Patterns and timing of artificial urinary sphincter failure

The Impact of Hypogonadism on Surgical Outcomes Following Primary Urethroplasty: Analysis of a Large Multi-institutional Database

OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical outcomes among a cohort of eugonadal and hypogonadal patients undergoing primary urethroplasty (UP).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using TriNetX between 2008-2023. Patients who were eugonadal and hypogonadal (symptoms plus testosterone <300 ng/dL) prior to UP were compared. A subgroup analysis of hypogonadal patients was performed to compare those with testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) vs TRT-naïve prior to UP. Propensity-score matching was used to adjust for differences in comorbidities. Outcomes were 5-year revision rates and revision-free survival for endoscopic revision and redo UP following primary UP.

RESULTS

We identified 12,556 eugonadal and 488 hypogonadal patients (153 TRT+, 335 TRT-) undergoing UP. Median age at UP and follow-up was 55years and 5years, respectively. After propensity-score matching, we compared 477 eugonadal and 477 hypogonadal patients. Hypogonadal patients had a statistically significantly higher 5-year redo UP rate (11% vs 6%, relative risk [RR] 1.5 [95%CI, 1.2-2.2]; P = .01) when compared to eugonadal patients however there was no difference in 5-year rates of endoscopic revision (11% vs 11%, RR 1.0 [95%CI, 0.7-1.5]; P = 1.0). We observed no difference in 5-year revision-free survival time for endoscopic revision or redo UP between groups. Hypogonadal patients treated with TRT had a significantly higher 5-year redo UP rate (15% vs 7%, RR 1.8 [95%CI, 1.1-3.3]; P = .02) compared to hypogonadal patients that were TRT-naïve prior to UP. There was no difference in rates of endoscopic revision (14% vs 10%, RR 1.3 [95%CI, 0.7-2.4]; P = .2) between subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Pre-existing hypogonadism may modestly adversely affect surgical outcomes following primary UP based on data from a large, retrospective cohort study.

Characterizing and Quantifying Material Fatigue of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter Pressure Regulating Balloon

OBJECTIVE

To characterize and quantify changes in elastic properties and in vivo pressure characteristics of pressure regulating balloons (PRB) over time, we conducted an analysis of the mechanical characteristics of the PRB after removal from patients for revision surgery.

METHODS

Pressure and elasticity characteristics of new and used 61-70 cm H2O PRBs were analyzed. Pressure-volume curves were generated using commercially available urodynamics equipment. PRB pressures were measured at a standard fill volume (23 cc). Elastance was calculated by the slope of the tangent line at the inflection point of the pressure-volume curve. Tests were repeated 5 times per PRB and intraclass correlations were used to gauge test-retest reliability. Regression models were used for continuous variables based on data distribution.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven used PRBs were analyzed after excluding 3 for alternative pressure ratings and 2 for occult pinpoint leaks. Time from artificial urinary sphincter placement to removal ranged from 0.02-17.6 years (median 8.4, interquartile range (IQR) 5.7-10.0). The mean pressure of all extracted PRBs: 58.8 cm H=O (± 7.4), 17 (62.9%) below the standard operating range. Each year of use in-vivo was associated with 1.09 cm H2O pressure loss on linear regression (P <.01 CI -1.52 to -0.65). PRB pressures were not significantly different according to indication for removal (1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) P = .11). Loss of elastance was non-linear, decreasing by 1.9% per year on Poisson regression (P <.01, CI -0.03 to -0.01). When accounting for PRB age, PRB pressure was independently associated with detrusor overactivity.

CONCLUSION

In PRBs tested for pressure-volume characteristics, increasing PRB age was associated with decreased pressure and elasticity.

Quality of Information for Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence Treatments on YouTube

OBJECTIVE

To assess the quality of information on YouTube regarding post-prostatectomy incontinence treatments. The 2019 American Urological Association(AUA)/(SUFU) Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction guidelines recommend the placement of a male sling or artificial urinary sphincter. Patient education is essential for appropriate expectations and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

The top 100 most relevant (default setting) YouTube videos searched with terms "post-prostatectomy incontinence" and "male stress incontinence" were assessed using the validated DISCERN instrument, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials, and a misinformation Likert Scale. Videos with poor video/audio quality, duplicates, and non-English videos were excluded. Four independent raters were randomly assigned such that each video had 2 raters. Data was analyzed using multivariate linear regression, and inter-rater reliability was measured using Cohen's kappa.

RESULTS

The median DISCERN score was 2.5 with 71% of videos scoring <=3. The median PEMAT Actionability and Understandability scores were 64.6 (range 0-100) and 79.9 (range 52-100), respectively. The median misinformation Likert score was 1 range (1-4). Less than half of the videos discussed realistic treatment outcomes or the risks (39% and 24%, respectively). PEMAT Actionability and risk discussion significantly predicted average DISCERN score (p < .001). There were no significant disagreements between raters.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows most videos on post-prostatectomy incontinence had moderate to low quality information and were published by medical professionals. The majority did not sufficiently discuss realistic outcomes and risks, which are hallmarks of informed decision making. This provides an opportunity for the urologic community to create educational materials that adequately supplement shared-decision making for patients treated for post-prostatectomy incontinence.

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Predicts Complications Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) independently predicts adverse outcomes after AUS surgery.

