Evaluation of outcome of anorectal anomaly in childhood: the role of anorectal manometry and endosonography

Manometric Evaluation of the Sphincter Complex in Anterior Anus and Mild Anorectal Malformations-An Important Diagnostic Tool

Background: Distinguishing between the anatomical variant of an anterior anus and mild forms of imperforate anus with rectoperineal fistula often requires inspection, calibration, and, in uncertain cases, electrical stimulation (ES) under general anesthesia. Anorectal manometry (AM), despite its ability to assess sphincter configuration and function, is rarely reported as a diagnostic tool. This study evaluated the utility of AM in such cases. Methods: A retrospective analysis of AM and clinical data from 38 patients (35 female, 3 male) with suspected anterior anus was conducted from October 2009 to September 2021. Water-perfused catheter probes with eight radial channels were used to perform pull-through maneuvers. Sphincter locations were identified through vector reconstruction, and pressure ratios of the anterior part to the circumference were recorded. Results were compared to clinical data, including ES findings. Statistical significance was assessed using Mann-Whitney U and Chi-Square tests. Results: Following AM, ES was unnecessary in 25 patients. Of the remaining patients, 83% showed abnormal sphincter configurations on ES, and seven underwent anoplasty. Patients with abnormal sphincter complexes demonstrated significantly lower mean anterior pressures (61.2 mmHg vs. 136.4 mmHg, U = 336.5, p = 0.001) and a trend toward lower anterior-to-circumferential pressure ratios (mean 0.42 vs. 0.85, U = 613, p = 0.270). Constipation was also more frequent in this group (X2(1,N = 38) = 4.1, p = 0.044). Average anterior pressures < 75 mmHg and ratios < 0.7 indicated an anus outside the sphincter complex (sensitivity 80%, specificity 90%). Conclusions: AM proves valuable for evaluating ambiguous anterior anus cases, potentially reducing reliance on ES under general anesthesia. 3D high-resolution AM may further increase diagnostic accuracy.

The effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on fecal incontinence and quality of life following colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions compared to control conditions on fecal incontinence (FI) and quality of life (QoL) following colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Electronic searches in English-language (Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Ovid, and PEDro) and Chinese-language (CNKI, Wanfang Data) databases were conducted. Trials comparing physiotherapy interventions against control conditions and assessing FI and QoL outcomes were included in the review.

RESULTS

Ten trials were included. Meta-analysis revealed statistically significant improvements in lifestyle (0.54; 95% CI 0.03, 1.05; p = 0.04), coping behavior (MD 1.136; 95% CI 0.24, 2.04; p = 0.01), and embarrassment (0.417; 95% CI 0.14, 0.70; p = 0.00) components of QoL among individuals receiving pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared with those receiving usual care (UC). Meta-analysis showed biofeedback to be significantly more effective than UC in enhancing anal resting pressure (ARP; 9.551; 95% CI 2.60, 16.51; p = 0.007), maximum squeeze pressure (MSP; 25.29; 95% CI 4.08, 48.50; p = 0.02), and rectal resting pressure (RRP; 0.51; 95% CI 0.10, 0.9; p = 0.02). Meta-analysis also found PFMT combined with biofeedback to be significantly more effective than PFMT alone for ARP (3.00; 95% CI 0.40, 5.60; p = 0.02), MSP (9.35, 95% CI 0.17, 18.53; p = 0.05), and RRP (1.54; 95% CI 0.60, 2.47; p = 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

PFMT combined with biofeedback was more effective than PFMT alone, but both interventions delivered alone were superior to UC. Future studies remain necessary to optimize and standardize the PFMT parameters for improving QoL among individuals who experience FI following CRC surgery.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

This systematic review is registered in the PROSPERO registry (Ref: CRD42022337084).

Evaluation of Anal Sphincter with High Resolution Anorectal Manometry and 3D Reconstruction in Patients with Anorectal Malformation

BACKGROUND

Patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) need long-term follow-up, in order to evaluate fecal continence; the main predictors of longer-term success are the type of ARM, associated anomalies and sacral integrity. Three-Dimensional High Resolution Anorectal Manometry (3D-HRAM) gives detailed information on pressure on the anal complex profile. Our objective was to analyze anal sphincter activity in ARM patients with 3D-HRAM establishing the correlation between manometric and clinical data.

METHODS

Forty ARM patients were submitted to 3D-HRAM: manometric, anatomical and clinical scores were correlated with each other and with the bowel management response (BM).

RESULTS

A positive correlation between all scores and types of ARM was found: in high ARM and in patients with spinal anomalies (regardless to ARM type) lower scores were reported and even after BM they did not achieve good continence.

CONCLUSIONS

3D-HRAM gives detailed data on the functional activity of the anal sphincter complex. Our study revealed a correlation between manometric parameters and clinical outcomes, confirming spinal malformations and ARM type as the most important prognostic risk factors for a bad outcome. Specific sphincteric defects can also be explored with manometry, allowing for tailored bowel management strategies.

