Vasomax for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction

Biological effects of α-adrenergic phentolamine on erythrocyte hemeprotein: Molecular insights from biorecognition behavior, protein dynamics and flexibility

Phentolamine is one of the most representative nonselective α-adrenoreceptor blocking agents, which have been proved to be owned various pharmacological actions. Unfortunately, whether erythrocytes in the veins intervene in biological behaviors of such drug are largely obscured. With the aid of multiple biophysical techniques, this scenario was to detailed explore the potential biorecognition between phentolamine and the hemeprotein in the cytosol of erythrocytes, and the influences of dynamic characters of protein during the bioreaction. Steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence data manifested that the biomolecular recognition of phentolamine by hemeprotein was processed through the biopolymer-drug adduct with a moderate strength of 10⁴M^-1. Such procedure causes a reduction in fluorescence intensity of the aromatic tryptophan (Trp) residues, and the R-T transition of the globular protein occurred concurrently. Circular dichroism demonstrated the conclusions of fluorescence essays, viz. biorecognition can induce fairly structural transformation (self-regulation) of protein conformation. Furthermore, one could find that a specific domain for phentolamine is located at the polypeptide chains α₁β₂ interface, and hydrogen bonds, π-conjugated and hydrophobic effects are discovered to be held the lowest energy state of the biomacromolecule-drug biosystem, which overtly matches the outcomes of wet experiments. Meanwhile, several crucial residues such as Trp-37 and Arg-40 were confirmed to have directly noncovalent interactions with phentolamine, and the effect of the heme group on the biomolecule-drug recognition is minimal. Further analyses of molecular dynamics simulation supported that the inherent protein flexibility may notably elicit alterations in some key noncovalent bonds between biomacromolecule and drug during the dynamic biointeraction, which might primarily be attributed to the torsion of drug structure and the conformational changes of essential residues. Undoubtedly, this research will not only help to thoroughly unearth the pharmacological profiles of phentolamine, but to elaborate the impacts of the intrinsic features (i.e. dynamics and flexibility) of critically cellular proteins on the biological conducts of active α-adrenergic blockers.

Mechanisms of penile erection and basis for pharmacological treatment of erectile dysfunction

Erection is basically a spinal reflex that can be initiated by recruitment of penile afferents, both autonomic and somatic, and supraspinal influences from visual, olfactory, and imaginary stimuli. Several central transmitters are involved in the erectile control. Dopamine, acetylcholine, nitric oxide (NO), and peptides, such as oxytocin and adrenocorticotropin/α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, have a facilitatory role, whereas serotonin may be either facilitatory or inhibitory, and enkephalins are inhibitory. The balance between contractant and relaxant factors controls the degree of contraction of the smooth muscle of the corpora cavernosa (CC) and determines the functional state of the penis. Noradrenaline contracts both CC and penile vessels via stimulation of α₁-adrenoceptors. Neurogenic NO is considered the most important factor for relaxation of penile vessels and CC. The role of other mediators, released from nerves or endothelium, has not been definitely established. Erectile dysfunction (ED), defined as the "inability to achieve or maintain an erection adequate for sexual satisfaction," may have multiple causes and can be classified as psychogenic, vasculogenic or organic, neurologic, and endocrinologic. Many patients with ED respond well to the pharmacological treatments that are currently available, but there are still groups of patients in whom the response is unsatisfactory. The drugs used are able to substitute, partially or completely, the malfunctioning endogenous mechanisms that control penile erection. Most drugs have a direct action on penile tissue facilitating penile smooth muscle relaxation, including oral phosphodiesterase inhibitors and intracavernosal injections of prostaglandin E₁. Irrespective of the underlying cause, these drugs are effective in the majority of cases. Drugs with a central site of action have so far not been very successful. There is a need for therapeutic alternatives. This requires identification of new therapeutic targets and design of new approaches. Research in the field is expanding, and several promising new targets for future drugs have been identified.

