1
|
Song C, Yang J, Gu Z. Latest developments of microphysiological systems (MPS) in aging-related and geriatric diseases research: A review. Ageing Res Rev 2025; 107:102728. [PMID: 40058462 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2025.102728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2024] [Revised: 03/04/2025] [Accepted: 03/06/2025] [Indexed: 03/16/2025]
Abstract
Aging is a gradual and irreversible process accompanied by the decline in tissue function and a significantly increased risk of various aging-related and geriatric diseases. Especially in the paradoxical context of accelerated global aging and the widespread emergence of pandemics, aging-related and geriatric diseases have become leading causes of individual mortality and disability, drawing increasing attention from researchers and investors alike. Despite the utility of current in vitro systems and in vivo animal models for studying aging, these approaches are limited by insurmountable inherent constraints. In response, microphysiological systems (MPS), leveraging advances in tissue engineering and microfluidics, have emerged as highly promising platforms. MPS are capable of replicating key features of the tissue microenvironment within microfabricated devices, offering biomimetic tissue culture conditions that enhance the in vitro simulation of intact or precise human body structure and function. This capability improves the predictability of clinical trial outcomes while reducing time and cost. In this review, we focus on recent advancements in MPS used to study age-related and geriatric diseases, with particular emphasis on the application of organoids and organ-on-a-chip technologies in understanding cardiovascular diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, fibrotic diseases, locomotor and sensory degenerative disorders, and rare diseases. And we aim to provide readers with critical guidelines and an overview of examples for modeling age-related and geriatric diseases using MPS, exploring mechanisms, treatments, drug screening, and other subsequent applications, from a physiopathological perspective, emphasizing the characteristic of age-related and geriatric diseases and their established correlations with the aging process. We also discuss the limitations of current models and propose future directions for MPS in aging research, highlighting the potential of interdisciplinary approaches to address unresolved challenges in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Song
- State Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China; School of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiachen Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China; School of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhongze Gu
- State Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China; School of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ohlendorf D, Avaniadi I, Adjami F, Christian W, Doerry C, Fay V, Fisch V, Gerez A, Goecke J, Kaya U, Keller J, Krüger D, Pflaum J, Porsch L, Loewe C, Scharnweber B, Sosnov P, Wanke EM, Oremek G, Ackermann H, Holzgreve F, Keil F, Groneberg DA, Maurer-Grubinger C. Standard values of the upper body posture in healthy adults with special regard to age, sex and BMI. Sci Rep 2023; 13:873. [PMID: 36650216 PMCID: PMC9845304 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-27976-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
In order to classify and analyze the parameters of upper body posture in clinical or physiotherapeutic settings, a baseline in the form of standard values with special regard to age, sex and BMI is required. Thus, subjectively healthy men and women aged 21-60 years were measured in this project. The postural parameters of 800 symptom-free male (n = 397) and female (n = 407) volunteers aged 21-60 years (Ø♀: 39.7 ± 11.6, Ø ♂: 40.7 ± 11.5 y) were studied. The mean height of the men was 1.8 ± 0.07 m, with a mean body weight of 84.8 ± 13.1 kg and an average BMI of 26.0 ± 3.534 kg/m2. In contrast, the mean height of the women was 1.67 ± 0.06 m, with a mean body weight of 66.5 ± 12.7 kg and an average BMI of 23.9 ± 4.6 kg/m2. By means of video rasterstereography, a 3-dimensional scan of the upper back surface was measured when in a habitual standing position. The means or medians, confidence intervals, tolerance ranges, the minimum, 2.5, 25, 50, 75, 97.5 percentiles and the maximum, plus the kurtosis and skewness of the distribution, were calculated for all parameters. Additionally, ANOVA and a factor analyses (sex, BMI, age) were conducted. In both sexes across all age groups, balanced, symmetrical upper body statics were evident. Most strikingly, the females showed greater thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis angles (kyphosis: Ø ♀ 56°, Ø♂ 51°; lordosis: Ø ♀ 49°, Ø♂ 32°) and lumbar bending angles (Ø ♀ 14°, Ø♂ 11°) than the males. The distance between the scapulae was more pronounced in men. These parameters also show an increase with age and BMI, respectively. Pelvic parameters were independent of age and sex. The upper body postures of women and men between the ages of 21 and 60 years were found to be almost symmetrical and axis-conforming with a positive correlation for BMI or age. Consequently, the present body posture parameters allow for comparisons with other studies, as well as for the evaluation of clinical (interim) diagnostics and applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Ohlendorf
