An overview of the ATOMS generations: port types, functionality and risk factors

Outcomes with the Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) for the Treatment of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence After Prostate Surgery and the Impact of Previous Radiotherapy

Background and objective

The adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) is an established treatment for patients with urinary incontinence after prostate surgery. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and the complication burdens associated with ATOMS with a focus on exploring the potential impact on previous radiotherapy (RT).

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis for consecutive patients who underwent ATMOS implantation procedure at a tertiary center over an 11-yr study period. Outcomes of interest were dryness at 3-mo follow up, postoperative complications (≤30 d), and late treatment failures (>30 d).

Key findings and limitations

A total of 118 patients underwent ATOMS surgery performed by five different surgeons. Median follow-up was 67 mo (interquartile range 41-95). The mean 24-h pad count after surgery was 1.1 (range 0-8) and the mean reduction in pad weight was 179 g (range 0-1080). There was no significant difference in the reduction in pad use between groups with and without RT (-1.7 vs -2.4; p = 0.13). Multivariable analysis revealed that RT, degree of incontinence, and age were not risk factors for reoperation.

Conclusions and clinical implications

ATOMS implantation is feasible in patients who have undergone prostate RT and patients with severe stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery. We found that RT was not a risk factor for reoperation and there was no significant difference in pad weight reduction by RT status. This study offers new insight into potential incontinence surgery for male patients with stress urinary incontinence and previous RT.

Patient summary

We assessed outcomes for patients who had an ATOMS (adjustable transobturator male system) device implanted to control stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery. After implantation, 52.5% of the patients reported zero leakage and 39.9% reported only mild incontinence. Our results show that this device can improve continence after prostate surgery and is also suitable in patients who underwent radiotherapy.

Update on Adjustable Trans-Obturator Male System (ATOMS) for Male Incontinence after Prostate Cancer Surgery

(1) Background: The adjustable trans-obturator male system (ATOMS) is a surgical device developed to treat post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) after prostate cancer treatment. We review the current literature on this anti-incontinence device with the intention of assessing the effectiveness, safety and duration of the silicone-covered scrotal port (SSP) ATOMS, the only generation of the device that is currently available. (2) Material and Methods: Non-systematic literature review is performed. Forty-eight full-text articles are assessed for eligibility. Case reports, expert opinions or commentaries without specific data reported (n = 6), studies with patients who underwent intervention before 2014 (IP or SP ATOMS; n = 10), and studies with incontinence after transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P; n = 2) are excluded for analysis. Thirty studies with SSP ATOMS are included in a qualitative synthesis that incorporates systematic reviews (n = 3), articles partially overlapping with other previously published studies (e.g., follow-up or series updates; n = 9), and studies focusing on specific populations (n = 8). Only articles revealing outcomes of SSP ATOMS were included in the quantitative synthesis of results (n = 10). (3) Results: the pooled data of 1515 patients from the 10 studies with SSP ATOMS confirmed very satisfactory results with this device after adjustment: dry rate: 63-82%, improved rate: 85-100%, complication rate: 7-33%, device infection rate: 2.7-6.2% and explant rate: 0-19%. The durability of the device is reassuring, with 89% of devices in place 5 years after implantation. (4) Conclusion: Despite the absence of randomized controlled studies, the literature findings confirm results of SSP ATOMS appear equivalent to those of artificial urinary sphincters (AUSs) in terms of continence, satisfaction and complications, but with a lower rate of revision in the long-term. A prospective study identified that patients with daily pad test results <900 mL and a Male Stress Incontinence Grading Scale (MSIGS) of not 4 (i.e., early and persistent stream or urine loss) are the best candidates. Future studies centered on the elder population at higher risk of impaired cognitive ability and in patients including radiation as prostate cancer treatment are needed.

Contemporary male slings for stress urinary incontinence: advances in device technology and refinements in surgical techniques

Synthetic male sling (MS) is considered an effective surgical treatment to restore male stress urinary incontinence. The modern MS can be categorised into adjustable or non-adjustable types, while the surgical techniques can be divided into retropubic or transobturator approaches. This narrative review paper evaluates the contemporary MS devices in the current commercial market regarding clinical outcomes and refinements in surgical techniques. Scientific advances in device design and technology, coupled with further surgical refinements will enhance the clinical outcomes and improve the safety profile of MS surgery. The newer generation of modern MS not only provides direct compression of the bulbar urethra but also allows for proximal urethral relocation by realigning the mobile sphincter complex to provide further urethral sphincter complex coaptation. Strict patient selection, use of MS with proven clinical records, adherence to safe surgical principles and judicious postoperative care are critical to ensure a high continence rate, good patient satisfaction and low postoperative complications.

Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) Infection: Causative Organisms and Clinical Profile

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical profile and the organisms producing adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) infection in a contemporary series.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective study evaluating patients undergoing ATOMS explant for clinical signs of infection from a series of 902 patients treated in 9 academic institutions. Clinical and microbiological data were evaluated.