Diabetes-induced erectile dysfunction: epidemiology, pathophysiology and management

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as the inability of the male to attain and maintain erection of penis sufficient to permit satisfactory sexual intercourse. Prevalence of impotence in diabetic men is ≥50%. The pathophysiology of diabetes-induced erectile dysfunction (DIED) is multifactorial and no single etiology is at the forefront. The proposed mechanisms of erectile dysfunction in diabetic patients includes elevated advanced glycation end-products, increased levels of oxygen free radicals, impaired nitric oxide synthesis, increased endothelin B receptor binding sites and up-regulated RhoA/Rho-kinase pathway, neuropathic damage and impaired cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-dependent protein kinase-1. The treatment of DIED is multimodal. Treatment of the underlying hyperglycemia and comorbidities is of utmost importance to prevent or halt the progression of disease. Oral medications are considered as the first line therapy for management of DIED. If oral agents cannot be used or have insufficient efficacy despite appropriate dosing and education, second-line treatments should be addressed. When there is lack of efficacy or when there is dissatisfaction with other modalities, penile prostheses are often the best alternative for ED and are considered as the third line therapy for DIED. Future strategies in the evolution of the treatment of DIED are aimed at correcting or treating the underlying mechanisms of DIED.

The dual control model: current status and future directions

The Dual Control Model proposes that sexual responses involve an interaction between sexual excitatory and sexual inhibitory processes. The model further postulates that individuals vary in their propensity for both sexual excitation and sexual inhibition, and that such variations help us to understand much of the variability in human sexuality. The development of psychometrically validated instruments for measuring such propensities for men (Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales) and for women (Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women) is described. These measures show close to normal variability in both men and women, supporting the concept that "normal" levels of inhibition proneness are adaptive. The relevance of the model to sexual development, sexual desire, the effects of aging, sexual identity, and the relation between mood and sexuality are discussed, and the available evidence is reviewed. Particular attention is paid to gender differences and similarities in propensities for sexual excitation and inhibition. Research findings related to sexual problems, high-risk sexual behavior, and the relevance of this model to clinical management of such problems are also summarized. Last, ideas for future use and further development of the Dual Control Model are considered.

Bioisosteric phentolamine analogs as selective human alpha(2)- versus alpha(1)-adrenoceptor ligands

Phentolamine is known to act as a competitive, non-subtype-selective alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist. In an attempt to improve alpha(2)- versus alpha(1)-adrenoceptor selectivity and alpha(2)-adrenoceptor subtype-selectivity, two new chemical series of bioisosteric phentolamine analogs were prepared and evaluated. These compounds were evaluated for binding affinities on alpha(1)- (alpha(1A)-, alpha(1B)-, alpha(1D)-) and alpha(2)- (alpha(2A)-, alpha(2B)-, alpha(2C)-) adrenoceptor subtypes that had been stably expressed in human embryonic kidney and Chinese hamster ovary cell lines, respectively. Methylation of the phenolic hydroxy group and replacement of the 4-methyl group of phentolamine with varying lipophilic substituents yielded bioisosteric analogs selective for the alpha(2)- versus alpha(1)-adrenoceptors. Within the alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, these analogs bound with higher affinity at the alpha(2A)- and alpha(2C)-subtypes as compared to the alpha(2B)-subtype. In particular, the t-butyl analog was found to be the most selective, its binding at the alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor (Ki=3.6 nM) being 37- to 173-fold higher than that at the alpha(1)-adrenoceptors, and around 2- and 19-fold higher than at the alpha(2A)- and alpha(2B)-adrenoceptors, respectively. Data from luciferase reporter gene assays confirmed the functional antagonist activities of selected compounds from the bioisosteric series on human alpha(1A)- and alpha(2C)-adrenoceptors. Thus, the results with these bioisosteric analogs of phentolamine provide a lead to the rational design of potent and selective alpha(2)-adrenoceptor ligands that may be useful in improving the therapeutic profile of this drug class for human disorders.

Potential future options in the pharmacotherapy of female sexual dysfunction

Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) is considered a common medical problem estimated to affect millions of women in the westernized countries. FSD has been classified into four different categories including sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), sexual desire disorder (HSDD), orgasmic disorder and sexual pain disorder. The focus of this article is the potential role of pharmacological compounds currently under development, in the treatment of sexual arousal and orgasmic disorders in order to enhance the sexual response in adult females. While a number of potential therapeutic options are available to date, not one of the pharmacological treatment regimens has been yet considered the Gold standard in the management of symptoms of FSD. This article reviews the rationale and potential benefits of using distinct drug formulations in the treatment of FSD.

