Reconstruction of the sternum and chest wall with methyl methacrylate: CT and MRI appearance

Chest wall reconstruction in pediatric patients with chest wall tumors: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Resection of pediatric chest wall tumors can result in large defects requiring reconstruction for function and cosmesis. Multiple reconstructive methods have been described. We performed a systematic review of the literature to describe commonly used approaches and outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for English-language publications describing chest wall tumor resection and reconstruction using implantable materials in patients ≤21 years, excluding soft tissue resection only, sternal resection, and reconstruction by primary repair or muscle flaps alone. Data were collected on diagnoses, reconstructive method, and outcomes. Rigid chest wall reconstruction was compared to mesh reconstruction.

RESULTS

There were 55 articles with 188 patients included. The median age was 12 years. Most tumors were malignant (n = 172, 91.5%), most commonly Ewing's sarcoma (n = 65, 34.6%), followed by unspecified sarcomas (n = 34, 18.1%), Askin's tumor (n = 16, 8.5%; a subset of Ewing's sarcoma) and osteosarcoma (n = 16, 8.5%). A median of 3 ribs were resected (range 1-12). Non-rigid meshes were most common (n = 138, 73.4%), followed by rigid prostheses (n = 50, 26.6%). There were 19 post-operative complications (16.8%) and 22.2% of patients developed scoliosis. There were no significant differences in complications (20.5% rigid vs. 10.6% non-rigid, p = 0.18) or scoliosis (22.7% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.23) by reconstruction method, but complications after rigid reconstruction were more likely to require surgery (90.0% vs. 53.9%, p = 0.09). The median follow-up duration was 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In this review of the literature, there were no significant differences in overall post-operative complications or scoliosis development by reconstruction method, yet complications after rigid reconstruction were more likely to require surgical intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Intra- and Extra-Thoracic Muscle Flaps and Chest Wall Reconstruction Following Resection of Thoracic Tumors

Improvements in surgical technique over the last decade enable surgeons to perform extensive resection and reconstruction in patients presenting with tumors involving the soft tissue or bony structures of the chest wall. The type of surgical resection and its size, depend on the type of tumor resected and its location. In addition to providing a better esthetic result, the reconstruction restores support and functionality of the thoracic cage. The approach to chest wall repair includes primary closure or reconstruction by using transposition flaps, free flaps, prosthetic material, or a mixture of a flap and prosthetic material.

Combined free vascularized iliac osteocutaneous flap and pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of anterior chest wall full-thickness defect

Large defects of the anterior chest wall lead to gross chest instability that can result in paradoxic respiration. Osteoradionecrosis of the lower sternum and multiple left ribs resulted in a huge, full-thickness defect of the left anterior chest wall in a 67-year-old woman. An iliac osteocutaneous flap (bone segment 3 × 14 cm) was harvested for reconstruction of the bone defect. The skin defect was covered by the skin paddle of the iliac osteocutaneous flap and a contralateral rotational pectoralis major muscle flap. Months postoperatively, the patient was physically active, the chest was stable, and the vascularized iliac bone was incorporated into the recipient bone.

MR imaging evaluation of disorders of the chest wall

Chest wall lesions constitute a diverse group of thoracic diseases, including those of soft tissue and osseous origin. MR imaging, with its superior tissue-resolving capability and multiplanar image acquisition, is an important tool for assessing chest wall lesions. In this article, the authors review common and uncommon diseases of the chest wall, with an emphasis on the MR imaging characteristics of these diseases. Among the diseases they discuss are diseases of the soft tissue including lipoma, hibernoma, liposarcoma, hemangioma, and lymphoma. They also examine diseases of the osseous thorax, including benign osseous tumors, fibrous dysplasia, and aneurysmal bone cyst. In addition, they discuss such malignant osseous tumors as osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma.

Comparison of mersilene mesh-methyl metacrylate sandwich and polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for chest wall reconstruction

We report the outcomes of patients who underwent reconstruction with Mersilene mesh-methyl methacrylate (MM-MM) sandwich and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts after a large chest wall resection. Between June 1990 and September 2001, 59 consecutive patients (37 men, 22 women; mean age, 48.1 +/- 11.8 years; range 22-74 years) underwent large chest wall resection (greater than 5 cm diameter) and reconstruction with prosthetic material in our department. Twenty-one patients (33%) underwent reconstruction with a PTFE graft (group 2) between 1990 and 1994, and 38 patients (67%) underwent reconstruction with an MM-MM sandwich graft (group 1) between 1994 and 2001. Operative morbidity ratios were 5.2% (2/38) in group 1 and 24% (5/21) in group 2 (p = .036). The paradoxical respiration ratio was significantly higher (p = .018) in group 2 (5/21: 24%) than it was in group 1 (1/38: 2.6%). The operative mortality ratio was 4.5% (1/21) in group 2 and 0% in group 1. Mean hospital stay was 10.6 days (range 5-21 days) in group 1 and 13.3 days (range 7-36 days) in group 2 (p = .015). The MM-MM graft is inexpensive and easy to apply, provides better cosmetic options, and offers minimal morbidity. We therefore recommend that the MM-MM sandwich graft be used rather than the PTFE graft for large defects of the anterolateral chest wall and sternum where successful prevention of paradoxical respiration is required.

Functional assessment of chest wall integrity after methylmethacrylate reconstruction

BACKGROUND

All patients with extensive resection of the anterolateral chest wall and the sternum followed by reconstruction with methylmethacrylate substitutes were assessed prospectively 6 months after the operation to delineate chest wall integrity with pulmonary function and cine-magnetic resonance imaging.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients underwent chest wall reconstruction by use of methylmethacrylate between 1994 and 1998 due to primary tumors in 35%, metastases in 27%, T3 lung cancer in 19%, and debridement for radionecrosis and osteomyelitis in 19% of patients. Three to eight ribs were resected and additional sternum resection was performed in 39% of patients.

RESULTS

There was no 30-day mortality. All patients were extubated after the operation without need for reintubation. Prosthesis dislocation occurred in 1 patient and infection in 2 patients during follow-up. Nineteen patients (73%) suffered no restrictions of daily activities. Clinical examination revealed normal shoulder girdle function in 77% of patients. There was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) measurements in patients with lobectomy or wedge resections. Cinemagnetic resonance imaging revealed concordant chest wall movements during respiration in 92% of patients without paradoxical movements or implant dislocations being observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Large defects of the anterolateral chest wall and sternum can be reconstructed efficiently with methylmethacrylate substitutes with minimal morbidity and excellent cosmetic and functional outcome.