Robustness of dual-energy CT-derived radiomic features across three different scanner types

Computed tomography-based deep learning radiomics model for preoperative prediction of tumor immune microenvironment in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death globally, with the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) influencing prognosis and immunotherapy response. Current TIME evaluation relies on invasive biopsies, limiting its clinical application. This study hypothesized that computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning (DL) radiomics models can non-invasively predict key TIME biomarkers: Tumor-stroma ratio (TSR), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and immune score (IS).

AIM

To develop a non-invasive DL approach using preoperative CT radiomics to evaluate TIME components in CRC patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, preoperative CT images of 315 pathologically confirmed CRC patients (220 in training cohort and 95 in validation cohort) were analyzed. Manually delineated regions of interest were used to extract DL features. Predictive models (DenseNet-121/169) for TSR, TILs, IS, and TIME classification were constructed. Performance was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The DL-DenseNet-169 model achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.892 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.828-0.957] for TSR and 0.772 (95%CI: 0.674-0.870) for TIME score. The DenseNet-121 model yielded AUC values of 0.851 (95%CI: 0.768-0.933) for TILs and 0.852 (95%CI: 0.775-0.928) for IS. Calibration curves demonstrated strong prediction-observation agreement, and DCA confirmed clinical utility across threshold probabilities (P < 0.05 for all models).

CONCLUSION

CT-based DL radiomics provides a reliable non-invasive method for preoperative TIME evaluation, enabling personalized immunotherapy strategies in CRC management.

The impact of the novel CovBat harmonization method on enhancing radiomics feature stability and machine learning model performance: A multi-center, multi-device study

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess whether the novel CovBat harmonization method can further reduce radiomics feature variability from different imaging devices in multi-center studies and improve machine learning model performance compared to the ComBat method.

MATERIALS

Non-contrast abdominal CT scans of 1,000 healthy subjects from three medical institutions (from four manufacturers and eight different models) were retrospectively included: Hospital A (n = 513), Hospital B (n = 338), and Hospital C (n = 149). 93 radiomics features were extracted from liver and spleen tissues using PyRadiomics. Performing a binary classification task of liver and spleen tissues on the pooled data from the three institutions: (1) Unharmonized, (2) ComBat, and (3) CovBat. Models were built separately for each radiomics feature classes (First-order, GLCM, GLRLM, GLSZM, NGTD, GLDM), as well as a combined model integrating all feature classes. The Kruskal-Wallis test and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to assess the variability of radiomics features among the groups. Multiple linear regression models were used to analyze the sources of variation. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate model performance.

RESULTS

After ComBat and CovBat harmonization, the number of consistent features increased by 68.82 % and 73.12 %, respectively, and the feature variability due to hardware differences decreased from 12.32-25.38 % to 1.89-2.01 % with ComBat and 1.19-1.88 % with CovBat. The AUC of the machine learning models improved significantly: Combined (Unharmonized: 0.93, ComBat: 0.99, CovBat: 1.00), First-order (0.93, 0.98, 0.98), GLCM (0.81, 0.93, 0.98), GLRLM (0.78, 0.96, 0.98), NGTDM (0.75, 0.96, 0.98), GLSZM (0.78, 0.93, 0.97), and GLDM (0.83, 0.94, 0.97). DeLong's test showed that the results before and after harmonization were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CovBat further reduced radiomics feature variability caused by different CT scanners and significantly improved the performance of machine learning models, although the degree of improvement varied across different feature categories.

Robustness of radiomics among photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT systems: a texture phantom study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the robustness of radiomics features among photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) systems.

METHODS

A texture phantom consisting of twenty-eight materials was scanned with one PCD-CT and four DECT systems (dual-source, rapid kV-switching, dual-layer, and sequential scanning) at three dose levels twice. Thirty sets of virtual monochromatic images at 70 keV were reconstructed. Regions of interest were delineated for each material with a rigid registration. Ninety-three radiomics were extracted per PyRadiomics. The test-retest repeatability between repeated scans was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. The intra-system reproducibility between dose levels, and inter-system reproducibility within the same dose level, were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Inter-system variability among five scanners was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD).

