1
|
Tsuboi I, Matsukawa A, Kardoust Parizi M, Klemm J, Schulz RJ, Cadenar A, Mancon S, Chiujdea S, Fazekas T, Miszczyk M, Laukhtina E, Kawada T, Katayama S, Iwata T, Bekku K, Wada K, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Teoh J, Singla N, Araki M, Shariat SF. Differential effect of surgical technique on intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. World J Urol 2024; 42:488. [PMID: 39162743 PMCID: PMC11335797 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05185-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment in patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). However, it is unclear which specific surgical technique may lead to improve oncological outcomes in term of intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with UTUC. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU in reducing IVR in UTUC patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Three databases were queried in January 2024 for studies analyzing UTUC patients who underwent RNU. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of IVR among various types of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Thirty-one studies, comprising 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 prospective study, were included for a systematic review and meta-analysis. The rate of IVR was significantly lower in RNU patients who had an early ligation (EL) of the ureter compared to those who did not (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02). Laparoscopic RNU significantly increased the IVR compared to open RNU (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.54, p < 0.001). Intravesical bladder cuff removal significantly reduced the IVR compared to both extravesical and transurethral bladder cuff removal (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83, p = 0.02 and HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.15-2.34, p = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS EL of the affected upper tract system, ureteral management, open RNU, and intravesical bladder cuff removal seem to yield the lowest IVR rate in patients with UTUC. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to conclusively elucidate the optimal surgical technique in the setting of single post-operative intravesical chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Tsuboi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Robert J Schulz
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Cadenar
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancon
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Sever Chiujdea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Spitalul Clinic Judetean Murures, University of Medicine, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Pharmacy, Mures, Romania
| | - Tamás Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Collegium Medicum - Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takehiro Iwata
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Koichiro Wada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, PARIS, F- 75013, France
| | - Jeremy Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Park 213, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia, Czechia.
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao Y, Lu K, Yin ZX, Peng YH, Pei CS. Systematic review and meta-analysis of completely retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy versus traditional retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34112. [PMID: 37352043 PMCID: PMC10289752 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of completely retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (CRNU) for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS A systematic review of PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify trials comparing the outcomes of CRNU and other surgical procedures. A total of 6 case-control studies were selected for analysis. The efficacy and safety of CRNU were evaluated using mean difference or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CIs, employing continuous or dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 11.0 software. RESULTS The meta-analysis indicated that CRNU in subjects with UTUC was significantly associated with a shorter operation time (standardized mean difference, -1.36; 95% CI, -1.61 to -1.11, P < .001) and lower blood loss (standardized mean difference, -0.54; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.31, P < .001) when compared to traditionally retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (TRNU). No significant difference was observed in the occurrence of grade I & II complications (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.49-2.2, P = .915) and total complications (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.38-1.27, P = .238) between CRNU and TRNU. CONCLUSION The findings suggest that CRNU is an advanced surgical technique that is safe and effective for the treatment of UTUC. We recommend that CRNU be further employed for patients with UTUC. Further randomized, multicenter trials are needed to validate these results, given the limitations of this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Zhao
- Department of Urology, Xuzhou Cancer Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ke Lu
- Department of Urology, Changshu Second People’s Hospital, Yangzhou University Fifth Clinical Medical College, Changshu, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zhi-Xiang Yin
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yu-Hao Peng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chang-Song Pei
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shimura S, Matsumoto K, Ikeda M, Moroo S, Koguchi D, Taoka Y, Hirayama T, Murakami Y, Utsunomiya T, Matsuda D, Okuno N, Irie A, Iwamura M. A multi-institutional retrospective study of open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy focused on the intravesical recurrence. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2023; 19:71-78. [PMID: 35404494 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
AIM Intravesical recurrence (IVR) after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is relatively frequent, occurring in about 30-50% of patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences of the prognosis and IVR between open and laparoscopic surgery and to elucidate the risk factor of IVR. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 403 patients with UTUC treated with laparoscopic or open nephroureterectomy at six affiliated hospitals between 1990 and 2015. The clinicopathological factors of each group were examined using Kaplan-Meier plots, and univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS There was no difference in recurrence and cancer-specific mortality between open and laparoscopic surgery in univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no significant difference in IVR rate between the laparoscopic and open groups (p = .22). Among the patients with IVR, 84% of patients relapsed within 2 years. Univariate analysis of IVR showed a significant increase in patients with low-grade (p = .03, HR = 1.64) or low-stage urothelial carcinoma (pT1 or lower, p = .006, HR = 1.77) with no lymph node involvement (p = .002, HR = 10.3) or lymphovascular invasion (p = .009, HR = 1.79). Surgical modality was not an independent factor. In multivariate analysis, there was no independent predictive factor for IVR. CONCLUSIONS There was no difference in recurrence, cancer-specific mortality, and IVR between open and laparoscopic surgery. On the other hand, our results suggested that the low malignant potential tumor may be a risk factor for IVR. This finding provides insight into IVR, which may help with the development of personalized prevention and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soichiro Shimura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Masaomi Ikeda
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Shigenori Moroo
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Dai Koguchi
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, Kitamoto, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Taoka
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, Kitamoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Hirayama
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Yasukiyo Murakami
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Takuji Utsunomiya
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Daisuke Matsuda
- Department of Urology, Higashiyamato Hospital, Higashiyamato, Japan
| | - Norihiko Okuno
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Akira Irie