METHODS

Using a large national database, we identified adult males who underwent AUS surgery between 2005-2019. To calculate eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m²), the Cockroft-Gault equation was utilized. Patients were classified into five different groups: 0-29 (advanced chronic kidney disease [CKD]), 30-59 (Stage III CKD), 60-89 (Stage II CKD), 90-119 (normal), and >120 (hyperfiltration). We investigated 30-day outcomes including any complication, readmission, reoperation, major and minor complications, extended length of stay, and non-home discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analysis (MLRA) was performed to assess eGFR categories as independent predictors for each outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 1,910 cases met inclusion criteria. Patients with advanced CKD had a higher frailty burden (5-item modified frailty index ≥2: 39.1% vs. 22.2%), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA III or IV: 95.7% vs. 53.5%), and lower BMI (median kg/m²: 29.3 vs. 30.9) compared to patients with normal eGFR. Likewise, patients with advanced CKD had higher rates of any complication, readmission, reoperation, extended length of stay, non-home discharge, as well as major and minor complications, compared to patients with normal eGFR. On MLRA, advanced CKD (0-29) was independently associated with reoperation (OR 5.14; 95% CI 1.06 - 20.84; p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced CKD had a higher likelihood of reoperation when compared to patients with normal eGFR. Patients with advanced CKD should be counseled prior to AUS surgery due to a potential higher risk of 30-day reoperation.

Impact of Radiation Therapy on Outcomes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

To compare incontinence rates and complications in patients receiving artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) with or without radiotherapy (RT).

Methods

PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies comparing outcomes of AUS between patients with and without RT. Search limits were from 1st January 2002 to 15th September 2021.

Results

Eighteen studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed statistically significant reduced odds of the absence of incontinence in the RT group (OR: 0.35 95% CI: 0.21, 0.59 I2 = 51% p &lt; 0.0001) as compared to the no-RT group. We also noted statistically significant increased risk of revision surgery in the RT group (OR: 1.74 95% CI: 1.16, 2.60 I2 = 73% p = 0.07). There was increased risk of infections (OR: 2.51 95% CI: 1.00, 6.29 I2 = 46% p = 0.05) and erosions (OR: 2.00 95% CI: 1.15, 3.45 I2 = 21% p = 0.01) in the RT group, but the difference was significant only for erosions. Meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant increased risk of explantation in patients with RT (OR: 3.00 95% CI: 1.16, 7.75 I2 = 68% p = 0.02) but there was no difference in the risk of urethral atrophy (OR: 1.18 95% CI: 0.47, 2.94 I2 = 46% p = 0.72) and mechanical failure (OR: 0.90 95% CI: 0.25, 3.27 I2 = 54% p = 0.87) between the two groups.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis of recent studies indicates that RT significantly reduces the odds of achieving complete continence after AUS placement. History of RT does not increase the risk urethral atrophy or mechanical failure in patients with AUS. However, the risk of revision surgery, erosions and explantations is significantly increased in patients with RT with a non-significant but increased tendency of infections.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: NCT02612389.

Urethral atrophy is now a rare cause for artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery in the contemporary 3.5 cm cuff era

Background

Urethral atrophy has long been suggested as the leading cause of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) revision. Since the introduction of the 3.5 cm AUS cuff in 2010, precise cuff sizing primarily has been suggested to reduce revisions due to urethral atrophy. We evaluated a large contemporary series of reoperative AUS cases to determine reasons for revision surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed our tertiary referral center database of male AUS procedures performed by a single surgeon from 2007-2019. AUS revision or replacement procedures were included for analysis. Cuff sizes and reasons for reoperation were recorded based on intraoperative findings and evaluated for temporal trends. Patients with cuff erosion or lacking follow-up were excluded.

Results

Among 714 AUS cases, 177 revisions or replacements were identified. Of these, 137 met inclusion criteria [mean age 71.7 years, median follow-up 52.7 months (IQR 22.3-94.6 months)]. Urethral atrophy was cited as the cause of AUS failure in 8.0% (11/137) of cases overall, virtually never among those with a 3.5 cm cuff placement (1/51, 2.0%). In those with ≥4.0 cm cuffs, urethral atrophy was the reason for revision in 10/86 (11.6%). Pressure regulating balloon (PRB) failure was the most frequently cited cause of failure (47/137, 34.3%). Cuff-related failure (23/137, 16.8%) and mechanical failure of unspecified device component (16/137, 11.8%) were the next most frequent causes of failure.

Conclusions

Urethral atrophy has become a rare cause of AUS revision surgery since the availability of smaller cuffs. PRB-related failure is now the leading cause of AUS reoperation.

Fundamentals of prosthetic urology

The field of prosthetic urology demonstrates the striking impact that simple devices can have on quality of life. Penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter implantation are the cornerstone procedures on which this specialty focuses. Modern research largely concentrates on decreasing the rates of complication and infection, as the current devices offer superior rates of satisfaction when revision is not necessary. These techniques are also able to salvage sexual function and continence in more difficult patient populations including female-to-male transgender individuals, those with ischemic priapism, and those with erectile dysfunction and incontinence secondary to prostatectomy. This review summarizes modern techniques, outcomes, and complications in the field of prosthetic urology.