Post-Operative Anorectal Manometry in Children following Anorectal Malformation Repair: A Systematic Review

Despite surgical correction, children with anorectal malformations may experience long-term bowel dysfunction, including fecal incontinence and/or disorders of evacuation. Anorectal manometry is the most widely used test of anorectal function. Although considerable attention has been devoted to its application in the anorectal malformation cohort, there have been few attempts to consolidate the findings obtained. This systematic review aimed to (1) synthesize and evaluate the existing data regarding anorectal manometry results in children following anorectal malformation repair, and (2) evaluate the manometry protocols utilized, including equipment, assessment approach, and interpretation. We reviewed four databases (Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed) for relevant articles published between 1 January 1985 and 10 March 2022. Studies reporting post-operative anorectal manometry in children (<18 years) following anorectal malformation repair were evaluated for eligibility. Sixty-three studies were eligible for inclusion. Of the combined total cohort of 2155 patients, anorectal manometry results were reported for 1755 children following repair of anorectal malformations. Reduced resting pressure was consistently identified in children with anorectal malformations, particularly in those with more complex malformation types and/or fecal incontinence. Significant variability was identified in relation to manometry equipment, protocols, and interpretation. Few studies provided adequate cohort medical characteristics to facilitate interpretation of anorectal manometry findings within the context of the broader continence mechanism. This review highlights a widespread lack of standardization in the anorectal manometry procedure used to assess anorectal function in children following anorectal malformation repair. Consequently, interpretation and comparison of findings, both within and between institutions, is exceedingly challenging, if not impossible. Standardized manometry protocols, accompanied by a consistent approach to analysis, including definitions of normality and abnormality, are essential to enhance the comparability and clinical relevance of results.

Long term outcome of antegrade colonic enema (ACE) stoma for treatment of constipation and fecal incontinence in children

AIM

To determine the long term outcome of antegrade colonic enema (ACE) stoma for treatment of chronic constipation and soiling in children.

METHOD

We reviewed patients prospectively who underwent formation of ACE stoma after failure of maximum medical treatment of chronic constipation and soiling from September 2008 to October 2020. All patients had anorectal manometry, endosonography and colonic transit study. A validated symptom severity (SS) score questionnaire was used pre operatively and during follow up. The sum of SS score ranged between 0 (best) and 65 (worst). Data was expressed as median(range) and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used and p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

58 patients had formation of ACE stoma, laparoscopic appendicostomy 56, cecostomy 1, and open procedure 1. The main indications for the ACE stoma were chronic functional constipation (FC) 50(86%), anorectal malformations (ARM) 6(11%) and Hirschsprung disease (HD) 2(3%). 41(71%) of patients had previous intrasphincteric botulinum toxin (BT) treatment. Age at operation was 11(range 4-15) years and follow up was 36(3-84) months. 47(81%) patients were continent of stool within three months postoperatively. The preoperative SS score improved from 34/65 (26-47) to 8/65 (4-12) at 12 months and 5/65 (2-11) at 24 months follow up, p ≤ 0.05. OVERALL: complication rate was 15(26%), wound infection 5, granulation tissue 4, stoma prolapse 4, retraction 1, abscess formation and fistula 1. 15 (26%) adolescents had transition of their care to adult services.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant improvement of constipation, soiling and general health of patients following formation of ACE stoma. Adolescents benefits an orderly transition of their care to adult services.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2, Therapeutic study.

Utility of postoperative anorectal manometry in children with anorectal malformation: a systematic review

Children with anorectal malformation (ARM) often continue to have disturbances in bowel function long after reconstructive surgery. Anorectal manometry may be utilized to evaluate bowel function in these children. We aimed to describe the reported protocols and manometric findings in children with ARM post-reconstructive surgery and to investigate the correlation between manometric evaluation and bowel functional outcome. PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched from 1980 to 2021. Data were reviewed and extracted independently by two authors, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Included studies were English articles reporting postoperative assessment of children (≤ 18 years) with ARM using anorectal manometry. From 128 articles obtained in the initial search, five retrospective cohort studies and one prospective study fulfilled inclusion criteria. The rectoanal inhibitory reflex and mean anal resting pressure were parameters most often reported to correlate with postoperative bowel function. The least reported parameters among the studies were high-pressure zone, rectal volume, and rectal sensation. Anorectal manometry could be an objective method providing important information for personalized management of postoperative ARM patients with bowel function issues, but lack of standardized protocols limits a comprehensive analysis of their utility.