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhao H, Jiao B, Liu K, Luo Z, Ding Z, Lai S, Ren J, Zhang G. Intravesical recurrence factors and outcome after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Multivariate analysis with propensity score matching. Front Oncol 2022; 12:984014. [PMID: 36059684 PMCID: PMC9433701 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.984014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe risk factors for intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remain inconsistent and unclear. Thus, the risk factors of IVR after RNU and the prognostic significance of the risk indicators were explored herein.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed UTUC patients upon RNU in our center from January 2009 to December 2019. After propensity score matching, 139 patients were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regressions were used to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were measured using the Kaplan–Meier curve with a log-rank test. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsWe included 139 patients with a median follow-up of 42 months, of which 48 patients had an intravesical recurrence. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed cytological abnormalities in urine (HR=3.101, P=0.002), hydronephrosis (HR=1.852, P=0.042), adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.242, P<0.001), and previous history of bladder cancer (HR=5.51, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for IVR. As for clinical outcomes, OS and CSS suggested disadvantages in patients with IVR compared with patients without recurrence (P=0.042 for OS, P<0.0001 for CSS), OS of patients with abnormal urine cytology and OS and CSS of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy did not present clinical significance, and other risk factors all affected the clinical outcome.ConclusionIn this propensity-score matching study, cytological abnormality of urine, hydronephrosis, adjuvant chemotherapy and previous history of bladder cancer were shown to be independent risk factors for IVR. Moreover, risk factors also influence clinical outcomes, thereby rendering it necessary to adopt more active postoperative surveillance and treatment strategies for these patients, which may help improve treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang Zhao
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- China-Japan Friendship School Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Binbin Jiao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Kunpeng Liu
- Beijing Laboratory of Biomedical Materials, State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composite Materials, College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenkai Luo
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenshan Ding
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shicong Lai
- Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Ren
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Guan Zhang, ; Jian Ren,
| | - Guan Zhang
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- China-Japan Friendship School Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Guan Zhang, ; Jian Ren,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fan B, Huang Y, Wen S, Teng Q, Yang X, Sun M, Chen T, Huang Y, Wang Y, Liu Z. Predictive Value of Preoperative Positive Urine Cytology for Development of Bladder Cancer After Nephroureterectomy in Patients With Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Prognostic Nomogram Based on a Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study and Systematic Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:731318. [PMID: 34660295 PMCID: PMC8519510 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.731318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) is a rare and severe urinary malignancy. Several studies have explored the relationship between preoperative urine cytology and intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with UUT-UC. However, the results of these studies are controversial or even contradictory, and investigations with UUT-UC patients in northeast China are rare. Methods We first estimated the prognostic significance of preoperative urine cytology in the outcomes of intravesical recurrence in 231 UUT-UC patients (training cohort = 142, validation cohort = 89) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) by the nomogram model. Subsequently, we quantitatively combined our results with the published data after searching several databases to assess whether preoperative positive urine cytology was associated with poor intravesical recurrence-free survival and a high risk of tumor malignant biological behavior. Results Firstly, the multicenter retrospective cohort study demonstrated that preoperative positive urine cytology correlated with poor intravesical recurrence-free survival and can serve as significant independent predictors of IVR by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. The construction of the nomogram demonstrated that predictive efficacy and accuracy were significantly improved when preoperative urine cytology was combined. Meanwhile, meta-analysis showed that preoperative positive urine cytology was associated with a 49% increased risk of IVR. In the subgroup analysis by region, study type, and sample size, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were statistically significant for the Japan subgroup (HR 1.32), China subgroup (HR 1.88), cohort study subgroup (HR 1.45), and the single-arm study subgroup (HR 1.63). Conclusions Preoperative urine cytology was validated as a potential predictor of intravesical recurrence in patients with UUT-UC after RNU, although these results need to be generalized with caution. Large, prospective trials are required to further confirm its significance in prognosis and tumor malignant biological behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Fan
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yuanbin Huang
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Shuang Wen
- Department of Pathology, Dalian Friendship Hospital, Dalian, China
| | - Qiliang Teng
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Xinrui Yang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Man Sun
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Tingyu Chen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yan Huang
- Department of Urology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Yumei Wang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Zhiyu Liu
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu G, Yao Z, Chen G, Li Y, Liang B. Laparoscopic compared with open nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systemic review and a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e14639. [PMID: 34309982 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy on postoperative results in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma subjects. METHODS A systematic literature search up to January 2021 was done and 36 studies included 23 013 subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma at the start of the study; 8178 of them were laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and 14 835 of them were open nephroureterectomy. They were reporting relationships between the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. RESULTS Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma was significantly related to longer operation time (MD, 43.90; 95% CI, 20.91-66.90, P < .001), shorter hospital stay (MD, -1.71; 95% CI, -2.42 to -1.00, P < .001), lower blood loss (MD, -133.82; 95% CI, -220.92 to -46.73, P = .003), lower transfusion need (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47-0.67, P < .001) and lower overall complication (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90, P < .001) compared with open nephroureterectomy. However, no significant difference was found between laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and open nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in 2-5-years recurrence-free survival (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69-1.18, P = .46), 2-5-years cancer-specific survival (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69-1.28, P = .68) and 2-5-years overall survival (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.91-1.87, P = .15). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma may have a longer operation time, shorter hospital stay, lower blood loss, transfusion need and overall complication compared with open nephroureterectomy. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guihong Liu
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Zeqin Yao
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Guoqiang Chen
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Yalang Li
- Department of Urology, Yuzhou People's Hospital, Xuchang, China
