Quantitative Nachstarevaluierung von Acrylat- und Silikonintraokularlinsen mit scharfem Kantendesign

Predictors of Successful Laser Capsulotomy for Significant Posterior Capsule Opacification after Phacoemulsification

Purpose:

This study aimed to determine the reasons behind the failure of laser capsulotomy (LC) performed for significant posterior capsular opacification (PCO).

Methods:

Eighty-eight eyes of 88 patients referred for LC at a tertiary care center were retrospectively analyzed. The data recorded included the cause of cataract, visual acuity, duration of PCO, location of PCO, intraocular lens (IOL) position, IOL type, and lens capsule status. These data were later analyzed for determining the requirement of high pulse energy during LC and the success rate of primary LC.

Results:

The mean age of the participants was 55.77 ± 18.60 years with 58 (65.9%) male patients. The mean duration between cataract and LC surgeries was 45.58 ± 37.33 months. Senile (n=58), uveitic (n=12), post-pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) (n=12), and traumatic (n=6) cataracts were the common causes. Late-presenting PCO, trauma, uveitis, sulcus placement of IOLs, irregular capsulorhexis shape, and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) IOLs were significantly associated with unsuccessful LC and/or higher pulse energy settings during LC.

Conclusion:

Significant PCO is often associated with cataract caused by uveitis or trauma, and after PPV. PCO associated with trauma, sulcus placement of IOLs, and PMMA IOLs may need multiple LCs.

Interventions for preventing posterior capsule opacification

BACKGROUND

Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) remains the most common long-term complication after cataract surgery. It can be treated by Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy, however this may lead to other complications and laser treatment is not available in large parts of the developing world. Therefore, many studies try to find factors influencing the development of PCO.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the effects of different interventions to inhibit PCO. These include modifications of surgical technique and intraocular lens (IOL) design, implantation of additional devices and pharmacological interventions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS in March 2009 and reference lists of identified trial reports.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only prospective, randomised and controlled trials with a follow-up time of at least 12 months. Interventions included modifications in surgical technique explicitly to inhibit PCO, modifications in IOL design (material and geometry), implantation of additional devices and pharmacological therapy compared to each other, placebo or standard treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data and entered it into RevMan. We compared visual acuity data, PCO scores and YAG capsulotomy rates and performed a meta-analysis when possible.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty six studies were included in the review. The review was divided into three parts. 1. Influence of IOL optic material on the development of PCO. There was no significant difference in PCO development between the different IOL materials (PMMA, hydrogel, hydrophobic acrylic, silicone) although hydrogel IOLs tend to have higher PCO scores and silicone IOLs lower PCO scores than the other materials. 2. Influence of IOL optic design on the development of PCO. There was a significantly lower PCO score (-8.65 (-10.72 to -6.59), scale 0 to 100) and YAG rate (0.19 (0.11 to 0.35)) in sharp edged than in round edged IOLs, however not between 1-piece and 3-piece IOLs. 3. Influence of surgical technique and drugs on the development of PCO. There was no significant difference between different types of intraoperative/postoperative anti-inflammatory treatment except for treatment with an immunotoxin (MDX-A) which led to a significantly lower PCO rate.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Due to the highly significant difference between round and sharp edged IOL optics, IOLs with sharp (posterior) optic edges should be preferred. There is no clear difference between optic materials. The choice of postoperative anti-inflammatory treatment does not seem to influence PCO development.