Clinical Differentiation between a Normal Anus, Anterior Anus, Congenital Anal Stenosis, and Perineal Fistula: Definitions and Consequences—The ARM-Net Consortium Consensus

In the past, an anteriorly located anus was often misdiagnosed and treated as an anorectal malformation (ARM) with a perineal fistula (PF). The paper aims to define the criteria for a normal anus, an anterior anus (AA) as an anatomic variant, and milder types of ARM such as congenital anal stenosis (CAS) and PF. An extensive literature search was performed by a working group of the ARM-Net Consortium concerning the subject “Normal Anus, AA, and mild ARM”. A consensus on definitions, clinical characteristics, diagnostic management, and treatment modalities was established, and a diagnostic algorithm was proposed. The algorithm enables pediatricians, midwives, gynecologists, and surgeons to make a timely correct diagnosis of any abnormally looking anus and initiate further management if needed. Thus, the routine physical inspection of a newborn should include the inspection of the anus and define its position, relation to the external sphincter, and caliber. A correct diagnosis and use of the presented terminology will avoid misclassifications and allow the initiation of correct management. This will provide a reliable comparison of different therapeutic management and outcomes of these patient cohorts in the future.

Comparing the fecal continence scores of patients with anorectal malformation with anorectal manometric findings

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing surgery for anorectal malformation (ARM) may have defecation-related problems throughout their lives, even if they are perfect treated surgically. Assessment methods are needed to standardize the clinical outcomes of patients with ARM. The aim of this study was to compare the scoring systems (SS) with the anorectal manometry (AM) findings.

METHODS

The data of patients operated on for ARM were examined. Holschneider's, Rintala's, Krickenbeck's and Peña's questionnaires were executed to the patients and AM was performed.

RESULTS

Our study was completed with 23 patients. There was a statistically significant relationship between the anal resting pressure and Holschneider's questionnaire (HQ). There was a statistically significant relationship between the area under the curve in the maximum voluntary squeeze pressure-time graph (AUC) and the HQ and Rintala's questionnaire (RQ). A statistically significant difference was found between HQ and RQ scores and high type and low type of ARMs.

CONCLUSION

In our study, based on AM data, it was found that the use of HQ and RQ from the four SS we compared could be more effective in patients' follow-up. It was concluded that Peña's questionnaire and Krickenbeck's questionnaire should be used to determine the bowel management program of the patients rather than patients' follow-up.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Anorectal Manometry on Children: A Moroccan Series and Literature Review

Introduction and objectives: Anorectal manometry is a test that evaluates the function of the rectum,but also the anus. It is useful for the diagnosis of several conditions like fecal incontinence and constipation.In children these tests are being increasingly used for all ages.The aim of this study was to determine the benefit of anorectal manometry in children and to report our experience. Material and Methods:Over a period of four years, 273children that underwent anorectal manometry were included in the study,their data and tests results were analyzed. Results:Out of 273 patients included,68,5% were boys and 31,5% were girls.The mean age was 9 years.154patients(51,6%) had Fecal incontinence(Group1),75children(27,5%) had chronic constipation(Group2),and both of them(Group3) were reported in 37children(13,6%).An awake manometry was  performed in 248children(91%) however this test under sedation allowed us the exclusion of Hirschsprung’s disease in 21children(84%).In group1, 25%patients had bad anal contraction.In groupe3, 21,6%children had bad anal contraction.The statistical analysis showed a significant difference in age(p=0.022) and resting pressure(p=0.050) between the three groups.Children with fecal incontinence had a higher rate of dyssynergy,80.2% and 83.8% in groups 1 and 3 respectively compared to 60.4% in patients with chronic constipation(p=0,852) Conclusion:The gold standard for the exploration of children’s terminal constipation and encopresis is the anorectal manometry.It is an important tool to establish diagnosis.In our study, this test allow the exclusion of Hirschsprung’s disease in infants with constipation,  in other hand we found a higher rate of dyssynergy in children with fecal incontinence(80%) which had allow us to propose a biofeedback therapy.

Anorectal manometry in pediatric settings: A systematic review of 227 studies

BACKGROUND

There is wide variation in the clinical use of diagnostic tools for children with chronic constipation and functional/structural fecal incontinence (CCFSFI). Anorectal manometry (ARM) is a well-recognized technique to assess the function of the anorectum.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to perform an up-to-date review on ARM in pediatric patients with CCFSFI, with specific focus on the indication of use and protocol. Variation of its use in pediatrics will be explored.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted for empirical studies utilizing ARM with a pediatric sample. A keyword search of literature published in English before July 2018 was conducted and updated to October 2019. Data on demographics, clinical information, study aims, ARM parameters and use of sedation/anesthesia were collected.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 227 studies were included in this systematic review. The age of study participants at the time of ARM ranged from birth to 18 years. ARM was most commonly used in patients with organic conditions (65%) compared to functional constipation (41%). In almost half [108/227 (48%)] of the studies, ARM was performed awake. The ARM parameters most frequently assessed were the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, which was evaluated in 198/227 studies (87%) and the anal resting pressure [166/227 studies (73%)].

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

This systematic review has highlighted the vast variation of ARM use within pediatrics and the need to strive toward standardization and use of consensus guidelines. We anticipate this will further advance our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in children with defecation disorders.