| | - Bing Liang
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu G, Yao Z, Chen G, Li Y, Liang B. Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. Front Surg 2021; 8:729686. [PMID: 34485377 PMCID: PMC8414582 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.729686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In this meta-analysis, we will focus on evaluating the effects of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy on postoperative results in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma subjects. Methods: A systematic literature search up to January 2021 was performed, and 36 studies included 23,013 subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma at the start of the study; of them, 8,178 were laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and 14,835 of them were open nephroureterectomy. They were reporting relationships between the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs to evaluate the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Results: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma was significantly related to longer operation time (MD, 43.90; 95% CI, 20.91–66.90, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (MD, −1.71; 95% CI, −2.42 to −1.00, p < 0.001), lower blood loss (MD, −133.82; 95% CI, −220.92 to −46.73, p = 0.003), lower transfusion need (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47–0.67, p < 0.001), and lower overall complication (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70–0.90, p < 0.001) compared with open nephroureterectomy. However, no significant difference was found between laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and open nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in 2–5 years recurrence-free survival (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69–1.18, p = 0.46), 2–5 years cancer-specific survival (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69–1.28, p = 0.68), and 2–5 years overall survival (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.91–1.87, p = 0.15). Conclusion: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma may have a longer operation time, shorter hospital stay, and lower blood loss, transfusion need, and overall complication compared to open nephroureterectomy. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guihong Liu
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Zeqin Yao
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Guoqiang Chen
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Yalang Li
- Department of Urology, Yuzhou People's Hospital, Xuchang, China
| | - Bing Liang
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu W, Wang Z, Liu S, Yao Y, Liu Y, Zhang G. Preoperative positive voided urine cytology predicts poor clinical outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing nephroureterectomy. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:1113. [PMID: 33198698 PMCID: PMC7670807 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07623-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Performance of urinary cytology is recommended as the part of a standard diagnostic workup and base surveillance regimens in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, the effect of positive voided urine cytology (VUC) on UTUC prognosis, compared with negative VUC, has not been fully demonstrated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative VUC on predicting intravesical recurrence, disease recurrence, and mortality in patients with UTUC who underwent nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS Clinicopathological information was collected from 315 UTUC patients treated with RNU. The association between VUC and oncological outcomes was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the influence of VUC on tumor grade. RESULTS Preoperative positive VUC, presenting in 101 patients (32%), was significantly associated with tumor multifocality (P = 0.017) and higher tumor grade (P = 0.010). On multivariable Cox regression analyses, preoperative positive VUC was an independent prognostic factor of intravesical recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-4.64; P = 0.035), RFS (HR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.08-2.99; P = 0.023), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.10-3.18; P = 0.020), but not overall survival (HR = 1.32, 95% CI 0.80-2.18; P = 0.28). Logistic regression analysis revealed that VUC was related to high tumor grade in UTUC (odds ratio = 2.23, 95%CI 1.15-4.52). CONCLUSION Preoperative positive VUC significantly increases the risk of intravesical recurrence in UTUC patients undergoing RNU. In addition, positive VUC is an adverse predictor of RFS and CSS, which might be due to the association between positive VUC and high tumor grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Liu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16, Jiangsu Rd, Qingdao, 266003, China
| | - Zhankun Wang
- Department of Urology, Qingdao Eighth People's Hospital, Qingdao, China
| | - Shuai Liu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16, Jiangsu Rd, Qingdao, 266003, China
| | - Yu Yao
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16, Jiangsu Rd, Qingdao, 266003, China
| | - Yong Liu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16, Jiangsu Rd, Qingdao, 266003, China
| | - Guiming Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16, Jiangsu Rd, Qingdao, 266003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang ML, Miki Y, Hang JF, Vohra M, Peyton S, McIntire PJ, VandenBussche CJ, Vohra P. A review of upper urinary tract cytology performance before and after the implementation of The Paris System. Cancer Cytopathol 2020; 129:264-274. [PMID: 32897658 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Urinary cytology (UC) is one of the primary diagnostic modalities used for the screening and surveillance of urothelial carcinoma. Despite its widespread use, UC has suffered from a lack of standardized or reproducible criteria and wide interobserver variability, particularly of the designation of atypical urothelial cells. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS), published in 2016, aimed to provide a standardized approach for evaluating UC by creating diagnostic categories with specific cytomorphologic criteria. Recent studies have primarily investigated the application of TPS on lower urinary tract specimens and have mostly shown that TPS implementation has improved the performance of UC specimens. Only a few studies have reported the impact of TPS on upper urinary tract (UUT) cytology. Additionally, there is uncertainty as to which cytological features are most predictive of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) in the UUT. This review summarizes the literature regarding the utility and performance of UUT cytology and highlights findings before and after the implementation of TPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lisa Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yurina Miki
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jen-Fan Hang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Manjiv Vohra
- Environmental Chemical Corp, Burlingame, California
| | - Stephen Peyton
- QML Pathology, Anatomical Pathology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Patrick J McIntire
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Poonam Vohra
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ye Z, Mi Q, Luo D, Li Z, Luo J. A case report of primary upper urinary tract signet-ring cell carcinoma and literature review. BMC Urol 2020; 20:75. [PMID: 32590974 PMCID: PMC7318531 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-020-00645-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Upper tract urothelial carcinoma with pure non-urothelial histology is an exception but variants are present in ~ 25% of cases. Primary upper urinary tract signet -ring cell carcinoma is extremely rare. Case presentation We report the case of a 65-year-old male diagnosed primary upper urinary tract signet-ring cell carcinoma while underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Radical nephroureterectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy were performed sequentially. The patient is now recovering well with a regular follow-up for more than 1 year. Conclusions The upper urinary tract malignancy often appears as a high grade, high stage tumor and has a uniformly poor prognosis, but a timely multimodal management can bring a good outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohua Ye
- Department of Urology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, 523000, China
| | - Qiwu Mi
- Department of Urology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, 523000, China.
