ECG-gated MR angiography provides better reproducibility for standard aortic measurements

Isotropic, high-resolution, whole-chest inversion recovery contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in under 4.5 min using image-based navigator fluoro trigger

Background

Serial assessment of the thoracic aorta with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is desirable due to 3D volumetric dataset, high spatial resolution, and lack of ionizing radiation. Electrocardiogram (ECG) gated, contrast-enhanced (CE), inversion recovery gradient echo MRA is efficient and historically provides low artifact burden, but the window for imaging with weak albumin binding extracellular gadolinium based contrast agents is small. Our purpose was to acquire whole-chest gated CE-MRA with 1.2 mm3 resolution using image-based navigator (iNAV) for motion correction/contrast monitoring, and variable density sampling in 4-5 min. Image quality and vessel diameter reproducibility are assessed against time resolved MRA (TR-MRA).

Methods

iNAV CE-MRA and TR-MRA were obtained prospectively in 40 patients and reviewed by 3 blinded cardiologists for vessel diameter and image quality rated on a four point scale: (1) non-diagnostic; (2) poor-significant blurring; (3) good-mild blurring; and (4) excellent. Reproducibility and image quality were evaluated using the concordance correlation statistic and Cohen's kappa with mean differences evaluated using paired t-tests and repeat-measures ANOVA.

Results

iNAV CE-MRA scan time was 4.2 ± 0.7 min. iNAV CE-MRA quality score was higher (p < .001); average difference was 1.4 ± .08 at the sinus of Valsalva (SOV), 1.3 ± .08 at the sinotubular junction (STJ), and .87 ± .10 at the ascending aorta (AAO). Major/minor diameter interobserver agreement was better for iNAV CE-MRA (SOV ICC = .87-.93; STJ ICC = .95-.96; AAO ICC = .96-.97) vs. TR-MRA (SOV ICC = .69-.82; STJ ICC = .78-.83; AAO ICC = .89), as was intraobserver agreement (SOV ICC = .93-.95; STJ ICC = .94-.96; AAO ICC = .96-.97) vs. TR-MRA (SOV ICC = .81-.88; STJ ICC = .72-.73; AAO ICC = .87-.93).

Conclusion

iNAV CE-MRA is feasible within a clinically reasonable scan time, provides superior image quality, and measurement reproducibility vs. TR-MRA.

Equilibrium phase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic aorta and heart using balanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) is routinely used for vascular evaluation. With existing techniques for CEMRA, diagnostic image quality is only obtained during the first pass of the contrast agent or shortly thereafter, whereas angiographic quality tends to be poor when imaging is delayed to the equilibrium phase. We hypothesized that prolonged blood pool contrast enhancement could be obtained by imaging with a balanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state (bT1RESS) pulse sequence, which combines 3D balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) with a saturation recovery magnetization preparation to impart T1 weighting and suppress background tissues. An electrocardiographic-gated, two-dimensional-accelerated version with isotropic 1.1-mm spatial resolution was evaluated for breath-hold equilibrium phase CEMRA of the thoracic aorta and heart.

METHODS

The study was approved by the institutional review board. Twenty-one subjects were imaged using unenhanced 3D bSSFP, time-resolved CEMRA, first-pass gated CEMRA, followed by early and late equilibrium phase gated CEMRA and bT1RESS. Nine additional subjects were imaged using equilibrium phase 3D bSSFP and bT1RESS. Images were evaluated for image quality, aortic root sharpness, and visualization of the coronary artery origins, as well as using standard quantitative measures.

RESULTS

Equilibrium phase bT1RESS provided better image quality, aortic root sharpness, and coronary artery origin visualization than gated CEMRA (P < 0.05), and improved image quality and aortic root sharpness versus unenhanced 3D bSSFP (P < 0.05). It provided significantly larger apparent signal-to-noise and apparent contrast-to-noise ratio values than gated CEMRA and unenhanced 3D bSSFP (P < 0.05) and provided ninefold better fluid suppression than equilibrium phase 3D bSSFP. Aortic diameter and main pulmonary artery diameter measurements obtained with bT1RESS and first-pass gated CEMRA strongly correlated (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that using bT1RESS greatly prolongs the useful duration of blood pool contrast enhancement while improving angiographic image quality compared with standard CEMRA techniques. Although further study is needed, potential advantages for vascular imaging include eliminating the current requirement for first-pass imaging along with better reliability and accuracy for a wide range of cardiovascular applications.

