Prostate cancer in men aged less than 50 years at diagnosis

Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted vs. Open Radical Prostatectomy in Quadragenarians

Background/Objectives: Adverse in-hospital outcomes at radical prostatectomy have not been specifically addressed in young patients aged 40-49 years (quadragenarians). Additionally, no comparison between robot-assisted (RARP) vs. open radical prostatectomy (ORP) has been reported in this population. Methods: Descriptive analyses, propensity score matching (PSM), and multivariable logistic/Poisson regression models addressed quadragenarians undergoing RARP or ORP within the National Inpatient Sample (2009-2019). Results: Of 5426 quadragenarians, 4083 (75.2%) and 1343 (24.8%) underwent RARP and ORP, respectively. The proportion of RARP increased from 68.1 to 84.5% (2009-2019, EAPC: +2.8%, p < 0.001). Adverse in-hospital outcomes after RARP were invariably lower than those after ORP. Specifically, the rates of overall complications (7.8 vs. 13.4%, Δ -5.6%, multivariable odds ratio (OR): 0.54), blood transfusions (1.2 vs. 6.3%, Δ -5.1%, OR: 0.21), and length of stay (LOS) > 2 days (10.6 vs. 28.7%, Δ -18.1%, OR: 0.32) were lower after RARP than after ORP (all p < 0.001). After additional one-to-one PSM between ORP and RARP patients, virtually the same results were reported (overall complications: 7.0 vs. 13.4%, Δ -6.4%, OR: 0.49; blood transfusion rates: 1.5 vs. 6.3%, Δ -4.8%, OR: 0.23; LOS > 2 days: 10.9 vs. 28.7%, Δ -17.8%, OR: 0.30). Conversely, RARP use resulted in higher total hospital charges (USD 43,690 vs. 36,840, Δ USD +6850, IRR: 1.18; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Quadragenarians exhibited a more favorable adverse in-hospital outcome profile after RARP vs. ORP. These advantages are offset by a small, albeit significant, increase in total hospital charges.

Width of spared neurovascular bundle after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer: is it a reliable factor for predicting postoperative sexual outcome?

Purpose

To investigate the relationship between the width of spared neurovascular bundle (NVB) measured during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and postoperative sexual outcomes.

Methods

Patients with localized prostate cancer with erectile hardness score ≥2 (N = 105) who underwent NVB-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy were included. Patients were divided into three groups [first (Q1) vs. second and third (Q2-3) vs. fourth (Q4) quartile] according to width of spared NVB measured with a flexible ruler after prostate removal. Preoperative and postoperative sexual function was evaluated according to erectile hardness score and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaires.

Results

The proportion of patients with postoperative erectile hardness score ≥2 at postoperative 6 months was as follows: 38.9% (Q1), 48.6% (Q2–3), and 83.3% (Q4) (P = 0.016). The preoperative/postoperative 6-month sexual function score was 40.7/16.9 (Q1), 48.1/19.0 (Q2–3), and 51.2/28.1 (Q4). Postoperative sexual function was significantly associated with preoperative sexual function in Q4 (P = 0.006) and Q2–3 (P = 0.030) but not in Q1. On multivariate analysis, the width of spared NVB was a significant predictor for postoperative 6-month erectile hardness score ≥2. Limitation includes selection bias and short follow-up duration.

Conclusions

Not only the performance but also the degree and quality of NVB sparing thought to be important for postoperative sexual function. Measurement of the width of NVB during surgery could be an easy intraoperative method for assessing the quality of NVB sparing.

Impact of Grade Groups on Prostate Cancer-Specific and Other-Cause Mortality: Competing Risk Analysis from a Large Single Institution Series