Research instruments for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction

As the incidence and prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) increase, healthcare providers will require robust, accurate, and efficient tools for appropriately diagnosing and treating patients with ED. Moreover, clinicians will need effective follow-up tools that assess treatment efficacy and satisfaction, to help patients meet their expectations for successful treatment of ED. We provide a summary of some of the most commonly used instruments for the diagnosis and assessment of ED treatment efficacy that will be referred to in this supplement.

Available and future treatments for erectile dysfunction

There is now a range of treatments for patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) beyond the psychosexual counselling and surgical implants that were the only available management options for many years. Oral treatments, which are minimally invasive, are the favoured first-line option for treatments and include the phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors, and dopamine agonists such as apomorphine. Psychosexual counselling may still be an appropriate treatment, on its own or in combination, in a minority of patients who do not respond to oral treatment, or where an origin for the ED is likely from the history. The PDE5 inhibitors, sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil, have proven to be effective and well tolerated and facilitate erectile function. Apomorphine is also effective, but causes nausea in a minority of men. The alpha-receptor antagonist yohimbine has been found to be effective in some placebo-controlled trials, but its effectiveness is probably inadequate for treatment of most ED. Intracavernosal injection of drugs such as prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine (sometimes in combination) is an effective but invasive treatment. Other treatments include testosterone, vacuum-pump treatment, surgery, and surgical implants, and tend to be used where patients do not respond to oral treatment and counselling.

Phentolamine relaxes human corpus cavernosum by a nonadrenergic mechanism activating ATP-sensitive K+ channel

To investigate the pharmacodynamics of phentolamine in human corpus cavernosum (HCC) with special attention to the role of the K+ channels. Strips of HCC precontracted with nonadrenergic stimuli and kept in isometric organ bath immersed in a modified Krebs-Henseleit solution enriched with guanethidine and indomethacine were used in order to study the mechanism of the phentolamine-induced relaxation. Phentolamine caused relaxation (approximately 50%) in HCC strips precontracted with K+ 40 mM. This effect was not blocked by tetrodotoxin (1 microM) (54.6+/-4.6 vs 48.9+/-6.4%) or (atropine (10 microM) (52.7+/-6.5 vs 58.6+/-5.6%). However, this relaxation was significantly attenuated by L-NAME (100 microM) (59.7+/-5.8 vs 27.8+/-7.1%; P<0.05; n = 8) and ODQ (100 microM) (62.7+/-5.1 vs 26.8+/-3.9%; P<0.05; n = 8). Charybdotoxin and apamin (K(Ca)-channel blockers) did not affect the phentolamine relaxations (54.6+/-4.6 vs 59.3+/-5.2%). Glibenclamide (100 microM), an inhibitor of K(ATP)-channel, caused a significant inhibition (56.7+/-6.3 vs 11.3+/-2.3%; P<0.05; n = 8) of the phentolamine-induced relaxation. In addition, the association of glibenclamide and L-NAME almost abolished the phentolamine-mediated relaxation (54.6+/-5.6 vs 5.7+/-1.4%; P<0.05; n = 8). The results suggest that phentolamine relaxes HCC by a nonadrenergic-noncholinergic mechanism dependent on nitric oxide synthase activity and activation of K(ATP)-channel.

