1
|
Bulut E, Johansen PM, Elbualy A, Kalman C, Mayer R, Kato N, Salmeron de Toledo Aguiar R, Pilitsis JG. How Long Does Deep Brain Stimulation Give Patients Benefit? Neuromodulation 2025; 28:472-483. [PMID: 39001725 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION One of the most common questions patients ask when they are contemplating deep brain stimulation (DBS) is how long it will last. To guide physicians in answering this query, we performed a scoping review to assess the current state of the literature and to identify the gaps that need to be addressed. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors performed a MEDLINE search inclusive of articles from January 1987 (advent of DBS literature) to June 2023 including human and modeling studies written in English. For longevity of therapy data, only studies with a mean follow-up of ≥three years were included. Using the Rayyan platform, two reviewers (JP and RM) performed a title screen. Of the 734 articles, 205 were selected by title screen and 109 from abstract review. Ultimately, a total of 122 articles were reviewed. The research questions we explored were 1) how long can the different components of the DBS system maintain functionality? and 2) how long can DBS remain efficacious in treating Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), dystonia, and other disorders? RESULTS We showed that patients with PD, ET, and dystonia maintain a considerable long-term benefit in motor scores seven to ten years after implant, although the percentage improvement decreases over time. Stimulation off scores in PD and ET show worsening, consistent with disease progression. Battery life varies by the disease treated and the programming settings used. There remains a paucity of literature after ten years, and the impact of new device technology has not been classified to date. CONCLUSION We reviewed existing data on DBS longevity. Overall, outcomes data after ten years of therapy are substantially limited in the current literature. We recommend that physicians who have data for patients with DBS exceeding this duration publish their results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esin Bulut
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - P Mitchell Johansen
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Alya Elbualy
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Cheyenne Kalman
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Ryan Mayer
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Nicholas Kato
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | | | - Julie G Pilitsis
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jakobs M, Hajiabadi MM, Aguirre-Padilla DH, Giaccobe P, Unterberg AW, Lozano AM. Recharge PSYCH: A Study on Rechargeable Implantable Pulse Generators in Deep Brain Stimulation for Psychiatric Disorders. World Neurosurg 2023; 170:e331-e339. [PMID: 36368453 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rechargeable implantable pulse generators (r-IPGs) for deep brain stimulation (DBS) promise longer battery life and fewer replacement surgeries versus non-rechargeable systems. Long-term data on the effects of recharging in patients who received DBS for psychiatric indications is limited. The Recharge PSYCH trial is the first study that included DBS patients with psychiatric disorders treated with different r-IPG models. METHODS Standardized questionnaires were sent to all psychiatric DBS patients with an r-IPG implanted at the time of the study. The primary endpoint was convenience of recharging. Secondary endpoints were rate of user confidence and rate of usage-related complications, as well as charge burden (defined as minutes per week needed to recharge). RESULTS Data sets of n = 21 patients were eligible for data analysis. At the time of the survey patients were implanted with the r-IPG for a mean 31.8 ± 22.4 months. Prior to being implanted with an r-IPG, patients had undergone a median of 3 IPG replacements. The overall convenience of the charging process was rated as "easy" with a median of 8.0 out of 10.0 points. 33.3% of patients experienced situations in which the device could not be successfully recharged. In 38.1% of patients, therapy with the r-IPG was interrupted unintentionally. The average charge burden was 286 ± 22.4 minutes per week. CONCLUSIONS Patients with psychiatric disorders rated the recharging process as "easy", but with a significantly higher charge burden and usage-related complication rates compared to published data on movement disorder DBS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Jakobs
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Mohammad Mehdi Hajiabadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Operative Pain Department, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Hernán Aguirre-Padilla
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Peter Giaccobe
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andreas W Unterberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gelineau-Morel R, Kruer MC, Garris JF, Libdeh AA, Barbosa DAN, Coffman KA, Moon D, Barton C, Vera AZ, Bruce AB, Larsh T, Wu SW, Gilbert DL, O’Malley JA. Deep Brain Stimulation for Pediatric Dystonia: A Review of the Literature and Suggested Programming Algorithm. J Child Neurol 2022; 37:813-824. [PMID: 36053123 PMCID: PMC9912476 DOI: 10.1177/08830738221115248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established intervention for use in pediatric movement disorders, especially dystonia. Although multiple publications have provided guidelines for deep brain stimulation patient selection and programming in adults, there are no evidence-based or consensus statements published for pediatrics. The result is lack of standardized care and underutilization of this effective treatment. To this end, we assembled a focus group of 13 pediatric movement disorder specialists and 1 neurosurgeon experienced in pediatric deep brain stimulation to review recent literature and current practices and propose a standardized approach to candidate selection, implantation target site selection, and programming algorithms. For pediatric dystonia, we provide algorithms for (1) programming for initial session and follow-up sessions, and (2) troubleshooting side effects encountered during programming. We discuss common side effects, how they present, and recommendations for management. This topical review serves as a resource for movement disorders specialists interested in using deep brain stimulation for pediatric dystonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Gelineau-Morel
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, Missouri, 64108
| | - Michael C Kruer
- Pediatric Movement Disorders Program, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s Hospital & University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, 85016
| | - Jordan F Garris
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, PO Box 800394, Charlottesville, VA, 22908−0394
| | - Amal Abu Libdeh
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, PO Box 800394, Charlottesville, VA, 22908−0394
| | - Daniel A N Barbosa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Edwards Bldg, Stanford, CA, 94305
| | - Keith A Coffman
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, Missouri, 64108
| | - David Moon
- Department of Child Neurology, Division of Neurosciences, Helen DeVos Children’s Hospital, 100 Michigan St NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49503
| | - Christopher Barton
- Department of Neurology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky; Division of Child Neurology, Norton Children’s Medical Group, 231 E Chestnut St, Louisville, KY 40202
| | - Alonso Zea Vera
- Department of Neurology, Children’s National Hospital, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20010
| | - Adrienne B Bruce
