1
|
Bonnet B, Stacoffe N, Milot L, Boulade W, Tselikas L, Deschamps F, Mastier C, de Baere T. In Vivo Safety and Feasibility of a CT-Guided Robotic Device for Percutaneous Needle Placement in Bone. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2025; 36:877-883.e1. [PMID: 39848322 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2025.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2024] [Revised: 01/07/2025] [Accepted: 01/12/2025] [Indexed: 01/25/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a robotic device used clinically in soft tissues (abdomen and lung), modified in design and workflow, to perform needle insertions in percutaneous skeletal procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS The primary objective was safety (severe adverse events) of robotic-assisted insertion in this new application. Secondary objectives were feasibility (placement technical success), performance (rate of acceptable insertions), accuracy (lateral deviation), number of intermediate computed tomography (CT) scans, and tolerability (mild/moderate adverse events). Robotic-assisted insertions were performed by 6 interventional radiologists on 3 male pigs under general anesthesia. Needle trajectory was planned on the device software, and then needles were inserted with robotic guidance to reach the cortical bone. Intermediate CT was then performed to verify needle direction; if needed, the trajectory was modified, and robotic-assisted modified insertion into the target was performed. As many intermediate CT scans and trajectory modifications as needed by the operator were allowed. RESULTS Twenty-eight needles were inserted (10 in the spine and 18 in the pelvis). No adverse event was reported. Technical success rate was 96.4% (27/28). One insertion was not feasible after several robotic attempts. The placement success rate was 100% (27/27). After the planned intermediate CT scan, 13 (48.1%) of 27 trajectories did not require any modification, and 11 (40.7%) of 27 trajectories required a single modification. One needle was removed and replaced to achieve correct placement. Placement accuracy was similar for spinal and pelvic insertions, with a mean lateral deviation of 2.1 mm (SD ± 1.3). CONCLUSIONS Preclinical robotic-assisted needle insertions in bone were safe and feasible, with satisfactory accuracy. A multicenter in-human study is ongoing to evaluate feasibility and safety for percutaneous bone ablation and consolidation procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baptiste Bonnet
- Département d'Anesthésie Chirurgie et Interventionnelle (DACI), Service d'Imagerie Thérapeutique, Gustave Roussy (GR), Villejuif, France; Centre d'Investigation Clinique BIOTHERIS, INSERM CIC1428, Villejuif, France; Faculté de Médecine, Paris-Saclay Université, F-94276 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
| | - Nicolas Stacoffe
- Département de Diagnostic et de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Milot
- Département de Diagnostic et de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Lyon, France; LabTAU-INSERM U1032, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - William Boulade
- Département de Diagnostic et de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Lyon, France
| | - Lambros Tselikas
- Département d'Anesthésie Chirurgie et Interventionnelle (DACI), Service d'Imagerie Thérapeutique, Gustave Roussy (GR), Villejuif, France; Centre d'Investigation Clinique BIOTHERIS, INSERM CIC1428, Villejuif, France; Faculté de Médecine, Paris-Saclay Université, F-94276 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Frederic Deschamps
- Département d'Anesthésie Chirurgie et Interventionnelle (DACI), Service d'Imagerie Thérapeutique, Gustave Roussy (GR), Villejuif, France
| | - Charles Mastier
- Département de Diagnostic et de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Lyon, France
| | - Thierry de Baere
- Département d'Anesthésie Chirurgie et Interventionnelle (DACI), Service d'Imagerie Thérapeutique, Gustave Roussy (GR), Villejuif, France; Centre d'Investigation Clinique BIOTHERIS, INSERM CIC1428, Villejuif, France; Faculté de Médecine, Paris-Saclay Université, F-94276 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boeken T, Lim HPD, Cohen EI. The Role and Future of Artificial Intelligence in Robotic Image-Guided Interventions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 27:101001. [PMID: 39828389 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvir.2024.101001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2025]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence and robotics are transforming interventional radiology, driven by advancements in computer vision, robotics and procedural automation. Historically focused on diagnostics, AI now also enhances procedural capabilities in IR, enabling future robotic systems to handle complex tasks such as catheter manipulation or needle placement with increasing precision and reliability. Early robotic systems in IR demonstrated improved accuracy in both vascular and percutaneous interventions, though none were equipped with automatic decision-making. This review tends to show the potential in improving procedural outcomes with AI for robotics, though challenges remain. Techniques like reinforcement learning and haptic vision are under investigation to address several issues, training robots to adapt based on real-time feedback from the environment. As AI-driven robotics evolve, IR could shift towards a model where human expertise oversees the technology rather than performs the intervention itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Boeken
