sensitivity and MRI showed higher pooled specificity.

Molecular targeted and systemic therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-disciplinary approach

Most patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are diagnosed with advanced disease. For individuals with resectable tumors, R0 resection with lymphadenectomy is the best potentially curative-intent treatment. After resection, adjuvant therapy with capecitabine is the current standard of care. For patients with unresectable or distant metastatic disease, doublet chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is the most utilized first-line regimen, but recent studies using triplet regimens and even the addition of immunotherapy have begun to shift the paradigm of systemic therapy. Molecular therapies have recently received US FDA approval for second-line treatment for patients harboring actionable genomic alterations. This review focuses on the multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of ICC with an emphasis on molecular targeted and systemic therapy.

Risk stratification for overall survival and recurrence-free survival after R0 resection for solitary intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma based on preoperative MRI and clinical features

PURPOSE

This study aimed to establish two nomograms for predicting overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with solitary intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 120 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with solitary IMCC. Preoperative MRI and clinical features were collected. Based on the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, two nomograms were constructed to predict OS and RFS, respectively. The effective performance of the nomograms was evaluated using concordance index (C-index). The prognostic stratification systems for OS and RFS were developed and used to classify patients into high- and low-risk groups.

RESULTS

Suspicious lymph nodes, arterial phase (AP) enhancement patterns, and bile duct dilatation were independent predictors of OS, while suspicious lymph nodes, AP enhancement patterns, and necrosis were independent predictors of RFS. The nomograms achieved the C-index values of 0.705/0.710 for OS and 0.721/0.759 for RFS in the development/validation cohorts, which were significantly higher than those of the T and TNM stages (P < 0.05). Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups, the 1-year OS and RFS rates of high-risk patients were poorer than those of patients with low-risk in the development cohort (OS: 93.5% vs 76.3%, P < 0.001; RFS: 74.5% vs 22.4%, P < 0.001). Similar results were observed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Two nomograms were constructed based on preoperative MRI features in patients with solitary IMCC for predicting the OS and RFS and facilitate further prognostic stratification.

Diagnostic Value of MRI Features in Dual-phenotype Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study

This study aimed to explore the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of dual-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma (DPHCC) and their diagnostic value.The data of 208 patients with primary liver cancer were retrospectively analysed between January 2016 and June 2021. Based on the pathological diagnostic criteria, 27 patients were classified into the DPHCC group, 113 patients into the noncholangiocyte-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma (NCPHCC) group, and 68 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) were classified into the ICC group. Two abdominal radiologists reviewed the preoperative MRI features by a double-blind method. The MRI features and key laboratory and clinical indicators were compared between the groups. The potentially valuable MRI features and key laboratory and clinical characteristics for predicting DPHCC were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses, and the odds ratios (ORs) were recorded. In multivariate analysis, tumour without capsule (P = 0.046, OR = 9.777), dynamic persistent enhancement (P = 0.006, OR = 46.941), and targetoid appearance on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (P = 0.021, OR = 30.566) were independently significant factors in the detection of DPHCC compared to NCPHCC. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) > 20 µg/L (P = 0.036, OR = 67.097) and prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (P = 0.020, OR = 153.633) were independent significant factors in predicting DPHCC compared to ICC. The differences in other tumour marker levels and imaging features between the groups were not significant. In MR enhanced and diffusion imaging, tumour without capsule, persistent enhancement and DWI targetoid findings, combined with AFP > 20 µg/L and HBV infection-positive laboratory results, can help to diagnose DPHCC and differentiate it from NCPHCC and ICC. These results suggest that clinical, laboratory and MRI features should be integrated to construct an AI diagnostic model for DPHCC.

Machine learning based on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for differentiating atypical intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma from poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

The study was to develop a Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI radiomics model for differentiating atypical intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (aIMCC) from poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (pHCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 134 patients (51 aIMCC and 83 pHCC) who underwent Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI between March 2016 and March 2022 were enrolled in this study and then randomly assigned to the training and validation cohorts by 7:3 (93 patients and 41 patients, respectively). The radiomics features were extracted from the hepatobiliary phase of Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. In the training cohort, the SelectKBest and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used to select the radiomics features. The clinical, radiomics, and clinical-radiomics model were established using four machine learning algorithms. The performance of the model was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Comparison of the radiomics and clinical-radiomics model was done by the Delong test. The clinical usefulness of the model was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

In 1132 extracted radiomic features, 15 were selected to develop radiomics signature. For identifying aIMCC and pHCC, the radiomics model constructed by random forest algorithm showed the high performance (AUC = 0.90) in the training cohort. The performance of the clinical-radiomics model (AUC = 0.89) was not significantly different (P = 0.88) from that of the radiomics model constructed by random forest algorithm (AUC = 0.86) in the validation cohort. DCA demonstrated that the clinical-radiomics model constructed by random forest algorithm had a high net clinical benefit.

CONCLUSION

The clinical-radiomics model is an effective tool to distinguish aIMCC from pHCC and may provide additional value for the development of treatment plans.

A Deep Learning Workflow for Mass-Forming Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Classification Based on MRI

OBJECTIVE

Precise classification of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for personalized treatment strategy. The purpose of the present study was to differentiate MF-ICC from HCC applying a novel deep-learning-based workflow with stronger feature extraction ability and fusion capability to improve the classification performance of deep learning on small datasets.

METHODS

To retain more effective lesion features, we propose a preprocessing method called semi-segmented preprocessing (Semi-SP) to select the region of interest (ROI). Then, the ROIs were sent to the strided feature fusion residual network (SFFNet) for training and classification. The SFFNet model is composed of three parts: the multilayer feature fusion module (MFF) was proposed to extract discriminative features of MF-ICC/HCC and integrate features of different levels; a new stationary residual block (SRB) was proposed to solve the problem of information loss and network instability during training; the attention mechanism convolutional block attention module (CBAM) was adopted in the middle layer of the network to extract the correlation of multi-spatial feature information, so as to filter the irrelevant feature information in pixels.

RESULTS

The SFFNet model achieved an overall accuracy of 92.26% and an AUC of 0.9680, with high sensitivity (86.21%) and specificity (94.70%) for MF-ICC.

CONCLUSION

In this paper, we proposed a specifically designed Semi-SP method and SFFNet model to differentiate MF-ICC from HCC. This workflow achieves good MF-ICC/HCC classification performance due to stronger feature extraction and fusion capabilities, which provide complementary information for personalized treatment strategy.

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enhancement in the Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarinoma

Background

The distinction between combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before the operation has an important clinical significance for optimizing the treatment plan and predicting the prognosis of patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been widely used in the preoperative diagnosis and evaluation of primary liver malignant tumors.