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Prisma Health, 200 Patewood Drive A350, Greenville, SC, USA 29615; University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, 607 Grove Road, Greenville, SC, 29605
| | - Travis Larsh
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, 3333 Burnet Ave, Location E4, Suite 110, Cincinnati, OH 45229
| | - Steve W Wu
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, 3333 Burnet Ave, Location E4, Suite 110, Cincinnati, OH 45229
| | - Donald L Gilbert
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, 3333 Burnet Ave, Location E4, Suite 110, Cincinnati, OH 45229
| | - Jennifer A O’Malley
- Department of Neurology, Division of Child Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 750 Welch Road, Suite 317, Palo Alto, California, 94304
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jakobs M, Helmers AK, Synowitz M, Slotty PJ, Anthofer JM, Schlaier JR, Kloss M, Unterberg AW, Kiening KL. A multicenter, open-label, controlled trial on acceptance, convenience, and complications of rechargeable internal pulse generators for deep brain stimulation: the Multi Recharge Trial. J Neurosurg 2020; 133:821-829. [PMID: 31419794 DOI: 10.3171/2019.5.jns19360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Rechargeable neurostimulators for deep brain stimulation have been available since 2008, promising longer battery life and fewer replacement surgeries compared to non-rechargeable systems. Long-term data on how recharging affects movement disorder patients are sparse. This is the first multicenter, patient-focused, industry-independent study on rechargeable neurostimulators. METHODS Four neurosurgical centers sent a questionnaire to all adult movement disorder patients with a rechargeable neurostimulator implanted at the time of the trial. The primary endpoint was the convenience of the recharging process rated on an ordinal scale from "very hard" (1) to "very easy" (5). Secondary endpoints were charge burden (time spent per week on recharging), user confidence, and complication rates. Endpoints were compared for several subgroups. RESULTS Datasets of 195 movement disorder patients (66.1% of sent questionnaires) with Parkinson's disease (PD), tremor, or dystonia were returned and included in the analysis. Patients had a mean age of 61.3 years and the device was implanted for a mean of 40.3 months. The overall convenience of recharging was rated as "easy" (4). The mean charge burden was 122 min/wk and showed a positive correlation with duration of therapy; 93.8% of users felt confident recharging the device. The rate of surgical revisions was 4.1%, and the infection rate was 2.1%. Failed recharges occurred in 8.7% of patients, and 3.6% of patients experienced an interruption of therapy because of a failed recharge. Convenience ratings by PD patients were significantly worse than ratings by dystonia patients. Caregivers recharged the device for the patient in 12.3% of cases. Patients who switched from a non-rechargeable to a rechargeable neurostimulator found recharging to be significantly less convenient at a higher charge burden than did patients whose primary implant was rechargeable. Age did not have a significant impact on any endpoint. CONCLUSIONS Overall, patients with movement disorders rated recharging as easy, with low complication rates and acceptable charge burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Jakobs
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Stereotactic Neurosurgery, and
- Departments of2Neurosurgery and
| | - Ann-Kristin Helmers
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel
| | - Michael Synowitz
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel
| | - Philipp J Slotty
- 5Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf; and
| | - Judith M Anthofer
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen R Schlaier
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Manja Kloss
- 3Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | | | - Karl L Kiening
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Stereotactic Neurosurgery, and
- Departments of2Neurosurgery and
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ågren R, Bartek J, Johansson A, Blomstedt P, Fytagoridis A. Pulse Width and Implantable Pulse Generator Longevity in Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia: A Population-Based Comparative Effectiveness Study. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2020; 98:331-336. [PMID: 32668433 DOI: 10.1159/000508794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A wide range of pulse widths (PWs) has been used in globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for dystonia. However, no specific PW has demonstrated clinical superiority, and the paradigm may differ among DBS centers. OBJECTIVE To investigate how different paradigms of PWs in GPi DBS for dystonia affect implantable pulse generator (IPG) longevities and energy consumption. METHODS Thirty-nine patients with dystonia treated with bilateral GPi DBS at 2 Swedish DBS centers from 2005 to 2015 were included. Different PW paradigms were used at the 2 centers, 60-90 µs (short PWs) and 450 µs (long PW), respectively. The frequency of IPG replacements, pulse effective voltage (PEV), IPG model, pre-/postoperative imaging, and clinical outcome based on the clinical global impression (CGI) scale were collected from the medical charts and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS The average IPG longevity was extended for the short PWs (1,129 ± 50 days) compared to the long PW (925 ± 32 days; χ2 = 12.31, p = 0.0005, log-rank test). IPG longevity correlated inversely with PEV (Pearson's r = -0.667, p < 0.0001). IPG longevities did not differ between Kinetra® and Activa® PC in the short (p = 0.319) or long PW group (p = 0.858). Electrode distances to the central sensorimotor region of the GPi did not differ between the short or long PW groups (p = 0.595). Pre- and postoperative CGI did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS Short PWs were associated with decreased energy consumption and increased IPG longevity. These effects were not dependent on the IPG model or the anatomic location of the electrodes. PWs did not correlate with symptom severities or clinical outcomes. The results suggest that the use of short PWs might be more energy efficient and could therefore be preferred initially when programming patients with GPi DBS for dystonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Ågren
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden,
| | - Jiri Bartek
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Sweden
| | - Anders Johansson
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Patric Blomstedt
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Unit of Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Anders Fytagoridis