RESULTS

The test-retest repeatability analysis presented that 97.1% of features were repeatable between scan-rescans. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.945 ± 0.079 and 0.945 ± 0.079 for intra-system reproducibility, respectively, and 86.0% and 85.7% of features were with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90, respectively, between different dose levels. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.157 ± 0.174 and 0.157 ± 0.174 for inter-system reproducibility, respectively, and none of the features were with ICC > 0.90 or CCC > 0.90 within the same dose level. The inter-system variability suggested that 6.5% and 12.8% of features were with CV < 10% and QCD < 10%, respectively, among five CT systems.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics features were non-reproducible with significant variability in values among different CT techniques.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Radiomics features are non-reproducible with significant variability in values among photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT systems, necessitating careful attention to improve the cross-system generalizability of radiomic features before implementation of radiomics analysis in clinical routine.

KEY POINTS

CT radiomics stability should be guaranteed before the implementation in the clinical routine. Radiomics robustness was on a low level among photon-counting detectors and dual-energy CT techniques. Limited inter-system robustness of radiomic features may impact the generalizability of models.

Robustness of radiomics within photon-counting detector CT: impact of acquisition and reconstruction factors

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of acquisition and reconstruction factors on the robustness of radiomics within photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT).

METHODS

A phantom with twenty-eight texture materials was scanned with different acquisition and reconstruction factors including reposition, scan mode (standard vs high-pitch), tube voltage (120 kVp vs 140 kVp), slice thickness (1.0 mm vs 0.4 mm), radiation dose level (0.5 mGy, 1.0 mGy, 3.0 mGy, 5.0 mGy, vs 10.0 mGy), quantum iterative reconstruction level (0/4, 2/4, vs 4/4), and reconstruction kernel (Qr40, Qr44, vs Qr48). Thirteen sets of virtual monochromatic images at 70-keV were reconstructed. The regions of interest were drawn with rigid registrations. Ninety-three radiomics features were extracted from each material. The reproducibility of radiomics features was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The variability of radiomics features was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD).

RESULTS

The percentage of features with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90 were high when repositioned (88.2% and 88.2%) and tube voltage was changed (87.1% and 87.1%), but none of the features with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90 when high-pitch scan and different slice thickness were used. The percentage of features with CV < 10% and QCD < 10% were high when repositioned (47.3% and 68.8%) and tube voltage was changed (64.2% and 71.0%), but that with CV < 10% and QCD < 10% were low between standard and high-pitch scans (16.1% and 26.9%) and slice thickness (19.4% and 29.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The PCD-CT radiomics was robust to tube voltage, radiation dose, reconstruction strength level, and kernel, but brittle to high-pitch scan and slice thickness.

KEY POINTS

Question The stability of radiomics features against acquisition and reconstruction factors within PCD-CT should be fully determined before academic research and clinical application. Findings The radiomics features are robust against tube voltage, radiation dose, reconstruction strength level, and kernel within PCD-CT but brittle to high-pitch scan and slice thickness. Clinical relevance The high-pitch scan and slice thickness that influence voxel size should be set with careful attention within PCD-CT, to allow a higher robustness of radiomics features before the implementation of radiomics analysis in clinical routine.

Enhancing the Clinical Utility of Radiomics: Addressing the Challenges of Repeatability and Reproducibility in CT and MRI