Comparison of longitudinal and radial characteristics of intra-anal pressures using 3D high-definition anorectal manometry between children with anoretal malformations and functional constipation

BACKGROUND

Pathophysiology of fecal incontinence (FI) in children with anorectal malformations (AM) is not well understood. Standard or high-resolution anorectal manometry (ARM) does not identify radial asymmetry or localize abnormal sphincter function. 3D high-definition anorectal manometry (HDARM) provides detailed topographic and 3D pressure gradient representation of anal canal.

AIMS

To compare intra-anal pressure profiles between children with AM and controls using HDARM and to determine the association between manometric properties and reported predictors of fecal continence (AM type, spinal anomaly, and sacral integrity).

METHODS

HDARM tracings of 30 children with AM and FI referred for ARM were compared with 30 age and sex-matched children with constipation. 2D pressure profiles were used to measure length of high-pressure zone (HPZ). Longitudinal and radial measurements of sphincter pressure at rest and squeeze were taken along each segment in 3D topographic views and compared between groups.

KEY RESULTS

3D measurements demonstrated longitudinal and radial differences between groups along all quadrants of HPZ. At rest, intra-anal pressures were lower along the four segments longitudinally across the anal canal and radially along the quadrants in AM group (P < .01). At squeeze, all quadrant pressures were lower in segments 1-4 in AM group (P < .01). Sensation was abnormal in AM group (P < .01). Intra-anal pressures longitudinally and radially were not associated with predictors of fecal continence.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Children with AM had abnormal sensation and lower pressures longitudinally and radially along all quadrants of anal canal. Manometric properties at rest were not associated with reported predictors of fecal continence.

Anorectal manometry in children with defecation disorders BSPGHAN Motility Working Group consensus statement

Defecatory disorders in children, including chronic constipation (CC) and fecal incontinence (FI), are common conditions worldwide and have a significant impact on children, their families, and the healthcare system. Anorectal manometry (ARM) and high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) are relatively novel tools for the assessment of anal sphincter function and rectal sensation and have contributed significantly to improving the understanding of the anorectum as a functional unit. ARM has been recognized as the investigation of choice for adults with symptoms of defecation disorders, including fecal incontinence (FI), evacuation difficulties, and constipation. Although it is the gold standard tool in adults, it has yet to be formally accepted as a standardized diagnostic tool in the pediatric age, with limited knowledge regarding indications, protocol, and normal values. ARM/HRAM is slowly becoming recognized among pediatricians, but given that there are currently no agreed guidelines there is a risk that will lead to diversity in practice. The British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN)-Motility Working Group (MWG) therefore has taken the opportunity to provide guidance on the use of ARM/HRAM in children with CC and/or FI.

Does clinical score accurately support fecoflowmetry as a means to assess anorectal motor activity in pediatric patients after anorectal surgery?

PURPOSE

We investigated the relationship between Krickenbeck score (KS) and fecoflowmetry (FFM) parameters and assessed the characteristics of this new questionnaire test by comparing Kelly's clinical score (KCS) in pediatric patients with anorectal surgery for anorectal malformation (ARM) and Hirschsprung's disease (HD).

METHODS

We enrolled pediatric patients who underwent anorectal surgery for ARM or HD. Bowel function was assessed with KS and KCS thereafter, FFM and anorectal manometry (AM) were conducted. Patients were divided into subgroups according to each parameter of the scoring system and each FFM parameter was compared among the KCS or KS subgroups, respectively. Moreover, correlation analyses were conducted between FFM and AM parameters.

RESULTS

The comparison of FFM parameters among the subgroups of KCS showed that F_max in the KCS staining 2 group was significantly higher than that in KCS staining 1 group and the F_max in KCS sphincter squeeze 1 group was significantly higher than that in KCS sphincter squeeze 0 group. Moreover, F_max in the KCS "good" group was significantly higher than that in the KCS "fair" group. The comparison of FFM parameters among the subgroups of KS parameters showed that TR in the no soiling group was significantly higher than that in the KS grade 2 soiling group. FFM and AM parameters showed a significant positive correlation between F_max and voluntary squeezing anal pressure.

CONCLUSION

FFM clarified the different characteristics of two scoring systems, namely, KCS reflects the anal sphincter performance, whereas the KS soiling score might reflect the tolerance and evacuation ability.

Scientific solution to a complex problem: physiology and multidisciplinary team improve understanding and outcome in chronic constipation and faecal incontinence

PURPOSE

There is a lack of diagnostic credibility to direct focused management for children with chronic constipation (CC) and faecal incontinence (FI). The aim is to assess the impact of an innovative Children's Anorectal Physiology Service (CAPS) focusing on improving outcomes in children with CC/FI.

METHODS

Prospective data: demographics, bowel and quality of life (QoL)/risk of distress questionnaires. Diagnostics: awake high-resolution anorectal manometry (AHRAM), endoanal ultrasound and transit marker studies (TMS).

