Does conus morphology have implications for outcome in lumbosacral lipoma?

Lumbosacral lipoma in childhood, how strong is the evidence base? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Conus region lumbosacral lipomas (LSLs) are highly heterogeneous in their morphology, clinical presentation, and outcome, with an incompletely understood natural history and often treacherous surgical anatomy. This systematic review aims to critically evaluate and assess the strength of the current LSL evidence base to guide management strategies.

METHODS

According to a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, a search was conducted using the key term "lumbosacral lipoma" across MEDLINE (OVID), Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases from January 1951 to April 2021. All studies containing ten or more paediatric conus lipomas were included. Data heterogeneity and bias were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included, containing 913 LSLs (predominantly transitional type-58.5%). Two-thirds (67.5%) of all patients (treated and non-treated) remained clinically stable and 17.6% deteriorated. Neuropathic bladder was present in 8.6% at final follow-up. Of patients managed surgically, near-total resection vs. subtotal resection deterioration-free survival rates were 77.2-98.4% and 10-67% respectively. 4.5% (0.0-27.3%) required re-do untethering surgery. Outcomes varied according to lipoma type. Most publications contained heterogeneous populations and used variable terminology. There was a lack of consistency in reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Amongst published series, there is wide variability in patient factors such as lipoma type, patient age, and methods of (particularly urological) assessment. Currently, there is insufficient evidence base upon which to make clear recommendations for the management of children with LSL. There is an imperative for neurosurgeons, neuroradiologists, and urologists to collaborate to better standardise the terminology, assessment tools, and surgical interventions for this challenging group of conditions.

Surgery for spina bifida occulta: spinal lipoma and tethered spinal cord

The technical evolution of the surgery for spina bifida occulta (SBO) over the course of a half-century was reviewed with special foci placed on the spinal lipoma and tethered spinal cord. Looking back through history, SBO had been included in spina bifida (SB). Since the first surgery for spinal lipoma in the mid-nineteenth century, SBO has come to be recognized as an independent pathology in the early twentieth century. A half-century ago, the only option available for SB diagnosis was the plain X-ray, and pioneers of the time persevered in the field of surgery. The classification of spinal lipoma was first described in the early 1970s, and the concept of tethered spinal cord (TSC) was proposed in 1976. Surgical management of spinal lipoma with partial resection was the most widely practiced approach and was indicated only for symptomatic patients. After understanding TSC and tethered cord syndrome (TCS), more aggressive approaches became preferred. A PubMed search suggested that there was a dramatic increase of publications on the topic beginning around 1980. There have been immense academic achievements and technical evolutions since then. From the authors' viewpoint, landmark achievements in this field are listed as follows: (1) establishment of the concept of TSC and the understanding of TCS; (2) unraveling the process of secondary and junctional neurulation; (3) introduction of modern intraoperative neurophysiological mapping and monitoring (IONM) for surgery of spinal lipomas, especially the introduction of bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) monitoring; (4) introduction of radical resection as a surgical technique; and (5) proposal of a new classification system of spinal lipomas based on embryonic stage. Understanding the embryonic background seems critical because different embryonic stages bring different clinical features and of course different spinal lipomas. Surgical indications and selection of surgical technique should be judged based on the background embryonic stage of the spinal lipoma. As time flows forward, technology continues to advance. Further accumulation of clinical experience and research will open the new horizon in the management of spinal lipomas and other SBO in the next half-century.

The Current Status of the Surgical Management of Complex Spinal Cord Lipomas: Still Navigating the Labyrinth?

This review summarises the classification, anatomy and embryogenesis of complex spinal cord lipomas and describes in some detail the technique of total lipoma resection and radical reconstruction of the affected neural placode. Its specific mission is to tackle two main issues surrounding the management of complex dysraphic lipomas: whether total resection confers better long-term benefits than partial resection and whether total resection does better than conservative treatment, i.e. no surgery, for asymptomatic lipomas. Accordingly, the 24-year progression-free survival data of the senior author and colleagues' series of over 300 cases of total resection are compared with historical data from multiple series (including our own) of partial resection, and total resection data specifically for asymptomatic lesions are compared with the two known series of non-surgical treatment of equivalent patients. These comparisons so far amply support the author's recommendation of total resection for most complex lipomas, with or without symptoms. The notable exception is the asymptomatic chaotic lipoma, whose peculiar anatomical relationship with the neural tissue defies even our aggressive surgical approach, and consequently projects worse results (admittedly of small number of cases) than for the other two lipoma subtypes of dorsal and transitional lesions. Prophylactic resection of asymptomatic chaotic lipomas is therefore not currently endorsed. We have also recently found that some dorsal lipomas with clear outline of the conus on preoperative imaging had a significantly better long-term prognosis of preserving neurourological functions without surgery. Whether this subset of lipomas should be managed conservatively until symptoms arise is now an open question awaiting a longer follow-up of a larger cohort of such patients.

Radical resection of lumbosacral lipomas in children: the Great Ormond Street Hospital experience

PURPOSE

In 2009, Pang described a radical resection technique for congenital lumbosacral lipomas, with lower long-term symptomatic re-tethering rates compared with partial resections and conservative management, and low surgical morbidity. We adopted this technique in 2011, and aim to describe our first results.

METHODS

In this monocentric retrospective audit, we included dorsal, transitional, chaotic, and caudal-type lumbosacral lipomas. Exclusion criteria were previously operated lipomas, pure filar lipomas, and concomitant major congenital anatomical urogenital/gastrointestinal abnormalities. Neuro-uro-orthopaedic status at presentation and at three months, one year and last postoperative follow-up, intraoperative electrophysiology, and extent of resection were collected.

RESULTS

From January 2011 to September 2019, 91 patients were operated (median age 2y2m; 63 transitional; 14 caudal; 8 dorsal; 6 chaotic). Preoperatively, 67% were symptomatic. Preoperative and one-year postoperative rates of impaired ambulation (44% to 43%), hypoesthesia (8% to 5%), urodynamic/uroradiological abnormalities (49% to 37%), and foot/ankle deformities (8% to 5%) were comparable, whilst pain improved (25% to 5%) but catheterisation rates increased (21% to 36%). 23/92 (25%) suffered wound-related complications. 2/91 (2%) developed symptomatic re-tethering requiring second surgery. Mean cord/sac ratio was 0.47. 43% had > 20 mm³ residual fat, which improved with increasing surgical experience.

CONCLUSION

Radical lipoma resection, guided by intraoperative neuromonitoring, with reconstruction of the neural placode and expansion duraplasty is technically feasible and results in low rates of late deterioration and re-tethering. Lipoma-type and pre-operative status are important outcome predictors. Operative risks are not insignificant. Future studies need to determine appropriate selection criteria for surgery.