Efficacy of propiverine ER with or without α-blockers related to maximum urinary flow rate in adult men with OAB: results of a 12-week, multicenter, non-interventional study

Current and Emerging Pharmacological Targets and Treatments of Urinary Incontinence and Related Disorders

Overactive bladder syndrome with and without urinary incontinence and related conditions, signs, and disorders such as detrusor overactivity, neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, underactive bladder, stress urinary incontinence, and nocturia are common in the general population and have a major impact on the quality of life of the affected patients and their partners. Based on the deliberations of the subcommittee on pharmacological treatments of the 7th International Consultation on Incontinence, we present a comprehensive review of established drug targets in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome and the aforementioned related conditions and the approved drugs used in its treatment. Investigational drug targets and compounds are also reviewed. We conclude that, despite a range of available medical treatment options, a considerable medical need continues to exist. This is largely because the existing treatments are symptomatic and have limited efficacy and/or tolerability, which leads to poor long-term adherence. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Urinary incontinence and related disorders are prevalent in the general population. While many treatments have been approved, few patients stay on long-term treatment despite none of them being curative. This paper provides a comprehensive discussion of existing and emerging treatment options for various types of incontinence and related disorders.

What Are Realistic Expectations to Become Free of Overactive Bladder Symptoms? Experience from Non-interventional Studies with Propiverine

INTRODUCTION

Unmet expectations are a major cause of perceived treatment failure and discontinuation of treatment. To enable evidence-based counselling of patients on realistic expectations, we determined the chance of patients with overactive bladder becoming free of a given symptom upon treatment with a muscarinic antagonist in a non-interventional setting.

METHODS

Two non-interventional studies included 1335 and 745 patients, respectively, who received 30 or 45 mg q.d. propiverine ER for 12 weeks. They were monitored for becoming free of urgency, urinary incontinence, frequency, or nocturia. Analyses were also performed in subgroups defined by basal symptom severity, age, and gender. Categorical data are shown as a percentage of the respective population. Continuous data are expressed as means or as median depending on whether the variability was considered to exhibit a normal distribution.

RESULTS

The probability of becoming symptom-free was largest for incontinence and frequency (about 50%), but lesser for urgency (about 20%) and nocturia (about 10%). Greater basal severity of a symptom reduced the chance to become free of that symptom upon treatment, but the chance to become free of incontinence and frequency was still considerable. Age and gender had only minor if any effects on the chance of becoming symptom-free. These findings are in line with those of a limited number of randomized controlled trials.

CONCLUSION

These data provide an evidence base for the counselling of patients with overactive bladder on realistic expectations of treatment outcomes. We propose that realistic expectations can lead to greater long-term adherence.

Associations between the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition score and overactive bladder syndrome symptoms at baseline and upon treatment

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes such as the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) score are frequently used to characterize overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) patients and their treatment outcomes. However, little information is available on the relationship of such scores to OAB symptoms at the individual patient level.

METHODS

We have performed a post hoc analysis of two large noninterventional studies (n = 1345 and 745) in which patients received propiverine extended release (30 or 45 mg/day) for 12 weeks to determine the strength of nonparametric correlations between PPBC and OAB symptoms at baseline, after treatment and with treatment-associated changes thereof.

RESULTS

PPBC was not correlated with age but with episode frequencies of urgency, incontinence, micturitions, and nocturia, but the strength of correlations was only moderate (Spearman rank correlation coefficient 0.2045-0.3553). Similarly moderate correlations were observed after treatment and when changes in PPBC were compared to those of OAB symptoms, although these correlations were somewhat stronger.

CONCLUSIONS

PPBC is only moderately correlated to OAB symptoms indicating that it characterizes patients beyond what is captured by their symptoms.