RESULTS

Total patients: 112; 66 males (59%); median 9 years (17 months to 16 years). Patient groups included: 89 (79%) had functional CC/FI; 9 (8%), Hirschsprung's disease; 12 (11%), anorectal malformations and 2 (2%), trauma. St Marks Incontinence score (SMIS) abnormal in 91 (81%) and Cleveland Constipation Score (CCS) in 101 (90%) patients. Anorectal manometry: 94 (84%) awake and 18 (17%) under anaesthesia. Play specialist input 37 (33%) patients. AHRAM abnormal 65 (58%): sphincter dysfunction 36 (32%) and altered rectal sensation: hyposensitive 22% (20/91); 21% (19/91) hypersensitive. TMS normal in 64 (57%), 17 (15%) slow transit and 27 (24%) rectal evacuatory disorder. Risk of distress in 38% and poor QoL in 55% patients which correlated with abnormal SMIS (p = 0.02). Patient/parent satisfaction improved significantly (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Scientific investigations combined with multidisciplinary team improve patient satisfaction and reduces patient self-report illness severity. A complex problem requires a scientific solution.

Manometric findings in relation to functional outcomes in different types of anorectal malformations

AIMS

To compare anorectal manometry (AM) in patients with different types of anorectal malformations (ARMs) in relation to functional outcomes.

METHODS

A single-institution, cross-sectional study. After ethical approval, all patients ≥7years old treated for anterior anus (AA), perineal fistula (PF), vestibular fistula (VF), or rectourethral fistula (RUF) from 1983 onwards were invited to answer the Rintala bowel function score (BFS) questionnaire and to attend anorectal manometry (AM). Patients with mild ARMs (AA females and PF males) had been treated with minimally invasive perineal procedures. Females with VF/PF and males with RUF had undergone internal-sphincter saving sagittal repairs.

RESULTS

55 of 132 respondents (42%; median age 12 (7-29) years; 42% male) underwent AM. Patients with mild ARMs displayed good anorectal function after minimally invasive treatments. The median anal resting and squeeze pressures among patients with mild ARMs (60 cm H2O and 116 cm H2O respectively) were significantly higher than among patients with more severe ARMs (50 cm H2O, and 80cm H2O respectively; p≤0.002). The rectoanal inhibitory reflex was preserved in 100% of mild ARMs and 83% of patients with more severe malformations after IAS-saving sagittal repair. The functional outcome was poor in 4/5 patients with an absent RAIR (BFS≤11 or antegrade continence enema-dependence). Rectal sensation correlated significantly with the BFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the appropriateness of our minimally invasive approaches to the management of mild ARMs, and IAS-saving anatomical repairs for patients with more severe malformations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are one of the commonest anomalies in neonates. Both laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) can be used for the treatment of ARMs. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare these two approaches in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched from 2000 to August 2016. Both randomized and non-randomized studies, assessing LAARP and PSARP in pediatric patients with high/intermediate ARMs, were included. The primary outcome measures were operative time, length of hospital stay and total postoperative complications. The second outcome measures were rectal prolapse, anal stenosis, wound infection/dehiscence, anorectal manometry, Kelly's clinical score, and Krickenbeck classification. The quality of the randomized and non-randomized studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) respectively. The quality of evidence was assessed by GRADEpro.

Results

From 332 retrieved articles, 1, 1, and 8 of randomized control, prospective and retrospective studies, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. The randomized clinical trial was judged to be of low risk of bias, and the nine cohort studies were of moderate to high quality. 191 and 169 pediatric participants had undergone LAARP and PSARP, respectively. Shorter hospital stays, less wound infection/dehiscence, higher anal canal resting pressure, and a lower incidence of grade 2 or 3 constipation were obtained after LAARP compared with PSARP group values. Besides, the LAARP group had marginally less total postoperative complications. However, the result of operative time was inconclusive; meanwhile, there was no significant difference in rectal prolapse, anal stenosis, anorectal manometry, Kelly's clinical score and Krickenbeck classification.

Conclusion

For pediatric patients with high/intermediate anorectal malformations, LAARP is a better option compared with PSARP. However, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate.

Evaluation of postoperative anal functions using endoanal ultrasonography and anorectal manometry in children with congenital anorectal malformations

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the postoperative anorectal anatomy and function in children with congenital anorectal malformations (ARM) using endoanal ultrasonography (EUS) and anorectal manometry.

METHODS

This study included 47 children who had undergone posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) or transperineal anorectoplasty for the repair of an ARM. Children were grouped according to symptoms of defecation disorder, including normal defecation, fecal soiling, fecal incontinence, and constipation. Ten children with no history of anal or rectal diseases served as healthy controls. A well-established scoring system was used for the evaluation of anal function and defecation disorder.