Update on oral treatments for male erectile dysfunction

Impairment of erectile function compromises quality of life in millions of men and their partners, many of whom prefer to suffer in silence. It is important to maintain an elevated index of clinical suspicion in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) risk factors (e.g. hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease). There remains a high rate of voluntary discontinuation of therapy associated with most treatment modalities. Since the introduction of sildenafil, a greater awareness and openness regarding the epidemiology and treatment of male erectile dysfunction has emerged. The development of newer and potentially more efficacious phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors will serve to treat an even greater number of patients, allowing once daily and more convenient dosing. An increased understanding of the physiological principles of penile erection has allowed the development of novel oral pharmacological therapies. The new agents offer a potential benefit in a broader range of patients and clinical situations. They may provide a more acceptable alternative than other more invasive options (intracavernosal/urethral injection, implant surgery). The dopamine agonist apomorphine acts on the central control of penile erection to allow a sublingual preparation to produce a prompt response. It is not contraindicated in patients on nitrate medication for coronary artery disease, or in patients with depression or on antidepressants. As with any other treatment, the clinician's responsibility in the care of ED patients does not end with the writing of a prescription. Adequate education and follow-up are needed to optimize the efficacy and safety of oral ED therapy. Furthermore, patients and their partners need to be advised that the agents are not effective in the absence of sexual stimulation. Communicating with both the patient and his partner in a discreet, non-judgmental manner that fosters the physician-patient alliance can facilitate the recognition and treatment of ED.

Oral agents for erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction is a common disease affecting the lives of millions of men worldwide. Sildenafil was the first oral treatment licensed for male erectile dysfunction. However, there are now a number of other options available. In this article the currently available oral treatments are reviewed.

Long-term use of sildenafil

The treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) has been revolutionised by new agents to inhibit the enzyme PDE5. The scientific basis of this treatment of ED includes relaxation of the corpus cavernosum smooth muscle tissue by inhibition of PDE5 that breaks down cGMP, the key pathway for the production of erectile function in humans. Many clinical studies, both pre- and post-marketing, have demonstrated the clinical efficacy and safety of sildenafil (Viagra, Pfizer) - the first approved selective PDE inhibitor for the treatment of ED. Sildenafil is inhibitory of PDE5 at a rate tenfold higher than for the next PDE (PDE6), which produces visual changes through the retinal rods. Its clinical effectiveness has been well documented in the majority of men with ED irrespective of aetiology. The aetiology of ED, also, does not appear to effect the function of sildenafil in relaxing corpus cavernosum smooth muscle tissue. Adverse events are usually associated with the vascular changes from PDE5 inhibition. These include headache and flushing. Each of these adverse events, however, declines with medication use. With the use of sildenafil, it has been clearly, clinically demonstrated that the selective inhibition of PDE5 is an appropriate, effective, safe method for the treatment of ED of all aetiologies and severities.

Current oral treatments for erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as the inability to achieve and maintain a penile erection adequate for satisfactory sexual intercourse. It is a significant male health problem of global dimensions affecting approximately 150 million men worldwide. A broad range of options are currently available for the management of ED. They include oral agents (phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, dopamine agonists and alpha-receptor blocking drugs), intracavernosal injection (papaverine, phentolamine, prostaglandin E1, vasoactive intestinal peptide), transurethral vasoactive agents (prostaglandin E1), vacuum erection devices, vascular surgery and penile prostheses. Here we review the physiology of penile erection and the currently available oral preparations. In addition, novel therapeutic strategies to improve erectile function are discussed.

The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review

The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is a widely used, multi-dimensional self-report instrument for the evaluation of male sexual function. It is has been recommended as a primary endpoint for clinical trials of erectile dysfunction (ED) and for diagnostic evaluation of ED severity. The IIEF was developed in conjunction with the clinical trial program for sildenafil, and has since been adopted as the 'gold standard' measure for efficacy assessment in clinical trials of ED. It has been linguistically validated in 32 languages and used as a primary endpoint in more than 50 clinical trials. This review summarizes early stages in the psychometric validation of the instrument, its subsequent adoption in randomized clinical trials with sildenafil and other ED therapies, and its use in classifying ED severity and prevalence. The IIEF meets psychometric criteria for test reliability and validity, has a high degree of sensitivity and specificity, and correlates well with other measures of treatment outcome. It has demonstrated consistent and robust treatment responsiveness in studies in USA, Europe and Asia, as well as in a wide range of etiological subgroups. Although only one direct comparator trial has been performed to date, the IIEF is also sensitive to therapeutic effects with treatment agents other than sildenafil. A severity classification for ED has recently been developed, in addition to a brief screening version of the instrument. This review includes the strengths as well as limitations of the IIEF, along with some potential areas for future research.