Reliability and accuracy of time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in hypervascular spinal metastases prior embolization

Diagnostic performance of computed tomography-digital subtraction angiography and conventional magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the vascularity of osseous spinal tumors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with hypervascular spinal tumors may have severe blood loss during tumor resection, which increases the risks of perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, the preoperative evaluation of tumor vascularity may be challenging; moreover, the reliability of the data obtained in conventional preoperative noninvasive imaging is debatable. In this study, we compared conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subtraction computed tomography angiography (CTA) in terms of their performance in vascularity evaluation. The catheter digital subtraction angiography (DSA) technique was used as a reference standard.

METHODS

This study included 123 consecutive patients with spinal tumor who underwent subtraction CTA, catheter DSA, and subsequent surgery between October 2015 and October 2021. Data regarding qualitative and semiquantitative subtraction CTA parameters and conventional MRI signs were collected for comparison with tumor vascularity graded through catheter DSA. The diagnostic performance of qualitative CTA, quantitative CTA, and conventional MRI in assessing spinal tumor vascularity was analyzed.

RESULTS

Qualitative subtraction CTA was the best noninvasive imaging modality in terms of diagnostic performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.95). Quantitative CTA was relatively inferior (AUROC, 0.87). MRI results had low reliability (AUROC, 0.51 to 0.59). Intratumoral hemorrhage and prominent foraminal venous plexus were found to be the specific signs for hypervascularity (specificity 93.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative subtraction CTA offers the highest diagnostic value in evaluating spinal tumor vascularity, compared to quantitative CTA and MRI. Although conventional MRI may not be a reliable approach, certain MRI signs may have high specificity, which may be crucial for assessing spinal tumor vascularity.

Intratumoral Flow Void Diameter as a Predictor of High Intraoperative Blood Loss in Palliative Excisional Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Tumors

Background/Objectives: Massive intraoperative blood loss (IBL) is one of the major complications in metastatic spinal tumor surgery (MSTS), and understanding the predictors of this risk is essential. This study aimed to determine the impact of the intratumoral flow void (IFV) observed on standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its association with IBL in palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 88 palliative excisional surgeries performed at a single hospital between 2010 and 2024. Factors such as age, sex, body mass index, tumor location, histological tumor type, spinal instability neoplastic score, revised Tokuhashi score, preoperative radiation, presence of IFV, and IFV diameter were assessed in addition to surgical details such as the number of resected and instrumented vertebrae and surgical duration. Results: Of the 88 patients, 71 (80.7%) exhibited IFV, with a mean IFV diameter of 1.8 ± 1.3 mm. The univariate analysis identified a significant association between IBL and several factors, including the presence of IFV, IFV diameter, hypervascular tumor type, number of instrumented vertebrae, and surgical duration. The multivariate analysis indicated that IFV diameter had the highest standardized coefficient among the examined variables, suggesting its strong potential as a predictor of IBL. Conclusions: This is the first study to identify the IFV diameter as a critical and independent predictor of IBL in MSTS. IFV diameter, which can be easily assessed using standard MRI, should be considered in surgical planning to effectively manage bleeding.

Vascular Pathologic Conditions in and around the Spinal Cord

Diagnosing and differentiating spinal vascular pathologic conditions is challenging. Small structures, lengthy imaging examinations, and overlapping imaging features increase the difficulty. Yet, subtle findings and helpful protocols can narrow the differential diagnosis. The authors aim to help radiologists make accurate and timely diagnoses of spinal vascular pathologic conditions in and around the spinal cord by highlighting spinal vascular anatomy, imaging findings, and three broad categories of abnormalities: infarcts, anomalies, and tumors. ©RSNA, 2024.

Association of CT-DSA vascular assessment and perioperative outcomes in metastatic spinal surgery

INTRODUCTION

Computed tomography-digital subtraction angiography (CT-DSA) is a radiological method for assessing spinal metastatic tumor vascularity. The study aimed to investigate the association between CT-DSA results and perioperative outcomes in spinal metastatic surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients who underwent spinal metastatic operations with preoperative CT-DSA examinations at any time between January 2018 to December 2022. CT-DSA was classified into five grades ranging from grade 0 to grade 4. Grades 3 and 4 were indicative of hypervascularity. We analyzed the perioperative outcomes of intraoperative blood loss amount, massive hemorrhage (≥2500 ml) occurrence, blood transfusion status, operation time, hospital stay duration, and 30-day and 60-day mortality rates. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors affecting the likelihood of massive hemorrhage in conjunction with CT-DSA.

RESULTS

Data from 212 operations involving 209 patients were analyzed. In total, 30, 36, 66, 56, and 24 operations had CT-DSA grades from grade 0 to grade 4, respectively. Eighty (38 %) studies were indicative of hypervascularity. CT-DSA grade was positively correlated with the amount of operative blood loss, the occurrence of massive hemorrhage, and the amount of blood in blood transfusion (p < 0.05). However, CT-DSA grades was not significantly associated with operation duration or mortality rate. A multivariable analysis indicated that factors such as hemoglobulin, hypervascular pathology, and spinal instability neoplastic scores were positively correlated with CT-DSA grade. CT-DSA grade (odds ratio: 2.37, p = 0.02), spinal metastatic invasiveness index, and tumor size (≥50 mL) were found to be independent predictors in a multivariable logistic regression analysis where factors associated with massive hemorrhage were included. Hypervascular pathology type was not significantly associated with the likelihood of hemorrhage in the univariable and multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-DSA serves as an effective tool for assessing vascularity, and is associated with intra-operative blood loss and likelihood of experiencing massive hemorrhage. The predictive capability of CT-DSA surpasses that of traditional histopathology classifications, making it a useful method for preoperative planning in spinal metastatic surgeries.