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lin S, Wu Y, Li H, Zhang C, Wang T, Pan Y, He L, Shen R, Deng Z, Sun B, Ding J, Li D. Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus versus the subthalamic nucleus in isolated dystonia. J Neurosurg 2020; 132:721-732. [PMID: 30849756 DOI: 10.3171/2018.12.jns181927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Surgical procedures involving deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) or subthalamic nucleus (STN) are well-established treatments for isolated dystonia. However, selection of the best stimulation target remains a matter of debate. The authors' objective was to compare the effectiveness of DBS of the GPi and the STN in patients with isolated dystonia. METHODS In this matched retrospective cohort study, the authors searched an institutional database for data on all patients with isolated dystonia who had undergone bilateral implantation of DBS electrodes in either the GPi or STN in the period from January 30, 2014, to June 30, 2017. Standardized assessments of dystonia and health-related quality of life using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and SF-36 were conducted before and at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. No patients were lost to the 6-month follow-up; 5 patients were lost to the 12-month follow-up. RESULTS Both GPi (14 patients) and STN (16 patients) stimulation produced significant improvement in dystonia and quality of life in all 30 patients found in the database search. At the 1-month follow-up, however, the percentage improvement in the BFMDRS total movement score was significantly (p = 0.01) larger after STN DBS (64%) than after GPi DBS (48%). At the 12-month follow-up, the percentage improvement in the axis subscore was significantly (p = 0.03) larger after GPi DBS (93%) than after STN DBS (83%). Also, the total amount of electrical energy delivered was significantly (p = 0.008) lower with STN DBS than with GPi DBS (124 ± 52 vs 192 ± 65 μJ, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The GPi and STN are both effective targets in alleviating dystonia and improving quality of life. However, GPi stimulation may be better for patients with axial symptoms. Moreover, STN stimulation may produce a larger clinical response within 1 month after surgery and may have a potential economic advantage in terms of lower battery consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzhen Lin
- 1Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
- 2Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Key Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology, Institute of Health Science, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai; and
| | - Yiwen Wu
- 1Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
- 2Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Key Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology, Institute of Health Science, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai; and
| | - Hongxia Li
- 1Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
| | - Chencheng Zhang
- 3Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Tao Wang
- 3Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yixin Pan
- 3Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Lu He
- 1Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
| | - Ruinan Shen
- 1Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
| | - Zhengdao Deng
- 3Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Bomin Sun
- 3Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianqing Ding
- 2Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Key Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology, Institute of Health Science, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai; and
| | - Dianyou Li
- 3Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Furlanetti L, Raslan A, Khaleeq T, Hasegawa H, Tambirajoo R, Samuel M, Ashkan K. Fixed-Life or Rechargeable Battery for Deep Brain Stimulation: A Prospective Long-Term Study of Patient's Preferences. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2020; 98:43-47. [PMID: 32069466 DOI: 10.1159/000505700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for movement disorders. We have previously shown that in our practice, the majority of adult patients prefer fixed-life implantable pulse generators (IPGs), although rechargeable batteries are increasingly used. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' long-term satisfaction with their choice of battery and factors that influence their decision. METHODS Thirty patients with DBS were given a questionnaire to assess long-term satisfaction and experience with the type of battery they had chosen. RESULTS Twenty-six patients completed the survey. The mean age was 67.7 ± 7.3 years, and mean follow-up was 18.0 ± 7.2 months. The indications for DBS were Parkinson's disease (76.9%), tremor (11.5%) and dystonia (11.5%). Eleven patients (42.5%) had chosen the rechargeable battery. All patients were still happy with their choices and would not change the type of battery if they had the chance to do so. However, in patients who chose the fixed-life battery, concern about the size of battery rose from 6.7% pre-operatively to 60% on long-term post-operative follow-up. In patients who chose the rechargeable battery, concern about the need to recharge the battery did not change, remaining low postoperatively. Interestingly, even though the main reason cited for choosing the fixed-life battery was the convenience and concern about forgetting to recharge the battery, patients who had chosen a rechargeable IPG did not experience this problem. CONCLUSION Patients and caregivers should be involved in the choice of battery, as each type of IPG has its own advantages and disadvantages. Long-term evaluation of patient's experience and satisfaction with battery of choice revealed that size of the IPG, need for further replacement surgeries and need for recharging remain matters of major concern. Although preoperatively often underestimated, the size of the battery seems to be an important factor in long-term satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciano Furlanetti
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom,
| | - Ahmed Raslan
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tahir Khaleeq
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Harutomo Hasegawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ruby Tambirajoo
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Samuel
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Keyoumars Ashkan
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Niemann M, Schneider GH, Kühn A, Vajkoczy P, Faust K. Clinical Efficacy of Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation Does Not Change After Implantable Pulse Generator Replacement but the Impedances Do: A Prospective Study. Neuromodulation 2019; 23:530-536. [PMID: 31323173 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2018] [Revised: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved therapy option for movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD), essential Tremor (ET), and dystonia. While current research focuses on rechargeable implantable pulse generators (IPGs), little is known about changes of the motor functions after IPG replacement and the consequences of additionally implanted hardware. OBJECTIVE To assess changes of the motor functions, the therapy impedances, and the total electric energy delivered (TEED) after elective IPG replacement. METHODS We prospectively acquired the data of 47 patients with PD, ET, and dystonia treated with bilateral DBS. Motor functions were rated prior to and after surgery using the revised Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS-III), the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor-Rating-Scale (FTM-TRS), and the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS). Furthermore, the therapy impedances and TEED were assessed at the aforementioned times. RESULTS While preoperative motor scores were 48.32 ± 17.16 in PD, 39.71 ± 12.28 in ET, and 18.48 ± 16.30 in dystonia patients, postoperative scores were 47.84 ± 24.33, 32.86 ± 15.82, and 15.02 ± 15.17, respectively. Only in dystonia patients, motor scores significantly differed. Perioperative therapy impedance changes were 142.66 ± 105.35 Ω (Kinetra® to Activa® PC), -68.75 ± 43.05 Ω (Activa® PC to Activa® PC), and - 51.38 ± 38.75 Ω (Activa® PC to Activa® RC). Perioperative TEED changes were - 37.15 ± 38.87 μJ, 2.03 ± 35.91 μJ, and 12.39 ± 6.31 μJ in that first, second, and third group, respectively. Both the therapy impedances and TEED significantly differed between groups. CONCLUSION Although there were no statistically significant changes in the motor functions of all patients after elective IPG replacement, the therapy impedances were significantly higher and TEED was significantly lower after IPG replacement with concurrent Pocket Adapter implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Niemann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrea Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katharina Faust
