Hepatospecific MR contrast agent uptake on hepatobiliary phase can be used as a biomarker of marked β-catenin activation in hepatocellular adenoma

Beta-Catenin-Mutated Hepatocellular Adenomas at Hepatobiliary Phase MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Beta-catenin-mutated hepatocellular adenomas (β-HCAs) can appear iso- to hyperintense at the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Given the relatively lower prevalence of β-HCAs, prior studies had limited power to show statistically significant differences in the HBP signal intensity between different subtypes.

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic performance of HBP MRI to discriminate β-HCA from other subtypes.

STUDY TYPE

Systemic review and meta-analysis.

POPULATION

Ten original studies were included, yielding 266 patients with 397 HCAs (9%, 36/397 β-HCAs and 91%, 361/397 non-β-HCAs).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5 T and 3.0 T, HBP.

ASSESSMENT

PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 2000, to August 31, 2023, for all articles reporting HBP signal intensity in patients with histopathologically proven HCA subtypes. QUADAS-2 was used to assess risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Univariate random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. Heterogeneity estimates were assessed with I2 heterogeneity index. Meta-regression (mixed-effect model) was used to test for differences in the prevalence of HBP signal between HCA groups. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

HBP iso- to hyperintensity was associated with β-HCAs (pooled prevalence was 72.3% in β-HCAs and 6.3% in non-β-HCAs). Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 72.3% (95% confidence interval 54.1-85.3) and 93.7% (93.8-97.7), respectively. Specificity had substantial heterogeneity with I2 of 83% due to one study, but not for sensitivity (I2  = 0). After excluding this study, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 77.4% (59.6-88.8) and 94.1% (88.9-96.9), with no substantial heterogeneity. One study had high risk of bias for patient selection and two studies were rated unclear for two domains.

DATA CONCLUSION

Iso- to hyperintensity at HBP MRI may help to distinguish β-HCA subtype from other HCAs with high specificity. However, there was heterogeneity in the pooled estimates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Association Between Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Organic Anion Transporters, and Farnesoid X Receptor in Benign Focal Liver Lesions

The organic anion uptake and efflux transporters [organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1, OATP1B3 and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP)2 and MRP3] that mediate the transport of the hepatobiliary-specific contrast agent gadoxetate (Gd-EOB-DTPA) are direct or indirect targets of the farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a key regulator of bile acid and lipid homeostasis. In benign liver tumors, FXR expression and activation is not yet characterized. We investigated the expression and activation of FXR and its targets in hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and their correlation with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI patterns were assessed by an expert radiologist. The intensity of the lesions on the hepatobiliary phase was correlated to mRNA expression levels of OATP1B1, OATP1B3, MRP2, MRP3, FXR, and small heterodimer partner (SHP) in fresh surgical specimens of patients with FNH or HCA subtypes. Normal and tumor sample pairs of 43 HCA and 14 FNH were included. All FNH (14/14) were hyperintense. Of the 34 HCA with available Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, 6 were hyperintense and 28 HCA were hypointense. OATP1B3 was downregulated in the hypointense tumors compared with normal surrounding liver tissue (2.77±3.59 vs. 12.9±15.6, P < 0.001). A significant positive correlation between FXR expression and activation and OATP1B3 expression level was found in the HCA cohort. SHP showed a trend toward downregulation in hypointense HCA. In conclusion, this study suggests that the MRI relative signal in HCA may reflect expression level and/or activity of SHP and FXR. Moreover, our data confirms the pivotal role of OATP1B3 in Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in HCA. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: FXR represents a valuable target for the treatment of liver disease and metabolic syndrome. Currently, two molecules, ursodeoxycholate and obeticholate, are approved for the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis and cholestasis, with several compounds in clinical trials for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease. Because FXR expression and activation is associated with gadoxetate accumulation in HCA, an atypical gadoxetate-enhanced MRI pattern might arise in patients under FXR-targeted therapy, thereby complicating the differential diagnosis.

Sonic hedgehog hepatocellular adenoma: magnetic resonance imaging features and correlation with histology

OBJECTIVES

Sonic hedgehog hepatocellular adenoma (shHCA) is a new hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) subgroup characterized by high risk of hemorrhage. ShHCA account for below 10% of all HCA cases and are often associated with female gender, obesity, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. No specific MRI characteristics have been described to date. The objective of this study was to assess the value of using MRI to identify shHCA, and correlate MRI findings with histology.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected MRI scans of 29 patients with shHCA from our center and from different liver referral centers to include 35 lesions. Diagnosis of shHCA was assessed by immunohistochemical overexpression of argininosuccinate synthase 1 or prostaglandin D2 synthase, then confirmed by molecular analysis of sonic hedgehog pathway activation and/or by proteomic analysis.

