1
|
Jiang C, Fang W, Wei N, Ma W, Dai C, Liu R, Cai A, Feng Q. Node Reporting and Data System Combined With Computed Tomography Radiomics Can Improve the Prediction of Nonenlarged Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2025; 49:215-224. [PMID: 39438281 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the diagnostic performance of Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) combined with computed tomography (CT) radiomics for assessing nonenlargement regional lymph nodes in gastric cancer (GC). METHODS Preoperative CT images were retrospectively collected from 376 pathologically confirmed of gastric adenocarcinoma from January 2019 to December 2023, with 605 lymph nodes included for analysis. They were divided into training (n = 362) and validation (n = 243) sets. Radiomics features were extracted from venous-phase, and the radiomics score was obtained. Clinical information, CT parameters, and Node-RADS classification were collected. A combined model was built using machine-learning approach and tested in validation set using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Further validation was conducted in different subgroups of lymph node short-axis diameter (SD) range. RESULTS Node-RADS score, SD, maximum diameter of thickness of tumor, and radiomics were identified as the most predictive factors. The results demonstrated that the integrated model combining SD, maximum diameter of thickness of tumor, Node-RADS, and radiomics outperformed the model excluding radiomics, yielding an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 compared with 0.79, with a statistically significant difference ( P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis based on different SDs of lymph nodes also revealed enhanced diagnostic accuracy when incorporating the radiomics score for the 4- to 7.9-mm subgroups, all P < 0.05. However, for the 8- to 9.9-mm subgroup, the combination of the radiomics did not significantly improve the prediction, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 versus 0.85, P = 0.877. CONCLUSION The integration of radiomics scores with Node-RADS assessments significantly enhances the accuracy of lymph node metastasis evaluation for GC. This combined model is particularly effective for lymph nodes with smaller standard deviations, yielding a marked improvement in diagnostic precision. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The findings of this study indicate that a composite model, which incorporates Node-RADS, radiomics features, and conventional parameters, may serve as an effective method for the assessment of nonenlarged lymph nodes in GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wei Fang
- Radiology Department, Yidu Central Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, Qingzhou, Shandong
| | - Na Wei
- Yidu Central Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, Qingzhou
| | - Wenwen Ma
- Radiology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang
| | - Cong Dai
- Radiology Department, Yidu Central Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, Qingzhou, Shandong
| | - Ruixue Liu
- Pathology Department, Yidu Central Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, Qingzhou, Shandong Province, China
| | - Anzhen Cai
- Radiology Department, Yidu Central Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, Qingzhou, Shandong
| | - Qiang Feng
- Radiology Department, Yidu Central Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, Qingzhou, Shandong
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parillo M, Quattrocchi CC. Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) for the Assessment of Oncological Patients' Lymph Nodes in Clinical Imaging. J Clin Med 2025; 14:263. [PMID: 39797344 PMCID: PMC11722337 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2024] [Revised: 01/01/2025] [Accepted: 01/03/2025] [Indexed: 01/13/2025] Open
Abstract
The assessment of lymph node (LN) involvement with clinical imaging is a key factor in cancer staging. Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) was introduced in 2021 as a new system specifically tailored for classifying and reporting LNs on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging scans. The aim of this review is to compile the scientific evidence that has emerged since the introduction of Node-RADS, with a specific focus on its diagnostic performance and reliability. Node-RADS's performance has been evaluated in various cancer types and anatomical sites, revealing a trend where higher Node-RADS scores correspond to a greater probability of metastatic LN with better diagnostic performances compared to using short axis diameter alone. Moreover, Node-RADS exhibits encouraging diagnostic value for both Node-RADS ≥ 3 and Node-RADS ≥ 4 cutoffs in predicting metastatic LN. In terms of Node-RADS scoring reliability, preliminary studies show promising but partially conflicting results, with agreement levels, mostly between two readers, ranging from fair to almost perfect. This review highlights a wide variation in methodologies across different studies. Thus, to fully realize the potential of Node-RADS in clinical practice, future studies should comprehensively evaluate its diagnostic accuracy, category-specific malignancy rates, and inter-observer agreement. Finally, although limited, promising evidence has suggested the following: a potential prognostic role for Node-RADS; the possible value of diffusion-weighted imaging for LNs classified as Node-RADS ≥ 3; a correlation between Node-RADS and certain texture features in CT; and improved diagnostic performance when Node-RADS is integrated into radiomics or clinical models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Parillo
