Anorectal malformations and neurospinal dysraphism: is this association a major risk for continence?

State of the Art Bowel Management for Pediatric Colorectal Problems: Anorectal Malformations

Up to 79% of patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs) experience constipation and/or soiling after a primary posterior sagittal anoplasty (PSARP) and are referred to a bowel management program. We aim to report the recent updates in evaluating and managing these patients as part of the manuscript series on the current bowel management protocols for patients with colorectal diseases (ARMs, Hirschsprung disease, functional constipation, and spinal anomalies). The unique anatomic features of ARM patients, such as maldeveloped sphincter complex, impaired anal sensation, and associated spine and sacrum anomalies, indicate their bowel management plan. The evaluation includes an examination under anesthesia and a contrast study to exclude anatomic causes of poor bowel function. The potential for bowel control is discussed with the families based on the ARM index calculated from the quality of the spine and sacrum. The bowel management options include laxatives, rectal enemas, transanal irrigations, and antegrade continence enemas. In ARM patients, stool softeners should be avoided as they can worsen soiling.

Multi-Institutional Review From the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium of Minor Spinal Cord Dysraphism in the Setting of Anorectal Malformations: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE

Anorectal malformations (ARM) are associated with congenital anomalies of the spine, but the impact of a minor spinal cord dysraphism (mSCD) on fecal continence in the setting of ARM remains unclear.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A retrospective review was performed utilizing data from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) registry. The patient cohort was reviewed for ARM type, mSCD screening/incidence/neurosurgical intervention and age-based BMP utilization.

RESULTS

987 patients with ARM were categorized into mild (38%), moderate (32%) or complex (19%). 694 (70%) had normal spinal (NS) status. 271 (27.5%) patients had mSCD. MRI alone (49%) was the most common screening test for mSCD. US screening had a positive predictive value of 86.3% and a negative predictive value of 67.1%. Surgical intervention rates for mSCD ranged between 13% and 77% at a median age of 0.6-5.2 years. 726 (73.6%) patients were prescribed BMP (74.4% NS, 77.5% mSCD). Laxatives were most utilized BMP in all groups <5yo. ≥5yo, enema utilization increased with ARM complexity independent of spine status (with or without neurosurgical intervention). Neurosurgical intervention did not affect BMP utilization at any age or with any ARM when mSCD was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

MSCD influence on bowel function in the setting ARM remains unclear. No significant impact of mSCD was noted on ARM patient bowel management program utilization. Variability exists within PCPLC site with screening and intervention for mSCD in patients with ARM. Future studies with standardized care may be needed to elucidate the true impact of mSCD on long term patient outcomes in ARM patients.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective Comparative Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Tethered cord in patients affected by anorectal malformations: a survey from the ARM-Net Consortium

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to determine the degree of consensus in the management of spinal cord tethering (TC) in patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) in a large cohort of European pediatric centers.

METHODS

A survey was sent to pediatric surgeons (one per center) members of the ARM-Net Consortium.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (86%) from ten different countries completed the survey. Overall prevalence of TC was: 21% unknown, 46% below 15, and 29% between 15 and 30%. Ninety-six agreed on screening all patients for TC regardless the type of ARM and 79% start screening at birth. Responses varied in TC definition and diagnostic tools. Fifty percent of respondents prefer ultrasound (US), 21% indicate either US or magnetic resonance (MRI) based on a pre-defined risk of presenting TC, and 21% perform both. Discrepancy exists in complementary test: 82% carry out urodynamic studies (UDS) and only 37% perform somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP). Prophylactic untethering is performed in only two centers (8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Survey results support TC screening in all patients with ARM and conservative management of TC. There is discrepancy in the definition of TC, screening tools, and complementary test. Protocols should be developed to avoid such variability in management.

