MRI features in differentiating mucosal high-grade neoplasia from early invasive squamous cell cancer of the esophagus

Meta-Analysis of MRI in Predicting Early Response to Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

At present, the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the prediction of response to neoadjuvant therapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of esophageal cancer still needs to be further explored, and its early differential value remains controversial, thus we carried out this systematic review with a meta-analysis. In the application, different MRI sequences and corresponding parameters are used for the differential diagnosis of the response to neoadjuvant therapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

All relevant studies evaluated the efficacy and response to MRI in neoadjuvant therapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer on Pubmed, Embase, Cohrane Library, and Web of Science databases published before October 10, 2023 (inclusive) were systematically searched. A revised tool was used to assess the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) to assess the risk of bias in the included original studies. A subgroup analysis of MRI sequences diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and their corresponding different parameters, as well as the acquisition timepoints (before and after treatment) for different parameters, was performed during the meta-analysis. The bivariate mixed-effects model was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

21 studies were finally included, involving 1128 patients with esophageal cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) of DWI sequence for identifying response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74-0.87), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72-0.87) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.56-0.98), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under ROC curve of DCE sequence for identifying response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70-0.84), 0.65 (95% CI: 0.59-0.70) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.50-0.88), respectively. In patients with esophageal cancer, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve of DWI sequences for identifying response to neoadjuvant therapy were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69 - 0.88), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.69 - 0.89), and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.34 - 0.99), respectively; the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve of DCE sequences for identifying response to neoadjuvant therapy were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76 - 0.90), 0.61 (95% CI: 0.53 - 0.68), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.27 - 0.94), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, MRI had a very good value in the early identification of response to neoadjuvant therapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer, especially DWI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value changes before and after treatment could be used as predictors of pathological response. Also, ADC value changes before and after treatment could be used as a tool to guide clinical decision-making.

Multiple diffusion models for predicting pathologic response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

To assess the feasibility and diagnostic performance of the fractional order calculus (FROC), continuous-time random-walk (CTRW), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), mono-exponential (MEM) and stretched exponential models (SEM) for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study prospectively included consecutive ESCC patients with baseline and follow up MR imaging and pathologically confirmed cT1-4aN + M0 or T3-4aN0M0 and underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) between July 2019 and January 2023. Patients were divided into pCR (TRG 0) and non-pCR (TRG1 + 2 + 3) groups according to tumor regression grading (TRG). The Pre-, Post- and Delta-treatment models were built. 18 predictive models were generated according to different feature categories, based on six models by five-fold cross-validation. Areas under the curve (AUCs) of the models were compared by using DeLong method.

RESULTS

Overall, 90 patients (71 men, 19 women; mean age, 64 years ± 6 [SD]) received NACT and underwent baseline and Post-NACT esophageal MRI, with 29 patients in the pCR group and 61 patients in the non-pCR group. Among 18 predictive models, The Pre-, Post-, and Delta-CTRW model showed good predictive efficacy (AUC = 0.722, 0.833 and 0.790). Additionally, the Post-FROC model (AUC = 0.907) also exhibited good diagnostic performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that the CTRW model, along with the Post-FROC model, holds significant promise for the future of NACT efficacy prediction in ESCC patients.

How to update esophageal masses imaging using literature review (MRI and CT features)

MRI offers new opportunities for detailed visualization of the different layers of the esophageal wall, as well as early detection and accurate characterization of esophageal lesions. Staging of esophageal tumors including extramural extent of disease, and status of the adjacent organ can also be performed by MRI with higher accuracy compared to other imaging modalities including CT and esophageal endoscopy. Although MDCT appears to be the primary imaging modality that is indicated for preoperative staging of esophageal cancer to assess tumor resectability, MDCT is considered less accurate in T staging. This review aims to update radiologists about emerging imaging techniques and the imaging features of various esophageal masses, emphasizing the imaging features that differentiate between esophageal masses, demonstrating the critical role of MRI in esophageal masses. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: MRI features may help differentiate mucosal high-grade neoplasia from early invasive squamous cell cancer of the esophagus, also esophageal GISTs from leiomyomas, and esophageal malignant melanoma has typical MR features. KEY POINTS: MRI can accurately visualize different layers of the esophagus potentially has a role in T staging. MR may accurately delineate esophageal fistulae, especially small mediastinal fistulae. MRI features of various esophageal masses are helpful in the differentiation.

MR imaging characteristics of different pathologic subtypes of esophageal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To describe the specific MRI characteristics of different pathologic subtypes of esophageal carcinoma (EC) METHODS: This prospective study included EC patients who underwent esophageal MRI and esophagectomy between April 2015 and October 2021. Pathomorphological characteristics of EC such as localized type (LT), ulcerative type (UT), protruding type (PT), and infiltrative type (IT) were assessed by two radiologists relying on the imaging characteristics of tumor, especially the specific imaging findings on the continuity of the mucosa overlying the tumor, the opposing mucosa, mucosa linear thickening, and transmural growth pattern. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for the consistency between two readers. The associations of imaging characteristics with different pathologic subtypes were assessed using multilogistic regression model (MLR).