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sette A, Seigneuret E, Reymond F, Chabardes S, Castrioto A, Boussat B, Moro E, François P, Fraix V. Battery longevity of neurostimulators in Parkinson disease: A historic cohort study. Brain Stimul 2019; 12:851-857. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Revised: 09/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
10
|
Tustin K, Elze MC, Lumsden DE, Gimeno H, Kaminska M, Lin JP. Gross motor function outcomes following deep brain stimulation for childhood-onset dystonia: A descriptive report. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2019; 23:473-483. [PMID: 30846371 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2019.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM To examine the impact of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on gross motor function in children with dystonic movement disorders. METHOD Prospective audit involving children implanted 2007-2015, followed for up to two years. Outcomes were evaluated across aetiological sub-groups (inherited, acquired, idiopathic) using the GMFM-88 and BFMDRS movement scale (BFM-M). The predictive value of proportion of life lived with dystonia (PLD) and baseline motor capacity were evaluated. RESULTS Data was available for 60 children (median surgery age 10y11mo). Inherited monogenetic dystonias demonstrated a median increase in GMFM-88 scores of 6.9% (p = 0.021) and 14.5% (p = 0.116) at one and two years. Heredodegenerative and idiopathic dystonias showed disparate responses, with non-significant changes seen in GMFM-88 and BFM-M scores, with the exception of improved one-year BFM-M scores in the idiopathic group [median change 5.5, p = 0.021]. Median GMFM-88 and BFM-M change scores were near zero for acquired dystonias, though improvement was noted in 9/18 CP cases with one-year GMFM-88 data. No significant relationship was found between PLD, or baseline GMFM-88, and GMFM-88 change following DBS. CONCLUSION Gross motor response to DBS is similar in profile to literature reporting results using impairment-based dystonia rating scales. Relatively consistent improvements were seen in inherited monogenetic ("primary") dystonias, while highly variable, often disappointing, gross motor responses were found in acquired, heredodegenerative, and idiopathic dystonias. In view of such response variability, alternatives to mean group studies, such as single case experimental designs with multiple replications, are needed to determine the efficacy of DBS in childhood-onset dystonias. Ongoing research is needed to identify factors that predict treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylee Tustin
- Complex Motor Disorder Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Floor 2 Beckett House, Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EU, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Daniel E Lumsden
- Complex Motor Disorder Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Floor 2 Beckett House, Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EU, United Kingdom
| | - Hortensia Gimeno
- Complex Motor Disorder Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Floor 2 Beckett House, Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EU, United Kingdom; King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, Psychology Department, London, SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
| | - Margaret Kaminska
- Complex Motor Disorder Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Floor 2 Beckett House, Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EU, United Kingdom
| | - Jean-Pierre Lin
- Complex Motor Disorder Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Floor 2 Beckett House, Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EU, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Candela S, Vanegas MI, Darling A, Ortigoza-Escobar JD, Alamar M, Muchart J, Climent A, Ferrer E, Rumià J, Pérez-Dueñas B. Frameless robot-assisted pallidal deep brain stimulation surgery in pediatric patients with movement disorders: precision and short-term clinical results. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2018; 22:416-425. [PMID: 30028274 DOI: 10.3171/2018.5.peds1814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to verify the safety and accuracy of the Neuromate stereotactic robot for use in deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implantation for the treatment of hyperkinetic movement disorders in childhood and describe the authors' initial clinical results. METHODS A prospective evaluation of pediatric patients with dystonia and other hyperkinetic movement disorders was carried out during the 1st year after the start-up of a pediatric DBS unit in Barcelona. Electrodes were implanted bilaterally in the globus pallidus internus (GPi) using the Neuromate robot without the stereotactic frame. The authors calculated the distances between the electrodes and their respective planned trajectories, merging the postoperative CT with the preoperative plan using VoXim software. Clinical outcome was monitored using validated scales for dystonia and myoclonus preoperatively and at 1 month and 6 months postoperatively and by means of a quality-of-life questionnaire for children, administered before surgery and at 6 months' follow-up. We also recorded complications derived from the implantation technique, "hardware," and stimulation. RESULTS Six patients aged 7 to 16 years and diagnosed with isolated dystonia ( DYT1 negative) (3 patients), choreo-dystonia related to PDE2A mutation (1 patient), or myoclonus-dystonia syndrome SGCE mutations (2 patients) were evaluated during a period of 6 to 19 months. The average accuracy in the placement of the electrodes was 1.24 mm at the target point. At the 6-month follow-up, patients showed an improvement in the motor (65%) and functional (48%) components of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale. Patients with myoclonus and SGCE mutations also showed an improvement in action myoclonus (95%-100%) and in functional tests (50%-75%) according to the Unified Motor-Rating Scale. The Neuro-QOL score revealed inconsistent results, with improvement in motor function and social relationships but worsening in anxiety, cognitive function, and pain. The only surgical complication was medial displacement of the first electrode, which limited intensity of stimulation in the lower contacts, in one case. CONCLUSIONS The Neuromate stereotactic robot is an accurate and safe tool for the placement of GPi electrodes in children with hyperkinetic movement disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Candela
- Departments of1Neurosurgery.,6Pediatric Movement Disorders Unit, Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Children's Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona
| | - María Isabel Vanegas
- 2Neuropediatrics, and.,6Pediatric Movement Disorders Unit, Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Children's Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona.,7Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Alejandra Darling
- 2Neuropediatrics, and.,6Pediatric Movement Disorders Unit, Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Children's Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona
| | - Juan Darío Ortigoza-Escobar
- 2Neuropediatrics, and.,6Pediatric Movement Disorders Unit, Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Children's Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona
| | - Mariana Alamar
- Departments of1Neurosurgery.,6Pediatric Movement Disorders Unit, Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Children's Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona
| | - Jordi Muchart
- 3Diagnostic Imaging.,6Pediatric Movement Disorders Unit, Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Children's Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona
| | - Alejandra Climent