RESULTS

In 46% (n = 16/35) of shHCA cases, we detected intralesional fluid-filled cavities defined on MR images as fluid-like foci markedly hyperintense on T2-weighted sequences, and hypointense on T1-weighted sequences, with or without delayed enhancement. Pathologically, these cavities were observed in 54% of cases as vacuoles filled with blood at different stages of degradation. Hemorrhage and/or necrosis were detected among 71% of cases by MRI analysis (n = 25/35) versus 82% pathologically. Seventeen percent of shHCA cases (n = 6/35) were completely homogeneous via MRI and pathological analysis. No MRI criteria was found in favor of focal nodular hyperplasia, HNF1A-mutated HCA, or typical inflammatory HCA.

CONCLUSION

We reveal the presence of intralesional fluid-filled cavities among 46% of our shHCA cases that represent a new MRI finding possibly helpful for shHCA diagnosis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This multicenter study is the first clinical study about the radiological aspect of this new hepatocellular adenoma subgroup. This highlights a strong correlation between MRI and histological analysis, with a specific pattern emerging for diagnosis.

KEY POINTS

• Sonic hedgehog hepatocellular adenoma is a new hepatocellular adenoma subgroup associated with high risk of hemorrhage, but imaging features of this subgroup remain unknown. • Analysis of MR images and correlation with pathology revealed intralesional fluid-filled cavities and necrotic-hemorrhagic changes. • Intralesional fluid-filled cavities have not yet been described in other adenoma subtypes and represent a new MRI finding for sonic hedgehog hepatocellular adenoma.

Surgical indications for solid hepatic benign tumors: An updated literature review

Hepatic hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatic adenoma are the most common benign solid liver tumors. However, their surgical indications have been the subject of debate. Minimally invasive liver resection reduces the cost of surgery and may lead to overtreatment of benign liver tumors. Recently, there has been a growing understanding of the etiology, pathogenesis, and natural history of these tumors. Great progress has also been made in imaging. The use of MRI and contrast agents has improved the accuracy of non-invasive diagnosis of these tumors, and especially in the identification of specific molecular subtypes of liver adenoma. These factors have resulted in alterations of surgical indications for these tumors. This article examines recent literature and it discusses the surgical indications for hepatic hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatic adenoma while summarizing modifications in clinical management.

Hepatocellular Adenomas: Molecular Basis and Multimodality Imaging Update

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are a family of liver tumors that are associated with variable prognoses. Since the initial description of these tumors, the classification of HCAs has expanded and now includes eight distinct genotypic subtypes based on molecular analysis findings. These genotypic subtypes have unique derangements in their cellular biologic makeup that determine their clinical course and may allow noninvasive identification of certain subtypes. Multiphasic MRI performed with hepatobiliary contrast agents remains the best method to noninvasively detect, characterize, and monitor HCAs. HCAs are generally hypointense during the hepatobiliary phase; the β-catenin-mutated exon 3 subtype and up to a third of inflammatory HCAs are the exception to this characterization. It is important to understand the appearances of HCAs beyond their depictions at MRI, as these tumors are typically identified with other imaging modalities first. The two most feared related complications are bleeding and malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma, although the risk of these complications depends on tumor size, subtype, and clinical factors. Elective surgical resection is recommended for HCAs that are persistently larger than 5 cm, adenomas of any size in men, and all β-catenin-mutated exon 3 HCAs. Thermal ablation and transarterial embolization are potential alternatives to surgical resection. In the acute setting of a ruptured HCA, patients typically undergo transarterial embolization with or without delayed surgical resection. This update on HCAs includes a review of radiologic-pathologic correlations by subtype and imaging modality, related complications, and management recommendations. ^© RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Benign liver lesions 2022: Guideline for clinical practice of Associazione Italiana Studio del Fegato (AISF), Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica e Interventistica (SIRM), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Ultrasonologia in Medicina e Biologia (SIUMB), Associazione Italiana di Chirurgia Epatobilio-Pancreatica (AICEP), Società Italiana Trapianti d'Organo (SITO), Società Italiana di Anatomia Patologica e Citologia Diagnostica (SIAPEC-IAP) - Part II - Solid lesions

Benign liver lesions are increasingly diagnosed in daily clinical practice due to the growing use of imaging techniques for the study of the abdomen in patients who have non-specific symptoms and do not have an increased risk of hepatic malignancy. They include simple or parasitic hepatic cysts and solid benign tumors which differ widely in terms of prevalence, clinical relevance, symptoms and natural history and often lead to significant clinical problems relating to diagnosis and clinical management. Following the need to have updated guidelines on the management of benign focal liver lesions, the Scientific Societies mainly involved in their management have promoted the drafting of a new dedicated document. This document was drawn up according to the present Italian rules and methodologies necessary to produce clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic guidelines based on evidence. Here we present the second part of the guideline, concerning the diagnosis and clinical management of hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatocellular adenoma.

