Zuverlässigkeit und Sicherheit von intravitrealen Ozurdex-Injektionen: Die ZERO-Studie

Management of ocular hypertension following intravitreal dexamethasone implant (ozurdex)

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of intravitreal dexamethasone implantation (Ozurdex) on ocular hypertension (OHT) development and characterize its management with non-invasive or minimally-invasive modalities.

Results

Chart review was performed for patients who received Ozurdex implantation between September 2016 to September 2023. Patients were excluded if they had ever been diagnosed with neovascular glaucoma or received a different intravitreal corticosteroid prior to Ozurdex injection or 6 months afterwards. The analysis included 171 Ozurdex implants (n = 61 patients, n = 74 eyes) for analysis. Patients were followed for an average of 326 ± 45 days. The rise in IOP was greatest 2- and 3-months post-injection. OHT occurred following 40 (23.3 %) Ozurdex implants. To lower IOP, medical drops were initiated after 17 (10.0 %) implants. Selective laser trabeculoplasty was performed in 2 (1.2 %) cases. Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) were utilized in 7 (4.1 %) cases. Patients >60 years old were at increased odds of developing OHT, whereas patients treated for retinal vein occlusion were less likely to develop OHT compared to patients treated for diabetic macular edema.

Conclusion

Patient-specific characteristics, including age and treatment indication, may confer different risk for developing OHT following Ozurdex implantation. Ozurdex-induced OHT can be safely and effectively managed using a combination of medical therapy, laser trabeculoplasty, and angle-based MIGS. This study supports an increasing range of alternative approaches for addressing elevated IOP or postponing surgeries linked with higher risks.

NONPHARMACOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF INTRAVITREAL DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT INJECTIONS: A Retrospective Study of 3,430 Injections and Complications

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the nonpharmacological safety profile of intravitreal dexamethasone implants in cases with different etiologies.

METHODS

This retrospective university-based study analyzed clinical reports of patients receiving 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant injections between 2013 and 2023. The study recorded patient demographics, injection indications, and follow-up data. Complications caused by the injection procedure and adverse events other than pharmacological side effects within a 3-month period were included.

RESULTS

In this study, 3,430 dexamethasone implant injections were made into 1,471 eyes of 1,091 patients. Nonpharmacological complications developed in 611 injections (17.8%). Subconjunctival hemorrhage was noted as the leading nonpharmacological complication (n = 576, 16.8%). Sight-threatening 35 nonpharmacological adverse events and complications (1.0%) were recorded. Cases of anterior chamber migration, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, hypotony, and implant misplacement were observed. Cases requiring intensive treatments and additional surgical interventions were encountered.

CONCLUSION

The injection of the dexamethasone implant may lead to nonpharmacological complications caused by the mechanical impact of the injection or improper positioning of the implant, potentially resulting in vision loss. Severe outcomes such as corneal decompensation, retinal detachment, and endophthalmitis can ensue, emphasizing the gravity of these complications. Careful selection of patients and adherence to proper injection techniques are essential in reducing these risks.

Anterior segment migration of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in a patient with scleral fixation intraocular lens implant: a case report

Corticosteroids are crucial for treating inflammatory ocular conditions. The development of dexamethasone revolutionized targeted ocular therapy. Ozurdex, a dexamethasone implant, effectively treats various eye conditions but carries risks such as implant migration. This is a case of anterior segment migration of intravitreal dexamethasone implant, Ozurdex, in a patient with scleral fixation intraocular lens implant in whom conservative management with supine positioning and pharmacologic pupil dilation can help retain the implant back in the vitreous. Patients at high risk of Ozurdex migration should avoid its use. Educate patients on the risk of implant migration and signs of migration to present immediately to an ophthalmology emergency department to avoid corneal damage. It is essential to identify high-risk patients before considering Ozurdex migration. In some cases, conservative management can be initiated while preparing for surgical removal.

Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Associated With Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Injection

Purpose: To describe an immunocompetent patient with cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis after dexamethasone implant injection and review previously documented cases. Methods: A review of case reports and literature was performed. Results: A 75-year-old man presented with acute decreased vision in the left eye. He had a vitrectomy and membrane peeling for an epiretinal membrane with recurrent cystoid macular edema and was receiving intravitreal dexamethasone implant injections at an outside hospital. The visual acuity in the left eye was hand motions, and an examination found patchy retinal whitening with hemorrhages. Aqueous polymerase chain reaction was positive for CMV. The laboratory evaluation was negative for immunodeficiencies. He was treated successfully with intravitreal and oral antivirals; however, his vision remained poor at most recent follow-up. A literature review found 8 previous cases of CMV retinitis after dexamethasone implant injection, although most had underlying immune dysregulation. Conclusions: CMV retinitis after intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection is rare. Awareness of this complication is essential because of the risk for devastating blindness.

Effect of intralenticular dexamethasone implant: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant is indicated for the treatment of macular oedema due to diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion and uveitis. The most common complications are cataract and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Accidental injection of DEX implant into the lens is a rare complication and only few papers presented it.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 40-year-old man was treated with DEX implant for diabetic macular oedema in both eyes. At 1 week follow-up visit, slit lamp examination showed the DEX implant was located in the crystalline lens of the right eye (RE) without any sign of inflammation, cataract or elevated IOP, so we decided to plan a normal follow-up schedule. Macular oedema relapsed 5 months after the injection in the left eye (LE), whereas the RE did not show any sing of intraretinal or subretinal fluid. Six months after DEX implantation an uneventful phacoemulsification and intraocular lens placement were performed in the RE because of IOP elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic effect of DEX implant can be maintained for a longer period of time than intravitreal implant, determining complete reabsorption of macular oedema. Intralenticular implant can be maintained inside the lens until either IOP increases, cataract progresses, or other complications occur.