Radiomics, which integrates the comprehensive characterization of imaging phenotypes with machine learning algorithms, is increasingly recognized for its potential in the diagnosis and prognosis of oncological conditions. However, the repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features are critical challenges that hinder their widespread clinical adoption. This review aims to address the paucity of discussion regarding the factors that influence the reproducibility and repeatability of radiomic features and their subsequent impact on the application of radiomic models. We provide a synthesis of the literature on the repeatability and reproducibility of CT/MR-based radiomic features, examining sources of variation, the number of reproducible features, and the availability of individual feature repeatability indices. We differentiate sources of variation into random effects, which are challenging to control but can be quantified through simulation methods such as perturbation, and biases, which arise from scanner variability and inter-reader differences and can significantly affect the generalizability of radiomic model performance in diverse settings. Four suggestions for repeatability and reproducibility studies are suggested: (1) detailed reporting of variation sources, (2) transparent disclosure of calculation parameters, (3) careful selection of suitable reliability indices, and (4) comprehensive reporting of reliability metrics. This review underscores the importance of random effects in feature selection and harmonizing biases between development and clinical application settings to facilitate the successful translation of radiomic models from research to clinical practice.

A reference framework for standardization and harmonization of CT radiomics features on cadaveric sample

Radiomics features (RFs) serve as quantitative metrics to characterize shape, density/intensity, and texture patterns in radiological images. Despite their promise, RFs exhibit reproducibility challenges across acquisition settings, thus limiting implementation into clinical practice. In this investigation, we evaluate the effects of different CT scanners and CT acquisition protocols (KV, mA, field-of-view, and reconstruction kernel settings) on RFs extracted from lumbar vertebrae of a cadaveric trunk. Employing univariate and multivariate Generalized Linear Models (GLM), we evaluated the impact of each acquisition parameter on RFs. Our findings indicate that variations in mA had negligible effects on RFs, while alterations in kV resulted in exponential changes in several RFs, notably First Order (94.4%), GLCM (87.5%), and NGTDM (100%). Moreover, we demonstrated that a tailored GLM model was superior to the ComBat algorithm in harmonizing CT images. GLM achieved R2 > 0.90 in 21 RFs (19.6%), contrasting ComBat's mean R2 above 0.90 in only 1 RF (0.9%). This pioneering study unveils the effects of CT acquisition parameters on bone RFs in cadaveric specimens, highlighting significant variations across parameters and scanner datasets. The proposed GLM model presents a robust solution for mitigating these differences, potentially advancing harmonization efforts in Radiomics-based studies across diverse CT protocols and vendors.

What to Expect (and What Not) from Dual-Energy CT Imaging Now and in the Future?

Dual-energy CT (DECT) imaging has broadened the potential of CT imaging by offering multiple postprocessing datasets with a single acquisition at more than one energy level. DECT shows profound capabilities to improve diagnosis based on its superior material differentiation and its quantitative value. However, the potential of dual-energy imaging remains relatively untapped, possibly due to its intricate workflow and the intrinsic technical limitations of DECT. Knowing the clinical advantages of dual-energy imaging and recognizing its limitations and pitfalls is necessary for an appropriate clinical use. The aims of this paper are to review the physical and technical bases of DECT acquisition and analysis, to discuss the advantages and limitations of DECT in different clinical scenarios, to review the technical constraints in material labeling and quantification, and to evaluate the cutting-edge applications of DECT imaging, including artificial intelligence, qualitative and quantitative imaging biomarkers, and DECT-derived radiomics and radiogenomics.

The impact of the combat method on radiomics feature compensation and analysis of scanners from different manufacturers

BACKGROUND

This study investigated whether the Combat compensation method can remove the variability of radiomic features extracted from different scanners, while also examining its impact on the subsequent predictive performance of machine learning models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

135 CT images of Credence Cartridge Radiomic phantoms were collected and screened from three scanners manufactured by Siemens, Philips, and GE. 100 radiomic features were extracted and 20 radiomic features were screened according to the Lasso regression method. The radiomic features extracted from the rubber and resin-filled regions in the cartridges were labeled into different categories for evaluating the performance of the machine learning model. Radiomics features were divided into three groups based on the different scanner manufacturers. The radiomic features were randomly divided into training and test sets with a ratio of 8:2. Five machine learning models (lasso, logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, neural network) were employed to evaluate the impact of Combat on radiomic features. The variability among radiomic features were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and principal component analysis (PCA). Accuracy, precision, recall, and area under the receiver curve (AUC) were used as evaluation metrics for model classification.