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients were identified on histopathology with a high inter-reader agreement (ICC = 0.991). LT showed intact mucosa overlying the tumor. IT showed transmural growth pattern extending from the mucosa to the adventitia and a "sandwich" appearance. The remaining normal mucosa on the opposing side was linear and nodular in UT. PT showed correlation with T1 staging and grade 1; IT showed correlation with T3 staging and grades 2-3. Four MLR models showed high predictive performance on the test set with AUCs of 0.94 (LT), 0.87 (PT), 0.96 (IT), and 0.97 (UT), respectively, and the predictors that contributed most to the models matched the four specific characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Different pathologic subtypes of EC displayed specific MR imaging characteristics, which could help predict T staging and the degree of pathological differentiation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Different pathologic subtypes of esophageal carcinoma displayed specific MR imaging characteristics, which correspond to differences in the degree of differentiation, T staging, and sensitivity to radiotherapy, and could also be one of the predictive factors of cause-specific survival and local progression-free rates.

KEY POINTS

Different types of EC had different characteristics on MR images. A total of 91/95 (96%) LTEC showed intact mucosa over the tumor, while masses or nodules are specific to PTEC; 21/27 (78%) ITEC showed a "sandwich" sign; and 33/35 (60%) UTEC showed linear and nodular opposing mucosa. In the association of tumor type with degree of differentiation and T staging, PTEC was predominantly associated with T1 and grade 1, and ITEC was associated with T3 and grades 2-3, while LTEC and UECT were likewise primarily linked with T2-3 and grades 2-3.

Aorta and tracheobronchial invasion in esophageal cancer: comparing diagnostic performance of 3.0-T MRI and CT

OBJECTIVES

To compare between the diagnostic performance of 3.0-T MRI and CT for aorta and tracheobronchial invasion in patients with esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

We prospectively included patients with pathologically confirmed EC from November 2018 to June 2021, who had baseline stage of T3-4N0-2M0 and restaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT and MRI of the thorax. Two independent blinded radiologists scored image quality and the presence of invasion. Agreements between the two readers were calculated using kappa test. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predict value (PPV), and negative predict value (NPV) of MRI and CT in evaluating invasion were calculated. The net reclassification index (NRI) was used to evaluate the change in the number of patients correctly classified by MRI and CT.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients (64.8 ± 9.0 years; 53 men) were enrolled. Inter-reader agreements of image quality scores and presence of invasion by MRI and CT between the two readers were almost perfect (kappa > 0.80). The accuracy of MRI in evaluating thoracic aorta invasion was significantly higher than that of CT (reader 1: 90.0% vs. 71.4%; reader 2: 92.9% vs. 70.0%, respectively), and the accuracy of MRI in evaluating tracheobronchial invasion also was significantly higher than that of CT (reader 1: 92.9% vs. 72.9%; reader 2: 95.7% vs. 70.0%, respectively). NRI values were positive in both the evaluation of aorta and tracheobronchial invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of 3-T MRI in determining thoracic aorta and tracheobronchial invasion is significantly higher than that of CT.

KEY POINTS

• 3.0-T MRI was significantly more accurate than CT in assessing invasion of the thoracic aorta in patients with esophageal cancer. • 3.0-T MRI was also significantly more accurate than CT in assessing tracheobronchial invasion in patients with esophageal cancer. • 3.0-T MRI has a higher diagnostic performance than CT in evaluating patients with suspected aortic or tracheobronchial invasion in esophageal cancer.

Quantitative RECIST derived from multiparametric MRI in evaluating response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to neoadjuvant therapy

OBJECTIVE

To develop a quantitative Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (qRECIST) for evaluating response to neoadjuvant therapy (nT) in ESCCs relying on multiparametric (mp) MRI.

METHODS

Patients with cT2-T4a/N0-N3/M0 ESCC undergoing pre-nT and post-nT esophageal mpMRI before radical resection were prospectively included. Images were reviewed by two experienced radiologists. qRECIST was redefined using four methods including conventional criterion (cRECIST) and three model-dependent RECIST relying on quantitative MRI measurements at pre-nT, post-nT, and delta pre-post nT, respectively. Pathological tumor regression grades (TRGs) were used as a reference standard. The rates of agreement between four qRECIST methods and TRGs were determined with a Cronbach's alpha test, area under the curve (AUC), and a diagnostic odds ratio meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were enrolled. All four methods revealed high inter-reader agreements between the two radiologists, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.96, 0.87, 0.88, and 0.97 for cRECIST, pre-nT RECIST, post-nT RECIST, and delta RECIST, respectively. Among them, delta RECIST achieved the highest overall agreement rate (67.0% [61/91]) with TRGs, followed by post-nT RECIST (63.8% [58/91]), cRECIST (61.5% [56/91]), and pre-nT RECIST (36.3% [33/91]). Especially, delta RECIST achieved the highest accuracy (97.8% [89/91]) in distinguishing responders from non-responders, with 97.3% (34/35) for responders and 98.2% (55/56) for non-responders. Post-nT RECIST achieved the highest accuracy (93.4% [85/91]) in distinguishing complete responders from non-pCRs, with 77.8% (11/18) for pCRs and 94.5% (69/73) for non-pCRs.

CONCLUSION

The qRECIST with mpMRI can assess treatment-induced changes and may be used for early prediction of response to nT in ESCC patients.

KEY POINTS

• Quantitative mpMRI can reliably assess tumor response, and delta RECIST model had the best performance in evaluating response to nT in ESCCs, with an AUC of 0.98, 0.95, 0.80, and 0.82 for predicting TRG0, TRG1, TRG2, and TRG3, respectively. • In distinguishing responders from non-responders, the rate of agreement between delta RECIST and pathology was 97.3% (34/35) for responders and 98.2% (55/56) for non-responders, resulting in an overall agreement rate of 97.8% (89/91). • In distinguishing pCRs from non-pCR, the rate of agreement between MRI and pathology was 77.8% (11/18) for pCRs and 94.5% (69/73) for non- pCRs, resulting in an overall agreement rate of 91.2% (83/91).