Liver trauma: hepatic vascular injury on computed tomography as a predictor of patient outcome

sCD155 as a potential marker for diagnosing the vascular invasion in hepatic alveolar echinococcosis

BACKGROUND

Alveolar Echinococcosis (AE) is a malignant zoonotic disease caused by Echinococcus multilocularis infection. Considering whether the lesion is accompanied by vascular invasion (VI) is crucial for treatment strategies. A cost-effective and convenient clinical diagnostic method is urgently needed to supplement current techniques. Consequently, we detected soluble CD155 (sCD155) as a potential biomarker for diagnosing VI in hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE).

METHODS

Blood samples were from 42 AE patients and 49 healthy controls (HCs). Based on the computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced CT, AE patients were further categorized into HAE with VI (VIAE; 27 cases) and HAE without VI (NVAE; 15 cases). The sCD155 concentration was measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Correlations between sCD155 expression levels and clinicopathological features of AE patients were analyzed using SPSS and GraphPad Prism software.

RESULTS

The sCD155 concentrations in AE patients were significantly higher than in HCs. The serum sCD155 level significantly differed between the VIAE and NVAE groups. The univariate analysis showed that VI of AE was significantly correlated with the sCD155 level when the sCD155 was greater than 11 ng/mL. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the multivariable analysis showed that sCD155 had an independent effect on VI of HAE. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that sCD155 could differentially diagnose VI of HAE at the cut-off value of 11.08 ng/mL with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.75. The sensitivity and specificity were 74.07 % and 66.67 %, respectively; the positive and negative predictive values were 74.07 % and 60.00 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The sCD155 could be a VI biomarker for HAE. Elevated sCD155 levels are indicative of an increased likelihood of concomitant VI in HAE patients, necessitating a thorough evaluation of vascular impairment and the formulation of individualized management strategies.

Value of contrast-enhanced arterial phase imaging in addition to portovenous phase in CT evaluation of blunt abdominopelvic trauma

OBJECTIVES

Compare the diagnostic performance of the arterial phase plus portovenous phases (AP + PVP) of abdominopelvic CT (CT) with PVP alone in the detection and characterization of traumatic vascular injury and the effects on radiologists' confidence.

METHODS

CT of 103 consecutive inpatients (median 36 years, 83 males) with blunt abdominopelvic injuries were retrospectively included if performed within 24 h after trauma and before definitive management. Images were re-reviewed by two blinded radiologists with disagreements resolved by the third radiologist.

RESULTS

Sixty vascular injuries (liver 23, spleen 15, kidneys 9, pancreas 2, adrenals 3, mesentery, and pelvis 4 each) were found with 4 injuries (liver 2, spleen, and kidneys 1 each) not detected at initial CT. Nineteen (liver 6, spleen 10, kidneys 2, adrenal 1) were visualized only on AP. The sensitivity and accuracy of AP + PVP were 89.58-91.67% and 94.44-95.15%, compared to 61.67-62.50% and 77.67-80.00% of PVP alone. The agreements on the types of injury with final diagnoses were higher for AP + PVP than for PVP alone (78.69% vs. 44.26%). The mean diagnostic radiologist confidence ((1 = 25%, 2 = 50%, 3 = 75%, 4 > 90%) increased significantly in the detection (from 3.38 to 3.71) and characterization (from 2.46 to 3.67) of vascular injuries with AP + PVP compared to PVP alone. For 19 lesions detected only on AP, 11 (spleen 8, liver 2, adrenal 1) received nonoperative management; others had transarterial embolization or surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of AP improves the detection and characterization of vascular injuries in CT evaluation of blunt abdominopelvic trauma.

KEY POINTS

• AP+PVP was more sensitive and precise than PVP alone in the detection of traumatic vascular abdominopelvic injuries. • AP+PVP improved the characterization of traumatic abdominopelvic vascular injuries. • When all abdominopelvic vascular injuries were considered, AP increased radiologists' diagnostic confidence in the detection and characterization of vascular injuries.