Factors Associated with Decisions for Initial Dosing, Up-Titration of Propiverine and Treatment Outcomes in Overactive Bladder Syndrome Patients in a Non-Interventional Setting

Two doses of propiverine ER (30 and 45 mg/d) are available for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome. We have explored factors associated with the initial dosing choice (allocation bias), the decision to adapt dosing (escalation bias) and how dosing relative to other factors affects treatment outcomes. Data from two non-interventional studies of 1335 and 745 OAB patients, respectively, receiving treatment with propiverine, were analyzed post-hoc. Multivariate analysis was applied to identify factors associated with dosing decisions and treatment outcomes. Several parameters were associated with dose choice, escalation to higher dose or treatment outcomes, but only few exhibited a consistent association across both studies. These were younger age for initial dose choice and basal number of urgency and change in incontinence episodes for up-titration. Treatment outcome (difference between values at 12 weeks vs. baseline) for each OAB system was strongly driven by the respective baseline value, whereas no other parameter exhibited a consistent association. Patients starting on the 30 mg dose and escalating to 45 mg after 4 weeks had outcomes comparable with those staying on a starting dose of 30 or 45 mg. We conclude that dose escalation after 4 weeks brings OAB patients with an initially limited improvement to a level seen in initially good responders. Analysis of underlying factors yielded surprisingly little consistent insight.

Results of a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial with propiverine extended release 30 mg in patients with overactive bladder

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of the 30 mg extended release (ER) formulation of propiverine hydrochloride with the 4 mg ER formulation of tolterodine tartrate in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) in a non-inferiority trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients, aged 18-75 years and with symptoms of OAB, were enrolled in this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled study. After a 2-week screening period, patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either propiverine ER 30 mg or tolterodine ER 4 mg daily during the 8-week treatment period. Efficacy was assessed using a 3-day voiding diary and patient's self-reported assessment of treatment effect. Safety assessment included recording of adverse events, laboratory test results, measurement of post-void residual urine and electrocardiograms.

RESULTS

A total of 324 patients (244 female and 80 male) were included in the study. Both active treatments improved the variables included in the voiding diary and in the patient's self-reported assessment. The change from baseline in the number of voidings per 24 h was significantly greater in the propiverine ER 30 mg group compared with the tolterodine ER 4 mg group after 8 weeks of treatment (full analysis set [FAS] -4.6 ± 4.1 vs -3.8 ± 5.1; P = 0.005). Significant improvements were also observed for the change of urgency incontinence episodes after 2 weeks (P = 0.026) and 8 weeks (P = 0.028) of treatment when comparing propiverine ER 30 mg with tolterodine ER 4 mg. Both treatments were well tolerated, with a similar frequency of adverse drug reactions in both the propiverine ER 30 mg and tolterodine ER 4 mg groups (FAS 40.7 vs 39.5%; P = 0.8). More patients treated with tolterodine ER 4 mg discontinued the treatment because of adverse drug reactions compared with propiverine ER 30 mg (7.4 vs 3.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Propiverine ER 30 mg was confirmed to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with OAB symptoms. This first head-to-head study showed non-inferiority of propiverine ER 30 mg compared with tolterodine ER 4 mg.

Persistence with solifenacin add-on therapy in men with benign prostate obstruction and residual symptoms of overactive bladder after tamsulosin monotherapy

AIMS

In spite of the reported efficacy and safety of antimuscarinics in men with OAB (overactive bladder) and BPO (benign prostatic obstruction), many patients do not persist with the treatment. We aimed to evaluate persistence and the reasons for the discontinuation of solifenacin add-on therapy in men with residual symptoms of OAB after tamsulosin monotherapy for BPO in a real clinical environment.

METHODS

Men aged ≥ 45 years with IPSS ≥ 12 and symptoms of OAB (OAB-V8 ≥ 8, micturition ≥ 8/24 h, urgency ≥ 2/24 h) were prescribed tamsulosin 0.2 mg. After 4 weeks, men who had residual symptoms of OAB (OAB-V8 ≥ 8, micturition ≥ 8/24 h, urgency ≥ 1/24 h) and reported that they were 'dissatisfied' or 'a little satisfied' with the therapy were enrolled and prescribed solifenacin 5 mg in combination with tamsulosin. After 52 weeks, persistence and the reasons for the discontinuation of solifenacin were evaluated. Factors related to persistence were analysed.