Purpose

The aim is to study the value of preoperative clinical data and enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of HCC and cHCC-CC and obtain independent risk factors for predicting cHCC-CC. Study type. Retrospective. Population. The clinical and imaging data of 157 HCC and 59 cHCC-CC patients confirmed by pathology were collected. Field Strength/Sequence. 1.5T; cross-sectional T1WI (gradient double echo sequence); cross-sectional T2WI (fast spin echo sequence, fat suppression); enhancement (3D LAVA technology). Assessment. The differences between the HCC and cHCC-CC patients were compared. Statistic Tests. Using the t-test, chi-square test, and logistic regression analysis, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Result

1. CHCC-CC was more likely to show multiple lesions than HCC (28.81% vs. 10.83%, P = 0.001) and more prone to microvascular invasion (MVI) (36.31% vs. 61.02%, P < 0.001). However, HCC had a higher incidence of liver cirrhosis than cHCC-CC (50.85% vs. 72.61%, P = 0.003). 2. The incidence of nonsmooth margin was higher in the cHCC-CC group (84.75% vs. 52.23%, P < 0.001). The incidence of peritumor enhancement in the arterial phase was higher in the cHCC-CC group (11.46% vs. 62.71%, P < 0.001) 3. According to the multivariate analysis, arterial peritumor enhancement (OR = 8.833,95%CI:4.033,19.346, P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor for cHCC-CC (P < 0.001)). It had high sensitivity (62.71%) and specificity (88.54%) in the diagnosis of cHCC-CC. Date Conclusions. Liver cirrhosis and the imaging findings of GD-DTPA-enhanced MRI are helpful for the differential diagnosis of HCC and cHCC-CC. In addition, the imaging sign of peritumoral enhancement in the arterial phase has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of cHCC-CC.

Values of MRI Imaging Presentations in the Hepatobiliary Phase, DWI and T2WI Sequences in Predicting Pathological Grades of Intrahepatic Mass-Forming Cholangiocarcinoma

Objective

To retrospectively investigate the value of various MRI image menifestations in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP), DWI and T2WI sequences in predicting the pathological grades of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC).

Materials and Methods

Forty-three patients of IMCCs confirmed by pathology were enrolled including 25 cases in well- or moderately-differentiated group and 18 cases in poorly-differentiated group. All patients underwent DWI, T2WI and HBP scan. The Chi square test was used to compare the differences in the general information. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors in predicting the pathological grade of IMCCs.

Results

The maximal diameter of the IMCC lesion was < 3 cm in 11 patients, between 3 cm and 6 cm in 15, and > 6 cm in 17. Sixteen cases had intrahepatic metastasis, including 5 in the well- or moderately-differentiated group and 11 in the poorly-differentiated group. Seventeen (39.5%) patients presented with target signs in the DWI sequence, including 9 in the well- or moderately-differentiated group and 8 in the poorly-differentiated group. Twenty (46.5%) patients presented with target signs in the T2WI sequence, including 8 in the well- or moderately-differentiated group and 12 in the poorly-differentiated group. Nineteen cases (54.3%) had a complete hypointense signal ring, including 13 in the well- or moderately-differentiated group and 6 in the poorly-differentiated group. Sixteen (45.7%) cases had an incomplete hypointense signal ring, including 5 in the well- or moderately-differentiated group and 11 in the poorly-differentiated group. The lesion size, intrahepatic metastasis, T2WI signal, and integrity of a hypointense signal ring in HBP were statistically significantly different between two gourps. T2WI signal, presence or non-presence of intrahepatic metastasis, and integrity of hypointense signal ring were the independent influencing factors for pathological grade of IMCC.

Conclusion

Target sign in T2WI sequence, presence of intrahepatic metastasis and an incomplete hypointense-signal ring in HBP are more likely to be present in poorly-differentiated IMCCs.

DWI Combined With Hepatobiliary-Phase Enhanced Imaging Can Better Differentiate Cholangiocarcinoma From Atypical Liver Abscesses

Objective

To investigate the value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) combined with the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) Gd-BOPTA enhancement in differentiating intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) from atypical liver abscess.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 43 patients with IMCCs (IMCC group) and 25 patients with atypical liver abscesses (liver abscess group). The DWI signal, the absolute value of the contrast noise ratio (│CNR│) at the HBP, and visibility were analyzed.

Results

A relatively high DWI signal and a relatively high peripheral signal were presented in 29 patients (67.5%) in the IMCC group, and a relatively high DWI signal was displayed in 15 patients (60.0%) in the atypical abscess group with a relatively high peripheral signal in only one (6.7%) patient and a relatively high central signal in 14 (93.3%, 14/15). A significant (P<0.001) difference existed in the pattern of signal between the two groups of patients. On T2WI, IMCC was mainly manifested by homogeneous signal (53.5%), whereas atypical liver abscesses were mainly manifested by heterogeneous signal and relatively high central signal (32%, and 64%), with a significant difference (P<0.001) in T2WI imaging presentation between the two groups. On the HBP imaging, there was a statistically significant difference in peripheral │CNR│ (P< 0.001) and visibility between two groups. The sensitivity of the HBP imaging was significantly (P=0.002) higher than that of DWI. The sensitivity and accuracy of DWI combined with enhanced HBP imaging were significantly (P=0.002 and P<0.001) higher than those of either HBP imaging or DWI alone.

Conclusion

Intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma and atypical liver abscesses exhibit different imaging signals, and combination of DWI and hepatobiliary-phase enhanced imaging has higher sensitivity and accuracy than either technique in differentiating intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma from atypical liver abscesses.

An Efficient Nomogram for Discriminating Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma From Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Objective

This study aims to establish a nomogram and provide an effective method to distinguish between intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

A total of 1,591 patients with HCC or ICC hospitalized at Shandong Provincial Hospital between January 2016 and August 2021 were included and randomly divided into development and validation groups in a ratio of 3:1. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the independent differential factors between HCC and ICC patients in the development cohort. By combining these independent differential factors, the nomogram was established for discriminating ICC from HCC. The accuracy of the nomogram was estimated by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). Furthermore, the predictive nomogram was assessed in the internal testing set.

Results

Through multivariate analysis, independent differential factors between HCC and ICC involved hepatitis B virus (HBV), logarithm of alpha-fetoprotein (Log AFP), logarithm of protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (Log PIVKA-II), logarithm of carbohydrate antigen 199 (Log CA199), and logarithm of carbohydrate antigen 125 (Log CA125). A nomogram was finally established by incorporating these five independent differential factors. Comparing a model of conventional tumor biomarkers including AFP and CA199, the nomogram showed a better distinction between ICC and HCC. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of ICC diagnosis was 0.951 (95% CI, 0.938–0.964) for the nomogram. The results were consistent in the validation cohort with an AUC of 0.958 (95% CI, 0.938–0.978). After integrating patient preferences into the analysis, the DCA showed that using this nomogram to distinguish ICC and HCC increased more benefit compared with the conventional model.

Conclusion

An efficient nomogram has been established for the differential diagnosis between ICC and HCC, which may facilitate the detection and diagnosis of ICC. Further use of the nomogram in multicenter investigations will confirm the practicality of the tool for future clinical application.

