Vagal nerve stimulation for medically refractory epilepsy in Angelman syndrome: a series of three cases

Neural hyperexcitability in Angelman syndrome: Genetic factors and pharmacologic treatment approaches

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder that is typically caused by deletion or a loss-of-function mutation of the maternal copy of the ubiquitin ligase E3A (UBE3A) gene. The disorder is characterized by severe intellectual disability, deficits in speech, motor abnormalities, altered electroencephalography (EEG) activity, spontaneous epileptic seizures, sleep disturbances, and a happy demeanor with frequent laughter. Regarding electrophysiologic abnormalities in particular, enhanced delta oscillatory power and an elevated excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) ratio have been documented in AS, with E/I ratio especially studied in rodent models. These electrophysiologic characteristics appear to relate with the greatly elevated rates of epilepsy in individuals with AS, and associated hypersynchronous neural activity. Here we briefly review findings on EEG, E/I ratio, and epileptic seizures in AS, including data from rodent models of the disorder. We summarize pharmacologic approaches that have been used to treat behavioral aspects of AS, including neuropsychiatric phenomena and sleep disturbances, as well as seizures in the context of the disorder. Antidepressants such as SSRIs and atypical antipsychotics are among the medications that have been used behaviorally, whereas anticonvulsant drugs such as valproic acid and lamotrigine have frequently been used to control seizures in AS. We end by suggesting novel uses for some existing pharmacologic agents in AS, including noradrenergic transmission reducing drugs (alpha2 agonists, beta blockers, alpha1 antagonists) and cholinesterase inhibitors, where these various classes of drugs may have the ability to ameliorate both behavioral disturbances and seizures.

Long-term follow-up of vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant KCNT1-related epilepsy: a case presentation

Background

The KCNT1 gene encodes a Na+-activated K+ channel. Gain-of-function mutations of KCNT1 lead to autosomal dominant sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy, early-onset epileptic encephalopathy, focal epilepsy and other epileptic encephalopathies. In this paper, we report a boy carrying a KCNT1 gene mutation, who presented with drug-resistant focal-onset seizures. He had decreased seizure frequency and improvement of background changes in electroencephalography (EEG) after vagus nerve stimulation (VNS).

Case presentation

The case was a nonverbal 9-year-old male who presented with drug-resistant focal-onset seizures since age 3 and had underwent VNS therapy for 2 years. He had hypermotor symptoms, automatism and bilateral asymmetric tonic seizures with cognitive decline and aphasis from age 3. The patient had a variety of seizure types that only occurred at night. The most common seizure type was automatisms, and ictal video EEG showed high-amplitude delta waves, followed by a fast rhythmic sharp activity in the mesial frontal and bitemporal regions. The patient was diagnosed with KCNT1-related epilepsy, epileptic encephalopathy and cognitive disorder. He was refractory to multiple anti-seizure medicines (ASM) and ketogenic diet. After VNS treatment at age 7, the frequency of seizures was reduced significantly and EEG was improved in background slowing.

Conclusions

Children with KCNT1-related epilepsy usually have early onset of disease, are nonverbal, and are refractory to ASM. This boy with drug-resistant KCNT1-related epilepsy showed significantly reduced seizure frequency after VNS. This report may provide reference for management of cases of KCNT1-related epilepsy.

Vagus nerve stimulation in children with drug-resistant epilepsy of monogenic etiology

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an effective treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The present study evaluated the efficacy of VNS in pediatric patients with DRE of monogenic etiology. A total of 20 patients who received VNS treatment at our center were followed up every 3 months through outpatient visits or a remote programming platform. The median follow-up time was 1.4 years (range: 1.0–2.9). The rate of response to VNS at 12 months of follow-up was 55.0% (11/20) and the seizure-free rate was 10.0% (2/20). We found that 75.0% (3/4) of patients with an SCN1A variant had a >50% reduction in seizure frequency. Patients with pathogenic mutations in the SLC35A2, CIC, DNM1, MBD5, TUBGCP6, EEF1A2, and CHD2 genes or duplication of X q28 (MECP2 gene) had a >50% reduction in seizure frequency. Compared with the preoperative electroencephalography (EEG), at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after stimulator implantation, the percentage of the patients whose background frequency increased >1.5 Hz was respectively, 15.0% (3/20), 50.0% (10/20), 58.3% (7/12) and 62.5% (5/8); the percentage of the patients whose interictal EEG showed a >50% decrease in spike number was respectively 10% (2/20), 40.0% (8/20), 41.6% (5/12) and 50.0% (4/8). In the 9 patients with no response to VNS treatment, there was no difference in terms of spike number and background frequency between preoperative and postoperative EEG. Five of the 20 children (25.0%) reached new developmental milestones or acquired new skills after VNS compared to the preoperative evaluation. The efficacy of VNS in pediatric patients with DRE of monogenic etiology is consistent with that in the overall population of pediatric DRE patients. Patients with Dravet syndrome (DS), tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), or Rett syndrome/MECP2 duplication syndrome may have a satisfactory response to VNS, but it is unclear whether patients with rare variants of epilepsy-related genes can benefit from the treatment.