RESULTS

Of the 305 men who had been treated with tamsulosin, 176 were prescribed solifenacin. After 52 weeks, 44 (25%) remained on solifenacin therapy. Of the 132 who discontinued solifenacin, 85 were evaluated on the reason for discontinuation. The three most common reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs) (35%), lack of efficacy (33%), and improvement in symptoms (16%). The aggravation of voiding symptoms was the most common AE leading to discontinuation. Retention was observed in 11 men. None of the demographical or clinical characteristics were significantly related to persistence.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 25% men with OAB and BPO remained on antimuscarinic add-on therapy after 1 year, mostly because of AEs and lack of efficacy. Realistic data should be added to what is already known about antimuscarinic treatment in men by including patients who were excluded or who dropped out of well-designed clinical trials.

Propiverine: a review of its use in the treatment of adults and children with overactive bladder associated with idiopathic or neurogenic detrusor overactivity, and in men with lower urinary tract symptoms

Propiverine is a well established antimuscarinic agent with a mixed mode of action in the treatment of symptoms associated with overactive bladder (OAB). As well as blocking muscarinic receptors in the detrusor muscle, the drug also inhibits cellular calcium influx, thereby diminishing muscle spasm. In patients with symptoms of OAB resulting from idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO) or neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO), propiverine demonstrated dose-dependent efficacy and tolerability, with adverse events consistent with those associated with all antimuscarinic agents. In adults with IDO, propiverine demonstrated similar efficacy to that of other antimuscarinic agents (including solifenacin, tolterodine, oxybutynin and imidafenacin) and, in adults with NDO, propiverine and oxybutynin demonstrated similar efficacy. Propiverine was generally well tolerated in these patient populations, with a lower incidence of dry mouth than that associated with oxybutynin. In men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and in whom the presence of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) was implicated, propiverine administered as add-on therapy to an α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist demonstrated similar or superior efficacy to that achieved with an α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist alone, and combination therapy was particularly effective in patients with urinary storage symptoms. Combination therapy was generally well tolerated, but was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events than an α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist alone. In children and adolescents with IDO/OAB or NDO, propiverine was generally more effective and better tolerated than oxybutynin. In conclusion, propiverine provides a valuable option for the treatment of adults and children with OAB associated with IDO or NDO, and in men with storage LUTS.

Factors associated with a better therapeutic effect of solifenacin in patients with overactive bladder syndrome

AIMS

To analyze the predictors of therapeutic success after solifenacin treatment.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and December 2011, all patients with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) who consecutively visited the urologic outpatient clinics of a medical center were prospectively enrolled. All enrolled patients received 5 mg solifenacin once a day for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Overall, 648 patients, 332 men, and 316 women, completed the 12-week study. The overall success rate was 48.8%. The success rate for female patients was superior to that for male patients (55.4% vs. 42.5%, P <  .001). The urgency severity scale (USS) score, daytime frequency, nocturia, voided volume, and bladder capacity were all improved after 12 weeks' treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that female gender, high USS score, high maximum flow rate (Qmax ), and low postvoid residual volume (PVR) were all significant predictive factors for success after antimuscarinic treatment. USS score = 4 and Qmax ≥ 12 ml/sec were the most strongly predictive cutoff values for success, with receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) areas of 0.70 (sensitivity = 66.8%, specificity = 66.0%) and 0.63 (sensitivity = 80.7%, specificity = 43.1%), respectively. PVR ≥ 70 ml was the most predictive cutoff value for failure, with a ROC area of 0.58 (sensitivity = 18.2%, specificity = 93.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Female gender, high USS score, high Qmax , and low PVR were associated with better therapeutic efficacy. These findings could serve as an initial guide or assist in consultation regarding the treatment of OAB patients with antimuscarinics.

