Perfluorobutane-enhanced ultrasonography with a Kupffer phase: improved diagnostic sensitivity for hepatocellular carcinoma

Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography with Perfluorobutane for Diagnosing Subpleural Lung Lesions

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic value of perfluorobutane-enhanced ultrasound (US) examinations for differentiating benign from malignant subpleural lung lesions.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients with subpleural lung lesions between January 2022 and March 2023. The cause of the lung lesions was confirmed by biopsy and follow-up examinations. The lesions were continuously evaluated using perfluorobutane-enhanced US for 0-180 s, and washout (WT) was observed after 3, 5, and 10 min. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify significant US features, which were evaluated for their diagnostic performance. The diagnostic performance of combining several features for predicting malignant lung lesions was also assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Seventy cases were included (17 benign lesions [13 men, 4 women; mean age: 57.5 ± 12.2 years] and 53 malignant lesions [41 men, 12 women; mean age: 63.3 ± 11.6 years]). Peak intensity (PI), arrival time (AT), and WT after 10 min significantly differed between malignant and benign lesions. The sensitivity and accuracy were significantly higher for 10-minute WT than for AT (both p < 0.05). The area under the curve of the combined diagnostic evaluation with AT, PI, and 10-minute WT was 0.897 (95% [CI]: 0.806-0.988), which was significantly higher than that of AT or PI alone.

CONCLUSION

Perfluorobutane-enhanced US can differentiate benign from malignant lung lesions, and combining AT, PI, and 10-minute WT for diagnostic purposes performed better than a single feature.

The Clinical Utility of Liver-Specific Ultrasound Contrast Agents During Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of hepatic malignancy, with high mortality rates recorded globally. Early detection through clinical biomarkers, medical imaging and histological assessment followed by rapid intervention are integral for positive patient outcomes. Although contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging are recognised as the reference standard for the diagnosis and staging of HCC in international guidelines, ultrasound (US) examination is recommended as a screening tool for patients at risk. Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) elevates the standard of an US examination using US contrast agents (UCAs), capable of diagnosing focal liver lesions with high efficacy. Most UCAs are purely intravascular, offering clinicians a dynamic representation of a lesions' arterial phase vascular kinetics, which is seldom seen in such detail during computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging assessments. Despite its benefits, there is incongruity between international societies on the role of CEUS in the HCC clinical pathway. The transient nature of pure blood-pool agents is suggested to be insufficient to justify CEUS as a primary modality due to the inability to consistently perform whole liver imaging, alongside disputes regarding its capabilities to differentiate HCC from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. A sinusoidal phase UCA affords clinicians the opportunity to perform whole liver imaging through Kupffer cell uptake in addition to visualising lesion vascular kinetics in the arterial and portal venous phases. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to examine the role of CEUS in the HCC clinical pathway in its current practice and observe how a Kupffer cell sinusoidal phase UCA may supplement contemporary diagnostic techniques through a multi-modality, multi-agent approach.

Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound With Sonazoid for Assessment of Focal Liver Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis examined the diagnostic accuracy of Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography (SZ-CEUS) in discriminating malignant from benign focal liver lesions (FLLs) and HCC from non-HCC FLLs. Finding relevant studies required a rigorous PubMed, EMBASE, and other database search. To distinguish malignant from benign FLLs, SZ-CEUS had a pooled sensitivity of 94% (95% CI: 0.91-0.95) and specificity of 84% (95%: 0.78-0.89). HCC distinction had 83% sensitivity and 96% specificity (95% CI: 0.80-0.85 and 0.95-0.97). SZ-CEUS accurately distinguishes malignant from benign FLLs and HCC from non-HCC lesions, especially smaller HCC lesions.

Clinicopathologic and ultrasonographic features of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and its correlation with microvascular invasion: a predictive role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Background

This study aims to investigate the clinicopathological and ultrasonography characteristics of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and its correlation with microvascular invasion (MVI), as well as the predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 57 patients diagnosed with cHCC-CCA between November 2017 and May 2023 at Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital. Among them, 27 patients were MVI-positive and 30 patients were MVI-negative, all of whom underwent preoperative CEUS within 2 weeks. Clinical data, ultrasonographic findings, and CEUS features were compared between the two groups to analyze the influencing factors and predictive value of MVI in cHCC-CCA patients.