Incidence and treatment approach of intraocular pressure elevation after various types of local steroids for retinal diseases

PURPOSE

For the treatment of macular edema, in addition to the use of antivascular endothelial growth factors, steroids are also used intravitreally and sub-Tenon. Side effects include among others cataract formation and elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP). The aim of this retrospective study was to elicit the IOP elevation after administration of various steroidal medication, the time of onset, and the efficacy of the administered IOP-lowering therapies.

METHODS

We included 428 eyes with a postoperative (n = 136), diabetic (n = 148), uveitic macular edema (n = 61), and macular edema after retinal vein occlusion (n = 83). These patients were treated with one or more diverse steroidal agents once or multiple times. These drugs included: triamcinolone acetonide (TMC) as intravitreal injection (TMC IVI) or sub-Tenon (TMC ST), as well as dexamethasone (DXM) and fluocinolone acetonide (FA) intravitreally. An increase of IOP of ≥ 25 mmHg was designated as pathological. A steroid response in anamnesis, the time of onset of IOP rise from the first administration, and the therapy administered were documented.

RESULTS

Of 428 eyes, 168 eyes (39.3%) had IOP elevation up to a mean of 29.7 (SD ± 5.6) mmHg, which occurred at a median of 5.5 months. Steroids most frequently leading to rise of IOP included DXM (39.1% of all eyes receiving that drug), TMC IVI (47.6%), TMC ST combined with DXM (51.5%), DXM with FA (56.8%), and TMC IVI with DXM (57.4%). A Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Log Rank test showed a significant difference (p < 0.001). IOP rise was treated as follows: 119 conservatively (70.8%), and 21 surgically (12.5%, cyclophotocoagulation 8.3%, filtering surgery 1.8%, in 4 the steroidal drug implant was removed 2.4%), and 28 eyes received no therapy (16.7%). Sufficient IOP regulation was achieved in 82 eyes (68.9%) with topical therapy. In 37 eyes (31.1%) with persistently elevated intraocular pressure, topical therapy had to be continued over the follow-up of 20 ± 7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

IOP increases after any type of steroid application are not rare. Results of our study let us suspect that especially therapy with intravitreal dexamethasone, either as a monotherapy or in combination with another steroid, tends to increase IOP more than other steroids. Regular IOP checks are necessary after each steroid administration, with possible initiation of long-term conservative and/or surgical therapy if necessary.

Anterior segment complications after dexamethasone implantations:real world data

PURPOSE

We aim to contribute to the literature in terms of treatment safety with our real world data by examining the anterior segment complications and follow-up results of patients who underwent dexamethasone implants in our clinic.

METHODS

The records of patients treated with at least one intravitreal dexamethasone implant for various retinal diseases: diabetic macular edema (265 eyes), central retinal vein occlusion (45 eyes), retinal vein branch occlusion (91 eyes), postoperative cystoid macular edema (18 eyes), non-infectious uveitis (37 eyes) and other (14 eyes) between July 2013 and April 2020 were reviewed.

RESULTS

After 925 injections were applied to 470 eyes of a total of 383 patients, the eyes were controlled during a mean follow-up of 24 months. No complications were detected in 328 eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) above 25 mmHg was detected in 97 eyes (20.6%) that had no previous history of ocular hypertension. Of these 97 eyes, 71 (73.1%) eyes with increased IOP were treated with topical monotherapy, 26 (26.8%) eyes were treated with topical combined therapy and 1 (1.03%) patient had glaucoma surgery. Cataracts requiring surgical intervention developed in 55 (%21.73) of 253 phakic eyes. Three patients have anterior chamber dislocation of dexamethasone, 1 patient was hospitalized with sterile endophthalmitis on the 7th day after the injection, and pars plana vitrectomy was performed.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first long-term follow-up study in our country evaluating the safety of dexamethasone implant injections in various retinal diseases and presenting the first real world data. Cataract progression and increased IOP were found to be the most common side effects. We observed that the patient's diagnosis did not cause a statistically significant change in the observation of side effects. As a result of our findings, close follow-up of IOP after the injection of dexamethasone implants would be appropriate.

Intralenticular Ozurdex injection in an eye with thicker lens and the therapeutic effect maintained for 15 months

Introduction

To report a case of accidental intralenticular Ozurdex injection in an eye with thicker lens. During the follow-up period of 15 months, the therapeutic effect of intralenticular Ozurdex was maintained.

Case description

Ozurdex was accidently injected into the lens of an eye with uveitis, and the lens thickness was measured to be 5.70 mm. The uveitis was under good control, and no significant development of cataract was observed until 7 months after the intralenticular Ozurdex injection. Then due to the outbreak of COVID-19, follow-up was suspended. Fifteen months after the injection, the patient returned to the doctor. At this time, significant cataract development was observed, whereas uveitis was still under good control. Accordingly, cataract surgery and Ozurdex extraction were performed. Two months after surgery, a mild recurrence of uveitis occurred.

Conclusions

A thicker lens might be an important risk factor for accidental intralenticular Ozurdex injections. However, after intralenticular Ozurdex injection, the development of cataract was slow, and Ozurdex could still have a therapeutic effect on uveitis in this case. Thus, immediate surgery might be unnecessary for certain accidental intralenticular Ozurdex injection cases, and a follow-up strategy could be chosen to maintain the effect of Ozurdex.

Safety and Effectiveness of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant (Ozurdex®) for the Treatment of Refractory Cystoid Macular Oedema (CMO) in Galway University Hospital

Aim:

The aim of this study is to assess the real-life effectiveness and safety of intravitreal Ozurdex in an Irish setting.

Background:

Ozurdex is an intravitreal dexamethasone implant that is used for the treatment of macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion and diabetic macular oedema.