RESULTS

The principal component and ANOVA analysis results show that the variability of different scanner manufacturers in radiomic features was removed (P˃0.05). After harmonization with the Combat algorithm, the distributions of radiomic features were aligned in terms of location and scale. The performance of machine learning models for classification improved, with the Random Forest model showing the most significant enhancement. The AUC value increased from 0.88 to 0.92.

CONCLUSIONS

The Combat algorithm has reduced variability in radiomic features from different scanners. In the phantom CT dataset, it appears that the machine learning model's classification performance may have improved after Combat harmonization. However, further investigation and validation are required to fully comprehend Combat's impact on radiomic features in medical imaging.

Robustness of radiomic features in healthy abdominal parenchyma of patients with repeated examinations on dual-layer dual-energy CT

OBJECTIVES

Robustness of radiomic features in physiological tissue is an important prerequisite for quantitative analysis of tumor biology and response assessment. In contrast to previous studies which focused on different tumors with mostly short scan-re-scan intervals, this study aimed to evaluate the robustness of radiomic features in cancer-free patients and over a clinically encountered inter-scan interval.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients without visible tumor burden who underwent at least two portal-venous phase dual energy CT examinations of the abdomen between May 2016 and January 2020 were included, while macroscopic tumor burden was excluded based upon follow-up imaging for all patients (≥3 months). Further, patients were excluded if no follow-up imaging was available, or if the CT protocol showed deviations between repeated examinations. Circular regions of interest were placed and proofread by two board-certified radiologists (4 years and 5 years experience) within the liver (segments 3 and 6), the psoas muscle (left and right), the pancreatic head, and the spleen to obtain radiomic features from normal-appearing organ parenchyma using PyRadiomics. Radiomic feature robustness was tested using the concordance correlation coefficient with a threshold of 0.75 considered indicative for deeming a feature robust.

RESULTS

In total, 160 patients with 480 repeated abdominal CT examinations (range: 2-4 per patient) were retrospectively included in this single-center, IRB-approved study. Considering all organs and feature categories, only 4.58 % (25/546) of all features were robust with the highest rate being found in the first order feature category (20.37 %, 22/108). Other feature categories (grey level co-occurrence matrix, grey level dependence matrix, grey level run length matrix, grey level size zone matrix, and neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix) yielded an overall low percentage of robust features (range: 0.00 %-1.19 %). A subgroup analysis revealed the reconstructed field of view and the X-ray tube current as determinants of feature robustness (significant differences in subgroups for all organs, p < 0.001) as well as the size of the region of interest (no significant difference for the pancreatic head with p = 0.135, significant difference with p < 0.001 for all other organs).

CONCLUSION

Radiomic feature robustness obtained from cancer-free subjects with repeated examinations using a consistent protocol and CT scanner was limited, with first order features yielding the highest proportion of robust features.

Impacts of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V and Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithms on Robustness of CT Radiomics Features: Opportunity for Minimizing Radiomics Variability Among Scans of Different Dose Levels

This study aims to investigate the influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) and deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on CT radiomics feature robustness. A standardized phantom was scanned under single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) modes at standard and low (20 and 10 mGy) dose levels. Images of SECT 120 kVp and corresponding DECT 120 kVp-like virtual monochromatic images were generated with filtered back-projection (FBP), ASIR-V at 40% (AV-40) and 100% (AV-100) blending levels, and DLIR algorithm at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H) strength levels. Ninety-four features were extracted via Pyradiomics. Reproducibility of features was calculated between standard and low dose levels, between reconstruction algorithms in reference to FBP images, and within scan mode, using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The average percentage of features with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90 between the two dose levels was 21.28% and 20.75% in AV-40 images, and 39.90% and 35.11% in AV-100 images, respectively, and increased from 15.43 to 45.22% and from 15.43 to 44.15% with an increasing strength level of DLIR. The average percentage of features with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90 in reference to FBP images was 26.07% and 25.80% in AV-40 images, and 18.88% and 18.62% in AV-100 images, respectively, and decreased from 27.93 to 17.82% and from 27.66 to 17.29% with an increasing strength level of DLIR. DLIR and ASIR-V algorithms showed low reproducibility in reference to FBP images, while the high-strength DLIR algorithm provides an opportunity for minimizing radiomics variability due to dose reduction.