Three-dimensional aortic geometry mapping via registration of non-gated contrast-enhanced or gated and respiratory-navigated MR angiographies

BACKGROUND

The measurement of aortic dimensions and their evolution are key in the management of patients with aortic diseases. Manual assessment, the current guideline-recommended method and clinical standard, is subjective, poorly reproducible, and time-consuming, limiting the capacity to track aortic growth in everyday practice. Aortic geometry mapping (AGM) via image registration of serial computed tomography angiograms outperforms manual assessment, providing accurate and reproducible 3D maps of aortic diameter and growth rate. This observational study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of AGM on non-gated contrast-enhanced (CE-) and cardiac- and respiratory-gated (GN-) magnetic resonance angiographies (MRA).

METHODS

Patients with thoracic aortic disease followed with serial CE-MRA (n = 30) or GN-MRA (n = 15) acquired at least 1 year apart were retrospectively and consecutively identified. Two independent observers measured aortic diameters and growth rates (GR) manually at several thoracic aorta reference levels and with AGM. Agreement between manual and AGM measurements and their inter-observer reproducibility were compared. Reproducibility for aortic diameter and GR maps assessed with AGM was obtained.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 3.8 ± 2.3 years for CE- and 2.7 ± 1.6 years for GN-MRA. AGM was feasible in the 93% of CE-MRA pairs and in the 100% of GN-MRA pairs. Manual and AGM diameters showed excellent agreement and inter-observer reproducibility (ICC>0.9) at all anatomical levels. Agreement between manual and AGM GR was more limited, both in the aortic root by GN-MRA (ICC=0.47) and in the thoracic aorta, where higher accuracy was obtained with GN- than with CE-MRA (ICC=0.55 vs 0.43). The inter-observer reproducibility of GR by AGM was superior compared to manual assessment, both with CE- (thoracic: ICC= 0.91 vs 0.51) and GN-MRA (root: ICC=0.84 vs 0.52; thoracic: ICC=0.93 vs 0.60). AGM-based 3D aortic size and growth maps were highly reproducible (median ICC >0.9 for diameters and >0.80 for GR).

CONCLUSION

Mapping aortic diameter and growth on MRA via 3D image registration is feasible, accurate and outperforms the current manual clinical standard. This technique could broaden the possibilities of clinical and research evaluation of patients with aortic thoracic diseases.

Agreement of Proximal Thoracic Aorta Size by Two-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography

There is currently a lack of uniformity in methods of aortic diameter measurements across different imaging modalities. In this study, we sought to evaluate the accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in comparison with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the measurement of proximal thoracic aorta diameters. This is a retrospective analysis of 121 adult patients at our institution who had TTE and electrocardiogram  (ECG)-gated MRA performed within 90 days of each other between 2013 and 2020. Measurements were made at the level of sinuses of Valsalva (SoV), sinotubular junction (STJ), and ascending aorta (AA) using leading edge-to-leading edge (LE) convention for TTE and inner-edge-to-inner-edge (IE) convention for MRA. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman methods. Intra- and interobserver variability were assessed by intraclass correlation. The average age of patients in the cohort was 62 years, and 69% of patients were male. The prevalence of hypertension, obstructive coronary artery disease, and diabetes was 66%, 20%, and 11%, respectively. The mean aortic diameter by TTE was SoV 3.8 ± 0.5 cm, STJ 3.5 ± 0.4 cm, and AA 4.1 ± 0.6 cm. The TTE-derived measurements were larger than the MRA ones by 0.2 ± 2 mm, 0.8 ± 2 mm, and 0.4 ± 3 mm at the level of SoV, STJ, and AA, respectively, but the differences were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the aorta measurements by TTE compared with MRA, when stratified by gender. In conclusion, transthoracic echocardiogram-derived proximal aorta measurements are comparable to MRA measurements. Our study validates current recommendations that TTE is an acceptable modality for screening and serial imaging of the proximal aorta.

The Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Aortic Stenosis and Regurgitation

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a well-set diagnostic technique for assessment of valvular heart diseases and is gaining ground in current clinical practice. It provides high-quality images without the administration of ionizing radiation and occasionally without the need of contrast agents. It offers the unique possibility of a comprehensive stand-alone assessment of the heart including biventricular function, left ventricle remodeling, myocardial fibrosis, and associated valvulopathies. CMR is the recognized reference for the quantification of ventricular volumes, mass, and function. A particular strength is the ability to quantify flow, especially with new techniques which allow accurate measurement of stenosis and regurgitation. Furthermore, tissue mapping enables the visualization and quantification of structural changes in the myocardium. In this way, CMR has the potential to yield important prognostic information predicting those patients who will progress to surgery and impact outcomes. In this review, the fundamentals of CMR in assessment of aortic valve diseases (AVD) are described, together with its strengths and weaknesses. This state-of-the-art review provides an updated overview of CMR potentials in all AVD issues, including valve anatomy, flow quantification, ventricular volumes and function, and tissue characterization.