Simple Summary

For prostate cancer patient, information on risk of long-term cancer-specific and other-cause mortality is essential to avoid over- and undertreatment. Patient stratification to low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups has been used for decades. However, recent evidence has shown that such stratification is not optimal and outcomes differ widely, especially in high-risk prostate cancer patients. Gleason score grading is an important factor for the prediction of cancer-specific survival and has been included in all prostate cancer risk stratification models. Moreover, this parameter could be used as an independent predictor. Recently proposed grade group model demonstrated good predictive probability on short-term outcomes. However, there is a lack of data regarding long-term cancer-specific survival. In the presented study, we analyzed long-term oncological outcomes in different grade groups. Detected ratio between cancer-specific and other-cause mortality could be very informative and helpful in prostate cancer patient risk stratification and more precise clinical decision making.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the risk of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) using post-operative International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (GG) model in patients after radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and Methods: Overall 1921 consecutive men who underwent RP during 2001 to 2017 in a single tertiary center were included in the study. Multivariate competing risk regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors and quantify cumulative incidence of CSM and OCM. Time-depending area under the curve (AUC) depicted the performance of GG model on prediction of CSM. Results: Over a median follow-up of 7.9-year (IQR 4.4-11.7) after RP, 235 (12.2%) deaths were registered, and 52 (2.7%) of them were related to PCa. GG model showed high and stable performance (time-dependent AUC 0.88) on prediction of CSM. Cumulative 10-year CSM in GGs 1 to 5 was 0.9%, 2.3%, 7.6%, 14.7%, and 48.6%, respectively; 10-year OCM in GGs was 15.5%, 16.1%, 12.6%, 17.7% and 6.5%, respectively. The ratio between 10-year CSM/OCM in GGs 1 to 5 was 1:17, 1:7, 1:2, 1:1, and 7:1, respectively. Conclusions: Cancer-specific and other-cause mortality differed widely between GGs. Presented findings could aid in personalized clinical decision making for active treatment.

Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of prostate cancer diagnosed in young men aged up to 45 years

AIMS

To characterise and compare the poorly understood clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) in very young patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared the clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of PCa diagnosed in 90 patients aged ≤45 years with those of PCa diagnosed in 200 patients of typical screening age (i.e. 60-65 years). Patients diagnosed at a younger age had a higher frequency of a family history of PCa and lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels than those diagnosed at regular screening age. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical stage or pathological characteristics of the core biopsy specimens between the groups. Young patients had a higher frequency of Grade Group 1 disease at radical prostatectomy. A subset of 13 aggressive PCa cases from young patients underwent successful DNA-based next-generation sequencing. In all, 46.2% (6/13) had TMPRSS2 rearrangements and 23.1% (3/13) had relevant pathogenic variants in DNA damage repair genes, including a mismatch repair-deficient case with biallelic inactivation of MLH1. No statistically significant differences were observed in PCa-specific recurrence/progression between the younger and older patients, including after adjustment for clinical stage, PSA level, and Grade Group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the clinicopathological and molecular features of PCa diagnosed in young patients were comparable to those of PCa diagnosed in patients of screening age. Early-onset PCa cases were not enriched in any of the known molecular PCa subtypes in this small series.

Early-onset prostate cancer is associated with increased risks of disease progression and cancer-specific mortality

OBJECTIVE

Prostate cancer (PCa) incidence has stabilized but not in patients at a young age. We assessed patient characteristics and disease progression in early-onset PCa.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 28,039 newly diagnosed PCa patients aged ≥35 years was constructed using the Taiwan Cancer Registry in 2008-2016. Patients were categorized by age at diagnosis (≤54, 55-59, 60-69, 70-74, and ≥75 years). The clinical stage at diagnosis, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis, Charlson's comorbidity index, and primary and secondary treatments for PCa were included in the analysis. All-cause mortality and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) were reported. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimating the risks of death and of receiving secondary cancer treatment were generated by Cox hazard models.

RESULTS

In patients aged ≤54, 55-59, and 60-69 years, about 60% of them in each group were classified into the high-risk, very high-risk, or metastatic group. However, young patients ≤54 years had a higher risk of PCSM than patients aged 60-69 years (HR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.10-1.49). This trend of an increased risk in PCSM remained for high-risk, very high-risk, or metastatic patients (HR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.01-1.51), but not in low- or intermediate-risk patients. Besides, young patients diagnosed with high-risk diseases had the highest risk of receiving secondary cancer treatment within 180 days after completing primary treatment among all age groups (HR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.07-1.63).

CONCLUSIONS

PCa arising in young patients ≤54 years of age, especially those with a high risk or metastatic form, might be more aggressive than that in other age groups.

Clinicopathological characteristics of localized prostate cancer in younger men aged ≤ 50 years treated with radical prostatectomy in the PSA era: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

With the rapid increase in younger age prostate cancer (PCa) patients, the impact of younger age on decision‐making for PCa treatment needs to be revaluated in the new era.