Gadoxetic Acid-Based MRI for Decision-Making in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Employing Perfusion Criteria Only—A Post Hoc Analysis from the SORAMIC Trial Diagnostic Cohort

The value of gadoxetic acid in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), based on perfusion criteria, is under dispute. This post-hoc analysis of the prospective, phase II, randomized, controlled SORAMIC study compared the accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (arterial, portovenous, and venous phase only) versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for stratifying patients with HCC to curative ablation or palliative treatment. Two reader groups (radiologists, R1 and R2) performed blind reads of CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (contrast dynamics only). A truth panel, with access to clinical and imaging follow-up data, served as reference. Primary endpoint was non-inferiority (margin: 5% points) of MRI vs. CT (lower 95% confidence interval [CI] > 0.75) in a first step and superiority (complete 95% CI > 1) in a second step. The intent-to-treat population comprised 538 patients. Accuracy of treatment decisions was 73.4% and 70.8% for CT (R1 and R2, respectively) and 75.1% and 70.3% for gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MRI. Non-inferiority but not superiority of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MRI versus CT was demonstrated (odds ratio 1.01; CI 0.97–1.05). Despite a theoretical disadvantage in wash-out depiction, gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MRI is non-inferior to CT in accuracy of treatment decisions for curative ablation versus palliative strategies. This outcome was not subject to the use of additional MR standard sequences.

Indeterminate liver lesions on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: Case-based radiologic-pathologic review

Different histopathological manifestations of focal liver lesions show varying common and uncommon imaging findings and some pathologies may show similar appearance despite of different histopathology. It is necessary to characterise focal liver lesions accurately as not only benign and malignant lesions are managed differently, but also certain benign lesions have differing management. These lesions are increasingly being detected due to rapid growth of use of cross-sectional imaging as well as improvement in image quality and new imaging techniques. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard technique in characterising focal liver lesions. Addition of gadoxetic acid has been shown to significantly increase diagnostic accuracy in the detection and characterization of liver abnormalities. Classic imaging characteristics of common liver lesions, including their behaviour on gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI, have been described in literature over recent years. It is important to be familiar with the typical aspects of these lesions as well as know the uncommon and overlapping imaging features to reach an accurate diagnosis. In this article, we will review the well-described characteristic imaging findings of common and rare focal liver lesions and present several challenging cases encountered in the clinical setting, namely hepatocellular adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatic angiomyolipoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumours as well as a pleomorphic liposarcoma of the liver.

Assessing locoregional treatment response to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: comparison of hepatobiliary contrast agents to extracellular contrast agents

Cross-sectional imaging with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is routinely performed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to assess tumor response to locoregional therapy (LRT). Current response assessment algorithms, such as the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA), allow assessment using conventional gadolinium-based extracellular contrast agents (ECA) for accurate tumor response assessment following LRT. MRI with hepatobiliary agents (HBA) allows an acquisition of hepatobiliary phase (HBP), which is proven to increase sensitivity for detection of observations in at-risk patients, particularly for findings < 2 cm. The use of HBA is not yet incorporated into the TRA; however, it is increasingly used in clinical practice. Few published studies have evaluated the performance of LI-RADS TRA by applying ancillary features related to HBP that has resulted in category adjustment, enabling more sensitive and unequivocal diagnosis. This may help timely management of viable cases, without a significant loss of specificity in comparison with the ECA-based LI-RADS TRA assessment. In this review, we will describe and compare the imaging appearance of treated HCC on MRI using extracellular and hepatobiliary contrast agents and discuss emerging evidence and pitfalls in the assessment of tumor response following LRT with HBA.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Nonhepatocellular Malignancies in Chronic Liver Disease

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver malignancy associated with chronic liver disease. Nonhepatocellular malignancies may also arise in the setting of chronic liver disease. The imaging diagnosis of non-HCC malignancies may be challenging. Non-HCC malignancies in patients with chronic liver disease most commonly include intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, and less commonly hepatic lymphomas and metastases. On MR imaging, non-HCC malignancies often demonstrate a targetoid appearance, manifesting as rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, peripheral washout, central delayed enhancement, and peripheral restricted diffusion. When applying the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System algorithm, observations with targetoid appearance are categorized as LR-M.

Liver Imaging and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018 and Other Imaging Features in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in Chinese Adults with vs. without Chronic Hepatitis B Viral Infection

PURPOSE

To describe liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018 and other MRI imaging features in intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) in Chinese adults with vs. without chronic hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 89 patients with pathologically proven iCCA after multiphase imaging performed between 2004 and 2017 at a tertiary medical center in southern China. Based on whether patients had chronic HBV, iCCA was divided into two subgroups: HBV-positive (n = 50 patients, including 9 with cirrhosis) vs. HBV-negative (n = 39 patients, including 14 with hepatolithiasis and 25 with no identifiable risk factor for iCCA; none had cirrhosis). Two independent abdominal radiologists in consensus reviewed the largest mass in each patient to assign LI-RADS v2018 features; they also scored each observation's shape and location. Imaging features were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Most iCCAs in HBV-positive (88% (44/50)) and HBV-negative (97% (38/39)) patients had at least one LR-M feature. Compared to iCCAs in HBV-negative patients, iCCAs in HBV-positive patients were more likely to have at least one major feature of HCC (46% (23/50) vs. 8% (3/39), P < 0.001) and more likely to be smooth (42% (21/50) vs. 10% (4/39), P = 0.001). Six of 50 (12%) iCCAs in HBV-positive patients and 1/39 (3%) iCCAs in HBV-negative patients had at least one major feature of HCC without any LR-M feature.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective single-center study in Chinese adults, iCCAs in HBV-positive patients were more likely to resemble HCCs than iCCAs in HBV-negative patients.

Cholangiocarcinoma - Part 2, Tumoral and Nontumoral Mimics and Imaging Features Helpful in Differentiation

Each of the 3 morphological subtypes of cholangiocarcinoma has a different set of imaging differentials. Emulators of mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma include other primary and secondary hepatic malignancies, benign tumors and tumor-like mimics such as abscess, hemangioma and confluent hepatic fibrosis. Benign inflammatory biliary strictures constitute the major differential of periductal-infiltrative type and intraductal calculi are the main consideration for intraductal-growth type. CT and MRI are the standard imaging tools for characterization of cholangiocarcinoma and differentiating it from close mimics. Here we will describe the various tumoral and non-tumoral mimics of cholangiocarcinoma and discuss specific imaging features useful in differentiation.

Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging may improve the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

To determine the clinical value of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

A total of 246 high-risk patients with 263 selected nodules (126 HCCs, 137 non-HCCs) undergoing gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in the study. Imaging-based diagnoses of small (≤3 cm) and large (>3 cm) HCCs were made using the following 4 criteria: (I) non-rim arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) plus hypointensity on the portal venous phase (PVP); (II) non-rim APHE plus hypointensity on the PVP and/or transitional phase (TP); (III) non-rim APHE plus hypointensity on the PVP and/or TP and/or HBP; (IV) criterion 3 plus non-LR-1/2/M. Based on typical imaging features, LR-1, LR-2, or LR-M (if definitely benign, probably benign, malignant but not HCC specific, respectively) were defined according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). Sensitivities and specificities of imaging criteria were calculated and compared using McNemar’s test.