- Radiology, Multizonal Unit of Rovereto and Arco, APSS Provincia Autonoma Di Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy;
| | - Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi
- Radiology, Multizonal Unit of Rovereto and Arco, APSS Provincia Autonoma Di Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy;
- Centre for Medical Sciences—CISMed, University of Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haghshomar M, Rodrigues D, Kalyan A, Velichko Y, Borhani A. Leveraging radiomics and AI for precision diagnosis and prognostication of liver malignancies. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1362737. [PMID: 38779098 PMCID: PMC11109422 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1362737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Liver tumors, whether primary or metastatic, have emerged as a growing concern with substantial global health implications. Timely identification and characterization of liver tumors are pivotal factors in order to provide optimum treatment. Imaging is a crucial part of the detection of liver tumors; however, conventional imaging has shortcomings in the proper characterization of these tumors which leads to the need for tissue biopsy. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics have recently emerged as investigational opportunities with the potential to enhance the detection and characterization of liver lesions. These advancements offer opportunities for better diagnostic accuracy, prognostication, and thereby improving patient care. In particular, these techniques have the potential to predict the histopathology, genotype, and immunophenotype of tumors based on imaging data, hence providing guidance for personalized treatment of such tumors. In this review, we outline the progression and potential of AI in the field of liver oncology imaging, specifically emphasizing manual radiomic techniques and deep learning-based representations. We discuss how these tools can aid in clinical decision-making challenges. These challenges encompass a broad range of tasks, from prognosticating patient outcomes, differentiating benign treatment-related factors and actual disease progression, recognizing uncommon response patterns, and even predicting the genetic and molecular characteristics of the tumors. Lastly, we discuss the pitfalls, technical limitations and future direction of these AI-based techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Amir Borhani
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang HW, Huang DL, Wang YR, Zhong HS, Pang HW. CT radiomics based on different machine learning models for classifying gross tumor volume and normal liver tissue in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Imaging 2024; 24:20. [PMID: 38279133 PMCID: PMC10811872 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00652-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The present study utilized extracted computed tomography radiomics features to classify the gross tumor volume and normal liver tissue in hepatocellular carcinoma by mainstream machine learning methods, aiming to establish an automatic classification model. METHODS We recruited 104 pathologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma patients for this study. GTV and normal liver tissue samples were manually segmented into regions of interest and randomly divided into five-fold cross-validation groups. Dimensionality reduction using LASSO regression. Radiomics models were constructed via logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, Xgboost, and Adaboost algorithms. The diagnostic efficacy, discrimination, and calibration of algorithms were verified using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses and calibration plot comparison. RESULTS Seven screened radiomics features excelled at distinguishing the gross tumor area. The Xgboost machine learning algorithm had the best discrimination and comprehensive diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.9975 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9973-0.9978] and mean MCC of 0.9369. SVM had the second best discrimination and diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.9846 (95% CI: 0.9835- 0.9857), mean Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC)of 0.9105, and a better calibration. All other algorithms showed an excellent ability to distinguish between gross tumor area and normal liver tissue (mean AUC 0.9825, 0.9861,0.9727,0.9644 for Adaboost, random forest, logistic regression, naivem Bayes algorithm respectively). CONCLUSION CT radiomics based on machine learning algorithms can accurately classify GTV and normal liver tissue, while the Xgboost and SVM algorithms served as the best complementary algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huai-Wen Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, 330029, Nanchang, China
- Department of Oncology, The third people's hospital of Jingdezhen, The third people's hospital of Jingdezhen affiliated to Nanchang Medical College, 333000, Jingdezhen, China
| | - De-Long Huang
- School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, China
| | - Yi-Ren Wang
- School of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, China
| | - Hao-Shu Zhong
- Department of Hematology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 200040, Shanghai, China.