Methods:

This was a retrospective observational study of adult patients in University Hospital Galway who received an intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) for the treatment of cystoid macular oedema secondary to diabetic eye disease or retinal vein occlusion. The main outcome was the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity 3-6 months after the treatment.

Results and Discussion:

36 patients were included in the study. Overall, there was a 1.66 mean letter gain (SD 11.8) 3-6 months post-treatment. The proportion of patients who gained >10 letters was 15.6%. The mean reduction in CST was 110.6um (SD 255.7), and in the linear regression analysis, no variables were found to be significantly associated with a change in visual acuity. In terms of adverse events, 14.3% of patients had significant cataract progression and 20.6% of patients had a significant rise in IOP following intravitreal Ozurdex implant.

Conclusion:

Intravitreal Ozurdex was found to be safe and effective, supporting it as an appropriate second-line treatment in patients with refractory macular oedema secondary to diabetic eye disease and retinal vein occlusion. Further studies should be carried out to evaluate the possible predictors of visual acuity outcome.

Local Dexamethasone Administration Delays Allogeneic Islet Graft Rejection in the Anterior Chamber of the Eye of Non-Human Primates

Pancreatic islet transplantation into the anterior chamber of the eye (ACE) has been shown to improve glycemic control and metabolic parameters of diabetes in both murine and primate models. This novel transplantation site also allows the delivery of therapeutic agents, such as immunosuppressive drugs, locally to prevent islet graft rejection and circumvent unwanted systemic side effects. Local intravitreal administration of micronized dexamethasone implant was performed prior to allogeneic islet transplantation into the ACEs of non-human primates. Two study groups were observed namely allogeneic graft without immunosuppression (n = 4 eyes) and allogeneic graft with local immunosuppression (n = 8 eyes). Survival of islet grafts and dexamethasone concentration in the ACE were assessed in parallel for 24 weeks. Allogeneic islet grafts with local dexamethasone treatment showed significantly better survival than those with no immunosuppression (median survival time- 15 weeks vs 3 weeks, log-rank test p<0.0001). Around 73% of the grafts still survived at week 10 with a single local dexamethasone implant, where the control group showed no graft survival. Dexamethasone treated islet grafts revealed a good functional response to high glucose stimulation despite there was a transient suppression of insulin secretion from week 8 to 12. Our findings show a significant improvement of allografts survival in the ACE with local dexamethasone treatment. These results highlight the feasibility of local administration of pharmacological compounds in the ACE to improve islet graft survival and function. By eliminating the need for systemic immunosuppression, these findings may impact clinical islet transplantation in the treatment of diabetes, and the ACE may serve as a novel therapeutic islet transplantation site with high potential for local pharmacological intervention.

Real-life medium term follow-up data for intravitreal dexamethasone implant in retinal vein occlusion

Macular edema (ME) is the most frequent vision threatening consequence after retinal vein occlusion (RVO). In this study, we evaluate the effect of dexamethasone intravitreal implants (DII, Ozurdex) in a real-life cohort of 99 patients with ME due to RVO. All patients who received DII for ME following RVO between 2011 and 2016 at the University Eye Hospital Freiburg, Germany and who had fully accessible electronic medical records were eligible for this study. Most of the patients included in this study were not treatment-naïve: 61 eyes had received prior anti-VEGF drugs, 6 eyes had received intravitreal corticosteroids (triamcinolone) and 15 had been treated with both; 17 eyes were treatment-naïve. Mean follow-up was 312 ± 310 days. Mean visual acuity (VA) was maintained throughout the observation period (mean VA at baseline: 66.7 ± 23.5 letters; at last observation 64.9 ± 28.3). Central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased from 526 ± 179 µm at baseline to 431 ± 199 µm. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) increased from 14.4 ± 3.1 mmHg at baseline to 17.1 ± 6.3 mmHg. Cataract surgery was performed in 22% of phakic eyes. DII was used as second-line treatment in the majority of cases in this cohort. The fact that mean VA remained unchanged while mean CRT decreased illustrates that morphologic improvement does not always translate into functional gain. Mean IOP was maintained within normal limits and cataract formation was as expected in this age group.

Disloziertes Dexamethason-Implantat in der Vorderkammer: ein Fallbericht

Hintergrund

Ozurdex® (Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland, Westport, Co. Mayo, Irland) ist ein intravitreales Implantat von 700 mcg Dexamethason, das für die Behandlung eines Makulaödems infolge eines retinalen Venenverschlusses, einer nichtinfektiösen posterioren Uveitis und einer diabetischen Makulopathie zugelassen ist. Erhöhter Augeninnendruck sowie Trübungen der kristallinen Linse sind bekannte Komplikationen. Seltener wird in der Literatur auch die unerwünschte Migration des Implantates in die Vorderkammer (VK) beschrieben. Laut Literatur erforderten die meisten Implantatdislokationen in die VK eine operative Entfernung oder Reposition in den Glaskörperraum. Wir berichten die erfolgreiche Repositionierung eines Ozurdex®-Implantats durch die medikamentöse Erweiterung der Pupille.

Falldarstellung

Eine 79-jährige Patientin entwickelte nach einer sekundären Intraokularlinsenimplantation ein persistierendes zystoides Makulaödem am linken Auge. Dieses wurde seit 3 Jahren mit intravitrealem Ozurdex® behandelt. Bei der geplanten Kontrolle 4 Wochen nach der letzten Behandlung wurde das Ozurdex®-Stäbchen in der VK zwischen Iris und Optik der Vorderkammerlinse (VKL) festgestellt. Es erfolgte eine medikamentöse Erweiterung der Pupille, um das dislozierte Stäbchen zu mobilisieren. Die anschließende Spaltlampenuntersuchung und Fundoskopie zeigten eine Rücklagerung des Ozurdex®-Implantates in dem Glaskörperraum.