RESULTS

Infection presented in 24 patients (2.7%). The median age was 73 ± 7yrs and the median interval from ATOMS implantation to explant 11 ± 26.5mo. Infection was diagnosed within 3-months after surgery in 7(29.2%). Scrotal port erosion was present in 6 cases (25%) and systemic symptoms of parenchymatous testicular infection in 2(8.3%). The culture of the periprosthetic fluid was positive in 20(83.3%): 12(50%) Gram-negative bacteria, 9(37.5%) Gram-positive cocci and 1(4.2%) yeast. The most frequent isolates were Enterococcus and Proteus sp. (16.7% each), followed by Pseudomona sp. and S. epidermidis (12.5% each). Methicillin resistant S. aureus was detected only in 1 case (4.2%). Despite the infection 17 patients (70.8%) were satisfied with the implant and 18(75%) received a second device (11 repeated ATOMS and 7 AUS) at a median 9.7 ± 12.6mo after explant. Limitations include retrospective design and lack of microbiological cultures in ATOMS explanted for non-infective cause.

CONCLUSION

Infection of a prosthetic device is a disturbing complication. A proportion of patients with ATOMS infection is associated to scrotal port erosion and/or parenchymatous urinary tract infection. Enterococcus and Proteus sp. are the most common organisms producing ATOMS infection and this could have implications for the selection of the most appropriate surgical prophylaxis.

Artificial urinary sphincter or a second adjustable transobturator male system offer equivalent outcomes in patients whom required revision on the initial ATOMS device: An international multi-institutional experience

AIM

To evaluate treatment options after surgical revision of adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) and the results of further incontinence implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study evaluating patients with surgical revision of ATOMS in academic institutions. Causes and factors affecting revision-free interval were studied and also the frequency of device explant and placement of second ATOMS or artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) at surgeon discretion. Operative results, complications (Clavien-Dindo), and efficacy (postoperative pad-test, pad-count, patient satisfaction, and patient global impression of improvement [PGI-I scale]) of each treatment option were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight out of 902 patients (8.65%) with ATOMS underwent surgical revision at 4.1 ± 2.4 years mean follow-up and 75 (8.3%) were explanted. The main causes for revision included persistence of incontinence (35.9%) and scrotal port erosion (34.6%). Independent risk factors of the shortened revision-free interval were previous anti-incontinence surgery (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.06-3.16; p = 0.007) and port erosion (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.06-3.16; p = 0.0027). Fifty-eight (6.4%) received a second implant: 31 repeated ATOMS and 27 AUS. Operative time was longer for AUS (p = .003). The visual analog scale of pain at hospital discharge (p = 0.837) and postoperative complications (p = 0.154) were equivalent. The predominant cuff size for AUS was 4.5 cm (59.3%). Mean follow-up after the second implant was 29.1 ± 25.8 months. Postoperative efficacy of secondary treatment results favored ATOMS based on pad-test (p = 0.016), pad-count (p = 0.029), patient satisfaction (p = 0.04), and PGI-I (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

ATOMS surgical revision due to different reasons generally leads to device explant. Rescue treatment is possible with ATOMS or AUS. No difference in postoperative complications was detected between secondary devices, but efficacy favors repeating ATOMS implantation.

De novo OAB After ATOMS: An Underestimated Problem or a Rare Side Effect?

Background: The urinary incontinence system ATOMS (A.M.I., Austria) generates suburethral compression through its sphincter cushion. To what extent the ATOMS may lead to overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms or which risk factors for these symptoms exist remain unknown to date. We report on our multicentre evaluation on the prevalence, status, and therapy of OAB after ATOMS.

Methods: Between 10/09 and 01/17, a total of 361 patients received an ATOMS device in Vienna and Halle. A prerequisite for surgery was persistent male stress urinary incontinence lasting at least 6 months after the primary intervention, as well as the failure of conservative treatment. Patients with a preoperative untreated anastomotic stricture or detrusor overactivity were excluded. In addition to continence and voiding parameters, patient's age, BMI, comorbidities, and pre-treatment strategies of the underlying disease and urinary incontinence were examined. If de novo OAB was present, urodynamics were used for further clarification. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 7® (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, USA), p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results: OAB presented 18 patients (4.9%). Regarding the degree of urinary incontinence as well as uroflowmetry, residual volume and comorbidities, patients with an OAB showed no differences compared to patients without an OAB (p < 0.05). Only previous radiotherapy or urinary incontinence surgery and urethral stricture interventions resulted in statistically significant differences based on the bivariate analysis (p = 0.030, p = 0.006, p = 0.007). The consecutive postoperative urodynamics revealed a sensory OAB in 17 patients and a low-compliance bladder in a patient with newly diagnosed insulin-dependent type II diabetes mellitus. OAB was treated with a standard dose of antimuscarinic drugs and for the low-compliance bladder with botulinum toxin type A.

Conclusion: OAB symptoms can occur after ATOMS implantation, but are rare and have no clear correlation to the incontinence device but rather are due to urinary incontinence-related underlying diseases and previous treatments.

[Differentiated surgical treatment of male stress urinary incontinence-between intention and reality?]

The differentiated surgical treatment of male urinary incontinence is a very interesting and sometimes also emotional topic, in which evidence is increasingly maturing. Nowadays, the most common surgical procedures are fixed sling and adjustable incontinence systems as well as the artificial urinary sphincter. The evidence for the procedures varies and there is currently a lack of prospective, comparative studies. The challenging question is: Which operation is the best for which patient? The following article is intended to give an overview of the surgical options and a constructive attempt to differentiate the indication.