Spinal cord anomalies in patients with anorectal malformations without severe sacral abnormalities or meningomyelocele: outcomes after expectant, conservative management

OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to determine the significance of spinal cord anomalies (SCAs) in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs) by comparing the outcomes for bowel function, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and lower-limb neurological abnormalities to these outcomes in patients with similar ARMs and a normal spinal cord. METHODS The spinal cord MRI records of female patients treated for vestibular and perineal fistula (VF/PF) and male patients with rectourethral fistula (RUF) at a single center between 1983 and 2006 were reviewed. Bowel function and LUTS were assessed by questionnaire. Patients with extensive sacral anomalies or meningomyelocele were excluded. RESULTS Of 89 patients (median age 15 years, range 5-29 years), MRI was available in 90% (n = 80; 40 male patients with RUF), and 80% of patients returned the questionnaire (n = 64; 31 male patients with RUF). Spinal cord anomalies were found in 34%, comprising a filum terminale lipoma in 30%, low conus medullaris in 10%, and thoracolumbar syrinx in 6%. Bowel functional outcomes between patients with SCAs (n = 23) and those with a normal spinal cord (n = 41) were not significantly different for soiling (70% vs 63%), fecal accidents (43% vs 34%), and constipation (57% vs 39%; p = not significant for all). The LUTS, including urge (65% vs 54%), urge incontinence (39% vs 24%), stress incontinence (17% vs 22%), and straining (32% vs 29%) were also comparable between groups (p = not significant for all). No patients developed lower-limb neurological abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that the long-term functional outcomes for patients with SCAs who had VF/PF and RUF may not differ significantly from patients with the same type of ARMs and a normal spinal cord. The results favor a conservative approach to their management in the absence of abnormal neurological findings in the lower limbs.

Peristeen(®) transanal irrigation in paediatric patients with anorectal malformations and spinal cord lesions: a multicentre Italian study

AIM

In paediatric and adult patients with neurogenic bowel, transanal irrigation (TAI) of the colon has gained popularity due to the introduction of a specifically designed device. The aim of this pilot study was to present the results of TAI using the Peristeen(®) TAI system in a group of paediatric patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) and congenital or acquired spinal cord lesions (SCLs).

METHOD

Eight Italian paediatric surgery and spina bifida centres participated in the study. The inclusion criteria were age between 6 and 17 years, weight above 20 kg and unsatisfactory bowel management. Patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease, mental disability and surgery within the previous 3 months were excluded. At the beginning of treatment (T0) and after 3 months (T1) the Bristol scale, a questionnaire assessing bowel function, and two questionnaires on quality of life (QoL) for patients aged 6-11 years (CHQ-pf50) and 12-17 years (SF36) were administered.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were enrolled, and seventy-eight completed the study (41 ARMs, 37 SCLs). At T1, constipation was reduced in ARMs from 69% to 25.6% and in SCLs from 92.7% to 41.5%, faecal incontinence in ARMs from 50% to 18.6% and in SCLs from 39% to 9.8% and flatus incontinence in ARMs from 20.9% to 9.8% and in SCLs from 31.7% to 10%. At T0, the Bristol Stool Scale types were 1-2 in 45% of ARMs and 77.5% of SCL patients, whereas at T1 types 1-2 were recorded in only 2.5% of SCL patients. QoL improved in both groups. In the younger group, a significant improvement in QoL was recorded in ARM patients for eight of nine variables and in SCL patients for seven of nine variables.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that Peristeen TAI resulted in a significant time reduction in colonic cleansing, increased independence from the carer and improved QoL in paediatric patients with ARMs and SCLs.

Impact of spinal dysraphism on urinary and faecal prognosis in 25 cases of cloacal malformation

