[Amblyopia-Basic principles and current diagnostic and therapeutic standards]

Macular and Optic Disc Parameters in Children with Amblyopic and Nonamblyopic Eyes under Optical Coherence Tomography Fundus Images

The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of macular and optic disc parameters in children with amblyopic and nonamblyopic eyes, using fundus images under optical coherence tomography (OCT). 36 patients with anisometropic amblyopia were selected in the experimental group, and another 36 healthy volunteers were selected in the control group, OCT examinations were performed in all groups, and the mean diopter, mean corrected visual acuity (CVA), mean axial length, mean optic disc retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, and mean macular fovea thickness were recorded in the two groups. The results found that the average diopter of the patients in the control group and the experimental group was +2.30 ± 2.54 D and +5.51 ± 1.76 D, respectively. The average CVA was 0.86 ± 0.07 and 0.22 ± 0.16, respectively; the average eye axial length was 22.41 ± 1.20 mm and 21.11 ± 0.78 mm, respectively. As P < 0.05, the differences were statistically significant in the three indicators between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the average thickness of the RNFL of the optic disc and the average thickness of the central fovea of macula (P > 0.05). There was some correlation among CVA, diopter, eye axial length, RNFL thickness, and average thickness of macular fovea, but the correlation was not significant. It was suggested that there were certain differences in the macular and optic disc parameters between amblyopic and nonamblyopic children, but the difference is little. Thereout, a certain objective basis was provided for the early detection and treatment of amblyopia.

[Detections of refractive risk factors for amblyopia with Plusoptix Autorefractor A09]

BACKGROUND

Amblyopia is the most frequent cause for decreased vision in childhood. Important risk factors for amblyopia (ARF) are refractive errors. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of the Plusoptix Autorefractor A09 (POA09) to detect refractive ARF.

METHOD

This prospective non-blinded, one-armed study was conducted between February 2012 and September 2015. Children aged 6 months to 12 years were screened in kindergarten and schools for refractive errors. Thresholds for screening failure were hyperopia ≥ 3.5 diopters (D), myopia ≥ 3.0 D, anisometropia ≥ 1.5 D and astigmatism ≥ 1.5 D (axis 90° or 180° ± 10°) or ≥ 1.0 D (≥ 10° axis deviation of 90° or 180°). Children who failed screening were advised to see an ophthalmologist for a comprehensive eye examination. After the visit, parents were asked for the results of the examination. A reference group of children who did not fail screening also received a comprehensive eye examination. Based on the number of children who failed screening, we calculated the proportion of correctly detected refractive errors. Based on the children of the reference group we calculated the proportion of correctly excluded refractive errors and the false negative rate.

RESULTS

In this study 3170 children were screened, 715 children (22.3%) failed screening. For 460 of these (64.3%) follow-up was available and for 132 children information on refractive errors in cycloplegia was available. Most frequent refractive errors at screening were astigmatism (90.9%) and anisometropia (11.4%). Most frequent refractive errors in cycloplegia were astigmatism (56.8%) and hyperopia (18.9%). The proportion of correctly detected refractive errors in the screening was highest for astigmatism (60%) and anisometropia (53.3%), followed by hyperopia (33.3%) and myopia (25%).

CONCLUSION

The reliability of POA09 to detect refractive ARF in children without cycloplegia was limited, highlighting the importance of a systematic amblyopia screening. A screening in cycloplegia can increase the proportion of correctly detected refractive ARF and should be studied.