Benign liver tumours: understanding molecular physiology to adapt clinical management

Improvements in understanding the pathophysiology of the different benign liver nodules have refined their nosological classification. New criteria have been identified using imaging, histology and molecular analyses for a precise diagnosis of these tumours. Improvement in the classification of liver tumours provides a more accurate prediction of disease progression and has modified patient management. Haemangioma and focal nodular hyperplasia, the most common benign liver tumours that develop in the absence of chronic liver disease, are usually easy to diagnose on imaging and do not require specific treatment. However, hepatocellular adenomas and cirrhotic macronodules can be difficult to discriminate from hepatocellular carcinoma. The molecular subtyping of hepatocellular adenomas in five major subgroups defined by HNF1A inactivation, β-catenin mutation in exon 3 or exon 7/8, and activation of inflammatory or Hedgehog pathways helps to identify the tumours at risk of malignant transformation or bleeding. New clinical, biological and molecular tools have gradually been included in diagnostic and treatment algorithms to classify benign liver tumours and improve patient management. This Review aims to explain the main pathogenic mechanisms of benign liver tumours and how this knowledge could influence clinical practice.

Imaging features of β-catenin-activated hepatocellular adenoma with weak β-catenin activation: A rare case report

We report valuable imaging findings in a case of β-catenin-activated hepatocellular adenoma (β-HCA) with weak β-catenin activation. A 40 year-old female presented with a liver tumor in S8 that was incidentally detected on ultrasonography. The tumor showed marked enhancement and early venous drainage into the middle hepatic vein in the arterial phase of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). The tumor revealed slight hypointensity in the hepatobiliary phase of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI). Six months after detection, the tumor had increased in size and a biopsy indicated hepatocellular carcinoma. The tumor was resected and pathologically diagnosed as β-HCA with weak β-catenin activation such as exon 3 S45 mutation and exon 7/8 mutation. Marked enhancement in the arterial phase of CT and MRI is a characteristic finding of β-HCA with weak β-catenin activation. Furthermore, the degree of β-catenin activation might determine the signal intensity of β-HCA in the hepatobiliary phase of EOB-MRI.

Preoperative radiomics model using gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for predicting β-catenin mutation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study

Objective

To compare and evaluate radiomics models to preoperatively predict β-catenin mutation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Ninety-eight patients who underwent preoperative gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MRI were retrospectively included. Volumes of interest were manually delineated on arterial phase, portal venous phase, delay phase, and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images. Radiomics features extracted from different combinations of imaging phases were analyzed and validated. A linear support vector classifier was applied to develop different models.

Results

Among all 15 types of radiomics models, the model with the best performance was seen in the R^HBP radiomics model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of the R^HBP radiomics model in the training and validation cohorts were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75–0.93), 0.75, 1.0, and 0.65 and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.63–0.93), 0.73, 0.67, and 0.76, respectively. The combined model integrated radiomics features in the R^HBP radiomics model, and signatures in the clinical model did not improve further compared to the single HBP radiomics model with AUCs of 0.86 and 0.76. Good calibration for the best R^HBP radiomics model was displayed in both cohorts; the decision curve showed that the net benefit could achieve 0.15. The most important radiomics features were low and high gray-level zone emphases based on gray-level size zone matrix with the same Shapley additive explanation values of 0.424.

Conclusion

The R^HBP radiomics model may be used as an effective model indicative of HCCs with β-catenin mutation preoperatively and thus could guide personalized medicine.

Morphomolecular Classification Update on Hepatocellular Adenoma, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs), hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) are a highly heterogeneous group of liver tumors with diverse pathomolecular features and prognoses. High-throughput gene sequencing techniques have allowed discovery of distinct genetic and molecular underpinnings of these tumors and identified distinct subtypes that demonstrate varied clinicobiologic behaviors, imaging findings, and complications. The combination of histopathologic findings and molecular profiling form the basis for the morphomolecular classification of liver tumors. Distinct HCA subtypes with characteristic imaging findings and complications include HNF1A-inactivated, inflammatory, β-catenin-activated, β-catenin-activated inflammatory, and sonic hedgehog HCAs. HCCs can be grouped into proliferative and nonproliferative subtypes. Proliferative HCCs include macrotrabecular-massive, TP53-mutated, scirrhous, clear cell, fibrolamellar, and sarcomatoid HCCs and combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma. Steatohepatitic and β-catenin-mutated HCCs constitute the nonproliferative subtypes. iCCAs are classified as small-duct and large-duct types on the basis of the level of bile duct involvement, with significant differences in pathogenesis, molecular signatures, imaging findings, and biologic behaviors. Cross-sectional imaging modalities, including multiphase CT and multiparametric MRI, play an essential role in diagnosis, staging, treatment response assessment, and surveillance. Select imaging phenotypes can be correlated with genetic abnormalities, and identification of surrogate imaging markers may help avoid genetic testing. Improved understanding of morphomolecular features of liver tumors has opened new areas of research in the targeted therapeutics and management guidelines. The purpose of this article is to review imaging findings of select morphomolecular subtypes of HCAs, HCCs, and iCCAs and discuss therapeutic and prognostic implications. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma by subtype and hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver by fractal analysis of perfusion MRI

Background

To investigate whether fractal analysis of perfusion differentiates hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) subtypes and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in non-cirrhotic liver by quantifying perfusion chaos using four-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (4D-DCE-MRI).