Interventions for preventing posterior capsule opacification

BACKGROUND

Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) remains the most common long-term complication after cataract surgery. It can be treated by Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy, however, this may lead to other complications and laser treatment is not available in large parts of the developing world. Therefore, many studies try to find factors influencing the development of PCO.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the effects of different interventions to inhibit PCO. These include modifications of surgical technique and intraocular lens (IOL) design, implantation of additional devices and pharmacological interventions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS in January 2007 and reference lists of identified trial reports.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only prospective, randomised and controlled trials with a follow-up time of at least 12 months. Interventions included modifications in surgical technique explicitly to inhibit PCO, modifications in IOL design (material and geometry), implantation of additional devices, and pharmacological therapy, compared to each other, placebo or standard treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted and entered into Review Manager. Visual acuity data, PCO score and YAG capsulotomy rates were compared and a meta-analysis was performed when possible.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty three studies were included in the review. The review was divided into three parts. (1) Influence of IOL optic material on the development of PCO. Compared to other materials, the meta-analysis of the included studies showed a significantly higher PCO score (overall effect: 12.39 (95% confidence interval: 9.82 to 14.95), scale 0 to 100) and YAG rate (odds ratio: 8.37 (3.74 to 20.36)) only in hydrogel IOLs. (2) Influence of IOL optic design on the development of PCO. There was a significantly lower PCO score (-8.65 (-10.72 to -6.59), scale 0 to 100) and YAG rate (0.19 (0.11 to 0.35)) in sharp edged than in round edged IOLs, however, not between 1-piece and 3-piece IOLs. (3) Influence of surgical technique and drugs on the development of PCO. There was no significant difference between different types of intra-/postoperative anti-inflammatory treatment except for treatment with an immunotoxin (MDX-A) leading to a significantly lower PCO rate.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Due to the highly significant difference between round and sharp edge IOL optics, IOLs with sharp (posterior) optic edges should be preferred. There is no clear difference between optic materials, except for hydrogel IOLs, that showed more PCO than the other materials. The choice of postoperative anti-inflammatory treatment does not seem to influence PCO development.

Long-term effect of optic edge design in a silicone intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification

PURPOSE

To compare the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) inhibiting effect of the round anterior and sharp posterior optic edge profile of the Clariflex silicone intraocular lens (IOL) [AMO Inc, Santa Ana, California, USA] with that of the double-round edge profile of the SI40 (Phacoflex; AMO Inc, Santa Ana, California, USA) silicone IOL over a period of three years.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-masked, bilateral clinical trial.

METHODS

The study took place at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Fifty-two patients with age-related cataracts (104 eyes) were included in the study. Each patient received an SI40 IOL (round edges) in one eye and a Clariflex IOL with OptiEdge (sharp posterior optic edge) in the other eye. Follow-up examinations were at one week, one month, six months, and one, two, and three years. Digital retroillumination images were taken of each eye. The amount of PCO was subjectively assessed with the slit-lamp and objectively assessed by automated image analysis software (the computer program Automated Quantification of After-Cataract [AQUA]; Vienna, Austria) one, two, and three years after surgery.

RESULTS

The Clariflex lens showed markedly less PCO at one, two, and three years after surgery. The mean AQUA PCO score was 1.39 for the SI40 and 0.56 for the Clariflex lens after one year, estimated at 1.64 and 0.57 after two years, and at 2.04 and 0.64, respectively, after three years (scale zero to 10; P < .001). The Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate was far higher in the SI40 group (Five cases vs one case at three years).

CONCLUSIONS

The sharp posterior optic edge profile of the Clariflex silicone IOL led to marked and consistently less PCO than the round-edged SI40 IOL one, two, and three years after surgery.

Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification

PURPOSE

To compare the rate of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) with the single-piece hydrophilic acrylic foldable Rayner Centerflex 570H intraocular lens (IOL), which has a sharp optic edge design excluding the optic-haptic junction, and the Rayner C-flex 570C IOL, which has an improved 360-degree sharp edge.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

METHODS

As part of a multicenter U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) study, 42 patients who had implantation of a C-flex IOL in 1 eye after uneventful phacoemulsification were enrolled. Six and 12 months postoperatively, PCO was evaluated by retroillumination photographs using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) 2000 image-analysis software. The data were then compared with those in a matched group of patients with a Centerflex IOL who participated in a previous FDA study.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients with the C-flex IOL was 71.5 years +/- 8.2 (SD) There was a statistically significant difference in EPCO scores between the C-flex group and Centerflex group. Six months after surgery, the mean EPCO value (total IOL optic) was 0.07 +/- 0.17 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.20 +/- 0.20 in the Centerflex group (n = 36) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). By 12 months, the mean had increased to 0.16 +/- 0.20 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.35 +/- 0.22 in the Centerflex group (n = 31) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test).

CONCLUSIONS

The C-flex IOLs showed good functional results and significantly lower PCO formation than the earlier model Centerflex IOL. The enhanced edge of the C-flex IOL seemed to improve PCO prevention clinically.