The role of vagus nerve stimulation in genetic etiologies of drug-resistant epilepsy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) affects many children. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) may improve seizure control; however, its role in children with genetic etiologies of epilepsy is not well described. The authors systematically reviewed the literature to examine the effectiveness of VNS in this cohort.

METHODS

In January 2021, the authors performed a systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS/Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to investigate the impact of VNS on seizure outcomes in children with genetic etiologies of epilepsy. Primary outcomes included seizure freedom rate, ≥ 90% seizure reduction rate, and ≥ 50% seizure reduction rate. Secondary outcomes were seizure severity and quality of life (QOL), including cognitive, functional, and behavioral outcomes. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The authors identified 125 articles, of which 47 with 216 nonduplicate patients were analyzed. Common diagnoses were Dravet syndrome (DS) (92/216 patients [42.6%]) and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) (63/216 [29.2%]). Seizure freedom was not reported in any patient with DS; the pooled proportion (95% CI) of patients with ≥ 50% seizure reduction was 41% (21%-58%). Secondary cognitive outcomes of VNS were variable in DS patients, but these patients demonstrated benefits in seizure duration and status epilepticus. In TSC patients, the pooled (95% CI) seizure freedom rate was 40% (12%-71%), ≥ 90% seizure reduction rate was 31% (8%-56%), and ≥ 50% reduction rate was 68% (48%-91%). Regarding the secondary outcomes of VNS in TSC patients, several studies reported decreased seizure severity and improved QOL outcomes. There was limited evidence regarding the use of VNS to treat patients with other genetic etiologies of epilepsy, such as mitochondrial disease, Rett syndrome, Doose syndrome, Landau-Kleffner syndrome, Aicardi syndrome, Angelman syndrome, ring chromosome 20 syndrome, and lissencephaly; variable responses were reported in a limited number of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conducted a systematic review of VNS outcomes in children with genetic etiologies of DRE. Among the most studied conditions, patients with TSC had substantial seizure reduction and improvements in QOL, whereas those with DS had less robust seizure reduction. Increased testing, diagnosis, and long-term follow-up studies are necessary to better characterize VNS response in these children.

Epilepsy in Angelman syndrome: A scoping review

Angelman Syndrome (AS) is characterized by severe developmental delays including marked speech impairment, movement abnormalities(ataxia, tremor), and unique behaviors such as frequent laughter and is caused by dysfunctional maternal UBE3A gene (maternal 15q11-13 deletions, maternal specific UBE3A mutation, uniparental disomy, and imprinting defect). Intractable epileptic seizures since early childhood with characteristic EEG abnormalities are present in 80-90% patients with AS. Underlying pathophysiology may involve neocortical and thalamocortical hyperexcitability secondary to severe reduction of GABAergic input, as well as dysfunctional synaptic plasticity, deficient synaptogenesis, and neuronal morphological immaturity. The onset of epilepsy is most prevalent between 1 and 3 years of age; however, approximately 25% of patients developed epilepsy before one year of age. Various types of generalized seizures are most prevalent, with most common types are myoclonic and atypical absence.More than 95% of epilepsy patients may have daily seizures at least for a limited time during early childhood, and two-third patients develop disabling seizures. Fever provoked seizures, and frequent occurrence of nonconvulsive status epilepticus are two unique features. Seizures are frequently pharmacoresistant. Considering underlying prominent GABAergic dysfunction, clinicians had used AEDs that target GABAergic signaling such as valproate, phenobarbital, and clonazepam as first-line therapies for AS. However, due to the unfavorable side effect profile of these AEDs, a recent treatment approach involves priority use of levetiracetam, clobazam, topiramate, lamotrigine, ethosuximide, VNS, and carbohydrate-restricted diets. Besides symptomatic management, there has been recent progress to find a curative treatment with the following approaches: 1. Gene/protein replacement therapy (Adeno and lentiviral vector therapy to deliver a gene or secretory protein); 2. Activation of the intact but silent paternal copy of UBE3A (antisense oligonucleotide therapy and artificial transcription factors); and 3. Downstream therapies (OV101/gaboxadol, ketone supplement, novel compounds/peptides, anti-inflammatory/regenerative therapy).