Preoperative assessment of the resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on CT according to the NCCN Guidelines focusing on SMA/SMV branch invasion

Multimodal treatment combining neoadjuvant therapy, laparoscopic subtotal distal pancreatectomy and adjuvant therapy for pancreatic neck-body cancer: Case series

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer involving the pancreas neck and body often invades the retroperitoneal vessels, making its radical resection challenging. Multimodal treatment strategies, including neoadjuvant therapy, surgery, and postoperative adjuvant therapy, are contributing to a paradigm shift in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. This strategy is also promising in the treatment of pancreatic neck-body cancer.

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a multimodal strategy for the treatment of borderline/locally advanced pancreatic neck-body cancer.

METHODS

From January 2019 to December 2021, we reviewed the demographic characteristics, neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment data, intraoperative and postoperative variables, and follow-up outcomes of patients who underwent multimodal treatment for pancreatic neck-body cancer in a prospectively collected database of our hospital. This investigation was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting of Case Series in Surgery criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients with pancreatic neck-body cancer were included in this study, of whom 6 patients were borderline resectable and 5 were locally advanced. Through multidisciplinary team discussion, all patients received neoadjuvant therapy, of whom 8 (73%) patients achieved a partial response and 3 patients maintained stable disease. After multidisciplinary team reassessment, all patients underwent laparoscopic subtotal distal pancreatectomy and portal vein reconstruction and achieved R0 resection. Postoperatively, two patients (18%) developed ascites, and two patients (18%) developed pancreatic fistulae. The median length of stay of the patients was 11 days (range: 10-15 days). All patients received postoperative adjuvant therapy. During the follow-up, three patients experienced tumor recurrence, with a median disease-free survival time of 13.3 months and a median overall survival time of 20.5 months.

CONCLUSION

A multimodal treatment strategy combining neoadjuvant therapy, laparoscopic subtotal distal pancreatectomy, and adjuvant therapy is safe and feasible in patients with pancreatic neck-body cancer.

Survival Outcomes According to NCCN Criteria for Resection Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients with Localized Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for resection following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study assessed 193 consecutive patients with localized PDAC (104 males and 89 females; mean age, 61.1 ± 9.4 years) who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery between January 2010 and March 2021. Combined resectability and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 evaluation before and after neoadjuvant therapy was used to determine whether patients were eligible for resection according to the NCCN criteria. Post-surgical overall survival (OS), recurrence free survival (RFS), and pathologic results were evaluated and compared between patients considered eligible according to the NCCN criteria and those considered ineligible. Preoperative factors associated with better OS and RFS also were investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 193 patients, 168 (87.0 %) were eligible for resection according to the NCCN criteria. The patients eligible according to the NCCN criteria showed marginally longer OS than those considered ineligible (p = 0.056). After adjustment of variables, meeting the NCCN criteria for resection was an independent predictor of better OS (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95 % confidence interval, 0.34-0.96; p = 0.034). The two groups had similar RFS. Lower T-staging (T2 or less) and less lympho-vascular invasion and peri-neural invasion were noted in the patients who met the NCCN criteria (p ≤ 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

The patients eligible for resection according to the NCCN criteria showed a trend toward longer OS and better pathologic results than the patients considered ineligible.

Precision Targeting Strategies in Pancreatic Cancer: The Role of Tumor Microenvironment

Pancreatic cancer demonstrates an ever-increasing incidence over the last years and represents one of the top causes of cancer-associated mortality. Cells of the tumor microenvironment (TME) interact with cancer cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumors to preserve cancer cells' metabolism, inhibit drug delivery, enhance immune suppression mechanisms and finally develop resistance to chemotherapy and immunotherapy. New strategies target TME genetic alterations and specific pathways in cell populations of the TME. Complex molecular interactions develop between PDAC cells and TME cell populations including cancer-associated fibroblasts, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, pancreatic stellate cells, tumor-associated macrophages, tumor-associated neutrophils, and regulatory T cells. In the present review, we aim to fully explore the molecular landscape of the pancreatic cancer TME cell populations and discuss current TME targeting strategies to provide thoughts for further research and preclinical testing.