- Departments of1Neurosurgery.,2Neuropediatrics, and.,4Intraoperative Neurophysiology Unit, and.,6Pediatric Movement Disorders Unit, Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Children's Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona
| | - Enrique Ferrer
- Departments of1Neurosurgery.,5Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona; and.,6Pediatric Movement Disorders Unit, Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Children's Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona
| | - Jordi Rumià
- Departments of1Neurosurgery.,5Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona; and.,6Pediatric Movement Disorders Unit, Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Children's Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona
| | - Belén Pérez-Dueñas
- 2Neuropediatrics, and.,6Pediatric Movement Disorders Unit, Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Children's Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona.,7Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khaleeq T, Hasegawa H, Samuel M, Ashkan K. Fixed-Life or Rechargeable Battery for Deep Brain Stimulation: Which Do Patients Prefer? Neuromodulation 2018; 22:489-492. [PMID: 30133071 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is increasingly used to treat a wide variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Implantable pulse generators (implantable pulse generators/batteries) for DBS were originally only available as a nonrechargeable option. However, there is now a choice between fixed-life and rechargeable batteries, with each having their own advantages and disadvantages. The extent of patient involvement in the choice of battery and the factors that matter to them have not been well studied. METHODS Thirty consecutive adult patients with movement disorders attending a pre-DBS clinic were offered a choice of fixed-life or rechargeable battery and completed a questionnaire after the consultation on which factors influenced their decision. RESULTS Nineteen patients (63%) chose the fixed-life battery and 11 patients (37%) chose the rechargeable battery. There were no significant differences in age, sex, underlying disease, disease duration or Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (part 3) score (for patients with Parkinson disease) between those who chose the fixed-life vs. rechargeable battery. Most patients were not concerned about the size of the battery. Equal numbers were concerned about surgery to replace the battery, and less than half were concerned about the need to recharge the battery. More than half of patients felt that an acceptable charging frequency was monthly or yearly, and all patients felt that an acceptable charging duration was less than 1 hour, with half of all patients choosing less than 30 min. The main reasons cited for choosing the fixed-life battery were convenience and concern about forgetting to recharge the battery. The main reason for choosing the rechargeable battery was the avoidance of further surgery. DISCUSSION Most patients in this adult cohort with movement disorders chose the fixed-life battery. The better lifestyle associated with a fixed-life battery is a major factor influencing their choice. Rechargeable batteries may be more acceptable if the recharging process is improved, more convenient, and discreet. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors' institution has received educational grants from Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific companies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahir Khaleeq
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Harutomo Hasegawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Michael Samuel
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Keyoumars Ashkan
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bari AA, Mikell CB, Abosch A, Ben-Haim S, Buchanan RJ, Burton AW, Carcieri S, Cosgrove GR, D'Haese PF, Daskalakis ZJ, Eskandar EN, Gerrard JL, Goodman WK, Greenberg BD, Gross RE, Hamani C, Kiss ZHT, Konrad P, Kopell BH, Krinke L, Langevin JP, Lozano AM, Malone D, Mayberg HS, Miller JP, Patil PG, Peichel D, Petersen EA, Rezai AR, Richardson RM, Riva-Posse P, Sankar T, Schwalb JM, Simpson HB, Slavin K, Stypulkowski PH, Tosteson T, Warnke P, Willie JT, Zaghloul KA, Neimat JS, Pouratian N, Sheth SA. Charting the road forward in psychiatric neurosurgery: proceedings of the 2016 American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery workshop on neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018; 89:886-896. [PMID: 29371415 PMCID: PMC7340367 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-317082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Revised: 11/28/2017] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Refractory psychiatric disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and there is a great need for new treatments. In the last decade, investigators piloted novel deep brain stimulation (DBS)-based therapies for depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Results from recent pivotal trials of these therapies, however, did not demonstrate the degree of efficacy expected from previous smaller trials. To discuss next steps, neurosurgeons, neurologists, psychiatrists and representatives from industry convened a workshop sponsored by the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery in Chicago, Illinois, in June of 2016. DESIGN Here we summarise the proceedings of the workshop. Participants discussed a number of issues of importance to the community. First, we discussed how to interpret results from the recent pivotal trials of DBS for OCD and depression. We then reviewed what can be learnt from lesions and closed-loop neurostimulation. Subsequently, representatives from the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration and industry discussed their views on neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders. In particular, these third parties discussed their criteria for moving forward with new trials. Finally, we discussed the best way of confirming safety and efficacy of these therapies, including registries and clinical trial design. We close by discussing next steps in the journey to new neuromodulatory therapies for these devastating illnesses. CONCLUSION Interest and motivation remain strong for deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disease. Progress will require coordinated efforts by all stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ausaf A Bari
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Charles B Mikell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Aviva Abosch
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sharona Ben-Haim
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Robert J Buchanan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seton Brain and Spine Institute, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Allen W Burton
- Neuromodulation, Movement Disorders, and Pain, St. Jude-Abbott, Plano, Texas, USA
| | - Stephen Carcieri
- Neuromodulation, Boston Scientific Corp, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA
| | - G Rees Cosgrove
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Emad N Eskandar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jason L Gerrard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Wayne K Goodman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Robert E Gross
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Clement Hamani
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zelma H T Kiss
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Peter Konrad
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brian H Kopell
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Lothar Krinke
- Medtronic Neuromodulation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jean-Philippe Langevin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Donald Malone