Robustness of radiomics features of virtual unenhanced and virtual monoenergetic images in dual-energy CT among different imaging platforms and potential role of CT number variability

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate robustness of dual-energy CT (DECT) radiomics features of virtual unenhanced (VUE) image and virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) among different imaging platforms.

METHODS

A phantom with sixteen clinical-relevant densities was scanned on ten DECT platforms with comparable scan parameters. Ninety-four radiomic features were extracted via Pyradiomics from VUE images and VMIs at energy level of 70 keV (VMI_70keV). Test-retest repeatability was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Inter-platform reproducibility of VUE images and VMI_70keV was evaluated by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD) among platforms, and by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between platform pairs. The correlation between variability of CT number radiomics reproducibility was estimated.

RESULTS

92.02% and 92.87% of features were repeatable between scan-rescans for VUE images and VMI_70keV, respectively. Among platforms, 11.30% and 28.39% features of VUE images, and 15.16% and 28.99% features of VMI_70keV were with CV < 10% and QCD < 10%. The average percentages of radiomics features with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90 between platform pairs were 10.00% and 9.86% in VUE images and 11.23% and 11.23% in VMI_70keV. The CT number inter-platform reproducibility using CV and QCD showed negative correlations with percentage of the first-order radiomics features with CV < 10% and QCD < 10%, in both VUE images and VMI_70keV (r² 0.3870-0.6178, all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of DECT radiomics features were non-reproducible. The differences in CT number were considered as an indicator of inter-platform DECT radiomics variation. Critical relevance statement: The majority of radiomics features extracted from the VUE images and the VMI70keV were non-reproducible among platforms, while synchronizing energy levels of VMI to reduce the CT number value variability may be a potential way to mitigate radiomics instability.

Ovarian imaging radiomics quality score assessment: an EuSoMII radiomics auditing group initiative

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the methodological rigor of radiomics-based studies using noninvasive imaging in ovarian setting.

METHODS

Multiple medical literature archives (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched to retrieve original studies focused on computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US), or positron emission tomography (PET) radiomics for ovarian disorders' assessment. Two researchers in consensus evaluated each investigation using the radiomics quality score (RQS). Subgroup analyses were performed to assess whether the total RQS varied according to first author category, study aim and topic, imaging modality, and journal quartile.

RESULTS

From a total of 531 items, 63 investigations were finally included in the analysis. The studies were greatly focused (94%) on the field of oncology, with CT representing the most used imaging technique (41%). Overall, the papers achieved a median total RQS 6 (IQR, -0.5 to 11), corresponding to a percentage of 16.7% of the maximum score (IQR, 0-30.6%). The scoring was low especially due to the lack of prospective design and formal validation of the results. At subgroup analysis, the 4 studies not focused on oncological topic showed significantly lower quality scores than the others.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall methodological rigor of radiomics studies in the ovarian field is still not ideal, limiting the reproducibility of results and potential translation to clinical setting. More efforts towards a standardized methodology in the workflow are needed to allow radiomics to become a viable tool for clinical decision-making.

KEY POINTS

• The 63 included studies using noninvasive imaging for ovarian applications were mostly focused on oncologic topic (94%). • The included investigations achieved a median total RQS 6 (IQR, -0.5 to 11), indicating poor methodological rigor. • The RQS was low especially due to the lack of prospective design and formal validation of the results.

The effect of preprocessing filters on predictive performance in radiomics

Background

Radiomics is a noninvasive method using machine learning to support personalised medicine. Preprocessing filters such as wavelet and Laplacian-of-Gaussian filters are commonly used being thought to increase predictive performance. However, the use of preprocessing filters increases the number of features by up to an order of magnitude and can produce many correlated features. Both substantially increase the dataset complexity, which in turn makes modeling with machine learning techniques more challenging, possibly leading to poorer performance. We investigated the impact of these filters on predictive performance.