Efficacy of preoperative embolization for metastatic spinal tumor surgery using angiographic vascularity assessment

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative embolization (PE) for metastatic spinal tumors is a method of minimizing intraoperative blood loss during aggressive surgery. This study specified angiographic standards and investigated the influence of these and other factors on blood loss in patients with spinal metastases and various pathologies.

METHODS

The cohort comprised 126 consecutive patients receiving PE from 2015 to 2021. Their clinical, surgical, and angiographic characteristics were reviewed. Standard angiographic grading was used for vascularity assessment. Degree of embolization was divided into complete (≥ 90%), near complete (67 to < 90%), and partial (< 67%). Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate factors predictive of massive blood loss (> 2500 mL). A proportional odds model was used to assess factors predictive of the degree of embolization.

RESULTS

Mean intraoperative blood loss was 1676 mL. Among the patients, 62 had hypervascular tumors and 64 had nonhypervascular tumors, according to the angiographic classification. Intraoperative blood loss differed significantly with embolization degree, both overall (p < 0.001) and in the hypervascular and nonhypervascular groups (p = 0.01 and 0.03). Angiographic hypervascularity, spinal metastasis invasiveness index, and embolization degree were significant predictors of massive blood loss in univariate analysis, but only embolization degree was significant in multivariate analysis. Only the presence of the radiculomedullary artery at the target level was significant in both the univariate and multivariate analyses for embolization degree.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to pathological classification, angiographic vascularity assessment is valuable. Although complete embolization is a reasonable goal, it is challenging to achieve in cases of visible radiculomedullary artery.

KEY POINTS

• Angiography has a supplementary role in vascularity assessment for spinal metastatic surgery. • Better embolization degree is associated with less intraoperative blood loss in both angiographic hypervascular and nonhypervascular groups. • Presence of radiculomedullary artery in the target level causes worse embolization outcome.

Peripheral vascular lesions in adults referred to MRI/MRA: Multivariable analysis of imaging features to help differentiate benign vascular anomalies from malignancies

PURPOSE

Symptomatic peripheral vascular lesions in adults are often clinically diagnosed as benign vascular anomalies and may receive MRI/MRA for pre-treatment vascular mapping. Malignant neoplasms are difficult to distinguish from benign vascular anomalies on MRI/MRA. This study was performed to determine if there are imaging signs that can distinguish malignancies from benign vascular anomalies in adults imaged with MRI/MRA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A radiology database was retrospectively searched for ISSVA classification terms in MRI/MRA reports from 1/1/2002-1/1/2019. Adult patients (n = 50, 52 corresponding lesions) with contrast-enhanced MRI/MRA, peripheral soft tissue based lesion (s), and available pathology or long-term (>1 year) imaging follow-up were included. MRI/MRA images were reviewed by 3 readers for the following lesional characteristics: morphology (marginal lobulation, internal septations, distinct soft tissue mass), peri-articular location, T2-weighted characteristics (hyperintensity, heterogeneity, perilesional edema, and adjacent triangular T2-peaks), bulk fat, hemorrhage, enhancement pattern (peripheral, diffuse, or absent), neovascularity, low-flow venous malformation type enhancement, arterial enhancement within 6 s, enhancement curve (progressive, plateau, or washout), measured size, and multifocality. The MRI/MRA features' associated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. To identify factors predictive of malignancy, a two-stage multivariable analysis was performed.

RESULTS

23% (12/52) of the lesions, corresponding to 22% (11/50) of the patients, were malignant neoplasms. No single imaging feature reliably predicted malignancy (PPV ≤ 60%). Absence of distinct soft tissue mass excluded malignancy (NPV 100%). Multivariate analysis derived a summary score based on the five strongest predictors of malignancy: adjacent T2 peaks, age ≥ 70 years, distinct soft tissue mass, lesion size ≥ 5 cm, and absence of septations. A score ≥ 3 resulted in sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 85%.

CONCLUSION

Extremity MRI/MRA rarely differentiates malignant from benign soft-tissue vascular tumors in adults. However, MRI/MRA can suggest malignancy when patient age and multiple imaging features are considered. Periodic clinical follow-up after the planned endovascular or operative procedure should be performed to avoid missing a malignancy.

The role of percutaneous transarterial embolization in the management of spinal bone tumors: a literature review

PURPOSE

Spinal bone tumors include a heterogeneous broad of primary or metastatic lesions that may present as incidental findings or manifest with painful symptoms and pathological fractures. Optimal management of spine bone lesions is often difficult and treatment algorithms are usually solidly based on surgery. We aimed to evaluate the contribution of trans-arterial embolization in this field, with particular attention to the procedure efficacy, technical difficulties and complications.

METHODS

We present a literature review on the role of trans-arterial embolization in the management of spinal bone tumors, both primary and metastatic, evaluating its contribution as preoperative treatment, palliative procedure and standalone curative strategy.

RESULTS

Trans-arterial embolization provides an important contribution to reducing surgery hemorrhagic risks, offering a better visualization of the operating field, and possibly increasing tumor susceptibility to chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Nonetheless, it plays an important part in pain palliation, with the unquestionable advantage of being easily repeatable in case of necessity. Its curative role as a standalone therapy is still subject of debate, and at the present time, satisfactory results have been recorded only in the treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous trans-arterial embolization has established as a highly useful minimally invasive procedure in the management of spinal bone lesions, particularly as adjuvant preoperative therapy and palliative treatment.