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
| | - I Avaniadi
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - F Adjami
- Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - W Christian
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - C Doerry
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - V Fay
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - V Fisch
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - A Gerez
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - J Goecke
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - U Kaya
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - J Keller
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - D Krüger
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - J Pflaum
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - L Porsch
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - C Loewe
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - B Scharnweber
- Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - P Sosnov
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - E M Wanke
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - G Oremek
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - H Ackermann
- Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - F Holzgreve
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - F Keil
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - D A Groneberg
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - C Maurer-Grubinger
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aubry C, Nüesch C, Fiebig O, Stoll TM, Köhler M, Barth A, Mündermann A. Accelerometry-based physical activity, disability and quality of life before and after lumbar decompression surgery from a physiotherapeutic perspective: An observational cohort study. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2021; 8:100087. [PMID: 35141652 PMCID: PMC8819940 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of lumbar decompression on physical activity (PA) measures (measured as number of steps/day and as moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA)) is poorly understood. The aim of the current study was to compare PA in patients before and after lumbar decompression and to determine the association between change in steps/day and MVPA with change in disability, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and pain. METHODS Patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery were recruited. Steps/day and MVPA MVPA were recorded with an accelerometer. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), HRQOL (Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36)) and pain levels (visual analogue scale (VAS)) were collected prior to surgery and six and twelve weeks postoperatively. Steps/day were compared to the lower bound of steps/day in healthy persons (7,000 steps per day), and the relationship between changes in steps/day, MVPA, ODI, SF-36, and VAS were calculated. RESULTS Twenty-six patients aged 37 to 75 years met inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Lumbar decompressions were performed for stenosis and/or disc herniation. Preoperatively, patients took an average 5,073±2,621 (mean±standard deviation) steps/day. At 6 weeks postoperatively, patients took 6,131±2,343 steps/day. At 12 weeks postoperatively, patients took 5,683±2,128 steps/day. Postoperative MVPA minutes per week increased compared to preoperative MVPA (preoperative: 94.6±122.9; 6 weeks: 173.9±181.9; 12 weeks: 145.7±132.8). From preoperative to 12 weeks postoperative, change in steps correlated with MVPA (R=0.775; P<0.001), but not with ODI (R=0.069; P=0.739), SF-36 (R=0.138; P=0.371), VAS in the back (R=0.230; P=0.259) or VAS in the leg (R=-0.123; P=0.550). CONCLUSIONS During the first 12 postoperative weeks, daily steps did not reach the lower bound of normal step activity of 7,000 steps/day, however postoperative steps/day were higher than before surgery. Steps/day and MVPA appear to be independent of ODI and SF-36 and represent additional outcome parameters in patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery and should be considered e.g., by physiotherapists especially from 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2, prospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Aubry
- Department of Physiotherapy, Bethesda Hospital AG, Basel, Switzerland
- Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Corina Nüesch
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Fiebig
- Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Surgery, Bethesda Hospital AG, 4052 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M. Stoll
- Department of Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Surgery, Bethesda Hospital AG, 4052 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Markus Köhler
- Department of Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Surgery, Bethesda Hospital AG, 4052 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alain Barth
- Department of Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Surgery, Bethesda Hospital AG, 4052 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Annegret Mündermann
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Spine Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|