Methods

Using seven publicly available radiomic datasets, we measured the impact of adding features preprocessed with eight different preprocessing filters to the unprocessed features on the predictive performance of radiomic models. Modeling was performed using five feature selection methods and five classifiers, while predictive performance was measured using area-under-the-curve at receiver operating characteristics analysis (AUC-ROC) with nested, stratified 10-fold cross-validation.

Results

Significant improvements of up to 0.08 in AUC-ROC were observed when all image preprocessing filters were applied compared to using only the original features (up to p = 0.024). Decreases of -0.04 and -0.10 were observed on some data sets, but these were not statistically significant (p > 0.179). Tuning of the image preprocessing filters did not result in decreases in AUC-ROC but further improved results by up to 0.1; however, these improvements were not statistically significant (p > 0.086) except for one data set (p = 0.023).

Conclusions

Preprocessing filters can have a significant impact on the predictive performance and should be used in radiomic studies.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-022-00294-w.

Development and validation of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-based radiomics model to detect primary prostate cancer

Background

This study aimed to develop a novel analytic approach based on a radiomics model derived from ⁶⁸Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 PET/CT for predicting intraprostatic lesions in patients with prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods

This retrospective study included consecutive patients with or without PCa who underwent surgery or biopsy after ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. A total of 944 radiomics features were extracted from the images. A radiomics model was constructed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm with tenfold cross-validation in the training set. PET/CT images for the test set were reviewed by experienced nuclear medicine radiologists. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated for the model and radiologists’ results. The AUCs were compared.

Results

The total of 125 patients (86 PCa, 39 benign prostate disease [BPD]) included 87 (61 PCa, 26 BPD) in the training set and 38 (61 PCa, 26 BPD) in the test set. Nine features were selected to construct the radiomics model. The model score differed between PCa and BPD in the training and test sets (both P < 0.001). In the test set, the radiomics model performed better than the radiologists’ assessment (AUC, 0.85 [95% confidence interval 0.73, 0.97] vs. 0.63 [0.47, 0.79]; P = 0.036) and showed higher sensitivity (model vs radiologists, 0.84 [0.63, 0.95] vs. 0.74 [0.53, 0.88]; P = 0.002).

Conclusion

Radiomics analysis based on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET may non-invasively predict intraprostatic lesions in patients with PCa.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-022-00936-5.

Meningioma Radiomics: At the Nexus of Imaging, Pathology and Biomolecular Characterization

Simple Summary

Meningiomas are typically benign, common extra-axial tumors of the central nervous system. Routine clinical assessment by radiologists presents some limitations regarding long-term patient outcome prediction and risk stratification. Given the exponential growth of interest in radiomics and artificial intelligence in medical imaging, numerous studies have evaluated the potential of these tools in the setting of meningioma imaging. These were aimed at the development of reliable and reproducible models based on quantitative data. Although several limitations have yet to be overcome for their routine use in clinical practice, their innovative potential is evident. In this review, we present a wide-ranging overview of radiomics and artificial intelligence applications in meningioma imaging.

Abstract

Meningiomas are the most common extra-axial tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). Even though recurrence is uncommon after surgery and most meningiomas are benign, an aggressive behavior may still be exhibited in some cases. Although the diagnosis can be made by radiologists, typically with magnetic resonance imaging, qualitative analysis has some limitations in regard to outcome prediction and risk stratification. The acquisition of this information could help the referring clinician in the decision-making process and selection of the appropriate treatment. Following the increased attention and potential of radiomics and artificial intelligence in the healthcare domain, including oncological imaging, researchers have investigated their use over the years to overcome the current limitations of imaging. The aim of these new tools is the replacement of subjective and, therefore, potentially variable medical image analysis by more objective quantitative data, using computational algorithms. Although radiomics has not yet fully entered clinical practice, its potential for the detection, diagnostic, and prognostic characterization of tumors is evident. In this review, we present a wide-ranging overview of radiomics and artificial intelligence applications in meningioma imaging.