Schlussfolgerungen

Die Entfernung des Ozurdex®-Stäbchens aus der VK ist notwendig, um eine Dekompensation des Hornhautendothels zu vermeiden. Wir empfehlen vor einer chirurgischen Intervention einen Repositionsversuch des Implantats durch die medikamentöse Erweiterung der Pupille.

Initial Ten Years of Experience with the Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant: A Retrospective Chart Review

Purpose

To evaluate the initial ten years of results from the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX) in patients treated for retinal vein occlusion (RVO), diabetic macular edema (DME) or uveitis.

Methods

Retrospective chart review of patients receiving DEX since its FDA approval. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) on optical coherence tomography, intraocular pressure and cataract status were collected. Baseline data were collected from the initial DEX and post-treatment data at the visit at least four weeks after the last DEX.

Results

In total, 315 eyes received 1216 DEX over 63.9±4.6 weeks. In the branch RVO (n=90), central RVO (n=59) and DME (n=62) cohorts, BCVA improved significantly (p<0.05). The uveitis (n=154) cohort did not have a significant change in BCVA, 0.62±0.04 to 0.61±0.04 logMAR (p=0.34). Younger patients, vitrectomized eyes, and eyes without a history of glaucoma were associated with significantly better BCVA outcomes in the uveitis cohort (p<0.05). Overall, CMT decreased significantly from 376.6±6.8 to 322.7±5.0 µm (p<0.05). Intraocular pressure increased significantly (p<0.001) and the percentage of patients requiring anti-glaucoma medications increased from 33.0% to 67.6%. Of phakic eyes, 58.8% (n=63) had cataract progression or underwent surgery with those who underwent surgery experiencing a significant improvement in BCVA (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Repeated DEX over extended follow-up offers significant anatomic benefits to all cohorts. Visual benefits are only seen in RVO, DME and select uveitis demographics.

Non-pharmacological complications associated with Intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection

OBJECTIVE

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IID) is an effective and safe treatment for macular oedema as described in the literature. Ocular hypertension and cataracts are the most frequent complications. The indications of IID in the last few years have led to the retrospective reporting of rare complications, with potential visual impact related to the injection procedure.

METHODS

A case series is presented of fifteen patients treated with IID for macular oedema who developed non-pharmacological complications related to the injection procedure or the implant itself, including, among others anterior chamber migration, intracrystalline injection, endophthalmitis, or segmentation. Differentiation was made between true complications and those that did not lead to any ocular damage. Epidemiological and baseline data were collected along with the treatment and outcome in each case. An analysis was made of multimodal imaging available.

RESULTS

The incidence of complications was 0.65% in this series Anterior chamber migration was the most frequent complication (n=4), followed by intracrystalline injection, and endophthalmitis (n=2). The times between the injection and complications were variable. Visual impairment was the most common symptom (n=6). However, despite the complications found, IID was an effective treatment in most of the reported cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware of these rare non-pharmacological complications so that they may be prevented and detected early, avoiding irreversible ocular damage.

Surgical Management of Complications after Dexamethasone Implant

Purpose

To report surgical management of ocular complications occurred after dexamethasone (DEX) implant (Ozurdex®) injection.

Methods

Retrospective interventional case series.

Results

Different surgical procedures including viscoexpression to manage the migration of the implant into the anterior chamber, "phaco-rolling" technique for the intralenticular injection, and vitrectomy with implant removal for an acute endophthalmitis were performed. Successful management of different complications after DEX implant by using individualized surgical approaches was observed.

Conclusions

Early and targeted surgical management is required in selected cases of ocular complications after DEX implant. The implant removal was needed to preserve ocular anatomy and function.

Morphological and Functional Outcomes after Intravitreal Dexamethasone Injection for Macular Edema in Patients with Central Vein Occlusion at 48-Week Follow-Up

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI: Ozurdex®) injection in eyes with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion. Material and Method. A retrospective, nonrandomized study was conducted in patients with macular edema (ME) due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) who undertook intravitreal Ozurdex® as first-line treatment. We performed a complete ocular exam including macular OCT.

Results

The mean BCVA (logMar) improved from 0.420.42 ± 0.23 logMar at baseline to 0.21 ± 0.23 logMar at 48 weeks in the BRVO group and from 0.72 ± 0.16 logMar at baseline to 0.31 ± 0.23 logMar at 48 weeks in the CRVO group. In both groups, CFT values decreased significantly compared to baseline (p < 0.0001 at each timepoint). Reinjection for recurrent macular edema after 18 weeks was indicated in five eyes (41.67%) in the BRVO group and in six eyes (25%) in the CRVO group. Cataract developed in two eyes (16.67%) in the BRVO group and in one eye (4.17%) in the CRVO group. The IOP was higher than 25 mmHg in two cases in the BRVO group (16.66%) and in three cases (8.33%) in the CRVO group.

Conclusion

Ozurdex® injected intravitreally significantly improved the mean CFT and BCVA in eyes with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion.

Steroid-induced glaucoma: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical management

Glucocorticoids are a class of anti-inflammatory drugs commonly used to treat various ocular and systemic conditions. Although the role of glucocorticoids in the treatment of numerous serious inflammatory diseases is pivotal, their prolonged use may increase intraocular pressure resulting in steroid-induced glaucoma. We provide a detailed update on steroid-induced glaucoma as a preventable cause of blindness in the adult and pediatric population and describe its epidemiology, social impact, and risk factors. Furthermore, we explore the propensity of different steroids to increase the intraocular pressure, the role of different routes of steroid administration, dosage and duration of treatment, as well as the clinical features, genetics, and management of steroid-induced glaucoma.