| | - Daosheng Luo
- Department of Urology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, 523000, China
| | - Zhixiong Li
- Department of Urology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, 523000, China
| | - Jiexin Luo
- Department of Urology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, 523000, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sato G, Yoshida T, Yanishi M, Saito R, Murota T, Kawa G, Kinoshita H, Matsuda T. Preoperative Pyuria Predicts for Intravesical Recurrence in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract After Radical Nephroureterectomy Without a History of Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 18:e167-e173. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
12
|
Mistretta FA, Carrion DM, Nazzani S, Vásquez JL, Fiori C, De Cobelli O, Porpiglia F, Esperto F. Bladder recurrence of primary upper tract urinary carcinoma following nephroureterectomy, and risk of upper urinary tract recurrence after ureteral stent positioning in patients with primary bladder cancer. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2019; 71:191-200. [PMID: 30654603 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03311-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder cancer (BCa) share similar biological, histological and pathological characteristics. These resemblances could explain the high rate of synchronous and metachronous tumors affecting both upper urinary tract and bladder. In patients affected by primary UTUC bladder recurrence is quite common and it represents one of the major concerns during the follow-up of patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Conversely, UTUC recurrence after primary non-muscular invasive BCa is a relatively rare event. Moreover, there is no clear evidence on whether the use of Double-J stenting as drainage in patients affected by BCa increases the risk of UTUC recurrence. The aim of the current study was to summarize the most recent evidence regarding the bladder recurrence after UTUC surgical treatment, and the UTUC recurrence after stent positioning in patients affected by primary BCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco A Mistretta
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy - .,European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Brussels, Belgium -
| | - Diego M Carrion
- European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sebastiano Nazzani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Donato Policlinic, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Juan L Vásquez
- European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zealand, Roskilde, Denmark.,Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Esperto
- European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu F, Guo W, Zhou X, Ding Y, Ma Y, Hou Y, Kong X, Wang Z. Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e11954. [PMID: 30170392 PMCID: PMC6393120 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000011954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) and open nephroureterectomy (ONU) for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were selected for systematic review of trials that compared outcomes of LNU and ONU. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and STATA 13.0 software. RESULTS LNU was associated with longer operation time (P < .001), shorter hospital stay (P < .001), less blood loss (P = .006) and lower rate of transfusion (P < .001). The occurrence of complications, including minor (P = .52), major (P = .21) and total complications (P = .19) were similar between LNU and ONU. There was no significant difference in the rate of 5-year recurrence-free survival (P = .90), 5-year cancer-specific survival (P = .12), and 5-year overall survival (P = .11) as well as 2-year RFS (P = .84), 2-year CSS (P = .86), and 2-year OS (P = .25). CONCLUSION Our results indicated that LNU is a safe and effective method to treat UTUC. Given the limitations of this study, further multicenter, randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Youpeng Ding
- Department of Urology, China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, PR China
| | - Yanan Ma
- Department of Urology, China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, PR China
| | - Yi Hou
- Department of Urology, China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, PR China
| | - Xiangbo Kong
- Department of Urology, China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, PR China
| | - Zhixin Wang
- Department of Urology, China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Guan B, Du Y, Su X, Cao Z, Li Y, Zhan Y, Peng D, Xiong G, Fang D, Ding Y, He S, Gong Y, He Q, Li X, Zhou L. Positive urinary fluorescence in situ hybridization indicates poor prognosis in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Oncotarget 2018; 9:14652-14660. [PMID: 29581871 PMCID: PMC5865697 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Here, we evaluated the potential contribution of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) as a prognostic risk factor of bladder recurrence and survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). A total of 159 UTUC patients were enrolled in this study from January 2012 to May 2016. The 159 voided urine samples before surgery were analyzed using the UroVysion® kit to detect the copy numbers of chromosomes 3, 7, 17 and 9p21 (p16). Patients were classified using an optimal cutoff value of chromosomes 3, 7, 17, and 9p21. Cox's proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the prognostic value of FISH for bladder recurrence and survival. We found that 27 (17.6%) patients experienced bladder recurrence and 26 (16.4%) patients died from cancer, with a median follow-up of 27 months. The patients with positive FISH result were more likely to present bladder recurrence (p = 0.077). However, positive FISH was not associated with cancer specific-free survival (CSS) (p = 0.944). Tumor multifocality, the percentage of abnormal chromosome 3 > 5%, chromosome 7 > 6%, chromosome 17 > 11% and deletion of p16 > 4% were significant prognostic risk factors for BRFS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, only tumor multifocality (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.487, 95%CI: 1.605–7.576, p = 0.002) and the percentage of p16 loss > 4% were both prognostic risk factors for bladder recurrence (HR = 3.487, 95%CI: 1.605–7.576, p = 0.002). These data consider that the urinary FISH test could be a powerful tool in predicting the risk of bladder recurrence in patients with UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bao Guan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Yicong Du
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohong Su
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenpeng Cao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China
| | - Yifan Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Yonghao Zhan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Ding Peng
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Gengyan Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Ding
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China
| | - Shiming He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Yanqing Gong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Qun He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng, Beijing, China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee CH, Ku JY, Jeong CW, Ku JH, Kwak C, Kim HH, Tae BS, Choi SH, Kim HT, Kim TH, Kwon TG, Hwang EC, Jung SI, Kang TW, Kwon DD, Ha HK. Predictors for Intravesical Recurrence Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A National Multicenter Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15:e1055-e1061. [PMID: 28802888 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Revised: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to identify the prognostic impact of intravesical recurrence (IVR) on oncologic outcomes and the clinicopathologic factors that predict IVR in patients who undergo radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2000 and December 2015, 760 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma underwent RNU at 5 institutions in Korea, and patient data were retrospectively collected. Clinicopathologic factors were analyzed for intravesical recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to test the clinicopathologic factors on IVR. RESULTS Of the 760 patients, 231 (30.3%) patients experienced IVR within 10 months of the median interval between RNU and the first IVR. The overall estimated probabilities of 5-year CSS, intravesical recurrence-free survival, and OS were 84.2%, 63.8%, and 79.2%, respectively. No difference was noted in terms of CSS and OS between the patients who did or did not experience IVR. The multivariate Cox analysis showed an association between IVR and positive hydronephrosis, tumor size, positive preoperative urinary cytology, and ureterorenoscopy before RNU (all P < .05). However, a significantly decreased risk of IVR was associated with female gender, laparoscopic RNU, and receipt of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy (all P < .05). CONCLUSION The occurrence of IVR following RNU did not affect CSS and OS. Patients with larger tumor size, preoperative hydronephrosis, positive preoperative urinary cytology, and ureterorenoscopy before RNU had a higher risk of IVR following RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan Ho Lee