Results

Among the diagnostic criteria for small HCCs, criterion 3 and 4, which included HBP hypointensity, showed significantly higher sensitivities (96.4% and 94.6%, respectively) than criterion 1 (58.9%, P<0.001 for both). Moreover, criterion 4, which included HBP hypointensity and ancillary features, showed significantly higher specificity (94.7%) than criterion 3 (66.7%, P<0.001) and comparable specificity to criterion 1 (97.4%, P=0.375), achieving the highest accuracies (94.7%). The diagnostic performance of criterion 4 for large HCCs was similar to that for small HCCs.

Conclusions

HBP hypointensity acquired from Gd-BOPTA-MRI can improve sensitivity and maintain high specificity in the diagnosis of both small and large HCCs after excluding benignities or non-HCC malignancies according to characteristic imaging features.

Surgical Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Current and Emerging Principles

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare, aggressive cancer of the biliary tract. It often presents with locally advanced or metastatic disease, but for patients with early-stage disease, surgical resection with negative margins and portahepatis lymphadenectomy is the standard of care. Recent advancements in ICC include refinement of staging, improvement in liver-directed therapies, clarification of the role of adjuvant therapy based on new randomized controlled trials, and advances in minimally invasive liver surgery. In addition, improvements in neoadjuvant strategies and surgical techniques have enabled expanded surgical indications and reduced surgical morbidity and mortality. However, recurrence rates remain high and more effective systemic therapies are still necessary to improve recurrence-free and overall survival. In this review, we focus on current and emerging surgical principals for the management of ICC including preoperative evaluation, current indications for surgery, strategies for future liver remnant augmentation, technical principles, and the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies.

Cholangiocarcinoma Evaluation via Imaging and Artificial Intelligence

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a relatively rare malignant biliary system tumor, and yet it represents the second most common primary hepatic neoplasm, following hepatocellular carcinoma. Regardless of the type, location, or etiology, the survival prognosis of these tumors remains poor. The only method of cure for CCA is complete surgical resection, but part of patients with complete resection are still subject to local recurrence or distant metastasis.

SUMMARY

Over the last several decades, our understanding of the molecular biology of CCA has increased tremendously, diagnostic and evaluative techniques have evolved, and novel therapeutic approaches have been established. Key Messages: This review provides an overview of preoperative imaging evaluations of CCA. Furthermore, relevant information about artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging is discussed, as well as the development of AI in CCA treatment.

Evaluation of Primary Liver Cancers Using Hepatocyte-Specific Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Pitfalls and Potential Tips

When radiologists interpret hepatic focal lesions seen on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, it is important not only to distinguish malignant lesions from benign ones but also to distinguish nonhepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) malignancies from HCCs. In addition, most major guidelines, including those of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and Korean Liver Cancer Association and National Cancer Center, allow for the noninvasive imaging diagnosis of HCC in at-risk patients. However, ~40% of HCC cases show atypical imaging features mimicking non-HCC malignancies. Furthermore, several benign and malignant lesions, such as flash-filling hemangioma and intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma, frequently look like HCC. In contrast, although multiparametric MRI options, including hepatobiliary phase and diffusion-weighted imaging, provide useful information that could help address these challenges, there remain several unresolved issues with regard to the noninvasive diagnostic criteria characterizing HCC. In this article, we discuss the typical imaging features and challenging situations related to primary liver cancers in MRI, while considering how to make a correct diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Atypical Appearance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Its Mimickers: How to Solve Challenging Cases Using Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed noninvasively with contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasonography on the basis of its hallmark imaging features of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout on portal or delayed phase images. However, approximately 40% of HCCs show atypical imaging features, posing a significant diagnostic challenge for radiologists. Another challenge for radiologists in clinical practice is the presentation of many HCC mimickers such as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma, arterioportal shunt, and hemangioma in the cirrhotic liver. The differentiation of HCCs from these mimickers on preoperative imaging studies is of critical importance. Hence, we will review the typical and atypical imaging features of HCCs and the imaging features of its common mimickers. In addition, we will discuss how to solve these challenges in practice.

Distinguishing intrahepatic mass-forming biliary carcinomas from hepatocellular carcinoma by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging using the Bayesian method: a bi-center study

OBJECTIVES

To determine imaging hallmarks for distinguishing intrahepatic mass-forming biliary carcinomas (IMBCs) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to validate their diagnostic ability using Bayesian statistics.

METHODS

Study 1 retrospectively identified clinical and imaging hallmarks that distinguish IMBCs (n = 41) from HCC (n = 247) using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study 2 retrospectively assessed the diagnostic ability of these hallmarks to distinguish IMBCs (n = 37) from HCC (n = 111) using Bayesian statistics with images obtained from a different institution. We also assessed the diagnostic ability of the hallmarks in the patient subgroup with high diagnostic confidence (≥ 80% of post-test probability). Two radiologists independently evaluated the imaging findings in studies 1 and 2.

RESULTS

In study 1, arterial phase peritumoral parenchymal enhancement on CT/MRI, delayed enhancement on CT/MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging peripheral hyperintensity, and bile duct dilatation were hallmarks indicating IMBCs, whereas chronic liver disease, non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement on CT/MRI, enhancing capsule on CT/MRI, and opposed-phase signal drop were hallmarks indicating HCC (p = 0.001-0.04). In study 2, Bayesian statistics-based post-test probability combining all hallmark features had a diagnostic accuracy of 89.2% (132/148) in distinguishing IMBCs from HCC for both readers. In the high diagnostic confidence subgroup (n = 120 and n = 124 for readers 1 and 2, respectively), the accuracy improved (95.0% (114/120) and 93.5% (116/124) for readers 1 and 2, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined interpretation of CT and MRI to identify hallmark features is useful in discriminating IMBCs from HCCs. High post-test probability by Bayesian statistics allows for a more reliable non-invasive diagnosis.

KEY POINTS

• Combined interpretation of CT and MRI to identify hallmark features was useful in discriminating intrahepatic mass-forming biliary carcinomas from hepatocellular carcinoma. • Bayesian method-based post-test probability combining all hallmark features determined in study 1 showed high (> 90%) sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing intrahepatic mass-forming biliary carcinomas from hepatocellular carcinoma. • If the post-test probability or the confidence was ≥ 80% when combining the imaging features of CT and MRI, the high specificity of > 95% was achieved without any loss of sensitivity to distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma from intrahepatic mass-forming biliary carcinomas.

Multimodality Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Diagnosis to Treatment Response Assessment in Everyday Clinical Practice

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a recently developed classification aiming to improve the standardization of liver imaging assessment in patients at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The LI-RADS v2017 implemented new algorithms for ultrasound (US) screening and surveillance, contrast-enhanced US diagnosis and computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging treatment response assessment. A minor update of LI-RADS was released in 2018 to comply with the American Association for the Study of the Liver Diseases guidance recommendations. The scope of this review is to provide a practical overview of LI-RADS v2018 focused both on the multimodality HCC diagnosis and treatment response assessment.