OBJECTIVE

Urinary and faecal continence are key challenges goal of cloacal malformation management. Most well-known prognostic factors are the length of common channel (CC) and the presence of a sacral defect, but the impact of associated spinal dysraphism is less well documented. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of different types of dysraphism on urinary and faecal continence in this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1991 to 2011, charts and office notes of 25 patients with cloacal malformation were retrospectively reviewed. At last clinic visit, urinary and faecal continence status according to Krickenbeck criteria were correlated with the length of CC, the presence of a sacral defect (sacral ratio), and the presence of different types of spinal cord dysraphism using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 8 years (4 months-21 years). The sacral ratio was abnormal (below 0.74) in 18 cases out of 25 (72%). MRI review showed normal spinal cord in eight out of 23 cases (Group 1), spinal cord anomaly in 15 out of 23 cases (65%) including nine cases of tethered cord complex (Group 2) and six cases of a short spinal cord (Group 3). While statistical analysis showed a difference regarding urinary prognosis between the groups (p=0.005), no significant difference was found regarding faecal prognosis. None of the six patients with short spinal cord were continent for both urinary and faecal prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study, which highlights the impact of different types of spinal dysraphism on functional outcome in patients with cloaca. Short spinal cord seemed to carry the worst prognosis. A prospective study with a larger series is mandatory to confirm these preliminary results.

Anorectal malformations with good prognosis: variables affecting the functional outcome

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcome of patients operated for anorectal malformations (ARMs) with good prognosis.

METHODS

Thirty patients underwent clinical evaluation by Rintala score and anorectal manometry recording anal resting pressure (ARP), rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR), and rectal volume (RV). The results were analysed with regard to sex, type of ARM, surgical timing of posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP), neurospinal cord dysraphism (ND), neonatal colostomy, and institution where they underwent surgery.

RESULTS

6/30 (20%) presented ND despite normal sacrum. 17/30 (57%) patients had a normal Rintala score. ND and neonatal colostomy were significantly associated with a pathologic score (p=0.0029 and p=0.0016). Patients with ND had significantly lower ARP compared to patients with normal spine (23.5±7.2mmHg vs 32±7.9mmHg, p=0.023). ARP was significantly lower in patients with neonatal colostomy compared to patients with primary repair (25.22±10.24mmHg vs 32.57±6.68mmHg, p=0.026). RAIR was present in only 2/6 (33%) patients with ND, while in 21/24 (87.5%) without ND (p=0.015) and in 4/9 (44%) patients with neonatal colostomy, while in 19/21 (90.5%) patients submitted to primary repair (p=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Neurospinal cord dysraphism may be present despite normal sacral ratio. From a clinical point of view, patients with good prognosis ARMs are not completely comparable to healthy children. Neurospinal cord dysraphism and neonatal colostomy seem to worsen the clinical and manometric (ARP and RAIR) outcomes of these patients.

Anomalies associated with anorectal malformations according to the Krickenbeck anatomic classification

PURPOSE

We evaluated the incidence of congenital anomalies associated with anorectal malformations (ARMs) in relation to the anatomic type of ARM as defined by the Krickenbeck classification.

METHODS

We reviewed 99 children with ARM in our institution from 2002 to 2011. Data were collected on patient demographics, type of ARM, and associated congenital anomalies, which were categorized according to organ systems. Statistical analysis was performed for comparison between groups using 'perineal fistula' as the base group.

RESULTS

There were 62 (63%) male patients. The majority had perineal fistulas (35, 35%). Seventy-seven (78%) had at least one associated malformation. The most frequent malformations seen were genitourinary (28, 28%) and spinal anomalies (26, 26%). Those with rectovesical fistula had the highest proportion of genitourinary malformations (Odds Ratio [OR], 41.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7-363.4). Those with cloaca (OR, 49.5; 95% CI, 3.4-718.9) and those with rectovestibular fistula (OR, 12.4; 95% CI, 2.3-65.6) were most likely to have major spinal abnormalities, with tethered cord seen in all groups. The rectovestibular group was also most likely to have other associated malformations (OR, 8.6; 95% CI, 2.2-32.8).

CONCLUSION

More than 75% of children with anorectal malformation have other associated malformations. Genitourinary anomalies are the most common. Major spinal anomalies are seen in all groups, affecting nearly half of those with rectovestibular fistula and those without fistula. The incidence of associated malformations in the rectovestibular group is higher than described in the literature. Thorough systematic evaluation of all infants with ARM should be done regardless of type of ARM.