1
|
Lakhoo J, Khatri G, Elsayed RF, Chernyak V, Olpin J, Steiner A, Tammisetti VS, Sundaram KM, Arora SS. MRI of the Male Pelvic Floor. Radiographics 2019; 39:2003-2022. [PMID: 31697623 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019190064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
The pelvic floor is a complex structure that supports the pelvic organs and provides resting tone and voluntary control of the urethral and anal sphincters. Dysfunction of or injury to the pelvic floor can lead to gastrointestinal, urinary, and sexual dysfunction. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders is much lower in men than in women, and because of this, the majority of the published literature pertaining to MRI of the pelvic floor is oriented toward evaluation of the female pelvic floor. The male pelvic floor has sex-specific differences in anatomy and pathophysiologic disorders. Despite these differences, static and dynamic MRI features of these disorders, specifically gastrointestinal disorders, are similar in both sexes. MRI and MR defecography can be used to evaluate anorectal disorders related to the pelvic floor. MRI can also be used after prostatectomy to help predict the risk of postsurgical incontinence, to evaluate postsurgical function by using dynamic voiding MR cystourethrography, and subsequently, to assess causes of incontinence treatment failure. Increased tone of the pelvic musculature in men secondary to chronic pain can lead to sexual dysfunction. This article reviews normal male pelvic floor anatomy and how it differs from the female pelvis; MRI techniques for imaging the male pelvis; and urinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual conditions related to abnormalities of pelvic floor structures in men.Online supplemental material is available for this article.©RSNA, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janesh Lakhoo
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave South, CCC1121, Nashville, TN 37232 (J.L., K.M.S., S.S.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.); Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt (R.F.E.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (J.O.); Department of Radiology, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside, NY (A.S.); and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (V.S.T.)
| | - Gaurav Khatri
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave South, CCC1121, Nashville, TN 37232 (J.L., K.M.S., S.S.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.); Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt (R.F.E.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (J.O.); Department of Radiology, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside, NY (A.S.); and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (V.S.T.)
| | - Rania F Elsayed
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave South, CCC1121, Nashville, TN 37232 (J.L., K.M.S., S.S.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.); Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt (R.F.E.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (J.O.); Department of Radiology, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside, NY (A.S.); and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (V.S.T.)
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave South, CCC1121, Nashville, TN 37232 (J.L., K.M.S., S.S.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.); Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt (R.F.E.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (J.O.); Department of Radiology, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside, NY (A.S.); and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (V.S.T.)
| | - Jeffrey Olpin
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave South, CCC1121, Nashville, TN 37232 (J.L., K.M.S., S.S.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.); Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt (R.F.E.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (J.O.); Department of Radiology, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside, NY (A.S.); and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (V.S.T.)
| | - Ari Steiner
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave South, CCC1121, Nashville, TN 37232 (J.L., K.M.S., S.S.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.); Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt (R.F.E.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (J.O.); Department of Radiology, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside, NY (A.S.); and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (V.S.T.)
| | - Varaha S Tammisetti
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave South, CCC1121, Nashville, TN 37232 (J.L., K.M.S., S.S.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.); Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt (R.F.E.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (J.O.); Department of Radiology, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside, NY (A.S.); and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (V.S.T.)
| | - Karthik M Sundaram
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave South, CCC1121, Nashville, TN 37232 (J.L., K.M.S., S.S.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.); Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt (R.F.E.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (J.O.); Department of Radiology, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside, NY (A.S.); and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (V.S.T.)
| | - Sandeep S Arora
- From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave South, CCC1121, Nashville, TN 37232 (J.L., K.M.S., S.S.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (G.K.); Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt (R.F.E.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (J.O.); Department of Radiology, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside, NY (A.S.); and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (V.S.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kahokehr AA, Selph JP, Belsante MJ, Bashir M, Sofue K, Tausch TJ, Brand TC, Lloyd JC, Goldsmith ZG, Walter JR, Peterson AC. Mechanism of Action of the Transobturator Sling for Post-Radical Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Multi-institutional Prospective Study Using Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Urology 2018; 116:185-192. [PMID: 29567018 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the length of the membranous (functional) urethra in male patients who underwent the male transobturator sling (TOS) for postradical prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI). The TOS is in established use for treatment of PPI; however, the precise mechanism of action is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a prospective case-controlled study on men undergoing male TOS surgery from 2008 to 2014. The comparison arm included patients without incontinence after radical prostatectomy. All participants underwent dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and this was repeated after TOS placement for those who underwent the procedure. Three standardized points were measured using MRI and compared in both groups in addition to clinical measures. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and 31 patients completed the protocols. The controls (N = 14) had a longer vesicourethral anastomosis to urethra measured at the penile bulb (functional urethral length) distance compared to the pre-TOS group at rest (1.92 cm controls vs 1.27 cm pre-TOS, P = .0018) and at Valsalva (2.13 cm controls vs 1.72 cm pre-TOS, P = .0371). Placement of the sling (N = 17) increased the functional urethral length distance at rest (1.92 cm control vs 1.53 cm post-TOS, P = .09) and at Valsalva (1.94 cm post-TOS vs 2.13 cm control, P = .61), so that the difference was no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSION We identified that one possible mechanism in improvement in stress urinary incontinence post-TOS placement is the lengthening of the vesicourethral anastomosis to bulbar-urethra distance. This is the first such study utilizing dynamics MRI in post prostatectomy controls, incontinent pre-TOS, and post-TOS to assess and show these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arman A Kahokehr
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
| | - John P Selph
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - Mustafa Bashir
- Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Keitaro Sofue
- Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Timothy J Tausch
- Department of Urology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
| | - Timothy C Brand
- Division of Urology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA
| | - Jessica C Lloyd
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | - Jack R Walter
- Division of Urology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pistolesi D, Zampa V, Gozzi C, Mariani C, Santarsieri M, Faggioni L, Bartolozzi C, Selli C. Could the sling position influence the clinical outcome in male patients treated for urinary incontinence? A magnetic resonance imaging study with a 3 tesla system. Urology 2014; 83:471-6. [PMID: 24468516 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2013] [Revised: 10/01/2013] [Accepted: 10/18/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the morphologic changes visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after sling procedure in continent patients and to compare MRI findings with the incontinent ones, to detect possible factors explaining the different clinical outcomes. METHODS Twenty-seven male patients who were treated with Advance sling for urinary stress incontinence after prostate surgery were enrolled: 16 had clinical recovery, whereas 11 had persistent incontinence. Patients after sling were defined as continent if used 0-1 dry "security pad" or incontinent >1 pad. Magnetic Resonance examinations were performed with a 3 Tesla system and included 3-dimensional T2-weighted sequence. Three readers performed a qualitative (representation of the bulb and indentation of the sling) and a quantitative analysis (length of the bulb posterior to the sling and distance of the sling from a line bisecting the pubic symphysis). RESULTS The sling was clearly recognizable in all 16 continent patients but only in 2 of 11 incontinent ones. The length of the bulb posterior to the sling was >10 mm (range, 10-28) in all continent patients and in 2 of the incontinent ones. The sling was coincident with a line drawn through the long axis of the pubic bone in 9 of 16 continent patients. A statistically significant association was found between MRI qualitative findings and continence status (P <.0001). CONCLUSION On the basis of our MRI results, the position of the sling and, in particular, the length of the urethral bulb posterior to the sling seem to be correlated with continence and must be considered in case of treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Virna Zampa
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Christian Gozzi
- Department of Urology, Health Agency of South Tyrol, Bressanone, Italy
| | | | | | - Lorenzo Faggioni
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Carlo Bartolozzi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Cesare Selli
- Department of Urology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|