Unsatisfactory Long-term Results of Liver Transplant in Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma is the primary liver tumor forming from the biliary epithelium. Two major subtypes of this disease are distinguished because of the initial location: the extra- and intrahepatic form. The latter disease is currently a controversial indication for liver transplant (LT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of LT of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Based on postoperative histopathologic examination of the explanted liver, 8 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were identified from all LT recipients in the period between 1994 and 2019 and included in this retrospective cohort study. Four of the patients received transplants with a preoperative diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma; the remaining tumors were incidental findings. Patient survival was the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

Six recipients had solitary lesion with a maximum tumor diameter of 6 cm. The median carbohydrate antigen 19-9 concentration prior to LT was 52.3 U/mL. The overall survival was 75.0%, 37.5%, and 25% after the first, third, and fifth year, respectively, with a median survival of 18 months. Age (P = .758), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (P = .282), largest tumor size (P = .862), and the sum of the number of lesions and diameter of the largest tumor (P = .530) were not significantly associated with overall survival. Recurrence-free survival was 71.4% after 1 year and 28.6% after 3 and 5 years. Correspondingly, no significant predictors of worse recurrence-free survival were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains associated with a very high risk of recurrence and dismal survival after LT irrespective of macroscopic disease burden.

Optimal Combination of Features on Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MR Imaging for Non-invasive Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The JAMP-HCC Study

Purpose:

To determine the optimal combination of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to compare its diagnostic ability to that of dynamic computed tomography (CT) in patients with chronic liver disease.

Methods:

This multi-institutional study consisted of two parts: Study 1, a retrospective study to determine the optimal combination of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI findings (decision tree and logistic model) to distinguish HCC (n = 199) from benign (n = 81) or other malignant lesions (n = 95) (375 nodules in 269 patients) and Study 2, a prospective study to compare the diagnostic ability of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI to distinguish HCC (n = 73) from benign (n = 15) or other malignant lesions (n = 12) with that of dynamic CT (100 nodules in 83 patients). Two radiologists independently evaluated the imaging findings (Study 1 and 2) and made a practical diagnosis (Study 2).

Results:

In Study 1, rim or whole enhancement on arterial phase images, signal intensities on T₂-weighted/diffusion-weighted/portal venous/transitional/hepatobiliary phase images, and signal drop on opposed-phase images were independently useful for differential diagnosis. In Study 2, the accuracy, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and negative likelihood ratio of the CT decision tree (reader 2) were higher than those of MRI Model 2 (P = 0.015–0.033). There were no other significant differences in diagnostic ability (P = 0.059–1.000) and radiologist-made practical diagnosis (P = 0.059–1.000) between gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI and CT.

Conclusion:

We identified the optimal combination of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI findings for HCC diagnosis. However, its diagnostic ability was not superior to that of dynamic CT.

Hepatic hemangioendothelioma: CT, MR, and FDG-PET-CT in 67 patients-a bi-institutional comprehensive cancer center review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the imaging features of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH) on multiphasic CT, MR, and FDG-PET-CT.

METHODS

Bi-institutional review identified 67 adults (mean age, 47 years; 23 M/44 F) with pathologically proven HEH and pretreatment multiphasic CT (n = 67) and/or MR (n = 30) and/or FDG-PET-CT (n = 13).

RESULTS

HEHs were multifocal in 88% (59/67). Mean size of the dominant mass was 4.1 cm (range, 1.4-19 cm). The tumors were located in the peripheral, subcapsular regions of the liver in 96% (64/67). Capsular retraction was present in 81% (54/67 cases) and tumors were coalescent in 61% (41/67). HEH demonstrated peripheral ring enhancement on arterial phase imaging in 33% (21/64) and target appearance on the portal venous phase in 69% (46/67). Persistent peripheral enhancement on the delayed phase was seen in 49% (31/63). On MR, multilayered target appearance was seen on the T2-weighted sequences in 67% (20/30) and on the diffusion-weighted sequences in 61% (11/18). Target appearance on hepatobiliary phase of MRI was seen in 57% (4/7). On pre-therapy FDG-PET-CT, increased FDG uptake above the background liver parenchyma was seen in 62% (8/13).

CONCLUSION

HEHs typically manifest as multifocal, coalescent hepatic nodules in peripheral subcapsular location, with associated capsular retraction. Peripheral arterial ring enhancement and target appearance on portal venous phase are commonly seen on CT. Similarly, multilayered target appearance correlating with its histopathological composition is typically seen on multiple sequences of MR including T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced multiphasic MR.

KEY POINTS

• Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas manifest on CT and MR as multifocal, coalescent hepatic nodules in peripheral subcapsular location, with associated capsular retraction. • Enhancement pattern on contrast-enhanced CT and MR can vary but peripheral ring enhancement on arterial phase and target appearance on portal venous phase are commonly seen. • Retrospective two-center study showed that cross-sectional imaging may help in the diagnosis.

Sirlin C, Song B, Taouli B, Yoshimitsu K, Koh DM. Consensus report from the 8th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVES

The 8th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), held in Basel, Switzerland, in October 2017, brought together clinical and academic radiologists from around the world to discuss developments in and reach consensus on key issues in the field of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI since the previous Forum held in 2013.

METHODS

Two main themes in liver MRI were considered in detail at the Forum: the use of gadoxetic acid for contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with liver cirrhosis and the technical performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI, both opportunities and challenges. This article summarises the expert presentations and the delegate voting on consensus statements discussed at the Forum.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI has higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), when compared with multidetector CT, by utilising features of hyperenhancement in the arterial phase and hypointensity in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). Recent HCC management guidelines recognise an increasing role for gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in early diagnosis and monitoring post-resection. Additional research is needed to define the role of HBP in predicting microvascular invasion, to better define washout during the transitional phase in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for HCC diagnosis, and to reduce the artefacts encountered in the arterial phase. Technical developments are being directed to shortening the MRI protocol for reducing time and patient discomfort and toward utilising faster imaging and non-Cartesian free-breathing approaches that have the potential to improve multiphasic dynamic imaging.

KEY POINTS

• Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI provides higher diagnostic sensitivity than CT for diagnosing HCC. • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI has roles in early-HCC diagnosis and monitoring post-resection response. • Faster imaging and free-breathing approaches have potential to improve multiphasic dynamic imaging.

Imaging findings of inflammatory pseudotumor-like follicular dendritic cell tumors of the liver: Two case reports and literature review

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory pseudotumor-like follicular dendritic cell (IPT-like FDC) tumors of the liver is an uncommon tumor with extremely low incidence. To date, the radiologic findings of this tumor in multiphase computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging have not been described.