- Department of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Ja Yoon Ku
- Department of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Bum Sik Tae
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seock Hwan Choi
- Department of Urology, Chilgok Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Tae Kim
- Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae-Hwan Kim
- Department of Urology, Chilgok Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Gyun Kwon
- Department of Urology, Chilgok Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Eu Chang Hwang
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Il Jung
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Taek Won Kang
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Deuk Kwon
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Hong Koo Ha
- Department of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim HS, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Kim HH, Ku JH. Association between demographic factors and prognosis in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017; 8:7464-7476. [PMID: 27448978 PMCID: PMC5352335 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.10708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 06/06/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to assess the prognostic significance of demographic factors, including age, sex, performance status, smoking status, obesity, and race in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We conducted PubMed search for all articles published until December 2014 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Survival outcomes of interest were intravesical recurrence (IVR) free survival, progression free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Seventy-nine studies, including numbers of subjects ranging from 24 to 9899, met the inclusion criteria. Advanced age was significantly associated with worse PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.01] and OS (HR 1.05). The significant predictors of CSS were age (HR 1.02) and performance status (HR 1.35). Female gender (HR 0.81) and smoking (HR 1.38) were the significant predictors only for IVR free survival. No significant associations with survival outcomes were observed in obesity and race. Our study reveals that age is one of the most important demographic predictor of survival in UTUC. Also, male gender, poor performance status, and smoking are also significantly related to worse survival outcomes. However, large well-designed prospective studies are required to investigate the precise prognostic significance of demographics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Suk Kim
- Department of Urology, Dongguk University Ilsan Medical Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Long X, Zu X, Li Y, He W, Hu X, Tong S, Wang Z, Chen M, Qi L. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Ki-67 as Predictive Biomarkers Identify Patients Who Will Be More Sensitive to Intravesical Instillations for the Prevention of Bladder Cancer Recurrence after Radical Nephroureterectomy. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0166884. [PMID: 27870887 PMCID: PMC5117727 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 11/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy is one of the few available treatments that effectively prevent secondary bladder cancer. However, treating all patients with prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy is excessive for patients who are at a low risk or insensitive to the treatment. Thus, to guide individualized clinical treatment, in addition to identifying patients who are at risk of bladder cancer recurrence, it is equally necessary to identify the patients who will benefit the most from prophylactic, postoperative intravesical instillation therapy. METHODS Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Ki-67 expression levels were measured using immunohistochemical staining samples from 320 patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) from 2004 to 2012. Although no patients received intravesical chemotherapy after RNU before 2008, this method began to be used in 2008 to prevent bladder cancer recurrence. To identify the patients who would most benefit from intravesical chemotherapy, we assessed biological interactions between intravesical chemotherapy and clinicopathological factors or biomarkers. RESULTS The incidence rates of bladder UTUC recurrence decreased after intravesical chemotherapy, and the decrease was greater in patients with low Ki-67 levels, negative EGFR staining and preoperative positive urine cytology. Biological interactions were observed between intravesical chemotherapy, low-level Ki-67 and EGFR negativity. The multivariate analysis showed that after balancing a variety of factors, intravesical chemotherapy is a protective factor for preventing intravesical recurrence in the negative EGFR, low-level Ki-67 and preoperative positive urine cytology sub-groups but not in their corresponding sub-groups. Additionally, the multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative positive urine cytology and Ki-67 were not but that EGFR positivity was an independent risk factor for recurrence after intravesical chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Patients with low Ki-67 levels, negative EGFR staining and preoperative positive urine cytology appear to be more sensitive to intravesical instillations for bladder recurrence prevention after RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingbo Long
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xiongbing Zu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yuan Li
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Wei He
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xiheng Hu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Shiyu Tong
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zhi Wang
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Minfeng Chen
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- * E-mail: (MC); (LQ)
| | - Lin Qi
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- * E-mail: (MC); (LQ)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kim HS, Ku JH, Kim SJ, Hong SJ, Hong SH, Kim HS, Kwon TG, Cho JS, Jeon SS, Joo KJ, Ahn HJ, Park HS, Seong DH, Kwon DD, Kim HJ, Lim JS, Lee HL. Prognostic Factors for Recurrence and Progression in Korean Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients: A Retrospective, Multi-Institutional Study. Yonsei Med J 2016; 57:855-864. [PMID: 27189277 PMCID: PMC4951460 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.4.855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2015] [Revised: 11/13/2015] [Accepted: 11/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify the prognostic factors related to tumor recurrence and progression in Korean patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were collected and analyzed for 2412 NMIBC patients from 15 centers who were initially diagnosed after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) from January 2006 to December 2010. Using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, the prognostic value of each variable was evaluated for the time to first recurrence and progression. RESULTS With a median follow-up duration of 37 months, 866 patients (35.9%) experienced recurrence, and 137 (5.7%) experienced progression. Patients with recurrence had a median time to the first recurrence of 10 months. Multivariable analysis conducted in all patients revealed that preoperative positive urine cytology (PUC) was independently associated with worse recurrence-free survival [RFS; hazard ratio (HR) 1.56; p<0.001], and progression-free survival (PFS; HR 1.56; p=0.037). In particular, on multivariable analysis conducted for the high-risk group (T1 tumor/high-grade Ta tumor/carcinoma in situ), preoperative PUC was an independent predictor of worse RFS (HR 1.73; p<0.001) and PFS (HR 1.96; p=0.006). On multivariable analysis in patients with T1 high-grade (T1HG) cancer (n=684), better RFS (HR 0.75; p=0.033) and PFS (HR 0.33; p<0.001) were observed in association with the administration of intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) induction therapy. CONCLUSION A preoperative PUC result may adversely affect RFS and PFS, particularly in high-risk NMIBC patients. Of particular note, intravesical BCG induction therapy should be administered as an adjunct to TURBT in order to improve RFS and PFS in patients with T1HG cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Suk Kim