RESULTS

EUS showed significant differences in the thickness of the interior sphincter between the ARM patients and the healthy controls (P<0.05). However, no significant difference was found in the thickness of the interior sphincters between the PSARP group and transperineal anorectoplasty group (P>0.05). Anorectal manometry showed that the balloon volumes were significantly different between the surgical group and the control group (P<0.01), and between the low defect group and the intermediate-high defect group (P=0.022). Balloon volume was significantly correlated with anal function scores (r=-0.30, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS and anorectal manometry can provide objective assessment of postoperative anorectal anatomy and function in children with ARM.

Prognostic evaluation of biofeedback response in patients treated for anorectal malformation

PURPOSE

Functional bowel outcome in patients with anorectal malformation often is poor. For fecal incontinence resulting from sphincter dysfunction, biofeedback (BFB) training appears to be effective. The aim of study was to investigate the bowel function in incontinent children treated for ARM, using a clinical score, a manometric and pelvic magnetic resonance evaluation, in order to establish predictive parameters of response after BFB.

METHODS

25 children (median age of 6.5 years) with true fecal incontinence were evaluated by clinical score, anorectal manometry and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). According to these evaluations patients were divided in 4 groups: group 1 (favorables manometry and MRI); group 2 (favorable manometry and unfavorable MRI); group 3 (unfavorable manometry and favorable MRI); group 4 (unfavorables manometry and MRI). All groups started a cycle of BFB and six months after end of BFB, were reevaluated by clinical score and manometry.

RESULTS

The overall response to BFB was excellent in 44%, discrete in 40% and poor in 16%; a better response was found in groups 1 and 2 than groups 3 and 4. The differences between groups before BFB proportionally correlated with values after BFB; a correlation with genitourinary and spinal anomalies was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that BFB is an effective for fecal incontinence when the assessment pretreatment (functional and morphologic) is favorable; the manometry can evaluate the potential sphincterial recovery after BFB with a further prognostic benefit if correlated to morphologic evaluation with MRI.

Anorectal manometry with and without ketamine for evaluation of defecation disorders in children

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal manometry (ARCM) provides valuable information in children with chronic constipation and fecal incontinence but may not be tolerated in the awake child. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ketamine anesthesia on the assessment of anorectal function by manometry and to evaluate defecation dynamics and anal sphincter resting pressure in the context of pathophysiology of chronic functional (idiopathic) constipation and soiling in children.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of children who were investigated for symptoms of chronic constipation and soiling between April 2001 and April 2004. We studied 52 consecutive children who had awake ARCM, biofeedback training and endosonography (awake group) and 64 children who had ketamine anesthesia for ARCM and endosonography (ketamine group). We age matched 31 children who had awake anorectal studies with 27 who had ketamine anesthesia.

RESULTS

The children in awake and ketamine groups were comparable for age, duration of bowel symptoms and duration of laxative treatments. ARCM profile was comparable between the awake and the ketamine groups with regard to anal sphincter resting pressure, rectal capacity, amplitude of rectal contractions, frequency of rectal and IAS contractions and functional length of anal canal. Of 52 children who had awake ARCM, dyssynergia of the EAS muscles was observed in 22 (42%) and median squeeze pressure was 87mm Hg (range 25-134). The anal sphincter resting pressure was non-obstructive and comparable to healthy normal children. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex was seen in all children excluding diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketamine anesthesia does not affect quantitative or qualitative measurements of autonomic anorectal function and can be used reliably in children who will not tolerate the manometry while awake. Paradoxical contraction of the EAS can only be evaluated in the awake children and should be investigated further as the underlying cause of obstructive defecation in patients with chronic functional constipation and soiling.

Long-term bowel functional outcomes in rectourethral fistula treated with PSARP: controlled results after 4-29 years of follow-up: a single-institution, cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) has become the standard surgical treatment for males rectourethral fistula (RUF) at most surgical centers worldwide. We aimed to define the long-term bowel functional outcomes following PSARP for RUF at our institution between 1983 and 2006, with comparison to age- and gender-matched controls.

METHODS

Patients were invited to answer a detailed, previously validated Bowel Function Score (BFS) questionnaire by post. Respondents were matched by age and gender to three controls from the general population who had answered identical questionnaires. Case records were reviewed retrospectively for operative details. Ethical approval was obtained. Social continence was defined as soiling or fecal accidents <1/week and no requirement for changes of underwear or protective aids.

RESULTS

Of 34 (79%) respondents (median age 19 (range, 4-29) years), 74% had voluntary bowel movements (VBMs), 24% were reliant on anterograde continence enema (ACE) washouts, and 1 patient had a colostomy. Impairment of bowel function was significantly higher in all aspects of fecal control among patients than controls (p<0.001). A statistically significant decline in fecal accidents and soiling was observed with age (p ≤ 0.03). Thirty-one percent of patients with VBMs had constipation managed with diet or laxatives (vs 2% of controls, p=0.0002). Of patients with VBMs followed up for > 12 years (n=20), 50% were completely continent (vs 73% of controls; p=NS). Overall, 76% of respondents were socially continent with or without artificial means in the form of ACE washouts. By BFS score, 39% had a good functional outcome, 27% had a moderate outcome, 9% had a clearly poor score and 24% were living with an ACE.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that in the long-term, functional symptoms remain highly prevalent among patients treated for RUF with PSARP. However, the majority can be expected to achieve social continence, although for some this will require intervention with ACE bowel management. Approximately one third may report VBMs and complete continence.