CASE SUMMARY

Patient 1 is a 31-year-old Chinese female, whose complaining incidentally coincided with the finding of multiple liver masses. In the local hospital, an abdominal enhanced CT found two hypo-dense solid lesions, with heterogeneous sustained hypoenhancement, in the upper segment of the liver’s right posterior lobe. In our hospital, enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with hepatocyte-specific contrast agents showed a similar enhanced pattern of lesions with patchy hyperintensity in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). The patient underwent surgery and recovered well. The final pathology confirmed an IPT-like FDC tumor. No recurrence was found on the regular re-examination. Patient 2 is a 48-year-old Chinese male admitted to our hospital for a huge unexpected hepatic lesion. A dynamic enhanced abdominal CT revealed a huge heterogeneous enhanced solid tumor in the right lobe of the liver with a size of 100 mm × 80 mm, which showed a heterogeneous sustained hypoenhancement. In addition, enlarged lymph nodes were found in the hilum of the liver. This patient underwent a hepatic lobectomy and lymph node dissection. The final pathology confirmed an IPT-like FDC tumor. No recurrence was found upon regular re-examination.

CONCLUSION

When a hepatic tumor shows heterogeneous sustained hypoenhancement with a patchy enhancement during HBP, an IPT-like FDC tumor should be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Magnetic resonance texture analysis for the identification of cytokeratin 19-positive hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To investigate potential findings associated with cytokeratin 19 (CK19)-positive HCC, with special emphasis on MR texture analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients with CK19-negative HCC and 38 patients with CK19-positive were retrospectively evaluated by texture analysis based on conventional MRI. Clinicalpathological characteristics, conventional MR imaging findings, and the MR texture analysis contained of 2415 texture features in the seven conventional sequences were compared. Significant features for differentiating were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Receiver operating characteristic analyses of the significant findings were performed and compared to evaluate their diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the top1 texture feature (three-dimensional standard deviation separation of intensity on T2-weighted original images, abbreviated as: StdSeparation 3D) and the combined top1-6 feature in identifying CK19-positive HCC(P = 0.660). Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level ≥400 ng/mL(P = 0.013), arterial rim enhancement(P = 0.005), and StdSeparation 3D texture character(P = 0.002) were independent variables associated with CK19-positive HCCs. The combination of the three indices showed a better performance than AFP level(P = 0.0028), arterial rim enhancement(P < 0.0001), and their combination(P = 0.0098); while no significantly better than the StdSeparation 3D texture character alone(P = 0.0788). An acceptable discrimination(AUC = 0.765) with both sensitivity and specificity greater than 75% was achieved for StdSeparation 3D texture character.

CONCLUSION

Serum AFP level ≥400 ng/mL, arterial rim enhancement, and the StdSeparation 3D texture character were independently associated with CK19-positive HCC. The StdSeparation 3D texture character may be a reliable imaging biomarker which can improve the diagnostic performance.

MR features based on LI-RADS identify cytokeratin 19 status of hepatocellular carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate the value of MR features based on Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS ver.2017) for identifying the status of cytokeratin (CK) 19 expression of HCC before surgery.

METHODS

A total of 201 patients with 207 HCCs who underwent MR imaging were reviewed retrospectively. MR features based on LI-RADS ver.2017 as well as clinical data were compared between CK19-positive (n = 51) and CK19-negative (n = 156) HCCs groups. Potential predictive parameters were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis and diagnostic odds ratios (ORs) were recorded.

RESULTS

MR features including targetoid appearance (p = 0.001) was more frequently observed while non-peripheral "washout" (p < 0.0001) and non-rim arterial phase hyper-enhancement (p < 0.0001) were found less frequently in CK19-positive HCCs compared to CK19-negative HCCs. At multivariate analysis, serum alphafetoprotein (AFP)>20 ng/ml (OR = 5.9) and targetoid appearance (OR = 4.2) and non-peripheral "washout" (OR = 0.2) were significant independent predictors of CK19-positive HCCs.

CONCLUSION

Targetoid appearance and absence non-peripheral "washout" combined with elevated AFP were useful for differentiating CK19-positive HCCs from CK19-negative HCC.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Hepatocellular carcinoma and mimickers

Gadoxetic acid, a hepatocyte-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent, has emerged as an important tool for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is useful for the evaluation of early-stage HCC, diagnosis of HCC precursor lesions, and highly sensitive diagnosis of HCC. Furthermore, functional information provided by gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI can aid in the characterization of focal liver lesions. For example, whereas lesions lack functioning hepatocytes appear hypointense in the hepatobiliary phase, preserved or enhanced expression of organic anion transporting polypeptides in some HCCs as well as focal nodular hyperplasia lead to hyperintensity in the hepatobiliary phase; and a targetoid appearance on transitional phase or hepatobiliary phase imaging can be helpful for identifying the histopathological composition of tumors. While gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may improve the sensitivity of HCC diagnosis and provide new insights into the characterization of focal liver lesions, there are many challenges associated with its use. This article reviews the pros and cons of HCC diagnosis with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and discuss some clues in the radiological differentiation of HCC from HCC mimickers.

Volumetric Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis in Differentiating Intrahepatic Mass-Forming Cholangiocarcinoma From Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Accurate differentiation between intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is needed because treatment and prognosis differ significantly.

PURPOSE

To explore whether volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis can provide additional value to dynamic enhanced MRI in differentiating IMCC from HCC.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

In all, 131 patients with pathologically proven IMCC (n = 33) or HCC (n = 98).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0T MRI/conventional T₁ -weighted imaging (T₁ WI), T₂ WI, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with b value of 800 sec/mm² , dynamic enhanced MRI with gadobenate dimeglumine.

ASSESSMENT

Dynamic enhanced MR images were analyzed by two independent reviewers using a five-point scale to determine the diagnosis. Volumetric ADC assessments were performed independently by two radiologists to obtain different histogram parameters for each lesion. Quantitative histogram parameters were compared between the IMCC group and HCC group. Diagnostic performance of dynamic enhanced MRI, volumetric ADC histogram analysis, and the combination of both were analyzed.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, independent Student's t-test, or Mann-Whitney U-test, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves analysis, and McNemar test.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity for dynamic enhanced MRI to differentiate IMCC from HCC were 82.1% and 82.6%, respectively. For all volumetric ADC histogram parameters, the 75th percentile ADC (ADC_75% ) had the highest AUC (0.791) in differentiating IMCC from HCC, with sensitivity and specificity of 69.7% and 77.6%, respectively. When combining dynamic enhanced MRI with ADC_75% , the sensitivity and specificity were 82.1% and 91.9%, respectively. Compared to dynamic enhanced MRI alone, the specificity for combined dynamic enhanced MRI and ADC_75% was significantly increased (P = 0.008).

DATA CONCLUSION

Volumetric ADC histogram analysis provides additional value to dynamic enhanced MRI in differentiating IMCC from HCC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:975-983.

