A simple and safe technique for trocar positioning in vesicoscopic ureteric reimplantation

Transvesicoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation for Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children: Does Prior Failed Endoscopic Injection Impact Outcome?

Purpose: Transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation (TVUR) for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a technically demanding operation. The technical difficulty is further increased by previous failed endoscopic injection, which causes intense fibrosis around the ureter. In this study, we compared primary TVUR with TVUR after previous failed endoscopic injection for VUR. Materials and Methods: The records of all children undergoing TVUR by a single surgeon over a 4-year period were analyzed. The children were divided into group 1 (primary TVUR, n = 50) and group 2 (TVUR after previous failed endoscopic treatment of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid, n = 7). Demographic, clinical, radiologic, operative and follow-up data were compared between the two groups. The results were analyzed by statistical software; Mann-Whitney test and Fisher's exact test were used where appropriate, and P < .05 was considered significant. Results: Both the groups were comparable with respect to age and mean VUR grade. The mean VUR grade was significantly higher in group 1 and mean operative time per ureter was significantly more for group 2 than group 1. The postoperative hospital stay, success of TVUR, and complications were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report of its kind. TVUR after previous failed endoscopic injection could be done safely with good success, but with longer operative time than primary TVUR even in expert hands. Hence, previous failed endoscopic injection is not a contraindication to TVUR.

Surgical management of vesicoureteral junction obstruction (VUJO) in children: A comparative study between transvesicoscopic Cohen reimplantation and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (TU-LESS) Lich-Gregoir techniques

BACKGROUND

There are many reports on the application of minimally invasive technology in the correction of children's VUJO, but there is no report on the treatment of children's VUJO by the TU-LESS Lich-Gregoir method. We aimed to comparatively analyze the therapeutic outcomes of transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation Cohen procedure (TUR-C) and TU-LESS surgery Lich-Gregoir procedure (TU-LESS-LG) in pediatric VUJO.

METHODS

The data of 49 children with VUJO admitted from January 2016 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on different surgical methods, they were divided into the TUR-C group (23 cases) and the TU-LESS-LG group (26 cases). The demographic characteristics, perioperative characteristics, postoperative complications, the recovery of renal function, and the improvement of hydronephrosis were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences in demographic characteristics and preoperative data between the two groups. The TU-LESS-LG group was superior to the TUR-C in terms of average operation time and postoperative hospital stay. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications, postoperative recovery of renal function, and improvement of hydronephrosis.

CONCLUSION

The two surgical methods can achieve a similar curative effect in the treatment of VUJO. The TU-LESS-LG has more advantages in operation time, postoperative hospital stays, the wider age selection range of cases, megaureter tapering, and cosmetic incision, but the operation is more difficult.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes of laparoscopic extravesical versus trans vesicoscopic ureteric reimplantation

OBJECTIVE

When considering treatment for vesico ureteric reflux via inimally invasive surgery there is a dilemma to choose between laparoscopic extravesical (LEVUR) and transvesicoscopic (TVUR) ureteric reimplantation. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we have analyzed the articles on LEVUR and TVUR and compared the outcomes.

METHODS

We searched the databases to identify all papers pertaining to TVUR and LEVUR in the pediatric population. Duplicate publications, review articles, incomplete articles and robotic assistance were excluded. Systematic review was performed to identify patient data, reflux grades, laterality, duration of surgery, time to discharge, success rate and complications. Meta-analysis of heterogeneity was reported with I 2 statistics. Once heterogeneity was found low, the pooled outcomes were compared with students t test and Fishers exact test, wherever appropriate.

RESULTS

After screening a total of 45 articles, 23 articles were included (13 articles on TVUR and 10 articles on LEVUR). The I 2 statistics for TVUR and LEVUR showed low heterogeneity with I 2 of 0% (95% C.I 0-37%) and 25% (95% C.I 0-64%) respectively. With low heterogeneity both were suitable to be considered to have been conducted under similar conditions with possibility of using fixed effect model. The percentage of Grade 5 VUR was significantly higher (p = 0.001; X 2) in TVUR (11.9%) compared to LEVUR (2.2%). The proportion of bilateral reimplantation was significantly higher (p = 0.001; X 2) in TVUR compared to LEVUR (summary table). The success rate of LEVUR was significantly higher at 96.7% compared to TVUR at 93.7% (p = 0.007 X 2). Unilateral/Bilateral TVUR took significantly longer duration of surgery (155/194 min vs 107/161 min) compared to LEVUR (p = 0.001; Fishers). The mean (s.d) time to discharge was longer at 3.2 (1.6) days for TVUR compared to 1.6 (0.4) days for LEVUR (p = 0.001; Fishers). The complication rate was comparable, 7.35% for TVUR and 5.35% for LEVUR (p = 0.167; X 2).

DISCUSSION

In this meta-analysis we found that LEVUR had shorter operating time, higher success, and shorter hospital stay compared to TVUR. A probable explanation could be higher number unilateral VURs and lower number of grade 5 VUR cases in LEVUR group. Both the techniques had comparable overall complication rate: LEVUR had more post-operative urinary retention while TVUR had more port-related problems.

Transvesicoscopic Politano-Leadbetter ureteral reimplantation in children with vesicoureteral reflux: A novel surgical technique

Purpose

We introduce our novel procedure for transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation using the Politano-Leadbetter technique (TVUR-PL). We describe the detailed surgical procedure and report operative outcomes.

Materials and Methods

We report a retrospective analysis of operative outcomes of TVUR-PL performed in children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) from January 2017 to July 2018. The analyzed operative outcomes included patient demographics, operative times, intra- and postoperative complications, indwelling duration of urethral Foley catheter, hospital length of stay, and treatment success.

Results

A total of 47 patients (17 males, 30 females) underwent TVUR-PL during the study period, including 18 unilateral and 29 bilateral cases (76 ureters). All operations were successfully completed without open conversion. The median operative time was 121 minutes for unilateral cases and 178 minutes for bilateral cases. The median duration of placement of a urethral Foley catheter was 2 days. There were no intra- or postoperative complications. Only one patient (1/47 patients, 2.1%), who had no postoperative VUR on voiding cystourethrography, experienced febrile urinary tract infection during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

Our novel TVUR-PL technique is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgical treatment option for children with VUR. The main advantage of our new operation is that it allows us to maintain the natural direction of the ureter after surgery.

Laparoscopic Approach for Intravesical Surgery Using Pneumovesicum in Urology: Literature Review

Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgical procedures are increasingly being used in the management of various urological diseases. In particular, the laparoscopic approach for intravesical surgery using pneumovesicum (LPV) is a minimally invasive alternative with potential advantages including decreased morbidity, shorter hospital stays, and improved cosmesis. We review the applications of LPV in urology, summarize data for different surgical approaches, and provide an overview of patient management, as well as other considerations. This narrative review focused primarily on articles indexed in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase databases. No formal search strategy was used, and no meta-analysis of data was performed.