Longitudinal and radial characteristics of intra-anal pressures in children using 3D high-definition anorectal manometry: new observations

OBJECTIVES

The pathophysiology of fecal incontinence is not well understood. Standard or high-resolution anorectal manometry (ARM) provides simple two-dimensional (2D) intra-anal pressure measurements and do not identify radial asymmetry or localize abnormal sphincter function. 3D high-definition ARM (HDARM) has 256 pressure sensors distributed circumferentially and provides a detailed topographical and 3D pressure gradient representation of the anal canal. The objective of this study was to use HDARM to characterize intra-anal pressure profiles in children during rest and squeeze.

METHODS

HDARM manometric tracings of 30 children with constipation referred for ARM were reviewed. 2D pressure profiles using high-resolution manometry were used to measure the length of the high-pressure zone (HPZ). The HPZ was divided into four equal segments from the anal verge to adjust for the variable sphincter length. Longitudinal and radial measurements of the HPZ during rest and squeeze (anterior, left, posterior, right quadrants of the HPZ) were taken along each segment in 2D and 3D topographical views. A 3D reconstruction combining all patients was then constructed.

RESULTS

Mean age was 149.3±1.8 months and mean HPZ length was 3.0±0.1 cm. Using 2D manometry, the mean peak HPZ pressure at rest was 72.0±2.5 mm Hg, and was located in the second segment of the HPZ. The mean peak HPZ pressure at squeeze was 202.9±13.1, and was located in the second segment. 3D measurement demonstrated both longitudinal and radial asymmetry along the anterior, left, posterior, and right quadrants of the HPZ. Left and right quadrant pressures were higher than anterior and posterior pressures at the anal verge and segment 1 during rest and squeeze. Anterior pressures were lower than posterior pressures longitudinally and radially in segments 2, 3, and 4 both during rest and squeeze. Our findings also suggest that in pediatrics it may be necessary to adjust pressure measurement to the anal canal length to get a more accurate picture.

CONCLUSIONS

3D HDARM allows for a detailed characterization of intra-anal pressures. 3D topographic pressure measurements demonstrate longitudinal and radial asymmetry of the anal canal at rest and during squeeze. This is the first time longitudinal and radial asymmetry of the anal canal has been described in children. 3D HDARM may allow for a better understanding of the mechanisms of fecal continence in children.

Pre- and postoperative rectal manometric assessment of patients with anorectal malformations: should we preserve the fistula?

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of congenital anorectal malformations could be complicated by fecal incontinence. Some authors believe that preservation of the fistula is associated with improved outcome. Rectal manometry is a well-established method to evaluate postoperative functional outcome in these patients and can demonstrate successful transplantation of the fistula.

OBJECTIVE

Herein, we report the results of our series of patients with anorectal malformations and an externally accessible fistula, who underwent pre- and postoperative rectal manometry studies.

DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a tertiary neonatal and pediatric surgical center.

PATIENTS

Patients with anorectal malformations, who underwent preoperative rectal manometry of the fistula and postoperative rectal manometry of the neoanus between January 2002 and December 2011 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pre- and postoperative rectal manometry results were compared by using paired t test or contingency tables (p values <0.05).

RESULTS

Twelve female patients with rectoperineal (n = 7, 58%) or rectovestibular (n = 5, 42%) fistula were treated by anterior sagittal anorectoplasty or minimal posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. Complete transposition of the fistula was achieved in all patients. Normal presence of rectoanal inhibitory reflex was demonstrated in all pre- and postoperative rectal manometry studies. There were no differences between pre- and postoperative rectal manometry in the length of the high-pressure zone (2.3 ± 0.6 cm vs 2.5 ± 0.8 cm (p = 0.5)) and resting pressure (59.4 ± 18.2 mm Hg vs 62.1 ± 19.2 mm Hg (p = 0.62)). At a median follow-up of 665 days (range, 290-1165 days), all patients have voluntary bowel movements, with no incontinence or soiling.

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its small sample size and by single-institution bias.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative rectal manometry of rectoperineal or rectovestibular fistula showed the presence of functional anal structures within the fistula in all patients. We speculate that fistula-preserving surgery in patients with anorectal malformations is associated with improved bowel function outcome.

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry in children with anorectal malformations: new discoveries

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Fecal incontinence and constipation are common problems in follow-up of anorectal malformations (ARMs). We evaluated the anal sphincters using the 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (3D-EAUS) and the anorectal manometry after ARMs repair.