Iatrogenic crystalline lens injury during intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide: A report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Intravitreal injection has become an efficient approach for delivering drugs at therapeutic levels to the posterior segment in retinal diseases. However, the increased frequency and number of intravitreal injections have raised concerns about their side effects. As manipulation during surgery is relatively simple, details of the procedure are easily overlooked. Iatrogenic crystalline lens injury is a rare complication caused by improper manipulation during surgical procedures. We report two cases of crystalline lens injury during intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) with the hope of providing an insight into this treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

Case 1 was a 62-year-old woman with macular edema caused by central retinal vein occlusion in her right eye, and Case 2 was a 65-year-old man with macular edema caused by branch retinal vein occlusion in his right eye. In view of the patients’ condition and economic constraints, an intravitreal injection of TA was administered. Due to inappropriate manipulation during surgery, the lens was injured. The site of lens injury and clinical manifestations were different in the two cases. Symptomatic treatment and continuous follow-up were carried out. The therapeutic effect following phacoemulsification of the cataract was satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

Well-defined surgical incision under proper anesthesia, sufficient patient information and proficient anatomical skills of the physician are mandatory to prevent this rare adverse event. Careful and meticulous phacoemulsification of the cataract is suggested.

Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant Injection in Eyes with Comorbid Hypotony

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes in patients with hypotony treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirteen patients (15 eyes) that received a total of 99 dexamethasone implant injections on occasions at which the intraocular pressure was low, meeting the definition of statistical hypotony.

METHODS

The medical records of 13 patients (15 consecutive eyes) receiving 1 or more intravitreal dexamethasone implants between December 2014 and April 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Hypotony was defined as intraocular pressure less than 6.5 mmHg. The indications for intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection were intermediate or posterior uveitis (86.7%), diabetic macular edema (13.3%), and/or cystoid macular edema (6.7%).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were safety outcomes and best visual acuity within 6 months of the final intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection in a hypotonous eye.

RESULTS

In 15 eyes (13 patients), 99 injections were administered to eyes under circumstances of hypotony. Uveitic cystoid macular edema or diabetic macular edema was reduced after treatment in all cases. No complications were noted during the injection procedure. Three complications were noted in 2 patients after injection. Pseudophakodonesis and mild vitreous hemorrhage immediately after injection were noted in 1 patient, and a case of delayed-onset vitreous hemorrhage with pigment release was noted in another. All 3 complications resolved without intervention. The primary end point of this study-mean visual acuity-was stable over the follow-up period. In patients with hypotony whose intraocular pressure normalized during the follow-up period, this was attributable to management of glaucoma surgery-related complications rather than an effect of the intravitreal dexamethasone implant.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection is a reasonable treatment option for patients with comorbid hypotony in whom clinical findings warrant treatment with a sustained-delivery intravitreal steroid implant. Further studies, including imaging of zonules before and after intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection in a hypotonous eye, could help define risks to intraocular lens stability with this procedure.

Acute Bacterial Endophthalmitis Following Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant: A Case Report

A 54-year-old male presented to our ophthalmology clinic with a diagnosis of the right central retinal vein occlusion with macular edema. The patient was treated with dexamethasone intravitreal implant. Three days after the implant insertion, the patient experienced pain, redness and blurred vision in the same eye. With a provisional diagnosis of acute endophthalmitis, a combination of ceftazidime 2.25 mg/0.1 ml and vancomycin 1 mg/0.1 ml was injected intravitreally. One week after the treatment, endophthalmitis signs and symptoms subsided. This report presents a case of endophthalmitis following dexamethasone intravitreal implant, with a favorable outcome after treatment with intravitreal antibiotic injection without removal of the implant.

Iatrogenic intralenticular broken steroid implant: a case report

Background

This is a case report of an iatrogenic intralenticular broken steroid (Ozurdex™) implant in a patient with uveitis. There are only a few case reports on broken Ozurdex™ implants in the vitreous cavity, with none of them involving the crystalline lens. A few authors have described the accidental injection of an Ozurdex™ implant into the crystalline lens, but all of the implants remained in one piece in the lens and none of them were broken. We report an unusual case of an Ozurdex™ implant which was injected inadvertently into the crystalline lens, resulting in a broken Ozurdex™ implant with an entry and exit wound through the posterior capsule of the lens.

Case presentation

An ophthalmic trainee performed an Ozurdex™ intravitreal injection into a 48-year-old Asian man’s right eye under aseptic conditions. This patient was then followed up for further management. On day 7 post-procedure, a slit lamp examination revealed that the Ozurdex™ implant was injected into the intralenticular structure of his right eye and had fractured into two pieces. The posterior capsule of the right lens was breached, with one half of the Ozurdex™ implant stuck at the entry and the other stuck at the exit wound of the posterior capsule. This patient underwent right eye cataract extraction and repositioning of the fractured implant; he made an uneventful recovery.

Conclusions

Ophthalmologists should be aware of the potential risk of injecting an Ozurdex™ implant into an anatomical structure other than the vitreous cavity. Adequate training and careful administration of the Ozurdex™ implant are necessary to avoid such a complication, which fortunately is rare.

Drug-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcal endophthalmitis following dexamethasone intravitreal implant

A 60-year-old female came to our hospital with defective vision due to persistent diabetic macular edema and was treated with intravitreal ozurdex implant in the right eye. Three days later, the patient presented with diminution of vision, ocular pain, congestion, and hypopyon with no fundus view. B-scan ultrasonography showed vitritis, and diagnosis of endophthalmitis was made. Subsequently, 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy was performed along with intravitreal vancomycin and amikacin and removal of implant. On culture, there was growth of coagulase-negative staphylococcus which was resistant to ofloxacin antibiotic. A week following treatment, there was significant improvement in the patient's sign and symptoms with improvement in vision. Our case demonstrated that acute endophthalmitis can occur following dexamethasone intravitreal implant.

