Randomized comparison between provisional and routine kissing-balloon technique after main vessel crossover stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions

Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: Review of Current Techniques and Evidence

BACKGROUND

Coronary bifurcation stenting constitutes 20% of all PCI performed. Given the extensive prevalence of bifurcation lesions, various techniques have sought to optimally stent the bifurcation to improve revascularization while also decreasing rates of stent thrombosis and lesion recurrence. Advanced techniques, such as planned two-stent approaches, have been shown to have improved outcomes but also require fluoroscopy and procedure time, posing an economic argument as well as a patient-outcome one.

OBJECTIVE

Because of the many strategies posited in the literature, it becomes essential to objectively evaluate evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses to help determine the optimal stenting strategy.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical evidence on the efficacy of coronary bifurcation stenting.

RESULTS

In this paper, we review the most recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses on the efficacy of various stenting techniques and advances in stenting technologies published to gauge the current state of understanding and chart where the field is heading.

CONCLUSION

Bifurcation stenting is a maturing problem in the field of interventional cardiology that is adapting to the needs of the patients and advances in technology.

Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions

Bifurcation coronary artery disease is common as the development of atherosclerosis is facilitated by altered endothelial shear stress. Multiple anatomical and physiological factors need to be considered when treating bifurcation lesions. To achieve optimal results, various stenting techniques have been developed, each with benefits and limitations. In this state-of-the-art review we describe technically important characteristics of bifurcation lesions and summarise the evidence supporting contemporary bifurcation techniques.

Association of the extent of myocardial ischemia with outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease in Japan

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing controversy regarding the necessity of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for patients with ischemic heart diseases after the publication of the results of the ISCHEMIA trial. We aimed to evaluate the association of the extent of myocardial ischemia with outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease in Japan.

METHODS

From the data of 2780 patients with stable angina who were enrolled prospectively between January 2006 and March 2008 in Japan and had undergone physician-referrednon-invasive imaging tests (Japanese Coronary-Angiography or Myocardial Imaging for Angina Pectoris Study), 1205 patients managed with SPECT were stratified by 10% myocardial ischemia. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, and late revascularization, were followed-up for 1year.

RESULTS

Patients with ≥10% myocardial ischemia (n=173) were less likely to be women than patients with <10% myocardial ischemia (n=1032) and had a significantly higher 1-year cumulative incidence of MACEs (6.9% vs. 1.8%, p<0.0001). After adjusting for confounders, the risk of ≥10% myocardial ischemia relative to <10% myocardial ischemia for MACEs remained significant [adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 2.40 (1.09-5.26), p=0.029]. After adjusting including treatments, the risk of MACEs became insignificant between the ≥10% myocardial ischemia group and the <10% myocardial ischemia group [adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 1.04 (0.45-2.45), p=0.92].

CONCLUSION

The presence of ≥10% myocardial ischemia at diagnosis was significantly associated with the 1-year risk for MACEs in Japanese patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Impact of late lumen loss on clinical outcomes of side branch bifurcation lesions treated by drug-coated balloon angioplasty with main branch stenting

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for side branches with main branch stenting is effective for bifurcation lesions and reduces late lumen loss (LLL) in side branches. However, the predictors and clinical implications of LLL after DCB angioplasty are largely unexplored.

METHODS

Among 181 patients undergoing DCB angioplasty for side branches with drug-eluting stent implantation for main branches between 2016 and 2018, we enrolled 138 patients (138 lesions) undergoing follow-up coronary angiography within 1 year. The 1-year cumulative rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and TLR) were compared between patients with late lumen gain (LLG) (LLG group) and those with LLL (LLL group).

RESULTS

The binary restenosis rate of the side branch was 8.0% (11 lesions), mean LLL was -0.14 ± 0.43 mm, and LLG was observed in 99 lesions (71.7%). The DCB size/reference vessel diameter ratio showed mild discrimination (area under the curve, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-65.0; p = 0.03) for predicting the side branch progression. The 1-year cumulative rates of MACE and TLR were not significantly different but numerically lower in the LLG group than in the LLL group (2.0% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.11 and 2.0% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.11, respectively). Lumen regression after DCB angioplasty for side branches are associated with improved clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The DCB size relative to the reference vessel diameter is a predictor of late lumen enlargement in side branches.

Should kissing balloon inflation after main vessel stenting be routine in the one-stent approach? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

The KBI (kissing balloon inflation) technique is considered the default strategy for the two-stent approach in real world practice. Studies comparing KBI and No-KBI in patients undergoing the one-stent approach have reported conflicting results. The meta-analysis was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of the KBI strategy and the No-KBI strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions in the one-stent approach. Five randomized studies were included, and a total of 1264 patients were involved in the meta-analysis. The primary outcome was cardiac death. The secondary end points were stent thrombosis, MI (myocardial infarction), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and main vessel and side branch restenosis. Compared with the No-KBI strategy, the KBI strategy was associated with a significant reduction in side branch restenosis (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.30–0.64, p<0.001). A high risk of main vessel restenosis was found in the KBI group (OR: 2.96, 95% CI: 1.74–5.01, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of cardiac death (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 0.60–5.95, p = 0.28), stent thrombosis (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.19–4.94, p = 0.98), MI (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.33–1.44, p = 0.30), TLR (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.68–1.90, p = 0.62), or TVR (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.75–2.16, p = 0.38). Compared with the No-KBI strategy, the KBI strategy reduced the incidence of side branch restenosis and increased the risk of main branch restenosis in the one-stent approach. However, the clinical outcomes were similar between the KBI and No-KBI groups.

Final kissing balloon inflation for coronary bifurcation lesions treated with single-stent technique : A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of final kissing balloon (FKB) inflation in one-stent techniques for bifurcation lesions is controversial. The goal of the present study was to investigate the impact of FKB on long-term clinical outcomes in one-stent strategies.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was undertaken through August 2017. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. Overall hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Ten studies comprising 7364 patients treated with a one-stent technique were included in the analysis. Overall, FKB did not demonstrate a significant reduction in MACE compared with non-FKB in both randomized trials (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.65-1.98) and observational studies (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.61-1.20). The risk of cardiac death (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.53-1.49), myocardial infarction (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.53-1.09), and target lesion revascularization (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.74-1.23) was also similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

FKB may not be mandatory and a selective FKB strategy might be more justified in one-stent techniques for bifurcation lesions.