Different MR features for differentiation of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma according to tumor size

OBJECTIVE

To identify reliable magnetic resonance (MR) features for distinguishing mass-forming type of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on tumor size.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 395 patients with pathologically confirmed IMCCs (n = 180) and HCCs (n = 215) who underwent pre-operative contrast-enhanced MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). MR features were evaluated and clinical data were also recorded. All the characteristics were compared in small (≤3 cm) and large tumor (>3 cm) groups by univariate analysis and subsequently calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis revealed that rim arterial phase hyperenhancement [odds ratios (ORs) = 13.16], biliary dilation (OR = 23.42) and CA19-9 (OR = 21.45) were significant predictors of large IMCCs (n = 138), and washout appearance (OR = 0.036), enhancing capsule appearance (OR = 0.039), fat in mass (OR = 0.057), chronic liver disease (OR = 0.088) and alpha fetoprotein (OR = 0.019) were more frequently found in large HCCs (n = 143). For small IMCCs (n = 42) and HCCs (n = 72), rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (OR = 9.68), target appearance at DWI (OR = 12.51), alpha fetoprotein (OR = 0.12) and sex (OR = 0.20) were independent predictors in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Valuable MR features and clinical factors varied for differential diagnosis of IMCCs and HCCs according to tumor size. Advances in knowledge: MR features for differential diagnosis of large IMCC and HCC (>3 cm) are in keeping with that recommended by LI-RADS. However, for small IMCCs and HCCs (≤3 cm), only rim enhancement on arterial phase and target appearance at DWI are reliable predictors.

Liver Transplant for Cholangiocarcinoma

Liver transplant (LT) for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) offers an opportunity for survival among patients with early-stage but anatomically unresectable disease. The 5-year survival rate after LT is 65% to 70%, higher among patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, who are often diagnosed earlier, and lower among patients with de novo CCA. The results of LT for hilar CCA, along with recent limited data suggesting favorable survival among patients with very early intrahepatic CCA (ICC), have reignited interest in the subject. This article discusses LT following neoadjuvant therapy for CCA and the early data on LT alone for ICC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma with central scar on gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

Background Central scars are rarely reported in conventional hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The presence of central scars on imaging might lead to erroneous diagnosis of hepatic tumors. Purpose To determine imaging features of HCC with central scars on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Material and Methods Fifty-one patients with 51 surgically confirmed HCCs with central scars (fibrotic scar: n = 50; myxoid scar: n = 1; range = 1.2-15 cm; mean = 3.7 cm) underwent liver MRI that consisted of T1- and T2-weighted (T2W) imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced arterial, portal, 3-min late phase, and 20-min hepatobiliary phase (HBP), and DWI. Two reviewers evaluated morphology, signal intensity, and enhancement features of tumors and central scars for each image and reached consensus. Results Lobulated contour was seen for 30 tumors (58.8%); the rest were round or oval masses. Central scars (range = 0.2-6.0 cm; mean = 0.9 cm) were most commonly seen as defects within hyperenhancement on arterial phase images (n = 47, 92.2%), bright (n = 28, 54.9%) or dark areas (n = 15, 29.4%) on T2W imaging, areas of central darkness on high b-value DWI (b = 800) (n = 31, 60.8%), and/or central enhancement on HBP (n = 36, 70.6%), mimicking a target appearance. Tumor capsule was seen in 35 (39 pathology, 74.5%) and intratumoral septum in 35 (41 pathology, 78.4%) tumors on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Conclusion Non-fibrolamellar HCC may show central scar. HCC with central scar mimics cholangiocarcinoma by showing a target appearance on HBP and DWI. Tumor capsule and intratumoral septum might be useful for characterizing HCC with central scar.

A nomogram incorporating six easily obtained parameters to discriminate intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are the most prevalent histologic types of primary liver cancer (PLC). Although ICC and HCC share similar risk factors and clinical manifestations, ICC usually bears poorer prognosis than HCC. Confidently discriminating ICC and HCC before surgery is beneficial to both treatment and prognosis. Given the lack of effective differential diagnosis biomarkers and methods, construction of models based on available clinicopathological characteristics is in need. Nomograms present a simple and efficient way to make a discrimination. A total of 2894 patients who underwent surgery for PLC were collected. Of these, 1614 patients formed the training cohort for nomogram construction, and thereafter, 1280 patients formed the validation cohort to confirm the model's performance. Histopathologically confirmed ICC was diagnosed in 401 (24.8%) and 296 (23.1%) patients in these two cohorts, respectively. A nomogram integrating six easily obtained variables (Gender, Hepatitis B surface antigen, Aspartate aminotransferase, Alpha-fetoprotein, Carcinoembryonic antigen, Carbohydrate antigen 19-9) is proposed in accordance with Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). A score of 15 was determined as the cut-off value, and the corresponding discrimination efficacy was sufficient. Additionally, patients who scored higher than 15 suffered poorer prognosis than those with lower scores, regardless of the subtype of PLC. A nomogram for clinical discrimination of ICC and HCC has been established, where a higher score indicates ICC and poor prognosis. Further application of this nomogram in multicenter investigations may confirm the practicality of this tool for future clinical use.

LI-RADS M (LR-M): definite or probable malignancy, not specific for hepatocellular carcinoma

LI-RADS v2017 introduces major changes to the diagnostic criteria for LR-M observations to better guide radiologists in the use of this malignant category designation. LR-M is intended to preserve the specificity of the LI-RADS algorithm for diagnosis of HCC while not losing sensitivity for diagnosis of malignancy. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief background on LR-M, discuss the diagnostic criteria new to v2017, special considerations for its application, and management implications.

LI-RADS® ancillary features on CT and MRI

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) uses an algorithm to assign categories that reflect the probability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), non-HCC malignancy, or benignity. Unlike other imaging algorithms, LI-RADS utilizes ancillary features (AFs) to refine the final category. AFs in LI-RADS v2017 are divided into those favoring malignancy in general, those favoring HCC specifically, and those favoring benignity. Additionally, LI-RADS v2017 provides new rules regarding application of AFs. The purpose of this review is to discuss ancillary features included in LI-RADS v2017, the rationale for their use, potential pitfalls encountered in their interpretation, and tips on their application.

Intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma and solitary hypovascular liver metastases: is the differential diagnosis using diffusion-weighted MRI possible?

Background Intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocellular carcinoma (IMC) is the second most common primary liver tumor. The differentiation between IMC and solitary hypovascular liver metastases (SHLM) represents a diagnostic challenge due to many overlapping magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. Purpose To determine the value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in addition to conventional MRI for the distinction between intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma and solitary hypovascular liver metastases. Material and Methods Fifty-three patients with pathologically proven IMC (n = 31) and SHLM (n = 22) who had undergone MRI and DWI before surgery or percutaneous biopsy were enrolled in this study. The following MRI features were analyzed: the size and shape of the lesion, presence of capsular retraction and segmental biliary dilatation, T2-weighted (T2W) signal intensity, the presence of target sign on DWI and enhancement pattern. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated for each lesion ( b = 800 s/mm²). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify significant differentiating features between IMCs and SHLMs. Results Univariate analysis revealed that following parameters favor diagnosis of IMCs over SHLMs: lobulating shape, heterogeneous T2W signal intensity, capsular retraction, segmental biliary dilatation, target sign on DWI and rim-like enhancement on arterial phase followed by progressive enhancement in delayed phases. ADC values measured in the periphery of the lesion were significantly lower in IMCs in comparison to SHLMs. Multivariate analysis revealed that target sign on DWI was the most significant predictor of IMCs. Conclusion Qualitative DWI analysis with target sign significantly improves diagnostic accuracy for differentiation among IMC and SHLM lesions.