[Treatment of macular edema: Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of subconjunctival triamcinolone injections, sub-tenon's triamcinolone injections and intravitreal dexamethasone implant]

The area of uveitis is related to numerous pathological entities. One of the main causes of decreased visual acuity in these patients is macular edema. One aspect of the treatment includes cortosteroids used peri- and intra-ocularly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The goal of our work was to estimate the criteria of efficacy (on improvement in visual acuity and macular edema, as well as time to recurrence) and safety (on intraocular pressure and cataract) of these various routes of administration of corticosteroid after a single injection. We compared patients treated with Ozurdex^® versus subconjonctival triamcinolone versus sub-tenon's triamcinolone. This is a retrospective study conducted in 2 tertiary centers, the university medical center of Nantes and La Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital from November, 2011 to November, 2013.

RESULTS

At presentation, 25 % of the patients displayed VA better than 5/10. During follow-up, this proportion increased to 45 % at M1, 50 % at M3, 49 % at M6 and 48 % at the end of follow-up. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to VA gain. The reductions in mean CMT compared with D0 were all statistically significant (improvement of one line in log-OCT). We observed an improvement in macular thickness of 88 % at M1, 86 % at M3, 61 % at M6 and 60 % at the end of follow-up, significant at each time, with no significant difference between the three groups. A comparison of time to anatomic vs. functional recurrence was performed, showing no difference. The largest increase in IOP was observed at M1, statistically different from the other time points.

DISCUSSION

Intra- and periocular injections should be considered as an adjuvant therapy, since the majority of the conditions in question require systemic treatment. They allow for increased intravitreal concentrations with fewer systemic effects.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated neither any true superiority of any of the 3 treatments nor any difference in tolerability between the 3 groups.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant (Ozurdex) to Control Recurrent Severe Idiopathic Uveitis Leads to Improvement in Steroid-Induced Diabetes Mellitus

Steroid-induced diabetes mellitus (SIDM) poses a unique challenge for the physician and ophthalmologist when faced with chronic recurrent uveitis controlled only with systemic steroids. We report a unique case where SIDM improved significantly following administration of intravitreal dexamethasone. A 53-year-old female had a history of recurrent idiopathic anterior uveitis that required oral steroids for control despite orbital floor steroids and systemic immunosuppression. After 9 years of oral steroid treatment she was diagnosed with SIDM necessitating insulin therapy. Following intravitreal dexamethasone implant, her oral steroid use was tapered with subsequent improvement in her diabetes and eventual cessation of insulin. In uveitis, steroid sparing immunosuppression may be used to minimize systemic steroid exposure. In this case, we demonstrated that an intravitreal dexamethasone implant achieved this goal. We recommend considering the use of such implants in patients with recurrent uveitis, particularly when there are significant steroid-induced side effects.

Ozurdex completely located inside a crystallized lens - Results of 14 months

Purpose

To report the therapeutic efficacy and results of an accidentally injected intralenticular sustained-release dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) in a patient with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion at 14 months after injection.

Observations

We present a 70-year-old female patient with central retinal vein occlusion who underwent an Ozurdex injection. Patient discontinued from the treatment period during the 14-month and there was no ophthalmologic examination of the patient. Detailed ophthalmological examination was performed. Ozurdex localization was determined by Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug System. The implant was accidentally injected into the crystalline lens. It did not cause a totally lens opacification but did result only in a posterior subcapsular cataract. The macular edema did not resolve, and the patient underwent phacoemulsification surgery.

Conclusions and importance

Ozurdex that totally located inside the crystallize lens may not have the therapeutic effects.

Retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) in its treatment

Purpose

To review published data pertaining to the clinical experience with a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) with a view to establishing a clinically based therapeutic regime.

Methods

A PubMed search using the MeSH terms “retinal vein occlusion” and either “pathophysiology” or “dexamethasone intravitreal implant” was undertaken for manuscripts published until August 2015. The analysis included studies involving minimally 15 patients under a prospective design or 30 under a retrospective design, a minimal follow up of 6 months, and at least 2 intravitreal Ozurdex® injections per eye.

Results

In the vast majority of eyes, satisfactory outcomes were achieved with retreatment intervals of between 3 and 5 months. Initial evidence indicates a similar efficacy compared to anti-VEGF therapies as a first-line treatment. Safety concerns associated with the long-term and repeated use of Ozurdex® are not borne out by clinical findings: its implantation is not associated with a sustained increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) over time or with the number of applications.

Conclusion

Compared with anti-VEGF therapies, the burden of retreatment is reduced. In patients with chronic macular edema not responsive to repetitive anti-VEGF therapies, the outcome after dexamethasone implant treatment is encouraging. However, these results are achieved at the expense of side effects typically associated with steroids: in up to 20 % of the Ozurdex®-treated patients, an elevation in IOP, which could be medically controlled in the majority of cases, and cataract formation or progression was observed.

Intravitreal Injection of Ozurdex(®) Implant in Patients with Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema, with Six-Month Follow-Up

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone injections in diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

A 700 μg slow-release intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®) was placed in the vitreal cavity of 17 patients (19 eyes) affected with persistent DME. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed through Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). Central macular thickness (CMT) was measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. BCVA and CMT examinations were carried out at baseline (T0) and repeated after three days, one month (T1), three months (T3), four months (T4), and six months (T6) post injection.

RESULTS

Dexamethasone implant induced an improvement in ETDRS at T1, T3, T4, and T6 post injection. CMT was reduced at T1, T3, and T4, while at T6, CMT values were not statistically different from baseline. No complications were observed during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that dexamethasone implant is effective in reducing DME symptoms within a six-month frame.