Comparison of the different versions of NCCN guidelines for predicting margin-negative resection of pancreatic cancer in patients undergoing upfront surgery

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the different versions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for defining resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in predicting margin-negative (R0) resection, and to assess inter-reader agreement.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 283 patients (mean age, 65.1 years ± 9.4 [SD]; 155 men) who underwent upfront pancreatectomy for PDAC between 2017 and 2019. Two radiologists independently determined the resectability on preoperative CT according to the 2017, 2019, and 2020 NCCN guidelines. The sensitivity and specificity for R0 resection were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

R0 resection was accomplished in 239 patients (84.5%). The sensitivity and specificity averaged across two readers were, respectively, 76.6% and 29.5% for the 2020 guidelines, 74.1% and 32.9% for the 2019 guidelines, and 72.6% and 34.1% for the 2017 guidelines. Compared with the 2020 guidelines, both 2019 and 2017 guidelines showed significantly lower sensitivity for R0 resection (p ≤ .009). Specificity was significantly higher with the 2017 guidelines (p = .043) than with the 2020 guidelines. Inter-reader agreements for determining the resectability of PDCA were strong (k ≥ 0.83) with all guidelines, being highest with the 2020 guidelines (k = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

The 2020 NCCN guidelines showed significantly higher sensitivity for prediction of R0 resection than the 2017 and 2019 guidelines.

Imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - An update for all stages of patient management

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a common and lethal cancer. From diagnosis to disease staging, response to neoadjuvant therapy assessment and patient surveillance after resection, imaging plays a central role, guiding the multidisciplinary team in decision-planning.

Review aims and findings

This review discusses the most up-to-date imaging recommendations, typical and atypical findings, and issues related to each step of patient management. Example cases for each relevant condition are presented, and a structured report for disease staging is suggested.

Conclusion

Despite current issues in PDAC imaging at different stages of patient management, the radiologist is essential in the multidisciplinary team, as the conveyor of relevant imaging findings crucial for patient care.

Pancreas CT assessment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resectability: effect of tube voltage and slice thickness on image quality and diagnostic performance

OBJECTIVES

To assess the resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the evaluation of tumor vascular contact holds paramount significance. This study aimed to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of high-resolution (HR) pancreas computed tomography (CT) using an 80 kVp tube voltage and a thin slice (1 mm) for assessing PDAC resectability, in comparison with the standard protocol CT using 120 kVp.

METHODS

This research constitutes a secondary analysis originating from a multicenter prospective study. All participants underwent both the standard protocol pancreas CT using 120 kVp with 3 mm slice thickness (ST) and HR-CT utilizing an 80 kVp tube voltage and 1 mm ST. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between parenchyma and tumor, along with the degree of enhancement of the abdominal aorta and main portal vein (MPV), were measured and subsequently compared. Additionally, the likelihood of margin-negative resection (R0) was evaluated using a five-point scale. The diagnostic performance of both CT protocols in predicting R0 resection was assessed through the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients (37 males and 32 females; median age, 66.5 years) were included in the study. The median CNR of PDAC was 10.4 in HR-CT, which was significantly higher than the 7.1 in the standard CT (P=0.006). Furthermore, HR-CT demonstrated notably higher median attenuation values for both the abdominal aorta (579.5 HU vs. 327.2 HU; P=0.002) and the MPV (263.0 HU vs. 175.6 HU; P=0.004) in comparison with standard CT. Following surgery, R0 resection was achieved in 51 patients. The pooled AUC for HR-CT in predicting R0 resection was 0.727, slightly exceeding the 0.699 of standard CT, albeit lacking a significant statistical distinction (P=0.128).

CONCLUSION

While HR pancreas CT using 80 kVp offered a notably greater degree of contrast enhancement in vessels and a higher CNR for PDAC compared to standard CT, its diagnostic performance in predicting R0 resection remained statistically comparable.

Pancreatic index: A prognostic factor of upfront surgery for body or tail pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement-A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The pancreatic index (PI) is a useful preoperative imaging predictor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this retrospective study, we determined the predictive effect of PI to distinguish patients of pancreatic body/tail cancer (PBTC) with vascular involvement who can benefit from upfront surgery.

METHOD

All patients who received distal pancreatectomy for PDAC from 2016 to 2020 at the Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine were considered for the study. A total of 429 patients with PBTC were assessed in relation to the value of PI. Fifty-five patients were eventually included and divided into low PI group and 29 patients in the normal PI group.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (mOS) was significantly shorter in the low PI group (13.1 vs. 30.0 months, p = 0.002) in this study, and PI ≥ 0.78 (OR = 0.552, 95% CI: 0.301-0.904, p = 0.020) was an independent influencing factor confirmed by multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis showed that PI was an independent prognostic factor for LA-PBTC (OR = 0.272, 95% CI: 0.077-0.969, p = 0.045). As for BR PBTC, PI (OR = 0.519, 95% CI: 0.285-0.947, p = 0.033) combined with carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) (OR = 2.806, 95% CI: 1.206-6.526, p = 0.017) and chemotherapy (OR = 0.327, 95% CI: 0.140-0.763, p = 0.010) were independent factors.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the PI can be used as a predictive factor to optimize the surgical indication for PBTC with vascular involvement. Preoperative patients with normal PI and CA125 can achieve a long-term prognosis comparable to that of resectable PBTC patients.

Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive (MI) surgery has been widely adopted to treat left-sided pancreatic cancer. However, outcomes are not clearly defined.