Results

Compared to the MVI-negative group, the MVI-positive group showed a higher proportion of tumors with a maximum diameter greater than 5 cm, elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, low echo halo around the tumor, non-smooth tumor contour, peripheral irregular rim-like enhancement and early washout (≤60s) with nodular patterns on CEUS (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that low echo halo, peripheral irregular rim-like enhancement, and early washout were independent risk factors for MVI in cHCC-CCA patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8056 for these factors.

Conclusions

Ultrasonographic and CEUS features have a certain correlation with MVI in cHCC-CCA patients. Low echo halo, peripheral irregular rim-like enhancement, and early washout are independent risk factors for MVI in patients with cHCC-CCA. These features have a predictive value in determining the presence of MVI in patients with cHCC-CCA.

Review of Clinical Applications of Sonazoid Ultrasound Contrast for Liver Evaluation

ABSTRACT

Sonazoid is a new ultrasound contrast agent with unique Kupffer phase imaging advantages and high mechanical index stability. This paper introduces the basic theories and advantages of Sonazoid ultrasound. Then, the application and latest advances of Sonazoid in the diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases are reviewed in detail. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of Sonazoid ultrasound and its future directions are discussed. Sonazoid is expected to become an important tool for clinical ultrasound diagnosis and treatment.

Washout-parametric imaging with Sonazoid for enhanced differentiation of focal liver lesions

PURPOSE

The study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of washout-parametric imaging (WOPI) with that of conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (cCEUS) in differentiating focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHODS

A total of 181 FLLs were imaged with contrast-enhanced ultrasound using Sonazoid, and the recordings were captured for 10 minutes in a prospective setting. WOPI was constructed from three images, depicting the arterial phase (peak enhancement), the early portal venous phase (1-minute post-injection), and the vasculo-Kupffer phase (5 or 10 minutes post-injection). The intensity variations in these images were color-coded and superimposed to produce a single image representing the washout timing across the lesions. From the 181 FLLs, 30 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 30 non-HCC malignancies, and 30 benign lesions were randomly selected for an observer study. Both techniques (cCEUS and WOPI) were evaluated by four off-site readers. They classified each lesion as benign or malignant using a continuous rating scale, with the endpoints representing "definitely benign" and "definitely malignant." The diagnostic performance of cCEUS and WOPI was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with the DeLong test. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

The difference in average AUC values between WOPI and cCEUS was 0.0062 (95% confidence interval, -0.0161 to 0.0285), indicating no significant difference between techniques. The interobserver agreement was higher for WOPI (ICC, 0.77) than cCEUS (ICC, 0.67).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of WOPI is comparable to that of cCEUS in differentiating FLLs, with superior interobserver agreement.

A non-invasive predictive model based on multimodality ultrasonography images to differentiate malignant from benign focal liver lesions

We have developed a non-invasive predictive nomogram model that combines image features from Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SCEUS) and Sound touch elastography (STE) with clinical features for accurate differentiation of malignant from benign focal liver lesions (FLLs). This study ultimately encompassed 262 patients with FLLs from the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, covering the period from March 2020 to April 2023, and divided them into training set (n = 183) and test set (n = 79). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent indicators and develop a predictive model based on image features from SCEUS, STE, and clinical features. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve was determined to estimate the diagnostic performance of the nomogram with CEUS LI-RADS, and STE values. The C-index, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were further used for validation. Multivariate and LASSO logistic regression analyses identified that age, ALT, arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), enhancement level in the Kupffer phase, and Emean by STE were valuable predictors to distinguish malignant from benign lesions. The nomogram achieved AUCs of 0.988 and 0.978 in the training and test sets, respectively, outperforming the CEUS LI-RADS (0.754 and 0.824) and STE (0.909 and 0.923) alone. The C-index and calibration curve demonstrated that the nomogram offers high diagnostic accuracy with predicted values consistent with actual values. DCA indicated that the nomogram could increase the net benefit for patients. The predictive nomogram innovatively combining SCEUS, STE, and clinical features can effectively improve the diagnostic performance for focal liver lesions, which may help with individualized diagnosis and treatment in clinical practice.