| | - Hao-Wen Pang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tabari A, Chan SM, Omar OMF, Iqbal SI, Gee MS, Daye D. Role of Machine Learning in Precision Oncology: Applications in Gastrointestinal Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010063. [PMID: 36612061 PMCID: PMC9817513 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, consisting of a wide spectrum of pathologies, have become a prominent health issue globally. Despite medical imaging playing a crucial role in the clinical workflow of cancers, standard evaluation of different imaging modalities may provide limited information. Accurate tumor detection, characterization, and monitoring remain a challenge. Progress in quantitative imaging analysis techniques resulted in "radiomics", a promising methodical tool that helps to personalize diagnosis and treatment optimization. Radiomics, a sub-field of computer vision analysis, is a bourgeoning area of interest, especially in this era of precision medicine. In the field of oncology, radiomics has been described as a tool to aid in the diagnosis, classification, and categorization of malignancies and to predict outcomes using various endpoints. In addition, machine learning is a technique for analyzing and predicting by learning from sample data, finding patterns in it, and applying it to new data. Machine learning has been increasingly applied in this field, where it is being studied in image diagnosis. This review assesses the current landscape of radiomics and methodological processes in GI cancers (including gastric, colorectal, liver, pancreatic, neuroendocrine, GI stromal, and rectal cancers). We explain in a stepwise fashion the process from data acquisition and curation to segmentation and feature extraction. Furthermore, the applications of radiomics for diagnosis, staging, assessment of tumor prognosis and treatment response according to different GI cancer types are explored. Finally, we discussed the existing challenges and limitations of radiomics in abdominal cancers and investigate future opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azadeh Tabari
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Shin Mei Chan
- Yale University School of Medicine, 330 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Omar Mustafa Fathy Omar
- Center for Vascular Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA
| | - Shams I. Iqbal
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Michael S. Gee
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Dania Daye
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen Q, Zhang L, Liu S, You J, Chen L, Jin Z, Zhang S, Zhang B. Radiomics in precision medicine for gastric cancer: opportunities and challenges. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:5852-5868. [PMID: 35316364 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08704-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Radiomic features derived from routine medical images show great potential for personalized medicine in gastric cancer (GC). We aimed to evaluate the current status and quality of radiomic research as well as its potential for identifying biomarkers to predict therapy response and prognosis in patients with GC. METHODS We performed a systematic search of the PubMed and Embase databases for articles published from inception through July 10, 2021. The phase classification criteria for image mining studies and the radiomics quality scoring (RQS) tool were applied to evaluate scientific and reporting quality. RESULTS Twenty-five studies consisting of 10,432 patients were included. 96% of studies extracted radiomic features from CT images. Association between radiomic signature and therapy response was evaluated in seven (28%) studies; association with survival was evaluated in 17 (68%) studies; one (4%) study analyzed both. All results of the included studies showed significant associations. Based on the phase classification criteria for image mining studies, 18 (72%) studies were classified as phase II, with two, four, and one studies as discovery science, phase 0 and phase I, respectively. The median RQS score for the radiomic studies was 44.4% (range, 0 to 55.6%). There was extensive heterogeneity in the study population, tumor stage, treatment protocol, and radiomic workflow amongst the studies. CONCLUSIONS Although radiomic research in GC is highly heterogeneous and of relatively low quality, it holds promise for predicting therapy response and prognosis. Efforts towards standardization and collaboration are needed to utilize radiomics for clinical application. KEY POINTS • Radiomics application of gastric cancer is increasingly being reported, particularly in predicting therapy response and survival. • Although radiomics research in gastric cancer is highly heterogeneous and relatively low quality, it holds promise for predicting clinical outcomes. • Standardized imaging protocols and radiomic workflow are needed to facilitate radiomics into clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiuying Chen
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No.613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, China.,Graduate College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Lu Zhang
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No.613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, China.,Graduate College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shuyi Liu
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No.613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, China.,Graduate College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jingjing You
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No.613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, China.,Graduate College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Luyan Chen
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No.613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, China.,Graduate College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhe Jin
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No.613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, China.,Graduate College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shuixing Zhang
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No.613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, China. .,Graduate College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Bin Zhang
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, No.613, Huangpu West Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510627, Guangdong, China. .,Graduate College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|