MATERIALS

Retrospective cohort study utilizing NCDB and NSQIP data.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2016 were included (n = 7347). Utilizing NSQIP (n = 2406), patients were divided into two groups: intention-to-treat (ITT) MI (including MI converted to open, n = 929) and open (n = 1477). Patients undergoing open pancreatectomy were more likely to have longer length of stay (6 vs. 5 days, p=<0.001). On multivariate analysis, open procedures were not associated with mortality (OR 1.24; CI 0.51-3.30, p = 0.64), serious complications (OR 1.03; CI 0.90-1.37, p = 0.79), and any complications (OR 1.07; CI 0.86-1.32, p = 0.56). NCDB patients (n = 4941) were also divided into two groups, ITT MI (n = 1,769, 36%) and open group (n = 3,172, 64%). The median survival was lower in open procedure patients, 23 vs. 27.1 months (p < 0.001). This finding was maintained on multivariable analysis (HR 1.16; CI 1.03-1.32, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Based on these data, MI distal pancreatectomy could be considered a standard of care for pancreatic cancer when technically feasible. Although morbidity and mortality were similar, the laparoscopic approach had a shorter length of stay and could hasten recovery.

High-resolution pancreatic computed tomography for assessing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resectability: a multicenter prospective study

OBJECTIVE

This prospective multicenter study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 80-kVp thin-section pancreatic CT in determining pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resectability according to the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled surgical resection candidates for PDAC from six tertiary referral hospitals (study identifier: NCT03895177). All participants underwent pancreatic CT using 80 kVp tube voltage with 1-mm reconstruction interval. The local resectability was prospectively evaluated using NCCN guidelines at each center and classified into three categories: resectable, borderline resectable, and unresectable.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients were enrolled; among them, 60 patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy. R0 resection was achieved in 103 patients (74.6%). The R0 resection rates were 88.7% (47/53), 52.4% (11/21), and 0.0% (0/4) for resectable, borderline resectable, and unresectable disease, respectively, in 78 patients who underwent upfront surgery. Meanwhile, the rates were 90.9% (20/22), 76.7% (23/30), and 25.0% (2/8) for resectable, borderline resectable, and unresectable PDAC, respectively, in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy. The area under curve of high-resolution CT in predicting R0 resection was 0.784, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 87.4% (90/103), 48.6% (17/35), and 77.5% (107/138), respectively. Tumor response was significantly associated with the R0 resection after neoadjuvant therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 38.99, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

An 80-kVp thin-section pancreatic CT has excellent diagnostic performance in assessing PDAC resectability, enabling R0 resection rates of 88.7% and 90.9% for patients with resectable PDAC who underwent upfront surgery and patients with resectable PDAC after neoadjuvant therapy, respectively.

KEY POINTS

• The margin-negative (R0) resection rates were 88.7% (47/53), 52.4% (11/21), and 0.0% (0/4) for resectable, borderline resectable, and unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), respectively, on 80-kVp thin-section pancreatic CT in the 78 patients who underwent upfront surgery. • Among the 60 patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy, the R0 rates were 90.9% (20/22), 76.7% (23/30), and 25.0% (2/8) for resectable, borderline resectable, and unresectable PDAC, respectively. • Tumor response, along with the resectability status on pancreatic CT, was significantly associated with the R0 resection rate after neoadjuvant therapy.

A nomogram diagnostic prediction model of pancreatic metastases of small cell lung carcinoma based on clinical characteristics, radiological features and biomarkers

Objective

To investigate clinical characteristics, radiological features and biomarkers of pancreatic metastases of small cell lung carcinoma (PM-SCLC), and establish a convenient nomogram diagnostic predictive model to differentiate PM-SCLC from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) preoperatively.

Methods

A total of 299 patients with meeting the criteria (PM-SCLC n=93; PDAC n=206) from January 2016 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 249 patients from hospital 1 (training/internal validation cohort) and 50 patients from hospital 2 (external validation cohort). We searched for meaningful clinical characteristics, radiological features and biomarkers and determined the predictors through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Three models: clinical model, CT imaging model, and combined model, were developed for the diagnosis and prediction of PM-SCLC. Nomogram was constructed based on independent predictors. The receiver operating curve was undertaken to estimate the discrimination.

Results

Six independent predictors for PM-SCLC diagnosis in multivariate logistic regression analysis, including clinical symptoms, CA199, tumor size, parenchymal atrophy, vascular involvement and enhancement type. The nomogram diagnostic predictive model based on these six independent predictors showed the best performance, achieved the AUCs of the training cohort (n = 174), internal validation cohort (n = 75) and external validation cohort (n = 50) were 0.950 (95%CI, 0.917-0.976), 0.928 (95%CI, 0.873-0.971) and 0.976 (95%CI, 0.944-1.00) respectively. The model achieved 94.50% sensitivity, 83.20% specificity, 86.80% accuracy in the training cohort and 100.00% sensitivity, 80.40% specificity, 86.70% accuracy in the internal validation cohort and 100.00% sensitivity, 88.90% specificity, 87.50% accuracy in the external validation cohort.