METHODS

Seventeen patients, divided into 3 groups according to Wingspread classification, underwent anorectal manometry and 3D-EAUS. Clinical, manometric, and endosonographic scoring systems were used.

RESULTS

The average anal resting pressure (aARP) was significantly higher in low ARMs than in intermediate and high ARMs. The anal squeeze pressure was not statistically different between the 3 groups. Three-dimensional EAUS visualized internal anal sphincter (IAS) disruptions in 7 of 17 patients and absence of IAS in 6 of 17 children with high ARMs. Scars of the external anal sphincter were localized in low ARMs and generalized in the other groups. In the case of IAS disruption with aARP greater than 20 mm Hg, fecal incontinence and constipation improved with biofeedback and/or laxatives, whereas daily enemas were necessary in absence of IAS with aARP less than 20 mm Hg. Statistical correlation was observed between endosonographic and manometric findings and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesions of the anal sphincter are common in ARMs. Three-dimensional EAUS and anorectal manometry ensure a complete assessment of the anal sphincter and could provide useful information to define the most appropriate treatments to improve the quality of life.

Immunohistochemical confirmation of the presence of smooth muscle in the normal neonatal anorectum and in neonates with anorectal malformations

AIM

To evaluate the presence of smooth muscle in relation to the anorectum in neonates that are normal and in neonates with anorectal malformations using immunohistochemical staining of antibodies specific to smooth muscle actin (SMA).

METHODS

Research ethics committee approval was obtained to study historical neonatal tissue sections. 7-15-μ thickness, sagittal sections of both normal anorectums (NA) and neonates with anorectal malformations (ARM) were available to study. The fragile tissue predates the development of charged glass microscope slides that are inherent to contemporary immunohistochemistry (IHC). Normal appendix sections on non-charged slides were used to establish and optimise a novel, steam generated heat, antigen retrieval protocol. This technique of "gentle" antigen retrieval allows preservation of tissue architecture whilst maintaining adequate staining of tissue on non-charged glass microscope slides. NA and ARM tissue was stained and compared to control NA and ARM sections.

RESULTS

SMA staining was observed in sagittal sections of both normal neonatal anorectums and neonates with anorectal malformations, confirming the presence of smooth muscle.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary work confirms the presence of smooth muscle in the anorectum of neonates that are normal and in neonates with anorectal malformations. It is likely that the smooth muscle complex demonstrated represents the internal anal sphincter in the normal anorectum. It is postulated that the smooth muscle complex seen in anorectal malformations may represent a similar internal anal sphincter complex which maybe of functional significance. Further IHC of tissue sections will allow reconstruction of the exact three-dimensional smooth muscle structure of the anorectum in neonates that are normal and neonates with anorectal malformations.

Use of anorectal manometry for evaluation of postoperative results of patients with anorectal malformation: a study from Kuwait

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to use anorectal manometry for functional assessment of early postoperative results after corrective surgery for anorectal malformations (ARMs) in children and compare manometric observations with age-matched controls. Parents were counseled and management strategies were planned according to the manometric assessments.

METHODS

From August 2005 to September 2009, 32 patients who underwent surgery for ARM were assessed postoperatively with anorectal manometry using a water-perfused anorectal motility catheter to record anal canal length or high-pressure zone, resting pressure of anal canal (RP), and rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR). These patients were divided in 2 groups (infants, <1 year; children, >1 year) according to the age at the time of performance of anorectal manometry that was done at 6 months or later following stoma closure or anoplasty.

RESULTS

Out of these 32 patients, high anomaly was present in 13, whereas 19 had low type of defect. Manometric anal canal length of the children with high and low ARM was 2.10 ± .44 and 2.25 ± .53 cm, respectively, which was significantly shorter than that of their age-matched controls(P < .05). In patients with high ARM, RP in infants (17 ± 7.7 mm of Hg) and children (21 ± 9.4 mm of Hg) was lower than that of controls (RP in infants = 42.43 ± 8.19 mm of Hg, RP in children = 43.43 ± 8.79 mm of Hg, P < .001). In patients with low ARM, RP in infants (34 ± 8.6 mm of Hg, P = .002) and children (26 ± 9.9 mm of Hg, P = .001) was lower than that in controls. Presence of RAIR was demonstrated in 5 (38.4%) of 13 patients with high ARM and in 11 (57.9%) of 19 cases with low ARM. Parental counseling was done after this early evaluation, and management strategies like bowel management program and biofeedback training were planned according to the results of the tests.

CONCLUSION

Our anorectal manometric results suggest that patients with ARM had short anal canal with lower RP and impaired RAIR, which could affect the ultimate functional outcome in these patients. Thus, postoperative anorectal manometric evaluation of the patients with ARM can give more realistic information about future continence and might help in planning future treatment strategies like bowel management program or biofeedback training.