Intralenticular Sustained-Release Dexamethasone Implant: Is It Still Effective on Macular Edema?

PURPOSE

To report the therapeutic efficacy of an accidentally injected intralenticular sustained-release dexamethasone implant in a patient with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion and shortly discuss the management strategy of this rare complication.

METHODS

Complete ophthalmological examination and optical coherence tomography imaging were performed at each visit.

RESULTS

The implant accidentally caused a posterior capsular tear during the procedure and was injected into the crystalline lens because of an involuntary head movement of the patient. Since the anterior segment was normal, and the resultant cataract and implant itself did not obscure the visual axis, the decision was made to observe the patient with intralenticular implant, preserve the therapeutic effect and avoid reinjection. The macular edema resolved within time, while visual acuity did not show significant improvement due to an increase in lens opacification. The patient underwent phacoemulsification surgery at 7 months after the injection with implantation of posterior chamber IOL into the capsular bag.

CONCLUSION

Inadvertent injection of sustained-release intravitreal dexamethasone implant into the crystalline lens is an uncommon but possible complication that is mostly caused by surgeon inexperience, improper technique and uncontrolled head movement during the procedure. Once this complication occurs, early phacoemulsification and repositioning of the implant into the vitreous is the frequently preferred management strategy. However, remarkable decrease in macular edema and visual acuity improvement can also be achieved without an immediate surgical intervention.

Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Treatment of Refractory Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion in Taiwan

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of slow-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX implant) in patients with refractory macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in Taiwan.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with a diagnosis of ME secondary to RVO who received the DEX implant at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital from October 2010 to February 2014.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients with an average age of 60.7 ± 11.1 years were examined. Of these patients, 17 were diagnosed with branch RVO (BRVO) and 11 were diagnosed with central RVO (CRVO). The mean maximal change in vision from the baseline after the final injection was an improvement of 1.7 ± 2.8 lines (equivalent to 8.5 ETDRS letters; p<0.0001). The response to the first injection was similar across both BRVO and CRVO groups, but patients with BRVO showed a more favorable response than those with CRVO after the second injection. The response in patients who had refractory ME after at least 3 previous interventions was similar to the whole group. Three patients (10.7%) had elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) that was well controlled by IOP-lowering medications. None of these patients required laser or glaucoma surgery. Five patients (17.9%) exhibited cataract progression during the observation period.

CONCLUSION

The DEX implant is an effective and safe treatment for ME, secondary to RVO, including refractory ME.

[Effects of ozurdex on intraocular pressure. A real life clinical practice study]

OBJECTIVE

The dexamethasone biodegradable implant, ozurdex, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and by the European Medical Agency for the treatment of intermediate and posterior uveitis, and for the treatment of macular edema following retinal vein occlusion and diabetic macular edema. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of intraocular pressure in a cohort of patients from a real-life clinical practice.

METHODS

Retrospective review was performed on the clinical records of patients treated with Ozurdex in Hospital Universitario Cruces in a 6 month period. The following variables were recorded: age, gender, diagnosis and history of glaucoma; intraocular pressure, antihypertensive treatment and macular thickness were recorded before the injection, and in the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 6th months after the injection.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Mann-Whitney U test, Chi square test (with Fisher correction when needed) and Wilcoxon test. The level of statistical significance was set at P<.05.

RESULTS

The effects of 75 injections given to 67 patients (35 women: 52%; mean age: 62) were evaluated. Mean intraocular pressure before the injection was 15.9 mmHg and at 1st, 2nd, 4th and 6th months after de injection it was 18.80 (P=.627), 18.84 (P=.494), 17.02 (P=.796) and 15.5 (P=.829), respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in intraocular pressure measurements at the mentioned follow-up visits between patients with and without a history of glaucoma.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-life clinical practice, ozurdex shows an excellent safety profile in terms of intraocular hypertension. Patients with a history of glaucoma may also show this profile, with ozurdex being a good option to treat retinal diseases in these patients.

Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of Bioerodible Dexamethasone implant in Concanavalin A-induced uveitic cataract rabbit model

PURPOSE

To advance therapy for the treatment of concurrent uveitis and post-cataract surgical inflammation; we evaluated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Bioerodible Dexamethasone Implant (BDI) containing 0.3 mg of dexamethasone (DXM) in Concanavalin A (Con A) induced uveitis followed by phacoemulsification in New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits.

METHODS

The BDI was implanted in the inferior fornix of the capsular bag after intravitreal injection of Con A and ensuing phacoemulsification in NZW rabbits; standard-of-care topical 0.1% dexamethasone drops served as control. DXM was quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and pharmacokinetics of DXM in disease vs. healthy eyes was compared. All eyes were assessed clinically using slit lamp biomicroscopy and Draize scoring scale. Retinal thickness and histological analyses were performed to evaluate retinal edema, inflammation and implant biocompatibility respectively.

RESULTS

In Con A-induced inflammatory uveitic cataract model the BDI controlled anterior and posterior segment inflammation as well as retinal thickening more effectively than topical drops. The exposure (AUC0-t) of DXM with BDI is superior in all ocular tissues, while topical drops did not achieve therapeutic posterior segment levels and did not control inflammation nor prevent retinal edema and architectural disruption.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate the superiority of the BDI in suppressing Con A-induced inflammation and retinal edema in NZW rabbits and highlight the need for sustained bidirectional delivery of potent anti-inflammatory agents for 5 to 6 weeks to optimize clinical outcomes.

Evaluation of pain during intravitreal Ozurdex injections vs. intravitreal bevacizumab injections

PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the pain associated with intravitreal Ozurdex injections, and to compare it with that associated with intravitreal bevacizumab injections.