- Department of Urology, Dongguk University Ilsan Medical Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Joong Kim
- Department of Urology, Ajou University College of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Sung Joon Hong
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Hoo Hong
- Department of Urology, The Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Sup Kim
- Department of Urology, Konkuk University College of Medicine, Chungju, Korea
| | - Tae Gyun Kwon
- Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jin Seon Cho
- Department of Urology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwan Joong Joo
- Department of Urology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Han Jong Ahn
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Seok Park
- Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Do Hwan Seong
- Department of Urology, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Dong Deuk Kwon
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Hyung Jin Kim
- Department of Urology, Chonbuk National University College of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Jae Sung Lim
- Department of Urology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Hyung Lae Lee
- Department of Urology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhang S, Luo Y, Wang C, Fu SJ, Yang L. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ 2016; 4:e2063. [PMID: 27280069 PMCID: PMC4893337 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2016] [Accepted: 05/01/2016] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. Several factors have been validated as predictors of disease recurrence in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. However, the oncological outcomes between different surgical approaches (open nephroureterectomy versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, ONU vs LNU) remain controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the oncological outcomes associated with different surgical approaches. Methods. We conducted an electronic search of the PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge and Cochrane Library electronic databases through November 2015, screened the retrieved references, collected and evaluated the relevant information. We extracted and synthesized the corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using Stata 13. Results. Twenty-one observational studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed no differences in the intravesical recurrence-free survival (IRFS), unspecified recurrence-free survival (UnRFS) and overall survival (OS) between LNUandONU. However, improvements in the extravesical recurrence free survival (ExRFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were observed inLNU. The pooled hazard ratios were 1.05 (95% CI [0.92–1.18]) for IRFS, 0.80 (95% CI [0.64–0.96]) for ExRFS, 1.10 (95% CI [0.93–1.28]) for UnRFS, 0.91 (95% CI [0.66–1.17]) for OS and 0.79 (95% CI [0.68–0.91]) for CSS. Conclusion. Based on current evidence, LNU could provide equivalent prognostic effects for upper tract urothelial carcinoma, and had better oncological control of ExRFS and CSS compared to ONU. However, considering all eligible studies with the intrinsic bias of retrospective study design, the results should be interpreted with caution. Prospective randomized trials are needed to verify these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Zhang
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital , Lan Zhou , China
| | - You Luo
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital , Lan Zhou , China
| | - Cheng Wang
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital , Lan Zhou , China
| | - Sheng-Jun Fu
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital , Lan Zhou , China
| | - Li Yang
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital , Lan Zhou , China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yamashita S, Ito A, Mitsuzuka K, Tochigi T, Namima T, Soma F, Aizawa M, Ioritani N, Kaiho Y, Arai Y. Clinical implications of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Int J Urol 2016; 23:378-84. [DOI: 10.1111/iju.13054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Yamashita
- Department of Urology; Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Akihiro Ito
- Department of Urology; Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Koji Mitsuzuka
- Department of Urology; Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Tatsuo Tochigi
- Department of Urology; Miyagi Cancer Center; Natori Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Takashige Namima
- Department of Urology; Tohoku Rosai Hospital; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Fumihiko Soma
- Department of Urology; Hachinohe City Hospital; Hachinohe Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Masataka Aizawa
- Department of Urology; Japan Community Health Care Organization Sendai Hospital; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Naomasa Ioritani
- Department of Urology; Japan Community Health Care Organization Sendai Hospital; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kaiho
- Department of Urology; Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Yoichi Arai
- Department of Urology; Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Seisen T, Granger B, Colin P, Léon P, Utard G, Renard-Penna R, Compérat E, Mozer P, Cussenot O, Shariat SF, Rouprêt M. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinicopathologic Factors Linked to Intravesical Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy to Treat Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2015; 67:1122-1133. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2014] [Accepted: 11/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
22
|
Narukawa T, Hara T, Arai E, Komiyama M, Kawahara T, Kanai Y, Fujimoto H. Tumour multifocality and grade predict intravesical recurrence after nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma without a history of bladder cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2015; 45:488-93. [PMID: 25681388 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyv019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2014] [Accepted: 01/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) without a history of bladder cancer have a different natural history of intravesical recurrence after nephroureterectomy compared with those with a history of bladder cancer. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors for post-operative intravesical recurrence in patients with non-metastatic upper urinary tract-localized urothelial carcinoma without a history of bladder cancer and who were not taking medication during the perioperative period. METHODS This retrospective study included 133 patients who were treated between 1995 and 2012. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the clinical and pathological factors associated with the cumulative incidence of bladder cancer. RESULTS Of the 133 patients, 51 (38.3%) developed intravesical recurrence during a median follow-up of 71 months (range, 0.8-210.8). In the multivariate analysis, multifocality (P = 0.03) and high tumour grade (P = 0.007) were significantly associated with the cumulative incidence of bladder cancer. We constructed a prediction classification model on the basis of the total number of risk factors. The 2-year cumulative incidence rates were 5.6, 34.8 and 50.0% in individuals with no, one and two risk factors, respectively. There was a significant difference between patients with no risk factors and those with two risk factors (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Although this retrospective study had several limitations, tumour multifocality and tumour grade were found to be potential risk factors for intravesical recurrence in our cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tomohiko Hara