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Helen S Mayberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jonathan P Miller
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Parag G Patil
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - DeLea Peichel
- Neuromodulation, Movement Disorders, and Pain, St. Jude-Abbott, Plano, Texas, USA
| | - Erika A Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Science, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Ali R Rezai
- Neurological Institute, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Patricio Riva-Posse
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tejas Sankar
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jason M Schwalb
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Helen Blair Simpson
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY
| | - Konstantin Slavin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Tor Tosteson
- Departmentof Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth University, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Peter Warnke
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jon T Willie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kareem A Zaghloul
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Joseph S Neimat
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Nader Pouratian
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Deng Z, Pan Y, Zhang C, Zhang J, Qiu X, Zhan S, Li D, Sun B. Subthalamic deep brain stimulation in patients with primary dystonia: A ten-year follow-up study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2018; 55:103-110. [PMID: 29880315 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2018] [Revised: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a promising intervention for primary dystonia; however, evidence regarding its efficacy is lacking. Thus, a long-term follow-up is indispensable. OBJECTIVE This trial was designed to examine the efficacy and consistency of subthalamic deep brain stimulation in patients with primary dystonia over the long term. METHOD This was a retrospective study involving 14 patients with primary dystonia who underwent STN-DBS and consented to a follow-up of at least 10 years. The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and 36-item Short-Form General Health Survey were employed, at five time points (pre-operation [baseline], 1 month post-operation, 1 year post-operation, 5 years post-operation, and last follow-up), to assess improvement of dystonic symptoms and changes in quality of life. OUTCOMES All patients gained extensive clinical benefits from STN-DBS therapy, without experiencing serious adverse effects. Improvements of 59.0% at 1 month, 85.0% at 1 year, and 90.8% at 5 years after the operation, and up to 91.4% at the last follow-up, were demonstrated by movement evaluation with the BFMDRS. All patients achieved a substantial improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSION Subthalamic deep brain stimulation is an effective and persisting alternative to pallidal deep brain stimulation, and importantly, it is very safe even with extremely long-term chronic stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengdao Deng
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yixin Pan
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chencheng Zhang
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xian Qiu
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shikun Zhan
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dianyou Li
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bomin Sun
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Niemann M, Schneider GH, Kühn A, Vajkoczy P, Faust K. Longevity of Implantable Pulse Generators in Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders. Neuromodulation 2017; 21:597-603. [DOI: 10.1111/ner.12743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Revised: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Niemann
- Department of Neurosurgery; Charité University Medicine Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | | | - Andrea Kühn
- Department of Neurosurgery; Charité University Medicine Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery; Charité University Medicine Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | - Katharina Faust
- Department of Neurosurgery; Charité University Medicine Berlin; Berlin Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Helmers AK, Lübbing I, Deuschl G, Witt K, Synowitz M, Mehdorn HM, Falk D. Comparison of the Battery Life of Nonrechargeable Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2017; 21:593-596. [DOI: 10.1111/ner.12720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2017] [Revised: 09/04/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Kristin Helmers
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel; Kiel Germany
| | - Isabel Lübbing
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel; Kiel Germany
| | - Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology; University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel; Kiel Germany
| | - Karsten Witt
- Department of Neurology; University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel; Kiel Germany
- Department of Neurology; Evangelic Hospital Oldenburg; Oldenburg Germany
| | - Michael Synowitz
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel; Kiel Germany
| | - Hubertus Maximilian Mehdorn
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel; Kiel Germany
| | - Daniela Falk
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel; Kiel Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bilateral globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation for dyskinetic cerebral palsy supports success of cochlear implantation in a 5-year old ex-24 week preterm twin with absent cerebellar hemispheres. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2017; 21:202-213. [PMID: 28017556 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2016] [Revised: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 11/30/2016] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early onset dystonia (dyskinesia) and deafness in childhood pose significant challenges for children and carers and are the cause of multiple disability. It is particularly tragic when the child cannot make use of early cochlear implantation (CI) technology to relieve deafness and improve language and communication, because severe cervical and truncal dystonia brushes off the magnetic amplifier behind the ears. Bilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) neuromodulation can reduce dyskinesia, thus supporting CI neuromodulation success. METHODS We describe the importance of the order of dual neuromodulation surgery for dystonia and deafness. First with bilateral GPi DBS using a rechargeable ACTIVA-RC neurostimulator followed 5 months later by unilateral CI with a Harmony (BTE) Advanced Bionics Hi Res 90 K cochlear device. This double neuromodulation was performed in series in a 12.5 kg 5 year-old ex-24 week gestation-born twin without a cerebellum. RESULTS Relief of dyskinesia enabled continuous use of the CI amplifier. Language understanding and communication improved. Dystonic storms abated. Tolerance of sitting increased with emergence of manual function. Status dystonicus ensued 10 days after ACTIVA-RC removal for infection-erosion at 3 years and 10 months. He required intensive care and DBS re-implantation 3 weeks later together with 8 months of hospital care. Today he is virtually back to the level of functioning before the DBS removal in 2012 and background medication continues to be slowly weaned. CONCLUSION This case illustrates that early neuromodulation with DBS for dystonic cerebral palsy followed by CI for deafness is beneficial. Both should be considered early i.e. under the age of five years. The DBS should precede the CI to maximise dystonia reduction and thus benefits from CI. This requires close working between the paediatric DBS and CI services.