Results

A retrospective population of 63 patients (47 female) with histopathologically characterized HCA and HCC in non-cirrhotic livers was investigated. Our population consisted of 13 hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-1α-inactivated (H-HCAs), 7 β-catenin-exon-3-mutated (b^ex3-HCAs), 27 inflammatory HCAs (I-HCAs), and 16 HCCs. Four-dimensional fractal analysis was applied to arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases of 4D-DCE-MRI and was performed in lesions as well as remote liver tissue. Diagnostic accuracy of fractal analysis was compared to qualitative MRI features alone and their combination using multi-class diagnostic accuracy testing including kappa-statistics and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Fractal analysis allowed quantification of perfusion chaos, which was significantly different between lesion subtypes (multi-class AUC = 0.90, p < 0.001), except between I-HCA and HCC. Qualitative MRI features alone did not allow reliable differentiation between HCA subtypes and HCC (κ = 0.35). However, combining qualitative MRI features and fractal analysis reliably predicted the histopathological diagnosis (κ = 0.89) and improved differentiation of high-risk lesions (i.e., HCCs, b^ex3-HCAs) and low-risk lesions (H-HCAs, I-HCAs) from sensitivity and specificity of 43% (95% confidence interval [CI] 23–66%) and 47% (CI 32–64%) for qualitative MRI features to 96% (CI 78–100%) and 68% (CI 51–81%), respectively, when adding fractal analysis.

Conclusions

Combining qualitative MRI features with fractal analysis allows identification of HCA subtypes and HCCs in patients with non-cirrhotic livers and improves differentiation of lesions with high and low risk for malignant transformation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-022-01223-6.

Preneoplastic lesions in the liver: Molecular insights and relevance for clinical practice

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are the most frequent primary liver cancers, accounting for approximately 80% and 15%, respectively. HCC carcinogenesis occurs mostly in cirrhosis and is a complex multi-step process, from precancerous lesions (low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nodules) to progressed HCC. During the different stages of liver carcinogenesis, there is an accumulation of pathological, genetic and epigenetic changes leading to initiation, malignant transformation and finally tumour progression. In contrast, a small subset of HCC occurs in normal liver from the transformation of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), a benign hepatocellular tumour. The recent molecular classification enables to stratify HCAs according to their risk of complication, in particular malignant transformation, associated with mutations in exon 3 of the catenin beta 1 (CTNNB1) gene. Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) derives from the multistep malignant transformation of preneoplastic lesions, like biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN) and intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB), for which a pre-operative diagnosis remains difficult. Different genetic alterations are involved in BilIN and IPNB progression, leading to the development of tubular or intestinal adenocarcinoma. The aims of this review are to describe the main clinical and molecular features of preneoplastic lesions leading to the development of HCC and CCA, their implications in clinical practice and the perspectives for future research.

Hepatocellular Adenoma: What We Know, What We Do Not Know, and Why It Matters

In the last 2 decades there has been significant progress in research and diagnosis of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), resulting in the establishment of a molecular and immunohistological HCA classification. This review aims to fine-tune the current expertise in order to enhance the histopathological diagnostic possibilities, by refining issues that are already known, addressing diagnostic difficulties and identifying still unknown aspects of HCA. We will discuss novel methods to identify HCA subtypes, in particular the sonic hedgehog HCAs and the interpretation of glutamine synthetase patterns for the recognition of beta-catenin mutated HCAs. The major complications of HCAs, bleeding and malignant transformation, will be considered, including the dilemmas of atypical and borderline lesions. Paragraphs on HCAs in different clinical and geographical settings, e.g. pregnancy, cirrhosis and non-western countries are included. The natural history of the different HCA subtypes in relation with age, sex and risk factors is a feature still insufficiently investigated. This is also true for the risks of clinical bleeding and malignant transformation in association with HCA subtypes. As HCA is a relatively rare tumor, a multicenter and multidisciplinary approach across geographical boundaries will be the appropriate method to establish prospective programs to identify, classify and manage HCAs, focusing on several aspects, e.g. etiology, underlying liver disease, complications, regression and growth. Updating what we know, identifying and addressing features that we do not know matters to warrant optimal patient management.