Cranial distraction osteogenesis: a proposal of minimal consolidation period

Accelerated cranial distraction protocol for one-piece fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis without bandeau in patients with craniosynostosis

This study aimed to compare the bony relapse ratios of standard and accelerated distraction protocols (ADP) in one-piece fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis (DO). Patients with unilateral or bilateral coronal synostoses who underwent one-piece fronto-orbital DO were included. The accelerated cranial distraction protocol included a 3-day latency period and a distraction rate of 1-2 mm/day, followed by a 4-week consolidation period. Intracranial volume was measured using computed tomography (CT) before the surgery, at the end of the consolidation period, and 1 year after the removal of distractors. The intracranial volume changes and relapse ratios were calculated. This study included 32 patients; of these, 16 were included in each of the ADP and standard protocol (SP) groups. The mean ages were 1.4 years and 1.6 years in the ADP and SP groups, respectively (p = 0.895). In the ADP and SP groups, the expanded volumes were 270.9 ± 90.3 cm³ and 284.6 ± 149.7 cm³ (p = 0.91) and the growth-corrected expanded volumes were 162.1 ± 67.5 cm³ and 177.1 ± 105.2 cm³, respectively (p = 0.867). The relapse and growth-corrected relapse ratios showed no significant differences between the two groups, suggesting similar stability between the two protocols. The relapse ratios were 7.1 ± 4.8% and 7.3 ± 5.0% (p = 0.91) and the growth-corrected relapse ratios were -3.0 ± 3.3% and -2.4 ± 2.7%, respectively (p = 0.498). Within the limitations of the study, it seems that the ADP can shorten the distraction period without compromising stability. This may contribute to resolving the disadvantages and highlighting the advantages of DO.