- Urology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
| | - Eri Arai
- Division of Molecular Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Yae Kanai
- Division of Molecular Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Diagnostics clinique, urétéroscopique et photodynamique des tumeurs de la voie excrétrice urinaire supérieures : état-de-l’art pour le rapport scientifique annuel de l’Association française d’urologie. Prog Urol 2014; 24:977-86. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2014.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2014] [Revised: 07/16/2014] [Accepted: 07/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
24
|
Hashimoto T, Ohno Y, Nakashima J, Gondo T, Yoshioka K, Ohori M, Tachibana M. Prediction of Multifocal Lesions in Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urology 2014; 84:869-74. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2014] [Revised: 05/17/2014] [Accepted: 05/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
25
|
Gruschwitz T, Gajda M, Enkelmann A, Grimm MO, Wunderlich H, Horstmann M, Junker K. FISH analysis of washing urine from the upper urinary tract for the detection of urothelial cancers. Int Urol Nephrol 2014; 46:1769-74. [PMID: 24752865 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-014-0714-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2014] [Accepted: 04/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To evaluate FISH analysis of washing urine from the upper urinary tract (UUT) in comparison with cytology (Cyt) for the detection of urothelial cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS In 82 patients with symptoms or abnormalities of the UUT sampling of washing urine for FISH and Cyt and a stepwise diagnostic work-up (e.g. retrograde ureteropyelography, ureterorenoscopy and endoscopic biopsy) were performed. In case of endoscopically and/or histologically proven malignancy patients either underwent nephroureterectomy, partial ureterectomy or local treatment. Sensitivity and specificity for FISH and Cyt as well as its combination were determined. RESULTS Urothelial cancer of the UUT was detected in 20 patients. Eleven patients underwent nephroureterectomy, six partial ureterectomy and three endoscopic tumour treatment. This revealed nine pTa, three pT1 and seven muscle-invasive tumours. Twelve tumours were classified as low and seven as high-grade tumours. In one patient with a macroscopic unequivocal finding of tumour, endoscopic laser ablation without histologic confirmation was performed. FISH was evaluable in 76 patients and detected 16 tumours with a sensitivity and specificity of 84.2 and 91.1 %, respectively. Cyt was performed in 79 and was evaluable in 78 patients. It detected ten tumours with a sensitivity and specificity of 52.6 and 91.4 %, respectively. Cyt and FISH together detected 19 tumours with (sensitivity 100 % and specificity 83.6 %). CONCLUSION FISH was more sensitive than and equally specific to Cyt in the detection of urothelial cancers of the UUT. Both markers in combination revealed the best sensitivity, making it a possible approach in future settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten Gruschwitz
- Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, Lessingstr. 1, 07743, Jena, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tanaka N, Kikuchi E, Kanao K, Matsumoto K, Shirotake S, Kobayashi H, Miyazaki Y, Ide H, Obata J, Hoshino K, Hayakawa N, Hagiwara M, Kosaka T, Oyama M, Miyajima A, Momma T, Nakagawa K, Jinzaki M, Hasegawa S, Nakajima Y, Oya M. Independent predictors for bladder outcomes after treatment of intravesical recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy in patients with primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:3151-8. [PMID: 24682698 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3657-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2013] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have described the clinical courses and outcomes in the bladder after treatment of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We investigated the indicators for predicting subsequent bladder outcomes after treatment of intravesical recurrence after RNU. METHODS A total of 241 patients with primary UTUC (pTa-4N0M0) who experienced intravesical recurrence after RNU were included. Of these patients, 101 (41.9 %) underwent Bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatments, whereas 49 (20.3 %) underwent intravesical chemotherapy. The median follow-up period after initial transurethral resection of the bladder tumor was 33 months. Relationships with bladder outcomes were analyzed by using multivariable analysis. RESULTS Ninety-six patients experienced intravesical recurrence, and bladder progression was observed in 13. Cumulative incidence rates of intravesical recurrence at 1 and 5 years after treatment of the first intravesical recurrence were 31.0 and 48.4 %, whereas those of bladder progression at 1 and 5 years thereafter were 2.4 and 8.0 %. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of recurrent tumors and pT1 tumors at the time of the first intravesical relapse were independent risk factors for subsequent intravesical recurrence. With respect to bladder progression, multivariate analysis showed that pT1 tumors, the appearance of concomitant carcinoma-in situ at the time of the first intravesical relapse, and the absence of the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment were independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective study presents a detailed picture of further bladder outcomes after intravesical recurrence after RNU in primary UTUC patients. The results may assist physicians to develop a more rational protocol in bladder surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuyuki Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pattern and risk factors of intravesical recurrence after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a large Chinese center experience. J Formos Med Assoc 2013; 113:820-7. [PMID: 24360737 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2013] [Revised: 11/06/2013] [Accepted: 11/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE There is currently no consensus about the pattern and risk factors of bladder recurrence after nephroureterectomy, especially in the Chinese population. We evaluated the pattern and risk factors based on data from a large Chinese center. METHODS The clinical and pathological data of 438 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), who underwent nephroureterectomy at Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China between 2000 and 2010, was retrospectively analyzed. Univariate analysis by log-rank test and multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to determine the independent risk factors. RESULTS A total of 135 patients (30.8%) developed intravesical recurrence within a median follow-up of 45 months (range: 12-144 months). The median interval of bladder recurrence was 15 months (range: 2.0-98.0 months), and the two peaks for recurrence were 4-6 months and 17-19 months. Lower tumor grade, tumor multifocality, concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) and tumors located in the lower ureter were significant risk factors by univariate and multivariate analysis. A risk-scoring system was developed and a significant difference was found between different risk evaluations. Patients with concomitant CIS tended to develop a late bladder recurrence. One hundred and eighteen patients (87.4%) received transurethral resection after bladder tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION Lower tumor grade, tumor multifocality, concomitant CIS and tumors located in the lower ureter tend to be predictive for bladder recurrence after nephroureterectomy, although the underlying mechanism is not fully elucidated, and the scoring system could help risk stratification. Most recurrent tumors could be treated by transurethral resection and there were two peaks for recurrence, which is probably related to the mechanisms and may be unique to the Chinese population.