Intra-individual comparison of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound and SonoVue contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess whether the diagnostic performance of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SZUS) is non-inferior to that of SonoVue contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SVUS) in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in individuals with high risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was conducted from October 2020 to May 2022 and included participants with a high risk of HCC who underwent SZUS and SVUS. All lesions were confirmed by clinical or pathological diagnosis. Each nodule was classified according to the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017 (CEUS LI-RADS v2017) for SVUS and SZUS and the modified CEUS LI-RADS (using Kupffer phase defect instead of late and mild washout) for SZUS. The diagnostic performance of both two modalities for all observations was compared. Analysis of the vascular phase and Kupffer phase imaging characteristics of CEUS was performed.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifteen focal liver lesions from 113 patients (94 HCCs, 12 non-HCC malignancies, and 9 benign lesions) were analysed. According to CEUS LI-RADS (v2017), SVUS and SZUS showed similar sensitivity (71.3% vs. 72.3%) and specificity (85.7% vs. 81.0%) in HCC diagnosis. However, the modified CEUS LI-RADS did not significantly improve the diagnostic efficacy of Sonazoid compared to CEUS LI-RADS v2017, having equivalent sensitivity (73.4% vs. 72.3%) and specificity (81.0% vs. 81.0%). The agreement between SVUS and SZUS for all observations was 0.610 (95% CI 0.475, 0.745), while for HCCs it was 0.452 (95% CI 0.257, 0.647).

CONCLUSION

Using LI-RADS v2017, SZUS and SVUS showed non-inferior efficacy in evaluating HCC lesions. In addition, adding Kupffer phase defects to SZUS does not notably improve its diagnostic efficacy.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound With Perfluorobutane for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis: Comparison of Imaging Phases and Diagnostic Criteria

BACKGROUND. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with perfluorobutane has used varying protocols and diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to assess diagnostic performance for HCC of CEUS with perfluorobutane in high-risk patients using various criteria. METHODS. This retrospective post hoc study evaluating individual patient data from three earlier prospective studies from one hospital included 204 patients (136 men, 68 women; mean age, 63 ± 11 [SD] years) at high risk of HCC with 213 liver observations. Patients underwent CEUS using perfluorobutane from March 2019 to June 2022. Three radiologists (the examination's operator and two subsequent reviewers) independently interpreted examinations, assessing arterial, portal venous (arterial phase completion through 2 minutes), transitional (2-5 minutes after injection), and Kupffer (≥ 10 minutes after injection) phase findings. Six criteria for HCC were tested: 1, any arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) with Kupffer phase hypoenhancement; 2, nonrim APHE with Kupffer phase hypoenhancement; 3, nonrim APHE with portal venous washout; 4, nonrim APHE with portal venous washout and/or Kupffer phase hypoenhancement; 5, nonrim APHE with portal venous and/or transitional washout; 6, nonrim APHE with any of portal venous washout, transitional washout, or Kupffer phase hypoenhancement. Depending on the criteria, observations were instead deemed to be a non-HCC malignancy if showing rim APHE, early washout (at < 1 minute), or marked washout (at 2 minutes). Reference was pathology for malignant observations and pathology or imaging follow-up for benign observations. Diagnostic performance was assessed, pooling readers' data. RESULTS. Criterion 1 (no recognized features of non-HCC malignancy) had highest sensitivity (86.9%) but lowest specificity (43.2%) for HCC. Compared with nonrim APHE and portal venous washout (criterion 3), the addition of Kupffer phase hypoenhancement (criterion 4), transitional washout (criterion 5), or either feature (criterion 6) significantly increased sensitivity (34.4% vs 62.6-64.2%) and accuracy (61.8% vs 75.1-76.5%), but significantly decreased specificity (98.5% vs 91.9-94.1%). Criteria 2, 4, 5, and 6 (all incorporating transitional washout and/or Kupffer phase hypoenhancement) showed no significant differences in sensitivity (62.6-64.2%), specificity (91.9-94.1%), or accuracy (75.1-76.5%). CONCLUSION. Recognition of features of non-HCC malignancy improved specificity for HCC. Incorporation of the findings of transitional washout and/or Kupffer phase hypoenhancement improved sensitivity and accuracy, albeit lowered specificity, versus arterial and portal venous findings alone, without further performance variation among criteria incorporating those two findings. CLINICAL IMPACT. Kupffer phase acquisition may be optional for observations classified as HCC or non-HCC malignancy by arterial, portal venous, and transitional phases.

Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography for noninvasive imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: special emphasis on the 2022 KLCA-NCC guideline

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is a noninvasive imaging modality used to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on specific imaging features, without the need for pathologic confirmation. Two types of ultrasound contrast agents are commercially available: pure intravascular agents (such as SonoVue) and Kupffer agents (such as Sonazoid). Major guidelines recognize CEUS as a reliable imaging method for HCC diagnosis, although they differ depending on the contrast agents used. The Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center guideline includes CEUS with either SonoVue or Sonazoid as a second-line diagnostic technique. However, Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasound is associated with several unresolved issues. This review provides a comparative overview of these contrast agents regarding pharmacokinetic features, examination protocols, diagnostic criteria for HCC, and potential applications in the HCC diagnostic algorithm.

