ETV as a last resort

A systematic review of surgical and interventional radiology procedures for pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Background

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is defined as elevated intracranial pressure and consequent symptoms (mainly headache and visual deterioration) occurring in the absence of secondary causes. Surgical and interventional radiology procedures should be considered for refractory IIH and mainly include cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion techniques, optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF), and venous sinus stenting (VSS). Our study aims to review the current literature on the application of these techniques in clinical practice.

Methods

A systematic literature review on the surgical and interventional radiology treatment of IIH was conducted, focusing on ONSF, VSS, and CSF diversion techniques. According to PRISMA guidelines, all reports published in PubMed in the last 30 years (1993-2023) were considered, and among 722 papers, 48 were included in the present study, resulting in a total study population of 454 children or adolescents (11 months-17 years old).

Results

Among 454 patients, 193 underwent an invasive approach, divided into CSF diversion (115/193), ONSF (65/193), VSS (11/193), cranial subtemporal decompression (8/193), and internal cranial expansion (9/193). Sixteen of the 193 patients (8%) required reintervention due to relapsing symptoms or surgical complications, particularly those who underwent CSF diversion. Furthermore, 9/115 required shunt revision due to shunt obstruction or malfunction. We extracted data on the outcome of each procedure: of the 193 patients, 71 experienced a positive outcome with symptom resolution or improvement, while 27 demonstrated a negative outcome.

Discussion and conclusions

Severe and refractory cases of IIH are eligible for invasive treatments. CSF diversion is the most frequently used technique, despite its high failure risk and need for reintervention. ONSF has shown good results in terms of outcome and safety, particularly in children with visual symptoms. VSS is the most recent approach, indicated in children with stenosis of the venous sinus. In our study population, VSS demonstrated good results in terms of symptom resolution and need for reintervention, but its use remains limited to a few centers.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO (CRD42024504244).

Is There Evidence for the (Sole) Use of Third Ventriculostomy in the Treatment of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) remains a poorly understood condition with no standardized treatment. Treatment is therefore generally individualized. Recent isolated reports have begun to describe the use of third ventriculostomy (open or closed) for the treatment of IIH. This review aims to communicate the current evidence for the use of third ventriculostomy in IIH.

METHODS

A systemic review, using PubMed, was performed of studies describing the use of third ventriculostomy, either open or closed, for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

RESULTS

Only 3 studies for a total of 3 patients were found in which a third ventriculostomy was performed for the treatment of IIH.

CONCLUSION

Despite very plausible proposed mechanisms of action, there is currently a paucity of both studies and, therefore, evidence for the use of either endoscopic or open third ventriculostomy for the treatment of IIH. The studies done to date do strongly suggest that further consideration is warranted.

Is the endoscopic third ventriculostomy success score an appropriate tool to inform clinical decision-making?

INTRODUCTION

The endoscopic third ventriculostomy success score (ETVSS) is a model, which provides each patient with a prediction of the outcome of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. The objective of this study was to determine if there is clinical value to the use of the ETVSS in the decision for ETV.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data on all ETV procedures with the Republic of Ireland in children ≤16 years of age, totalling 112, from 2008 to 2014 was analysed. The percentage chance of success at six months was retrospectively calculated according to the ETVSS. A multivariable model, comprising the risk factors from the ETVSS - age, aetiology and previous shunt - was created and its performance compared to that of the ETVSS.

RESULTS

The ETVSS achieved an AUC of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.49-0.71) with a sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 76%, respectively, at its optimal cutoff. The ETVSS was not significantly well calibrated in this cohort and there was a limited net benefit on decision curve analysis in comparison with the strategy of performing ETV in all patients. The multivariable model achieved an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.56-0.78), was well calibrated and was associated with a superior net benefit over that of the ETVSS.

CONCLUSION

The ETVSS represents the future of patient risk stratification with an easy to use, individualised approach for each patient. The ETVSS has performed adequately in this study. However, through the addition of novel risk factors, the continuous updating of the model and recalibration where needed, the ETVSS can become a tool that the paediatric neurosurgeon cannot do without.