Collapse
|
18
|
Kaminska M, Perides S, Lumsden DE, Nakou V, Selway R, Ashkan K, Lin JP. Complications of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for dystonia in children - The challenges and 10 year experience in a large paediatric cohort. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2017; 21:168-175. [PMID: 27567277 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Revised: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been increasingly used for primary and secondary movement disorders in children and young people. Reports of hardware related complications have been sparse for this population and from small cohorts of patients. We report DBS complications from a single large DBS centre with 10 year experience. Data was collected as a prospective audit and additionally from a questionnaire on recharging of the stimulators. 129 patients with a minimum 6 months follow up were identified, mean age10.8 y (range 3.0-18.75), mean follow up 3.3y (range 0.5-10.3), weight 10.4-94.2 kg, 126 new implants (92 Activa RC) and 69 revisions for reasons other than infection. 26 patients were 7y or younger. Surgical site infections (SSI) rates were 10.3% for new implants and revisions, lower 8.6% for new Activa RC and even lower, 4.7%, for new Activa RC in patients under 7y (1/21). SSI occurred within first 6 months and necessitated total system removal in 86% of those infected. Electrode/extension problems were recorded in 18.4% of patients, fracture in 4.6% malfunction in 7.7%, short extension 3.8% and electrode migration in 2.3%. Other complications involved clinically silent intracranial bleed in 1 patient, skin erosions (2.3%), unexpected switching off in 18.7% of Soletra/Kinetra and 3.4% of Activa RC, transient seroma at IPG site in postoperative period (8%). Of the 48 returned recharging questionnaires, 38% of families required recharger replacement and 23% experienced frequent problems maintaining connection during recharging. However, 83% of responders considered recharging not at all or only a little care burden. We identified lower than previously reported DBS infection rates particularly for patients under 7 years, but relatively high incidence of technical problems with electrodes, extensions and in particular recharging. This has to be considered when offering DBS for children with movement disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Kaminska
- Complex Motor Disorders Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Sarah Perides
- Complex Motor Disorders Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel E Lumsden
- Complex Motor Disorders Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Vasiliki Nakou
- Complex Motor Disorders Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Richard Selway
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Keyoumars Ashkan
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jean-Pierre Lin
- Complex Motor Disorders Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van Riesen C, Tsironis G, Gruber D, Klostermann F, Krause P, Schneider GH, Kupsch A. Disease-specific longevity of impulse generators in deep brain stimulation and review of the literature. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2016; 123:621-30. [DOI: 10.1007/s00702-016-1562-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2016] [Accepted: 04/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
20
|
Udupa K, Chen R. The mechanisms of action of deep brain stimulation and ideas for the future development. Prog Neurobiol 2015; 133:27-49. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2015] [Revised: 08/04/2015] [Accepted: 08/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
21
|
Observation and modeling of deep brain stimulation electrode depth in the pallidal target of the developing brain. World Neurosurg 2015; 83:438-46. [PMID: 25698522 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2014] [Revised: 09/14/2014] [Accepted: 01/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It is unclear how brain growth with age affects electrode position in relation to target for children undergoing deep brain stimulation surgery. We aimed to model projected change in the distance between the entry point of the electrode into the brain and target during growth to adulthood. METHODS Modeling was performed using a neurodevelopmental magnetic resonance imaging database of age-specific templates in 6-month increments from 4 to 18 years of age. Coordinates were chosen for a set of entry points into both cerebral hemispheres and target positions within the globus pallidus internus on the youngest magnetic resonance imaging template. The youngest template was nonlinearly registered to the older templates, and the transformations generated by these registrations were applied to the original coordinates of entry and target positions, mapping these positions with increasing age. Euclidean geometry was used to calculate the distance between projected electrode entry and target with increasing age. RESULTS A projected increase in distance between entry point and target of 5-10 mm was found from age 4 to 18 years. Most change appeared to occur before 7 years of age, after which minimal change in distance was found. CONCLUSIONS Electrodes inserted during deep brain stimulation surgery are tethered at the point of entry to the skull. Brain growth, which could result in a relative retraction with respect to the original target position, appears to occur before 7 years of age, suggesting careful monitoring is needed for children undergoing implantation before this age. Reengineering of electrode design could avoid reimplantation surgery in young children undergoing deep brain stimulation.