Conclusion

We proposed a noninvasive and convenient nomogram diagnostic predictive model based on clinical characteristics, radiological features and biomarkers to preoperatively differentiate PM-SCLC from PDAC.

Development and validation of an MRI-radiomics nomogram for the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Objective

To develop and validate an MRI-radiomics nomogram for the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Background

"Radiomics" enables the investigation of huge amounts of radiological features in parallel by extracting high-throughput imaging data. MRI provides better tissue contrast with no ionizing radiation for PDAC.

Methods

There were 78 PDAC patients enrolled in this study. In total, there were 386 radiomics features extracted from MRI scan, which were screened by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm to develop a risk score. Cox multivariate regression analysis was applied to develop the radiomics-based nomogram. The performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration.

Results

The radiomics-based risk-score was significantly associated with PDAC overall survival (OS) (P < 0.05). With respect to survival prediction, integrating the risk score, clinical data and TNM information into the nomogram exhibited better performance than the TNM staging system, radiomics model and clinical model. In addition, the nomogram showed fine discrimination and calibration.

Conclusions

The radiomics nomogram incorporating the radiomics data, clinical data and TNM information exhibited precise survival prediction for PDAC, which may help accelerate personalized precision treatment.

Clinical trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05313854.

Vascular involvement and resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with pancreatic protocol CT

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance for detecting vascular involvement and determining resectability differences regarding pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) between contrast-enhanced CT and MRI.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 82 patients (73 years, 46 men) with PDAC who underwent both preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI from January 2008 to March 2021. Two radiologists independently categorized vascular involvements for celiac, superior mesenteric, splenic, and common hepatic arteries, and portal, superior mesenteric, and splenic veins into no tumor contact, solid soft-tissue contact ≤ 180°, or solid soft-tissue contact > 180°. The radiologists also classified resectability into resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performances for detecting vascular involvements which were confirmed by pathological or intraoperative findings. The proportion of resectability classifications was compared between CT and MRI by the Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

No statistical difference was found in the diagnostic performances for detecting vascular involvement in CT (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.50-0.89) and MRI (AUC, 0.51-0.75) (P = 0.06-> 0.99). Resectability on CT were 79% and 68%, 20% and 26%, and 1% and 6% for resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced tumors for reviewers 1 and 2; those on MRI were 87% and 81%, 12% and 13%, and 1% and 6%, respectively. The proportion of resectability classifications was not different between CT and MRI (P = 0.48 and = 0.15 for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance for detecting vascular involvement and determining resectability of PDAC on contrast-enhanced MRI were comparable with pancreatic protocol CT.

Neoadjuvant Treatment in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. Is It Time for Pushing on It?

Pancreatic resection still represents the only curative option for patients affected by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the association with modern chemotherapy regimens is a key factor in improving the inauspicious oncological outcome. The benefit of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for borderline resectable/locally advanced PDAC has been demonstrated; this evidence raises the question of whether even resectable PDAC should undergo NAT rather than upfront surgery. NAT may avoid futile surgery because of undetected distant metastases or aggressive tumor biology, providing more effective systemic control of the disease, which is hampered when adjuvant chemotherapy is delayed or precluded. However, recent data show controversial results regarding the efficacy and safety of NAT in resectable PDAC compared to upfront surgery. Although several prospective studies and meta-analyses indicate better oncologic outcomes after NAT, there are some biases, such as the methodological approaches used to capture the events of interest, which could make these results hardly reproducible. For instance, per-protocol studies, considering only the postoperative outcomes, tend to overestimate the performance of NAT by excluding patients who will never be suitable for surgery due to the development of chemotoxicity or tumor progression. To draw reliable conclusions, the studies should capture the events of interest of both strategies (NAT/upfront surgery) from the time of allocation to a specific treatment in an intention-to-treat fashion. This critical review highlights the current literature data concerning the use of NAT in resectable PDAC, summarizing the results of high-quality studies and focusing on the methodological issues of the most recent pieces of evidence.

Focal Pancreatic Lesions: Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

The introduction of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has led to a significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the characterization of a pancreatic mass. CEUS, by using a blood pool contrast agent, can provide dynamic information concerning macro- and micro-circulation of focal lesions and of normal parenchyma, without the use of ionizing radiation. On the basis of personal experience and literature data, the purpose of this article is to describe and discuss CEUS imaging findings of the main solid and cystic pancreatic lesions with varying prevalence.