Materials and Methods

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to October 2019 to identify the eligible radical prostatectomy (RP) studies focusing on understanding the impact of age on clinicopathological features and oncological prognosis in patients with localized PCa in PSA era. Meta‐analyses were conducted using available hazard ratios (HRs) from both univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Twenty‐six studies including 391 068 patients with RP treatments from the PSA era were included. Of these studies, age of 50 years old (age50) is the most commonly used cut‐off age to separate the younger patient group (including either age < 50 or age ≤ 50) from the older patient group. In these studies, the incidence of younger patients varied between 2.6% and 16.6% with a median of 8.3%. Younger patients consistently showed more favorable clinicopathological features correlated with better BCR prognosis. Meta‐analyses showed a 1.38‐fold improved BCR survival of younger patients in multivariate analysis. Among the high‐risk PCa patients, younger age was independently associated with worse oncological outcomes in multivariate analyses.

Conclusion

In this study, we found younger age correlated with favorable clinicopathological characteristics and better BCR prognosis in low‐ to intermediate‐risk patients. In high‐risk group patients, younger patients often showed significantly worse oncological outcomes. Our study results suggest that age 50 could be used as a practical cut‐off age to separate younger age patients from older age PCa patients.

Outcomes of men aged ≤50 years treated with radical prostatectomy: a retrospective analysis

Previous studies investigating prostate cancer (PCa) features in younger men have reported conflicting findings. This study aimed to investigate pathologic outcomes and biochemical recurrence (BCR) status in younger men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for PCa. Records of 2057 patients who underwent RP at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (Seongnam, Korea) between 2006 and 2015 were reviewed; patients were divided according to age into the younger and older groups (men aged ≤50 and >50 years, respectively). Postoperative BCR status and functional outcomes and clinicopathologic features were compared between both groups. All analyses were repeated after propensity score matching. Younger men were more likely to have low-risk disease (P < 0.001), lower pathologic Gleason score (P < 0.001) and pathologic stages (P < 0.001) than older men. The pathologic Gleason score (P = 0.002) and rates of extracapsular extension (P = 0.004) were lower in younger men after propensity score matching. In multivariate analysis, age at RP was not an independent predictor of BCR-free survival after RP (P = 0.669). Moreover, at 1 year after RP, younger men with preoperative 5-item International Index of Erectile Function score ≥22 (n = 228) showed more favorable results for urinary continence (defined as nonuse of pads daily) (99.4% vs 95%, P = 0.009) and erections sufficient for vaginal intercourse (81.8% vs 55.5%, P = 0.001). Younger men had more favorable clinicopathologic features at RP than their older counterparts. Although age was not an independent predictor of BCR status outcome, younger men had better functional outcomes following RP.

Age and aggressiveness of prostate cancer: analysis of clinical and pathological characteristics after radical prostatectomy for men with localized prostate cancer

Introduction

The aim of this study was to describe age- related prostate cancer (PCa) characteristics in men after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Material and methods

There were 2,373 men who underwent RP for clinically localized PCa between 2002 and 2017 and had complete data that were included into the study. Among them, 315 (13.3%) men aged ≤55 years (GR-1), 1,098 (46.3%) men aged between 56 to 65 years (GR-2) and 960 (40.4%) men aged older than 65 years (GR-3) were identified. All preoperative and pathological parameters were compared between all three groups and between each group separately. High-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) cases were analyzed separately. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of age on cancer aggressiveness.

Result

Clinical stage (cT), biopsy Gleason score and D'Amico risk groups were different comparing age-related study groups (all p <0.01), respectively. Preoperatively cT1 and Gleason 6 were in the highest rate for GR-1 in comparison with GR-3: 35.9 vs. 27.1%, p = 0.003 and 65.1% vs. 56.7%, p = 0.008, respectively. Analyzing pathological parameters, only Gleason 9–10 was different between GR-1 and GR-3–3.8 vs. 7.6%, p = 0.02. There were 921 (38.8%) HRPCa cases identified. Age was a significant predictor for HRPCa (p = 0.019) in the regression analysis. The oldest men (GR-3) had up to 1.5 fold increased risk for HRPCa detection in comparison with the youngest one (p = 0.008, HR1.44. 95% CI 1.098–1.87).

Conclusions

Younger, ≤55-year-old men, are more likely to present with less aggressive clinical and pathological PCa features in comparison with the older ones. Increasing age has a significant influence on HRPCa detection after RP.