Collapse
|
22
|
Latini F, Sensi M, Preda F, Cavallo MA. How to avoid trivial mistakes during IPG replacement in patients treated with DBS for movement disorders: technical note from 13-years experience. Int J Neurosci 2014; 125:760-4. [DOI: 10.3109/00207454.2014.984294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
23
|
Mehanna R, Wilson KM, Cooper SE, Machado AG, Fernandez HH. Clinical and programming pattern of patients with impending deep brain stimulation power failure: a retrospective chart review. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MOVEMENT DISORDERS 2014; 1:6. [PMID: 26788332 PMCID: PMC4677734 DOI: 10.1186/2054-7072-1-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2014] [Accepted: 08/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is important to prevent complications of implanted pulse generators (IPG) depletion by replacing the IPG in time. METHODS We reviewed the charts of all patients with deep brain stimulation treated movement disorders who were seen at our institution over a period of 6 months. Among these, we retained for analyses those who had undergone IPG replacement within the previous 3 years. RESULTS A total of 55 IPG replacements (from 38 patients) were reviewed. Electrodes were implanted in the subthalamic nucleus in all Parkinson's disease patients, in the ventral intermedius nucleus of the thalamus in all essential tremor patients and in the globus pallidus interna in all dystonia patients. Replacements were preceded by a voltage increase due to worsened symptoms in 27.3% (15/55); 25.5% (14/55) had full IPG depletion or had too low IPG reserve to allow for any voltage adjustment; and 21.7% (12/55) did not get a needed voltage increase either for safety reasons (eg: concern for increase in falls with higher voltages) or because the surgery date for IPG replacement was close. Only 25.5% (14/55) remained clinically well-controlled prior to IPG replacement, all of whom had IPG longevity estimates available. Clinical deterioration was noted prior to IPG replacement in 100% of patients without available longevity estimates versus 61% of patients with available longevity estimates (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Despite best efforts, clinical deterioration prior to IPG replacement can be seen frequently. Routine estimation of IPG life, along with symptom assessment at every follow-up visit may prevent it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raja Mehanna
- University of Texas Health Science Center, 6410 Fannin Street, Suite 1014, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Romito LM, Zorzi G, Marras CE, Franzini A, Nardocci N, Albanese A. Pallidal stimulation for acquired dystonia due to cerebral palsy: beyond 5 years. Eur J Neurol 2014; 22:426-e32. [DOI: 10.1111/ene.12596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2014] [Accepted: 09/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- L. M. Romito
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico ‘Carlo Besta’; Milano Italy
- Istituto di Neurologia; Università Cattolica; Milano Italy
| | - G. Zorzi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico ‘Carlo Besta’; Milano Italy
| | - C. E. Marras
- Neurosurgery Unit; Department of Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation; IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital; Roma Italy
| | - A. Franzini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico ‘Carlo Besta’; Milano Italy
| | - N. Nardocci
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico ‘Carlo Besta’; Milano Italy
| | - A. Albanese
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico ‘Carlo Besta’; Milano Italy
- Istituto di Neurologia; Università Cattolica; Milano Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Selecting the appropriate treatment for dystonia begins with proper classification of disease based on age, distribution, and underlying etiology. The therapies available for dystonia include oral medications, botulinum toxin, and surgical procedures. Oral medications are generally reserved for generalized and segmental dystonia. Botulinum toxin revolutionized the treatment of focal dystonia when it was introduced for therapeutic purposes in the 1980s. Surgical procedures are available for medication-refractory dystonia, markedly affecting an individual's quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Ann Thenganatt
- Parkinson’s Disease Center & Movement Disorders Clinic, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, 6550 Fannin, Suite 1801, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Joseph Jankovic
- Parkinson’s Disease Center & Movement Disorders Clinic, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, 6550 Fannin, Suite 1801, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chakraborti S, Hasegawa H, Lumsden DE, Ali W, Kaminska M, Lin JP, Ashkan K. Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for refractory total body dystonia secondary to metabolic autopallidotomy in a 4-year-old boy with infantile methylmalonic acidemia: case report. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013; 12:374-9. [PMID: 23952031 DOI: 10.3171/2013.7.peds1350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The methylmalonic acidemias (MMAs) are a group of inborn errors of metabolism resulting in the accumulation of methylmalonic acid in body tissues and fluids. A recognized complication of MMA is bilateral liquefaction of the globus pallidi, resulting in a fulminant total body dystonia of childhood often refractory to medical treatment. This case of total body dystonia due to MMA in a 4-year-old boy had been medically refractory for 15 months. Complete metabolic destructive liquefaction of the pallidi, that is, autopallidotomy, necessitated an alternative, bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) with a marked improvement in dystonia and reduction in pain. The case illustrates the efficacy of STN DBS in this condition and the technical challenges in targeting the STN in a small child.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cao C, Pan Y, Li D, Zhan S, Zhang J, Sun B. Subthalamus deep brain stimulation for primary dystonia patients: A long-term follow-up study. Mov Disord 2013; 28:1877-82. [PMID: 23861342 DOI: 10.1002/mds.25586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2012] [Revised: 05/15/2013] [Accepted: 05/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chunyan Cao
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital; Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; Shanghai China
| | - Yixin Pan
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital; Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; Shanghai China
| | - Dianyou Li
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital; Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; Shanghai China
| | - Shikun Zhan
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital; Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; Shanghai China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital; Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; Shanghai China
| | - Bomin Sun
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital; Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; Shanghai China
| |
Collapse
|