Collapse
|
28
|
Tanaka N, Kikuchi E, Kanao K, Matsumoto K, Shirotake S, Kobayashi H, Miyazaki Y, Ide H, Obata J, Hoshino K, Hayakawa N, Kosaka T, Oyama M, Miyajima A, Momma T, Nakagawa K, Jinzaki M, Nakajima Y, Oya M. The predictive value of positive urine cytology for outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy in patients with primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. Urol Oncol 2013; 32:48.e19-26. [PMID: 24055429 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2013] [Revised: 06/02/2013] [Accepted: 07/01/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Few studies have addressed the predictive value of positive urine cytology for prognosis in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We investigated whether the status of preoperative urine cytology could provide additional prognostic information following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 474 patients with primary nonmetastatic UTUC (pTa-4N0M0) from a retrospective multi-institutional cohort. The median follow-up period was 35 months. Associations between the status of urine cytologic evaluation and outcomes were analyzed using multivariate Cox regression models. Urine cytology was evaluated preoperatively using voided samples. Disease recurrence was defined as any relapse in nonbladder lesions and was coded separately from intravesical recurrence. RESULTS Positive urine cytology was detected in 184 patients (38.8%) preoperatively. Disease recurrence occurred in 127 patients, while intravesical recurrence occurred in 219 patients; 83 patients died of UTUC during follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that only the incidence of intravesical recurrence was significantly associated with the status of urine cytologic evaluation (P = 0.024); the intravesical recurrence-free survival rates at 1 and 3 years following RNU were 61.4% and 46.2% in patients with positive urine cytology and 71.1% and 51.6% in their counterparts, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that gender (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.28-2.43), tumor multifocality in RNU specimens (HR = 1.64, 95% CI; 1.09-2.47), and positive urine cytology (HR = 1.41, 95% CI; 1.08-1.85) were independent risk factors for subsequent intravesical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS The results showed the prognostic value of positive urine cytology in patients with primary UTUC, and preoperative positive urine cytology may be associated with a significant increase in the prevalence of intravesical recurrence following RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuyuki Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Musashino Yowakai Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Kikuchi
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kent Kanao
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Suguru Shirotake
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, International Medical Center-Comprehensive Cancer Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Miyazaki
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Ogikubo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Ide
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Saitama City Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Jun Obata
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsura Hoshino
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Nozomi Hayakawa
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeo Kosaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Irumagawa Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masafumi Oyama
- Department of Urology, International Medical Center-Comprehensive Cancer Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akira Miyajima
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Momma
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization, Saitama Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Ken Nakagawa
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Jinzaki
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Nakajima
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ito A, Shintaku I, Satoh M, Ioritani N, Tochigi T, Numata I, Namima T, Kambe K, Kyan A, Ueno S, Katoh S, Adachi H, Yamashita S, Yamaguchi T, Arai Y, Aizawa M, Kawamura S, Aoki H, Takeda A, Namiki S, Ikeda Y, Tokuyama S. Intravesical Seeding of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Cells During Nephroureterectomy: An Exploratory Analysis from the THPMG Trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2013; 43:1139-44. [DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyt129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
30
|
Ito A, Shintaku I, Satoh M, Ioritani N, Aizawa M, Tochigi T, Kawamura S, Aoki H, Numata I, Takeda A, Namiki S, Namima T, Ikeda Y, Kambe K, Kyan A, Ueno S, Orikasa K, Katoh S, Adachi H, Tokuyama S, Ishidoya S, Yamaguchi T, Arai Y. Prospective Randomized Phase II Trial of a Single Early Intravesical Instillation of Pirarubicin (THP) in the Prevention of Bladder Recurrence After Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: The THP Monotherapy Study Group Trial. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:1422-7. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.45.2128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We evaluated the efficacy of a single early intravesical instillation of pirarubicin (THP) in the prevention of bladder recurrence after nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC). Patients and Methods From December 2005 to November 2008, 77 patients clinically diagnosed with UUT-UC from 11 institutions participating in the Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group were preoperatively enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive or not receive a single instillation of THP (30 mg in 30 mL of saline) into the bladder within 48 hours after nephroureterectomy. Cystoscopy and urinary cytology were repeated every 3 months for 2 years or until the occurrence of first bladder recurrence. Results Seventy-two patients were evaluable for efficacy analysis, 21 of whom had a subsequent bladder recurrence. Significantly fewer patients who received THP had a recurrence compared with the control group (16.9% at 1 year and 16.9% at 2 years in the THP group v 31.8% at 1 year and 42.2% at 2 years in the control group; log-rank P = .025). No remarkable adverse events were observed in the THP-treated group. Based on multivariate analysis, THP instillation (hazard rate [HR], 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.91; P = .035) and open surgery (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.84; P = .024) were independently predictive of a reduced incidence of bladder recurrence. Conclusion In this prospective randomized phase II study, a single intravesical instillation of THP seemed to reduce bladder recurrence after nephroureterectomy. A phase III, large-scale, multicenter study is needed to confirm these observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiro Ito
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Ichiro Shintaku
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Makoto Satoh
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Naomasa Ioritani
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Masataka Aizawa
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Tatsuo Tochigi
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Sadafumi Kawamura
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Hiroshi Aoki
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Isao Numata
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Atsushi Takeda
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Shunichi Namiki
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Takashige Namima
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Yoshihiro Ikeda
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Koichi Kambe
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Atsushi Kyan
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Seiji Ueno
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Kazuhiko Orikasa
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Shinnosuke Katoh
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Hisanobu Adachi
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Satoru Tokuyama
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Shigeto Ishidoya
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Takuhiro Yamaguchi
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Yoichi Arai
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cho DS, Kim SI, Ahn HS, Kim SJ. Predictive factors for bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Int 2013; 91:153-9. [PMID: 23391941 DOI: 10.1159/000346086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2012] [Accepted: 11/24/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To identify predictive factors for developing subsequent bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC) in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract UC (UUT-UC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 78 patients with clinically localized UUT-UC who had undergone operation at our institution between June 1994 and December 2009. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine the predictive factors. RESULTS Out of a total of 78 patients, 14 (17.9%) developed bladder UC after radical nephroureterectomy at a median interval of 10 months (range: 3-46). Of these 14 patients, 11 (78.6%) experienced bladder recurrence within the first 2 years of follow-up. All 14 patients (100%) had non-muscle-invasive bladder UC and 10 patients (71.4%) had high-grade tumors. The univariate analysis identified preoperative voided urine cytology, tumor configuration, and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy as significant predictive factors for bladder recurrence, whereas the multivariate analysis indicated that only preoperative voided urine cytology was an independent predictive factor. CONCLUSIONS Positive preoperative voided urine cytology is an independent predictor for bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for UUT-UC. Therefore, closer surveillance of the bladder is necessary, especially in patients with positive preoperative urine cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dae Sung Cho
- Department of Urology, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|