Differentiation of Intrahepatic Cholangiocellular Carcinoma from Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Cirrhotic Liver Using Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the potential of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging features to differentiate between mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic livers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study, performed between 2001 and 2013, included 64 baseline magnetic resonance imaging examinations with pathohistologically proven liver cirrhosis, presenting with either ICC (n = 32) or HCC (n = 32) tumors. To distinguish ICC form HCC tumors, 20 qualitative single-lesion descriptors were evaluated by two readers, in consensus, and statistically classified using the chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID) methodology. Diagnostic performance was assessed by a receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

The CHAID algorithm identified three independent categorical lesion descriptors, including (1) liver capsular retraction; (2) progressive or persistent enhancement pattern or wash-out on the T1-weighted delayed phase; and (3) signal intensity appearance on T2-weighted images that could help to reliably differentiate ICC from HCC, which resulted in an AUC of 0.807, and a sensitivity and specificity of 68.8 and 90.6 (95% confidence interval 75.0-98.0), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed CHAID algorithm provides a simple and robust step-by-step classification tool for a reliable and solid differentiation between ICC and HCC tumors in cirrhotic livers.

Extracellular contrast agent-enhanced MRI: 15-min delayed phase may improve the diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease

OBJECTIVES

To determine the value of a 15-min delayed phase in extracellular contrast agent (ECA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic liver disease.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2015, 103 patients with chronic liver disease underwent ECA-enhanced MRI; 133 lesions consisting of 107 HCCs, 23 benign lesions and three non-HCC malignancies were identified with pathological or clinical diagnosis. MRI images were reviewed by two abdominal radiologists independently using the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) criteria. Imaging features observed in the 15-min delayed phase were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 107 HCCs, three or four additional HCCs were diagnosed according to the EASL criteria by adding the 15-min delayed phase, increasing sensitivity (Reviewer 1, from 69.2-72.0 % [P = 0.072]; Reviewer 2, from 75.7-79.4 % [P = 0.041]). Reviewers 1 and 2 upgraded one and four HCCs from LR-4 to LR-5 based on the LI-RADS, respectively. Among 23 benign lesions, no additional findings were observed in the 15-min delayed phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Including the 15-min delayed phase in ECA-enhanced MRI may improve the diagnostic performance for HCC in patients with chronic liver disease.

KEY POINTS

• Additional acquisition of 15-min delayed phase (FDP) requires approximately 20 s. • About 5 % of HCCs show washout or capsule appearance only in FDP. • Including FDP improves the sensitivity of extracellular contrast agent-enhanced MRI for HCC. • These results are applicable only to patients with chronic liver disease.

MRI features of primary rare malignancies of the liver: A report from four university centres

PURPOSE

To determine if rare primary malignancies of the liver may have consistent features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This IRB-compliant retrospective study reviewed the records from the pathology departments of four university centres over an 11-year period from 2005-2016 to identify rare primary malignant tumours, which were cross-referenced with MRI records. MRI studies of these patients were reviewed to determine if these tumours exhibited consistent and distinctive features.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were identified with rare primary liver tumours. The following distinctive features and frequency of occurrence were observed: mixed hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma showed regions of wash-out in 7/19 of patients; 6/6 of fibrolamellar carcinomas demonstrated large heterogeneous lesions with large heterogeneous central scars; epithelioid haemangioendothelioma larger than 2 cm showed target-like enhancement in late-phase enhancement in 9/13; sarcomas excluding angiosarcoma had central necrosis in 3/9 and haemorrhage in 5/9; angiosarcomas showed centripedal progressive nodular enhancement in 3/6 and showed regions of haemorrhage in 3/6; and 7/7 of primary hepatic lymphomas showed encasement of vessels.

CONCLUSION

Although helpful features for the differentiation of rare primary malignancies of the liver are identified, no MRI features appear to be specific and therefore histopathological confirmation is usually required for definitive diagnosis.

KEY POINTS

• No MRI features appear to be specific for rare primary liver malignancies. • Haemorrhage is a helpful sign in diagnosis of primary hepatic sarcomas. • Angiosarcomas may show progressive nodular enhancement towards the centre mimicking haemangioma. • Vessel encasement is a helpful sign in diagnosis of primary hepatic lymphoma.

Dynamic enhancement patterns of small-diameter mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Challenges faced by the radiologist

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of small-diameter mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICCs) (diameter ≤3 cm) are still unclear.This study focused on imaging findings of small mass-forming ICCs. The MRI findings for small-diameter mass-forming ICCs were summarized, and the enhancement features of small ICC nodules with different diameters [2 groups were defined: a smaller nodule group (ICC diameter <2 cm) and a larger nodule group (ICC diameter >2 cm)] were compared on contrast-enhanced MRI.In our study, there were 41 small ICC nodules in 41 patients, including 30 men and 11 women (average age, 56 years). The nodules were characterized by peripheral hyperintense in the arterial phase on contrast-enhanced MRI. In the different diameter groups, peripheral hyperintense was the most common in the larger nodule group (56% vs 12%, P < .05) and hypointense was more common in the smaller nodule group (25% vs 0%, P < .05) in the arterial phase on contrast-enhanced MRI. Smaller nodules mainly showed progressive enhancement, whereas larger nodules mainly showed peripheral continuous enhancement (56% vs 6%, P < .05).The small-diameter mass-forming ICC nodules mainly show peripheral continuous enhancement on contrast-enhanced MRI; however, those with diameters <2 cm commonly show progressive enhancement.

Primary malignant tumours in the non-cirrhotic liver

Intrahepatic chlangiocarcinomas (CCs), the second most common primary malignant liver tumours, usually occur in non-cirrhotic liver, and can be classified into three types based on gross morphology: mass-forming; periductal infiltrating; and intraductal growing. Among them, mass-forming intrahepatic CCs are the most common type and characterized by homogeneous mass with an irregular but well-defined margin with peripheral enhancement on late arterial phase and delayed enhancement in central portion of tumours corresponding to the fibrous stroma. Several imaging features such as enhancement pattern and degree of diffusion restriction have been suggested as prognostic markers for mass-forming CCs. Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) are the most common primary malignant liver tumors, and usually arise from the cirrhotic liver. However, approximately 20% of HCCs involve the non-cirrhotic liver (hereafter, non-cirrhotic HCC), and non-cirrhotic HCCs are often detected at an advanced stage due to the lack of surveillance for patients with non-cirrhotic liver. Other primary malignant liver tumours other than CCs and HCCs including angiosarcoma, undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma are quite rare, and imaging diagnosis is often difficult. This review offers a brief overview of epidemiology, risk factors and imaging features of primary malignant tumours in non-cirrhotic liver. Understanding of radiologic appearance and predisposing clinical features as well as differentials of primary malignant tumour in non-cirrhotic liver can be helpful for radiologists to adequately assess these tumours, and subsequently to make optimal management plan.