Pathological Characteristics of Prostate Cancer in Men Aged < 50 Years Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: a Multi-Centre Study in Korea

BACKGROUND

Recently, younger prostate cancer (PCa) patients have been reported to harbour more favourable disease characteristics after radical prostatectomy (RP) than older men. We analysed young men (<50 years) with PCa among the Korean population, paying attention to pathological characteristics on RP specimen and biochemical recurrence (BCR).

METHODS

The multi-centre, Severance Urological Oncology Group registry was utilized to identify 622 patients with clinically localized or locally advanced PCa, who were treated with RP between 2001 and 2017. Patients were dichotomized into two groups according to age (< 50-year-old [n = 75] and ≥ 50-year-old [n = 547]), and clinicopathological characteristics were analysed. Propensity score matching was used when assessing BCR between the two groups.

RESULTS

Although biopsy Gleason score (GS) was lower in younger patients (P = 0.033), distribution of pathologic GS was similar between the two groups (13.3% vs. 13.9% for GS ≥ 8, P = 0.191). There was no significant difference in pathologic T stage between the < 50- and ≥ 50-year-old groups (69.3% vs. 68.0% in T2 and 30.7% vs. 32.0% in ≥ T3, P = 0.203). The positive surgical margin rates were similar between the two groups (20.0% vs. 27.6%, P = 0.178). BCR-free survival rates were also similar (P = 0.644) between the two groups, after propensity matching.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to prior reports, younger PCa patients did not have more favourable pathologic features on RP specimen and showed similar BCR rates compared to older men. These findings should be considered when making treatment decisions for young Korean patients with PCa.

Multiparametric Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active Surveillance Protocol

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the role of confirmatory multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate at the time of Active Surveillance (AS) enrollment to reduce disease misclassification.

MATERIALS

From 2012 to 2016, 383 patients with low-risk disease respecting Prostate Cancer Research International AS criteria underwent confirmatory 1.5-T mpMRI. AS was proposed to patients with Prostate Imaging and Report and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≤3 and no extraprostatic extension (EPE), whereas patients with PI-RADS score ≥4 and/or EPE were treated actively. Kaplan-Meier analyses quantified progression-free survival (PFS) in patients enrolled in the AS program. Logistic regression analyses tested the association between confirmatory mpMRI and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) at radical prostatectomy (RP). Diagnostic performance of mpMRI was calculated in patients submitted to immediate RP.

RESULTS

PFS rate was 99, 90 and 86% at 1, 2 and 3 years respectively. At multivariable analysis, PI-RADS 3, PI-RADS 4, PI-RADS 5 and EPE increased the probability of having csPCa at immediate RP (PI-RADS 3 [OR] 1.2, p = 0.26; PI-RADS 4 [OR] 5.1, p = 0.02; PI-RADS 5 [OR] 6.7; p = 0.009; EPE [OR] 11.8, p < 0.001). Confirmatory mpMRI showed sensibility, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 85, 55, 68 and 76% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MpMRI at the time of AS enrollment reduces the misclassification rate of csPCa. We suggest to perform target biopsies in patients with PI-RADS score 3 and 4 lesions.

Survival outcomes of younger men (< 55 years) undergoing radical prostatectomy

Background

The aim of the paper is to investigate the outcomes of patients younger than 55 years in Victoria, Australia undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer.

Materials and methods

Data on all men undergoing RP in Victoria between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2014 were obtained from the Victorian Cancer Registry. Tumor characteristics including Gleason grade, stage of disease (based on final pathology specimen), and cause of death were also obtained. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square test, Cox proportional hazards method, and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

A total of 14,686 men underwent RP during the defined period. Of these men 109 were aged 35–44 years and 1,998 were aged 45–54 years. Men aged 35–44 years and 45–54 years were compared against men aged 55–74 years. The majority of men between the ages of 35 years and 44 years, and 45 years and 54 years had higher rates of Gleason ≤ 7 disease compared with men aged between 55 years and 74 years (92.7% vs. 86.8% vs. 79.3%; P < 0.01) and ≤ T2 disease (82.6% vs. 75.6% vs. 49.9%; P < 0.01) but similar median prostate-specific antigen values. On a multivariate analysis adjusting for Gleason score, T stage, and prostate-specific antigen, men aged 45–54 years and 55–64 years had 67% and 46% increase in overall survival, respectively, compared to men aged 65–74 years; but these differences were not seen in the 35–44 year age group. There were no differences in prostate cancer specific deaths between the groups. The 5- and 10-year overall survival outcomes were both higher for men aged 45–54 years compared to mean aged 55–74 years (97.9% vs. 95.9% and 94.9% vs. 85.3).