- Department of Vascular and Oncological Interventional Radiology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP; Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine; HEKA INRIA, INSERM PARCC U 970, Paris, France
| | - Hwa-Pyung David Lim
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Emil I Cohen
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chlorogiannis DD, Charalampopoulos G, Bale R, Odisio B, Wood BJ, Filippiadis DK. Innovations in Image-Guided Procedures: Unraveling Robot-Assisted Non-Hepatic Percutaneous Ablation. Semin Intervent Radiol 2024; 41:113-120. [PMID: 38993597 PMCID: PMC11236453 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1786724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Interventional oncology is routinely tasked with the feat of tumor characterization or destruction, via image-guided biopsy and tumor ablation, which may pose difficulties due to challenging-to-reach structures, target complexity, and proximity to critical structures. Such procedures carry a risk-to-benefit ratio along with measurable radiation exposure. To streamline the complexity and inherent variability of these interventions, various systems, including table-, floor-, gantry-, and patient-mounted (semi-) automatic robotic aiming devices, have been developed to decrease human error and interoperator and intraoperator outcome variability. Their implementation in clinical practice holds promise for enhancing lesion targeting, increasing accuracy and technical success rates, reducing procedure duration and radiation exposure, enhancing standardization of the field, and ultimately improving patient outcomes. This narrative review collates evidence regarding robotic tools and their implementation in interventional oncology, focusing on clinical efficacy and safety for nonhepatic malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Georgios Charalampopoulos
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital “ATTIKON,” Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Reto Bale
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Oncology - Stereotaxy and Robotics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Bruno Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bradford J. Wood
- Interventional Radiology and Center for Interventional Oncology, NIH Clinical Center and National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Dimitrios K. Filippiadis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital “ATTIKON,” Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Charalampopoulos G, Bale R, Filippiadis D, Odisio BC, Wood B, Solbiati L. Navigation and Robotics in Interventional Oncology: Current Status and Future Roadmap. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 14:98. [PMID: 38201407 PMCID: PMC10795729 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Interventional oncology (IO) is the field of Interventional Radiology that provides minimally invasive procedures under imaging guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant tumors. Sophisticated devices can be utilized to increase standardization, accuracy, outcomes, and "repeatability" in performing percutaneous Interventional Oncology techniques. These technologies can reduce variability, reduce human error, and outperform human hand-to-eye coordination and spatial relations, thus potentially normalizing an otherwise broad diversity of IO techniques, impacting simulation, training, navigation, outcomes, and performance, as well as verification of desired minimum ablation margin or other measures of successful procedures. Stereotactic navigation and robotic systems may yield specific advantages, such as the potential to reduce procedure duration and ionizing radiation exposure during the procedure and, at the same time, increase accuracy. Enhanced accuracy, in turn, is linked to improved outcomes in many clinical scenarios. The present review focuses on the current role of percutaneous navigation systems and robotics in diagnostic and therapeutic Interventional Oncology procedures. The currently available alternatives are presented, including their potential impact on clinical practice as reflected in the peer-reviewed medical literature. A review of such data may inform wiser investment of time and resources toward the most impactful IR/IO applications of robotics and navigation to both standardize and address unmet clinical needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Charalampopoulos
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital “ATTIKON”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Str, 12462 Athens, Greece;
| | - Reto Bale
- Interventional Oncology/Stereotaxy and Robotics, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Dimitrios Filippiadis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital “ATTIKON”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Str, 12462 Athens, Greece;
| | - Bruno C. Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Bradford Wood
- Interventional Radiology and Center for Interventional Oncology, NIH Clinical Center and National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA;
| | - Luigi Solbiati
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Milano), Italy and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (Milano), 20072 Milano, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|