METHODS

The study included 57 eyes of 57 patients who received an intravitreal Ozurdex injection at our institution. Pain was measured by the visual analog scale (VAS). Additional parameters recorded included age, sex, indication for the injection, number of previous Ozurdex injections in the study eye, presence of diabetes mellitus, and lens status. Data were compared with a 2 : 1 sex- and age-matched control group of 114 patients who received intravitreal bevacizumab injections.

RESULTS

Indications for injection included diabetic macular edema (40.4%) and macular edema secondary to central and branch retinal vein occlusion (28% and 31.6%, respectively). Pain scores on the VAS ranged from 0 to 90, with a mean of 20.8±20.3. There was no significant difference in pain between Ozurdex and bevacizumab injections. Pseudophakia was correlated with increased pain in Ozurdex injections.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first series evaluating the pain associated with intravitreal Ozurdex injections. Despite a larger needle gauge and tunneled injection technique, intravitreal injection of Ozurdex is not associated with increased pain compared with bevacizumab. This finding may be a potential advantage for Ozurdex, and may serve to improve patient compliance with future long-term treatment protocols.

Suspected bacterial endophthalmitis following sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant: a case report

A 58-year-old man admitted to our opthalmology department with the complaint of branch retinal vein occlusion. He was treated with intravitreal Ozurdex in the right eye. Two days after the injection, the patient presented with ocular pain and the visual acuity was hand movement. A diagnosis of endophthalmitis was made. We performed emergent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and the implant was removed from the vitreous cavity using a retinal forceps. A combination of vancomycin 1.0 mg and amikacin 0.4 mg was injected intravitreally. However, because of the blurring in the vitreus one week after the procedure, phacoemulsification and a repeat PPV was performed. Five days after the last procedure the signs and symptoms of endophthalmitis were resolved. Our case demonstrated that endophthalmitis could develop after intravitreal implantation of Ozurdex. Surgical removal of the implant and immediate vitrectomy seems to be a useful treatment option in these cases.

Penetration force, geometry, and cutting profile of the novel and old Ozurdex needle: the MONO study

PURPOSE

To investigate the geometry, penetration force, and cutting profile of the novel and old needle of the drug delivery system (DDS) for Ozurdex injections in a standardized laboratory setting.

METHODS

In this experimental study, the normative geometrical data of the DDS needle were systematically analyzed according to nomenclature DIN 13097 (ISO 7864) and ISO 9626. The force to penetrate a standardized 0.4-mm-thick polyurethane foil was measured by a penetrometer, when the needle was piercing, cutting, and sliding through the foil and plotted as a load-displacement diagram. Magnified images of the consecutive cut were taken after the entire penetration through the foil.

RESULTS

In this experimental study, the mean point length was equal to 3.34 mm (3.28-3.36 mm) for the old DDS needle versus 3.33 mm (3.30-3.36 mm) for the new DDS needle. The secondary bevel length was 1.64 mm (1.42-1.73 mm) for the new and 1.66 mm (1.62-1.69 mm) for the old needle. The primary angle was 9.2° (9.0°-9.5°) for the old and 8.9° (8.5°-9.0°) for the new needle, respectively. The secondary bevel angle was 117.2° (116°-118°) for the old and 111.4° (110°-113°) for the new needle. The mean penetration force of the old DDS needles was significantly higher at all phases of the penetration experiment: The mean piercing force was 0.7 Newton (N) with the old and 0.47 N with the new DDS needle. The mean cutting force was remarkable higher with 1.1 N for the old DDS needle versus 0.78 N for the new DDS needle. The dilatation phase was not statistically significant between 0.94 and 0.99 N in both DDS needles. The friction phase was maintained at significantly higher levels with the old DDS needle of 0.47 N, whereas it returned to the lowest measurements of 0.11 N with the new DDS needle. Both DDS systems induced a characteristic chevron-shaped incision.

CONCLUSION

A comparison of the old and new DDS needles demonstrated a reduced penetration force with the modified new DDS needle, which may help to achieve a smooth penetration through the human sclera.

Preliminary results of an intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®) in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®; Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA, USA) in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) over a 6-month follow-up period.

METHODS

Seventeen patients (20 eyes) affected by DME were selected. The mean age was 67 + 8 years, and the mean duration of DME was 46.3 + 18.6 months. The eligibility criteria were: age ≥ 18, a best-corrected visual acuity between 5 and 40 letters, and macular edema with a thickness of ≥275 μm. Thirteen patients had also previously been treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medication.

RESULTS

The mean ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) value went from 18.80 + 11.06 (T0) to 26.15 + 11.03 (P = 0.04), 28.15 + 10.29 (P = 0.0087), 25.95 + 10.74 (P = 0.045), 21.25 + 11.46 (P = 0.5) in month 1, 3, 4, and 6, respectively. The mean logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) value went from 0.67 + 0.23 (at T0) to 0.525 + 0.190 (P = 0.03), 0.53 + 0.20 (P = 0.034), and 0.56 + 0.22 (P = 0.12) in month 1, 3, and 4, respectively, to finally reach 0.67 + 0.23 in month 6. The mean central macular thickness value improved from 518.80 + 224.75 μm (at T0) to 412.75 + 176.23 μm, 292.0 + 140.8 μm (P < 0.0001), and 346.95 + 135.70 (P = 0.0018) on day 3 and in month 1 and 3, respectively, to then increase to 476.55 + 163.14 μm (P = 0.45) and 494.25 + 182.70 μm (P = 0.67) in month 4 and 6.

CONCLUSION

The slow-release intravitreal dexamethasone implant, Ozurdex, produced significant improvements in best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness from the third day of implant in DME sufferers, and this improvement was sustained until the third month.