Conclusion

Men aged 45–54 years undergoing RP had better overall survival compared to men aged 55–74 years, but these effects were not seen in men aged 35–44 years. There were no differences in prostate cancer specific survival in these groups.

Long-Term Oncological Outcomes for Young Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer

Aim. The aim of this study was to describe PCa characteristics and long-term outcomes in young men aged ≤55 years after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to compare them with older men cohort. Methods. Among 2,200 patients who underwent RP for clinically localized PCa at our centre between 2001 and 2015, 277 (10.3%) men aged ≤55 years were identified. All preoperative and pathological parameters were compared between groups. Biochemical progression free survival (BPFS) and disease progression free survival (DPFS) were assessed at 5 and 10 years. Results. Men aged ≤55 years had similar pathological tumor characteristics and biochemical recurrence rate (BCR) compared to their older counterparts. Disease progression rate 2.5% versus 0.4% was higher in older patients (p = 0.026). BPFS rate was not different in both study groups. Estimated 10-year DPFS was 98.8% in younger men compared to 89.2% in their older counterparts (p = 0.031). Multivariate Cox regression showed that Gleason score lymph-nodes and surgical margins status were significant predictors for disease progression. Conclusions. In our cohort, men aged ≤55 years had similar pathological PCa characteristics and BCR rate in comparison with older men. RP can be performed with excellent long-term DPFS results in men with localized PCa at ≤55 years of age.

Are the Pathological Characteristics of Prostate Cancer More Aggressive or More Indolent Depending upon the Patient Age?

Purpose. To identify pathological characteristics of prostate cancer according to patient age at diagnosis. Methods. A retrospective review of 2,929 men diagnosed with prostate cancer was performed. Pathological characteristics were compared across age groups: ≤55, 56–75, and >75 years. Results. The study cohort included 133 patients (4.5%), 2,033 patients (69.5%), and 763 patients (26.0%) in the three age groups, respectively. The median pathological Gleason sums in the three age groups were 8, 7, and 8, respectively. The Gleason sum, primary Gleason score, and second primary Gleason score were significantly different among the three age groups (Z = 12.975, p = 0.002; Z = 9.264, p = 0.010; Z = 6.692, p = 0.035, resp.). The percentages of Gleason pattern 5 tumors for the three age groups were 44.4%, 32.3%, and 36.8%, respectively; they were significantly different (χ² = 11.641, p = 0.003). The percentages of tumors with Gleason score grade groups 3–5 for the three age groups were 66.9%, 60.5%, and 66.3%, respectively; they were significantly different (χ² = 9.401, p = 0.009). Conclusions. The present study indicated that men aged ≤55 years or >75 years show higher levels of clinically significant prostate cancer compared to patients between the ages of 55 and 75 years. Younger and more elderly male patients are more likely to have a more aggressive disease.

Clinicopathological, functional, and immediate oncologic outcome assessment in men aged≤50 years with prostate cancer after robotic prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

To define the pathologic and functional outcomes of men 50 years of age and younger with prostate cancer in a contemporary robotic cohort, this study was designed.

METHODS

Patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy from April 2002 to April 2012 (n = 2,495) formed the base population for the current analyses. The patients were dichotomized according to their age≤50 (n = 271) and>50-year-old (n = 2,224). Clinicopathological and health-related quality-of-life outcomes were recorded and analyzed for differences. Propensity score matching was used when assessing urinary and sexual function outcome.

RESULTS

Baseline prostate-specific antigen and clinical stage were similar between men older than 50 years and those younger. Younger patients had less severe disease (D׳Amico risk and Gleason scores) and smaller prostates. Young men had higher rates of erectile function at all time points, including baseline (94% vs. 83% at 12mo, P <0.01). Continence was similar at all time points except for 6 months, where younger patients experienced a faster return than older patients and then remained constant, while older patients continued to improve (96% vs. 89%, P<0.01). After matching process, the difference in erectile function at 6-month follow-up was lost.

CONCLUSION

Most men aged 50 years and younger who received robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy had clinically significant prostate cancer. Although histopathologic and short-term oncologic outcomes were nearly identical when compared to older patients, younger men had a more rapid and superior return of erectile function.