Perfluorobutane-Enhanced Ultrasound for Characterization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma From Non-hepatocellular Malignancies or Benignancy: Comparison of Imaging Acquisition Methods

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the work described here was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of perfluorobutane (PFB)-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC malignancies and other benign lesions using different acquisition methods.

METHODS

This prospective study included 69 patients with solid liver lesions larger than 1 cm who were scheduled for biopsy or radiofrequency ablation between September 2020 and March 2021. Lesion diagnosis was designated by three blinded radiologists after reviewing three different sets of acquired images selected according to the following presumed acquisition methods: (i) method A, acquisition up to 5 min after contrast injection; (ii) method B, acquisition up to 1 min after contrast injection with additional Kupffer phase; and (iii) method C, acquisition up to 5 min after contrast injection with additional Kupffer phase.

RESULTS

After excluding 7 technical failures, 62 patients with liver lesions (mean size: 24.2 ± 14.8 mm), which consisted of 7 benign lesions, 37 non-HCC malignancies and 18 HCCs. For the HCC diagnosis, method C had the highest sensitivity (75.9%), followed by method B (72.2%) and method A (68.5%), but failed to exhibit statistical significance (p = 0.12). There was no significant difference with respect to the pooled specificity between the three methods (p = 0.28). Diagnostic accuracy was the highest with method C (87.1%) but failed to exhibit statistical significance (p = 0.24).

CONCLUSION

Image acquisition up to 5 min after contrast injection with additional Kupffer phase could potentially result in high accuracy and sensitivity without loss of specificity in diagnosing HCC with PFB-enhanced ultrasound.

Imaging Investigation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progress via Monitoring γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase Level with a Near-Infrared Fluorescence/Photoacoustic Bimodal Probe

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the main principal causes of cancer death, and the late definite diagnosis limits therapeutic approaches in time. The early diagnosis of HCC is essential, and the previous investigations on the biomarkers inferred that the γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) level could indicate the HCC process. Herein, a near-infrared fluorescence/photoacoustic (NIRF/PA) bimodal probe, CySO3-GGT, was developed for monitoring the GGT level and thus to image the HCC process. After the in-solution tests, the bimodal response was convinced. The various HCC processes were imaged by CySO3-GGT at the cellular level. Then, the CCl4-induced HCC (both induction and treatment) and the subcutaneous and orthotopic xenograft mice models were selected. All throughout the tests, CySO3-GGT achieved NIRF and PA bimodal imaging of the HCC process. In particular, CySO3-GGT could effectively realize 3D imaging of the HCC nodule by visualizing the boundary between the tumor and the normal tissue. The information here might offer significant guidance for the dynamic monitoring of HCC in the near future.

Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using Sonazoid: a comprehensive review

Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is a promising technique for the detection and diagnosis of focal liver lesions, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, a collaborative effort between the Korean Society of Radiology and Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology resulted in the publication of guidelines for diagnosing HCC using Sonazoid CEUS. These guidelines propose specific criteria for identifying HCC based on the imaging characteristics observed during Sonazoid CEUS. The suggested diagnostic criteria include nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement, and the presence of late and mild washout, or Kupffer phase washout under the premise that the early or marked washout should not occur during the portal venous phase. These criteria aim to improve the accuracy of HCC diagnosis using Sonazoid CEUS. This review offers a comprehensive overview of Sonazoid CEUS in the context of HCC diagnosis. It covers the fundamental principles of Sonazoid CEUS and its clinical applications, and introduces the recently published guidelines. By providing a summary of this emerging technique, this review contributes to a better understanding of the potential role of Sonazoid CEUS for diagnosing HCC.

Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Sonazoid Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: 2023 Guidelines From the Korean Society of Radiology and the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

Sonazoid, a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent, was introduced for the diagnosis of hepatic nodules. To clarify the issues with Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the Korean Society of Radiology and Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology collaborated on the guidelines. The guidelines are de novo, evidence-based, and selected using an electronic voting system for consensus. These include imaging protocols, diagnostic criteria for HCC, diagnostic value for lesions that are inconclusive on other imaging results, differentiation from non-HCC malignancies, surveillance of HCC, and treatment response after locoregional and systemic treatment for HCC.