Systematic review of combination drug therapy for non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms

BACKGROUND

Several drugs are approved for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men, but these are mostly used by clinicians as monotherapies. The combination of different compounds, each of which targets a different aspect of LUTS, seems appealing. However, only few clinical trials have evaluated the effects of combination therapies.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and adverse events of combination therapies for male LUTS.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed and Cochrane databases were used to identify clinical trials and meta-analyses on male LUTS combination therapy. The search was restricted to studies of level of evidence ≥ 1b. A total of 49 papers published between January 1988 and March 2012 were identified.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The α1-adrenoceptor antagonist (α1-blocker)/5α-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) combination provides the most data. This combination seems to be more efficacious in terms of several outcome variables in patients whose prostate volume is between 30 ml and 40 ml when treatment is maintained for >1 yr; when given for <1 yr, α1-blockers alone are just as effective. The combination of α1-blocker/5-ARI shows a slightly increased rate of adverse events. It remains unknown whether its safety and superiority over either drug as monotherapy are sustained after >6 yr. The α1-blocker/muscarinic receptor antagonist (antimuscarinic) combination was most frequently assessed as an add-on therapy to already existing α1-blocker therapy. Inconsistent data derive from heterogeneous study populations and different study designs. Currently, the α1-blocker/antimuscarinic combination appears to be a second-line add-on for patients with insufficient symptom relief after monotherapy. The combination seems to be safe in men with postvoid residual <200 ml. However, there are no trials >4 mo concerning safety and efficacy of this combination. The α1-blocker/phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor combination is a new treatment option with only preliminary reports. More studies are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn.

CONCLUSIONS

An α1-blocker/5-ARI combination is beneficial for patients whose prostate volume is between 30 ml and 40 ml when medical treatment is intended for >1 yr. Based on short-term follow-up studies, add-on of antimuscarinics to α1-blockers is an option when postvoid residual is <200 ml.

The muscarinic receptor antagonist propiverine exhibits α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonism in human prostate and porcine trigonum

Purpose

Combination therapy of male lower urinary tract symptoms with α₁-adrenoceptor and muscarinic receptor antagonists attracts increasing interest. Propiverine is a muscarinic receptor antagonist possessing additional properties, i.e., block of L-type Ca²⁺ channels. Here, we have investigated whether propiverine and its metabolites can additionally antagonize α₁-adrenoceptors.

Methods

Human prostate and porcine trigone muscle strips were used to explore inhibition of α₁-adrenoceptor-mediated contractile responses. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing cloned human α₁-adrenoceptors were used to determine direct interactions with the receptor in radioligand binding and intracellular Ca²⁺ elevation assays.

Results

Propiverine concentration-dependently reversed contraction of human prostate pre-contracted with 10 μM phenylephrine (−log IC₅₀ [M] 4.43 ± 0.08). Similar inhibition was observed in porcine trigone (−log IC₅₀ 5.01 ± 0.05), and in additional experiments consisted mainly of reduced maximum phenylephrine responses. At concentrations ≥1 μM, the propiverine metabolite M-14 also relaxed phenylephrine pre-contracted trigone strips, whereas metabolites M-5 and M-6 were ineffective. In radioligand binding experiments, propiverine and M-14 exhibited similar affinity for the three α₁-adrenoceptor subtypes with −log K_i [M] values ranging from 4.72 to 4.94, whereas the M-5 and M-6 did not affect [³H]-prazosin binding. In CHO cells, propiverine inhibited α₁-adrenoceptor-mediated Ca²⁺ elevations with similar potency as radioligand binding, again mainly by reducing maximum responses.

Conclusions

In contrast to other muscarinic receptor antagonists, propiverine exerts additional L-type Ca²⁺-channel blocking and α₁-adrenoceptor antagonist effects. It remains to be determined clinically, how these additional properties contribute to the clinical effects of propiverine, particularly in male voiding dysfunction.