Identification of CT Imaging Phenotypes of Colorectal Liver Metastases from Radiomics Signatures-Towards Assessment of Interlesional Tumor Heterogeneity

(1) Background: Tumoral heterogeneity (TH) is a major challenge in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and is associated with inferior response. Therefore, the identification of TH would be beneficial for treatment planning. TH can be assessed by identifying genetic alterations. In this work, a radiomics-based approach for assessment of TH in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in CT scans is demonstrated. (2) Methods: In this retrospective study, CRLM of mCRC were segmented and radiomics features extracted using pyradiomics. Unsupervised k-means clustering was applied to features and lesions. Feature redundancy was evaluated by principal component analysis and reduced by Pearson correlation coefficient cutoff. Feature selection was conducted by LASSO regression and visual analysis of the clusters by radiologists. (3) Results: A total of 47 patients’ (36% female, median age 64) CTs with 261 lesions were included. Five clusters were identified, and the categories small disseminated (n = 31), heterogeneous (n = 105), homogeneous (n = 64), mixed (n = 59), and very large type (n = 2) were assigned based on visual characteristics. Further statistical analysis showed correlation (p < 0.01) of clusters with sex, primary location, T- and N-status, and mutational status. Feature reduction and selection resulted in the identification of four features as a final set for cluster definition. (4) Conclusions: Radiomics features can characterize TH in liver metastases of mCRC in CT scans, and may be suitable for a better pretherapeutic classification of liver lesion phenotypes.

Differentiating pulmonary metastasis from benign lung nodules in thyroid cancer patients using dual-energy CT parameters

OBJECTIVES

To explore the importance of quantitative characteristics of dual-energy CT (DECT) between pulmonary metastasis and benign lung nodules in thyroid cancer.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we identified 63 patients from our institution's database with pathologically proven thyroid cancer who underwent DECT to assess pulmonary metastasis. Among these patients, 22 had 55 pulmonary metastases, and 41 had 97 benign nodules. If nodules showed increased iodine uptake on I-131 single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography or increased size in follow-up CT, they were considered metastatic. We compared the clinical findings and DECT parameters of both groups and performed a receiver operating characteristic analysis to evaluate the optimal cutoff values of the DECT parameters.

RESULTS

Patients with metastases were significantly older than patients with benign nodules (p = 0.048). The DECT parameters of the metastatic nodules were significantly higher than those of the benign nodules (iodine concentration [IC], 5.61 ± 2.02 mg/mL vs. 1.61 ± 0.98 mg/mL; normalized IC [NIC], 0.60 ± 0.20 vs. 0.16 ± 0.11; NIC using pulmonary artery [NIC_PA], 0.60 ± 0.44 vs. 0.15 ± 0.11; slope of the spectral attenuation curves [λHU], 5.18 ± 2.54 vs. 2.12 ± 1.39; and Z-effective value [Z_eff], 10.0 ± 0.94 vs. 8.79 ± 0.75; all p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis according to nodule size, all DECT parameters of the metastatic nodules in all subgroups were significantly higher than those of the benign nodules (all p < 0.05). The cutoff values for IC, NIC, λHU, NIC_PA, and Z_eff for diagnosing metastases were 3.10, 0.29, 3.57, 0.28, and 9.34, respectively (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DECT parameters can help to differentiate metastatic and benign lung nodules in thyroid cancer.

KEY POINTS

• DECT parameters can help to differentiate metastatic and benign lung nodules in patients with thyroid cancer. • DECT parameters showed a significant difference between benign lung nodules and lung metastases, even for nodules with diameters ≥ 3 mm and < 5 mm. • Among the DECT parameters, the highest diagnostic accuracy for differentiating pulmonary metastases from benign lung nodules was achieved with the NIC and IC, followed by the NIC_PA and λHU, and their cutoff values were 0.29, 3.10, 0.28, and 3.57, respectively.